PainNCT02470728
Optimal Management of Pain in Hospitalized Patients - Opioid Tolerant Populations.
A study testing New Clinical Pathway in people with Pain and Acute Pain, run by Duke University at 2 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Pain is a symptom that drives hospital admissions, and pain management is required by most patients during their hospital stay. Further, the use of medications such as opioids can lead to upward-spiraling doses, especially among chronic pain patients whose resource utilization rates are high. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain
- What is being tested?
- New Clinical Pathway
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to 31 Jul 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients (18 years and older)
- Known opioid tolerant (as determined per FDA criteria)
- Agree to sign the informed consent and HIPAA forms
Who cannot join
- Patients under the age of 18 years
- No known opioid tolerance
- Do not agree to sign the informed consent and HIPAA forms
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United States2 sites
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, 27710
University of California, Irvine Medical Center
Orange, California, 92868
About this study
Official title: Pain Management Options for Opioid Tolerant Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Pain is a symptom that drives hospital admissions, and pain management is required by most patients during their hospital stay. Further, the use of medications such as opioids can lead to upward-spiraling doses, especially among chronic pain patients whose resource utilization rates are high. Many initiatives aim to reduce the costs of these "high-resource utilizing" patients. One exciting aspect of improving the management of pain is that this may help prevent patients from ever becoming high-cost in the first place. The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of an early and sustained intervention pathway, in comparison to the current standard of care, for the treatment of pain in opioid tolerant patients. It is hypothesized that patients randomized to the intervention pathway, in comparison to the control, will lead to decreased costs of care, a reduction in opioid usage within 3 and 6 months, and decrease in hospital readmission rates.
- Conditions
- Pain, Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain
- Being tested
- New Clinical Pathway
- Keywords
- patient readmission, pain relief units, pain centers, multidisciplinary pain clinics, multidisciplinary pain centers, pain clinics, hospital readmission, emergencies, emergency medicine, critical care, emergency treatment, opioid, acute pain service
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Acute Pain, Pain, Postoperative, Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
New Clinical PathwayOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | Those randomized into the control group will receive the current standard of care for pain management. This standard care pathway involves a pain management specialist consultation only at the request of the primary admitting team. The pain management consultation can occur at any time during the patient's inpatient stay and care by these specialists ends at discharge. |
| Treatment Group | Experimental | Subjects randomized into the treatment (early intervention) group will receive the New Clinical Pathway: pain management care coordinated by pain-management specialists from inpatient admission through 60 days after discharge. Receives: Other: New Clinical Pathway |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Returns to Acute Care
Hospital Readmissions and Emergency Department Utilizations
Measured: Discharge through 90 days post-discharge
Secondary outcomes (9)
Opioid Analgesic Use
Quantification of opioid analgesic use over time
Measured: Discharge through 90 days post-discharge
Opioid Analgesic Use
Quantification of opioid analgesic use over time
Measured: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Opioid Tolerance Status
Opioid tolerance as inferred from opioid prescription and usage per FDA exposure threshold definition for opioid tolerance.
Measured: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Pain at Discharge
Patient-reported pain at the time of discharge from index hospitalization
Measured: Measured upon day of discharge from index hospitalization; up to 18 months from the date of randomization
Hospital Length of Stay
Duration of index inpatient hospitalization.
Measured: Measured upon day of discharge from index hospitalization; up to 18 months from the date of randomization
Latency to Hospital Readmission
Time between discharge from index hospitalization to readmission
Measured: Discharge through 12 months post-discharge
Returns to Acute Care
Hospital Readmissions and Emergency Department Utilizations at an extended time horizon
Measured: Discharge through 12 months post-discharge
Healthcare Expenditures
Inpatient and outpatients costs
Measured: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Use of Rescue Drugs
Antagonist usages for the reversal of index drug effects (opioid and benzodiazepine)
Measured: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted12 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completion29 Jul 2019
- Study completion31 Jul 2019
Why it stopped: Budgetary issues
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Duke UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Duke University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of California, Irvine
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Padma Gulur, MD, Principal investigator, Duke University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02470728
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- Pro00076402
- Status last verified
- Feb 2025
- First submitted
- 13 Jan 2015
- Last updated
- 11 Feb 2025
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Publications
Raebel MA, Newcomer SR, Reifler LM, Boudreau D, Elliott TE, DeBar L, Ahmed A, Pawloski PA, Fisher D, Donahoo WT, Bayliss EA. Chronic use of opioid medications before and after bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2013 Oct 2;310(13):1369-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278344.
PubMed 24084922Brown EG, Burgess D, Li CS, Canter RJ, Bold RJ. Hospital readmissions: necessary evil or preventable target for quality improvement. Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):583-9; discussion 589-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000923.
PubMed 25203874Gulur P, Williams L, Chaudhary S, Koury K, Jaff M. Opioid tolerance--a predictor of increased length of stay and higher readmission rates. Pain Physician. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):E503-7.
PubMed 25054400Kessler ER, Shah M, Gruschkus SK, Raju A. Cost and quality implications of opioid-based postsurgical pain control using administrative claims data from a large health system: opioid-related adverse events and their impact on clinical and economic outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Apr;33(4):383-91. doi: 10.1002/phar.1223.
PubMed 23553809Lembke A. Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers. How cultural attitudes and financial disincentives affect the prescribing habits of physicians. Minn Med. 2013 Mar;96(3):36-7. No abstract available.
PubMed 23930467Volkow ND, Frieden TR, Hyde PS, Cha SS. Medication-assisted therapies--tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 29;370(22):2063-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1402780. Epub 2014 Apr 23. No abstract available.
PubMed 24758595Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S. Causes and risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 20;39(9):761-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000270.
PubMed 24525993Hazratjee N, Agito M, Lopez R, Lashner B, Rizk MK. Hospital readmissions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;108(7):1024-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.343.
PubMed 23820989Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC grand rounds: prescription drug overdoses - a U.S. epidemic. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(1):10-3.
PubMed 22237030Bell JR. Australian trends in opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain, 1986-1996. Med J Aust. 1997 Jul 7;167(1):26-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138759.x.
PubMed 9236756Bot AG, Bekkers S, Arnstein PM, Smith RM, Ring D. Opioid use after fracture surgery correlates with pain intensity and satisfaction with pain relief. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2542-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3660-4. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
PubMed 24777731Herzig SJ, Rothberg MB, Cheung M, Ngo LH, Marcantonio ER. Opioid utilization and opioid-related adverse events in nonsurgical patients in US hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2014 Feb;9(2):73-81. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2102. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
PubMed 24227700Apfelbaum JL, Chen C, Mehta SS, Gan TJ. Postoperative pain experience: results from a national survey suggest postoperative pain continues to be undermanaged. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-540. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000068822.10113.9E.
PubMed 12873949Torrance N, Elliott AM, Lee AJ, Smith BH. Severe chronic pain is associated with increased 10 year mortality. A cohort record linkage study. Eur J Pain. 2010 Apr;14(4):380-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2009.07.006. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
PubMed 19726210Pavon JM, Zhao Y, McConnell E, Hastings SN. Identifying risk of readmission in hospitalized elderly adults through inpatient medication exposure. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Jun;62(6):1116-21. doi: 10.1111/jgs.12829. Epub 2014 May 6.
PubMed 24802165
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 Feb 2025. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pain Management Options for Opioid Tolerant Patients: a Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02470728
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Pro00076402
- Conditions
- Pain, Acute Pain, Postoperative Pain
- Keywords
- patient readmission, pain relief units, pain centers, multidisciplinary pain clinics, multidisciplinary pain centers, pain clinics, hospital readmission, emergencies
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Budgetary issues
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Duke UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of California, Irvine
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- 29 Jul 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 31 Jul 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 12 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain is a symptom that drives hospital admissions, and pain management is required by most patients during their hospital stay. Further, the use of medications such as opioids can lead to upward-spiraling doses, especially among chronic pain patients whose resource utilization rates are high. Many initiatives aim to reduce the costs of these "high-resource utilizing" patients. One exciting aspect of improving the management of pain is that this may help prevent patients from ever becoming high-cost in the first place. The purpose of this study is to examine the impacts of an early and sustained intervention pathway, in comparison to the current standard of care, for the treatment of pain in opioid tolerant patients. It is hypothesized that patients randomized to the intervention pathway, in comparison to the control, will lead to decreased costs of care, a reduction in opioid usage within 3 and 6 months, and decrease in hospital readmission rates.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Health services research
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Control Group | No intervention | –Those randomized into the control group will receive the current standard of care for pain management. This standard care pathway involves a pain management specialist consultation only at the request of the primary admitting team. The pain management consultation can occur at any time during the patient's inpatient stay and care by these specialists ends at discharge. |
| Treatment Group | Experimental | Other: New Clinical PathwaySubjects randomized into the treatment (early intervention) group will receive the New Clinical Pathway: pain management care coordinated by pain-management specialists from inpatient admission through 60 days after discharge. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Adult patients (18 years and older)
- Known opioid tolerant (as determined per FDA criteria)
- Agree to sign the informed consent and HIPAA forms
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Patients under the age of 18 years
- No known opioid tolerance
- Do not agree to sign the informed consent and HIPAA forms
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| New Clinical Pathway | Other | Treatment Group |
Primary outcome
Returns to Acute Care
Time frame: Discharge through 90 days post-discharge
Hospital Readmissions and Emergency Department Utilizations
9 secondary outcomes
Opioid Analgesic Use
Time frame: Discharge through 90 days post-discharge
Opioid Analgesic Use
Time frame: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Opioid Tolerance Status
Time frame: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Pain at Discharge
Time frame: Measured upon day of discharge from index hospitalization; up to 18 months from the date of randomization
Hospital Length of Stay
Time frame: Measured upon day of discharge from index hospitalization; up to 18 months from the date of randomization
Latency to Hospital Readmission
Time frame: Discharge through 12 months post-discharge
Returns to Acute Care
Time frame: Discharge through 12 months post-discharge
Healthcare Expenditures
Time frame: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Use of Rescue Drugs
Time frame: Admission through 12 months post-discharge
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Budgetary issues). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 Feb 2025.
- Background: PubMed 24084922Raebel MA, Newcomer SR, Reifler LM, Boudreau D, Elliott TE, DeBar L, Ahmed A, Pawloski PA, Fisher D, Donahoo WT, Bayliss EA. Chronic use of opioid medications before and after bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2013 Oct 2;310(13):1369-76. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.278344.
- Background: PubMed 25203874Brown EG, Burgess D, Li CS, Canter RJ, Bold RJ. Hospital readmissions: necessary evil or preventable target for quality improvement. Ann Surg. 2014 Oct;260(4):583-9; discussion 589-91. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000923.
- Background: PubMed 25054400Gulur P, Williams L, Chaudhary S, Koury K, Jaff M. Opioid tolerance--a predictor of increased length of stay and higher readmission rates. Pain Physician. 2014 Jul-Aug;17(4):E503-7.
- Background: PubMed 23553809Kessler ER, Shah M, Gruschkus SK, Raju A. Cost and quality implications of opioid-based postsurgical pain control using administrative claims data from a large health system: opioid-related adverse events and their impact on clinical and economic outcomes. Pharmacotherapy. 2013 Apr;33(4):383-91. doi: 10.1002/phar.1223.
- Background: PubMed 23930467Lembke A. Why doctors prescribe opioids to known opioid abusers. How cultural attitudes and financial disincentives affect the prescribing habits of physicians. Minn Med. 2013 Mar;96(3):36-7. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24758595Volkow ND, Frieden TR, Hyde PS, Cha SS. Medication-assisted therapies--tackling the opioid-overdose epidemic. N Engl J Med. 2014 May 29;370(22):2063-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1402780. Epub 2014 Apr 23. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24525993Pugely AJ, Martin CT, Gao Y, Mendoza-Lattes S. Causes and risk factors for 30-day unplanned readmissions after lumbar spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Apr 20;39(9):761-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000270.
- Background: PubMed 23820989Hazratjee N, Agito M, Lopez R, Lashner B, Rizk MK. Hospital readmissions in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jul;108(7):1024-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.343.
- Background: PubMed 22237030Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC grand rounds: prescription drug overdoses - a U.S. epidemic. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2012 Jan 13;61(1):10-3.
- Background: PubMed 9236756Bell JR. Australian trends in opioid prescribing for chronic non-cancer pain, 1986-1996. Med J Aust. 1997 Jul 7;167(1):26-9. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1997.tb138759.x.
- Background: PubMed 24777731Bot AG, Bekkers S, Arnstein PM, Smith RM, Ring D. Opioid use after fracture surgery correlates with pain intensity and satisfaction with pain relief. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Aug;472(8):2542-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3660-4. Epub 2014 Apr 29.
- Background: PubMed 24227700Herzig SJ, Rothberg MB, Cheung M, Ngo LH, Marcantonio ER. Opioid utilization and opioid-related adverse events in nonsurgical patients in US hospitals. J Hosp Med. 2014 Feb;9(2):73-81. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2102. Epub 2013 Nov 13.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Padma Gulur, MD principal investigator
Duke University
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing New Clinical Pathway in people with Pain and Acute Pain, run by Duke University at 2 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 Feb 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Budgetary issues). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Returns to Acute Care (time frame: Discharge through 90 days post-discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02470728, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 Feb 2025.