Muscle SpasticityPhase 4BacloToxNCT02462317
Study of the Effects on Motor Recovery of Early Post-stroke Spasticity Treatment
A Phase 4 study testing botulinum A toxin and Baclofen in people with Muscle Spasticity, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 19 sites in France.
Trial summary
Stroke is the first cause of motor impairment and disability in adults. Then the main objective of rehabilitation during the first six months following stroke is to facilitate motor recovery. Many post-stroke hemiplegics develop spasticity which is responsible for an increase of disability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Muscle Spasticity
- What is being tested?
- botulinum A toxin and Baclofen
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 184 participants
- Where
- 19 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- Apr 2015to 9 Dec 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- First single stroke ischaemic or haemorrhagic responsible of an hemiplegia
- Stoke since less than 2 month
- A sufficient understood
- A spasticity : a Tardieu score upper or equal to 2 on at least one of the following muscle-triceps surae, flexors of fingers, of wrist and of elbow
- A free consent
Who cannot join
- Previous antispastic drugs
- Contraindication for baclofen or toxin
- Antecedent of epileptic seizure
- Psychiatric antecedent
Trial locations and contacts
19 sites in 1 country.
19 sites in 1 country
France19 sites
CHU Jean Minjoz
Besançon, 25030
Groupe Pellegrin, University Hospital Bordeaux
Bordeaux, 33076
CHRU de Brest
Brest, 29609
Centre de rééducation MARIENIA
Cambo-les-Bains, 64250
Centre Bouffard- Vercelli
Cervera de la Marenda, 66290
University Hospital Dijon
Dijon, 21079
University Hospital Grenoble
Échirolles, 38434
Hôpital R. Poincarré
Garches, 92380
l'Institut Hélio Marin de la côte d'azur
Hyères, 67082
Hôpital Swynghedauw
Lille, 59000
Hôpital J Rebeyrol
Limoges, 87042
CHU Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, 34295
University Hospital Carémeau
Nîmes, 30029
Hopital Rothschild
Paris, 75012
GH Lariboisière F.Widal
Paris, 75013
Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière
Paris, 75013
Université Reims Champagne Ardenne
Reims, 51092
Pôle MPR St Hélier
Rennes, 35000
University Hospital, Toulouse
Toulouse, Haute-Garonne, 31059
About this study
Official title: Study of the Effects on Motor Recovery of Early Post-stroke Spasticity Treatment: Double Blinded Comparison Between Botulinum Toxin and Baclofen.
Stroke is the first cause of motor impairment and disability in adults. Then the main objective of rehabilitation during the first six months following stroke is to facilitate motor recovery. Many post-stroke hemiplegics develop spasticity which is responsible for an increase of disability. Then antispastic drugs are frequently prescribed to the patients even during the post-stroke recovery phase. Until recently most of french patients were treated by oral tablets of baclofen. Now the number of patients receiving intramuscular injections of botulinum A toxin is increasing. However in the literature, these drugs have been tested in post-stroke spasticity during the chronicle phase, after the sixth month and their action on motor recovery remain largely unknown. Then it is necessary to evaluate more accurately the effects of its drugs on motor recovery. The main criterion of its study is the time course of Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA). Spastic patients with a single stroke, since less than two months, will be included in the try. They receive at the same time oral tablets for five months and intramuscular injections. Patients are randomized in three arms planned with a distribution balanced by group of 5 patients with a 2 -2- 1 model: botulinum toxin and placebo baclofen (120 patients), oral baclofen and placebo botulinum toxin (120 patients), placebo baclofen and placebo botulinum toxin (60 patients). The FMA score will be assessed before treatment start, one month and three months later. Spasticity, functional abilities, capacity in the activities of daily life, pain and quality of life will be also assessed during the study with Tardieu score, Rivermead Motor Assessment scale, Barthel index, Rankin score, Visual Analogic Scale and Reintegration to Normal Life Index respectively. A positive difference of 12 points in the time course of FMA in the botulinum toxin group in comparison with the baclofen group will be considered as the minimum relevant effect. 300 patients have been planned to be included in 20 centers during the 2 years of trial.
Read the detailed description
Background: Stroke is the first cause of motor impairment and disability in adults. 80% of post-stroke survivors have a motor weakness resulting in hemiplegia. Post-stroke patients partially recover from their motor impairments . These patients reach their maximum motor score round the first 20 weeks. In all cases, motor recovery period is considered completed beyond the sixth month. There is a consensus of epidemiological studies and of more fundamental works on brain plasticity, for the positive effect of rehabilitation on post stroke motor recovery. Then the main objective of rehabilitation during the first six months following stroke is to facilitate motor recovery.
There are many arguments in animals and humans for the pharmacological modulation of post-stroke motor recovery. In animals, the experimental data suggesting efficacy of amphetamine in motor recovery after brain injury, are numerous. The administration of amphetamine in rats dramatically improves motor recovery after brain injury. This action appears to be related to the α noradrenergic activity of amphetamines and their properties of norepinephrine precursor. In contrast molecules that reduce the release of norepinephrine, which increase its metabolism, or blocking its post-synaptic effects such as gabaergic drugs or clonidine have a deleterious effect on motor recovery after brain injury.
In humans, the results of studies concerning the action of amphetamine are much more contrasted. A study in functional imaging has shown that a single dose of methylphenidate was able to modulate brain plasticity in post-stroke patients by increasing the activity of substitute neural networks in the lesioned hemisphere. However, if some clinical studies confirm the positive result, others at the opposite show no behavioral effect on recovery as compared to placebo group.
In humans, there is also some arguments for the positive effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI) drugs. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown the SRI modulating action on brain plasticity of sensorimotor cortex. Single dose SRI is responsible for an increase in neuronal activity of sensorimotor cortex correlated with an improvement in behavioral tests in healthy subjects as in post-stroke patients. In small clinical trial, Dam et al has shown a positive effect on motor recovery after prescription of fluoxetine associated with rehabilitation, irrespective of antidepressant activity of this molecule. A randomized controlled multicentre trial (FLAME), comparing the effects on post-stroke motor recovery assessed by the Fugl-Meyer score, of a treatment with fluoxetine or with placebo was published. This trial confirms the positive effect of fluoxetine on recovery of motor function in post stroke hemiplegics.
Regarding the deleterious drug GABAergic and especially diazepam has been tested in animal models of recovery after brain injury. The administration of these molecules has a negative impact on functional recovery. Golsdtein studied the impact on motor recovery of prescription of GABAergic drugs with benzodiazepine or neuroleptic during the recovery phase of brain injured patients. It shows that regardless of the indications of drugs there is a negative effect on the recovery of patients.
Conjointly 15% to 40% of post-stroke hemiplegics develop a spasticity which is responsible for an increase of disability. Spasticity is a symptom characterized by an increase of resistance to passive mobilization in relation to a post-stroke exaggeration of spinal reflexes and to a later muscular component. Usual antispastic drugs have an action on the reflex component and not on the muscular one. Then many physicians want to treat spasticity early after stroke even during the recovery phase, before development of the muscular changes. Until recently in France, most of patients were treated by oral tablets of baclofen. Now the number of patients receiving intramuscular injections of botulinum A toxin is increasing. However in the literature, these drugs have been tested in post-stroke spasticity during chronicle phase, after the sixth month and their action on motor recovery remain largely unknown. Botulinum toxin can increase weakness of injected muscles and baclofen belongs to the family of gabaergic drugs which have demonstrated a deleterious effect in animal models of recovery.
- Purpose: In the specific population of post-stroke hemiplegics, antispastic drugs should reduce spasticity while at least respecting functional recovery. Then it study wants to compare the effect on motor recovery of two usual antispastic treatments administrated before the end of second month after stroke: botulinum toxin versus oral baclofen. Our hypothesis is that botulinum toxin is more respectful of motor recovery than Baclofen and may be promotes the functional recovery.
- Conditions
- Muscle Spasticity
- Being tested
- botulinum A toxin, Baclofen, Placebo toxin, placebo baclofen
- Keywords
- Spasticity, Post stroke motor recovery, Botulinum toxin, Baclofen, Pharmacological modulation
- Medical subject headings
- Muscle Spasticity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
botulinum A toxinDrug
Also called Drug injection
botulinum toxin injection
BaclofenDrug
Also called Drug
baclofen oral tablet
Placebo toxinDrug
Also called placebo injection
placebo injection
placebo baclofenDrug
Also called placebo drug
placebo oral tablet
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| botulinum A toxin | Active comparator | Patients are injected with botulinum toxin in a standardized protocol and received placebo baclofen tablets (120 patients) Receives: Drug: botulinum A toxin; Drug: placebo baclofen |
| Baclofen | Active comparator | Patients are injected with placebo in a standardized protocol and received baclofen tablets (120 patients) Receives: Drug: Baclofen; Drug: Placebo toxin |
| double Placebo | Placebo comparator | Patients are injected with placebo in a standardized protocol and received placebo baclofen tablets (60 patients) Receives: Drug: Placebo toxin; Drug: placebo baclofen |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Motor recovery with time course of Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale
A positive difference of 12 points in the time of course of Fugl-Meyer motor Assessment scale (FMA) from inclusion to the third month, between the results obtained in the botulinum toxin group and those of the baclofen group will be considered as the minimum relevant effect.
Measured: month 3
Secondary outcomes (5)
none inferiority of motor recovery with time course of Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale
A none inferiority of the FMA time course between the results of the botulinum toxin group and the placebo group will be researched.
Measured: month 3
Spasticity with Tardieu scale
A comparison of efficacy of the two treatments on spastic symptoms using Tardieu scale.
Measured: Month 1 and 3
Function with Rivermead Motor Assessment score,
Functional impact of early treatment of post-stroke spasticity: comparison of changes in the Rivermead Motor Assessment score during the three months of protocol between all groups.
Measured: month 3
Quality of life : Reintegration to Normal Life Index
Measured: month 3
Pain : Visual Analogic Scale
Measured: Month 1 and 3
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2015
- Primary completion9 Dec 2019
- Study completion9 Dec 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Muscle SpasticityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University Hospital, ToulouseThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, Toulouse
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Philippe MARQUE, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Toulouse
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02462317
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 10 140 01
- Other IDs
- 2010-022881-28
- Acronym
- BacloTox
- Status last verified
- Jan 2021
- First submitted
- 5 May 2015
- Last updated
- 6 Apr 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
Montane E, Brihmat N, Cormier C, Thalamas C, Rousseau V, Tap G, De Boissezon X, Castel-Lacanal E; Baclotox Group; Marque P. Effect of Early Treatment of Spasticity After Stroke on Motor Recovery: Protocol for the Baclotox Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 9;14:e62951. doi: 10.2196/62951.
PubMed 40344664
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 6 Apr 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Study of the Effects on Motor Recovery of Early Post-stroke Spasticity Treatment: Double Blinded Comparison Between Botulinum Toxin and Baclofen.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02462317
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BacloTox / 10 140 01
- Conditions
- Muscle Spasticity
- Keywords
- Spasticity, Post stroke motor recovery, Botulinum toxin, Baclofen, Pharmacological modulation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 184 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital, ToulouseUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
- Study start
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 9 Dec 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 9 Dec 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Stroke is the first cause of motor impairment and disability in adults. Then the main objective of rehabilitation during the first six months following stroke is to facilitate motor recovery. Many post-stroke hemiplegics develop spasticity which is responsible for an increase of disability. Then antispastic drugs are frequently prescribed to the patients even during the post-stroke recovery phase. Until recently most of french patients were treated by oral tablets of baclofen. Now the number of patients receiving intramuscular injections of botulinum A toxin is increasing. However in the literature, these drugs have been tested in post-stroke spasticity during the chronicle phase, after the sixth month and their action on motor recovery remain largely unknown. Then it is necessary to evaluate more accurately the effects of its drugs on motor recovery. The main criterion of its study is the time course of Fugl-Meyer Motor Assessment (FMA). Spastic patients with a single stroke, since less than two months, will be included in the try. They receive at the same time oral tablets for five months and intramuscular injections. Patients are randomized in three arms planned with a distribution balanced by group of 5 patients with a 2 -2- 1 model: botulinum toxin and placebo baclofen (120 patients), oral baclofen and placebo botulinum toxin (120 patients), placebo baclofen and placebo botulinum toxin (60 patients). The FMA score will be assessed before treatment start, one month and three months later. Spasticity, functional abilities, capacity in the activities of daily life, pain and quality of life will be also assessed during the study with Tardieu score, Rivermead Motor Assessment scale, Barthel index, Rankin score, Visual Analogic Scale and Reintegration to Normal Life Index respectively. A positive difference of 12 points in the time course of FMA in the botulinum toxin group in comparison with the baclofen group will be considered as the minimum relevant effect. 300 patients have been planned to be included in 20 centers during the 2 years of trial.
Detailed description
Background: Stroke is the first cause of motor impairment and disability in adults. 80% of post-stroke survivors have a motor weakness resulting in hemiplegia. Post-stroke patients partially recover from their motor impairments . These patients reach their maximum motor score round the first 20 weeks. In all cases, motor recovery period is considered completed beyond the sixth month. There is a consensus of epidemiological studies and of more fundamental works on brain plasticity, for the positive effect of rehabilitation on post stroke motor recovery. Then the main objective of rehabilitation during the first six months following stroke is to facilitate motor recovery.
There are many arguments in animals and humans for the pharmacological modulation of post-stroke motor recovery. In animals, the experimental data suggesting efficacy of amphetamine in motor recovery after brain injury, are numerous. The administration of amphetamine in rats dramatically improves motor recovery after brain injury. This action appears to be related to the α noradrenergic activity of amphetamines and their properties of norepinephrine precursor. In contrast molecules that reduce the release of norepinephrine, which increase its metabolism, or blocking its post-synaptic effects such as gabaergic drugs or clonidine have a deleterious effect on motor recovery after brain injury.
In humans, the results of studies concerning the action of amphetamine are much more contrasted. A study in functional imaging has shown that a single dose of methylphenidate was able to modulate brain plasticity in post-stroke patients by increasing the activity of substitute neural networks in the lesioned hemisphere. However, if some clinical studies confirm the positive result, others at the opposite show no behavioral effect on recovery as compared to placebo group.
In humans, there is also some arguments for the positive effect of serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SRI) drugs. Functional neuroimaging studies have shown the SRI modulating action on brain plasticity of sensorimotor cortex. Single dose SRI is responsible for an increase in neuronal activity of sensorimotor cortex correlated with an improvement in behavioral tests in healthy subjects as in post-stroke patients. In small clinical trial, Dam et al has shown a positive effect on motor recovery after prescription of fluoxetine associated with rehabilitation, irrespective of antidepressant activity of this molecule. A randomized controlled multicentre trial (FLAME), comparing the effects on post-stroke motor recovery assessed by the Fugl-Meyer score, of a treatment with fluoxetine or with placebo was published. This trial confirms the positive effect of fluoxetine on recovery of motor function in post stroke hemiplegics.
Regarding the deleterious drug GABAergic and especially diazepam has been tested in animal models of recovery after brain injury. The administration of these molecules has a negative impact on functional recovery. Golsdtein studied the impact on motor recovery of prescription of GABAergic drugs with benzodiazepine or neuroleptic during the recovery phase of brain injured patients. It shows that regardless of the indications of drugs there is a negative effect on the recovery of patients.
Conjointly 15% to 40% of post-stroke hemiplegics develop a spasticity which is responsible for an increase of disability. Spasticity is a symptom characterized by an increase of resistance to passive mobilization in relation to a post-stroke exaggeration of spinal reflexes and to a later muscular component. Usual antispastic drugs have an action on the reflex component and not on the muscular one. Then many physicians want to treat spasticity early after stroke even during the recovery phase, before development of the muscular changes. Until recently in France, most of patients were treated by oral tablets of baclofen. Now the number of patients receiving intramuscular injections of botulinum A toxin is increasing. However in the literature, these drugs have been tested in post-stroke spasticity during chronicle phase, after the sixth month and their action on motor recovery remain largely unknown. Botulinum toxin can increase weakness of injected muscles and baclofen belongs to the family of gabaergic drugs which have demonstrated a deleterious effect in animal models of recovery.
- Purpose: In the specific population of post-stroke hemiplegics, antispastic drugs should reduce spasticity while at least respecting functional recovery. Then it study wants to compare the effect on motor recovery of two usual antispastic treatments administrated before the end of second month after stroke: botulinum toxin versus oral baclofen. Our hypothesis is that botulinum toxin is more respectful of motor recovery than Baclofen and may be promotes the functional recovery.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| botulinum A toxin | Active comparator | Drug: botulinum A toxin, Drug: placebo baclofenPatients are injected with botulinum toxin in a standardized protocol and received placebo baclofen tablets (120 patients) |
| Baclofen | Active comparator | Drug: Baclofen, Drug: Placebo toxinPatients are injected with placebo in a standardized protocol and received baclofen tablets (120 patients) |
| double Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo toxin, Drug: placebo baclofenPatients are injected with placebo in a standardized protocol and received placebo baclofen tablets (60 patients) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- First single stroke ischaemic or haemorrhagic responsible of an hemiplegia
- Stoke since less than 2 month
- A sufficient understood
- A spasticity : a Tardieu score upper or equal to 2 on at least one of the following muscle-triceps surae, flexors of fingers, of wrist and of elbow
- A free consent
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Previous antispastic drugs
- Contraindication for baclofen or toxin
- Antecedent of epileptic seizure
- Psychiatric antecedent
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| botulinum A toxinAlso: Drug injectionbotulinum toxin injection | Drug | botulinum A toxin |
| BaclofenAlso: Drugbaclofen oral tablet | Drug | Baclofen |
| Placebo toxinAlso: placebo injectionplacebo injection | Drug | Baclofen, double Placebo |
| placebo baclofenAlso: placebo drugplacebo oral tablet | Drug | botulinum A toxin, double Placebo |
Primary outcome
Motor recovery with time course of Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale
Time frame: month 3
A positive difference of 12 points in the time of course of Fugl-Meyer motor Assessment scale (FMA) from inclusion to the third month, between the results obtained in the botulinum toxin group and those of the baclofen group will be considered as the minimum relevant effect.
5 secondary outcomes
none inferiority of motor recovery with time course of Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale
Time frame: month 3
Spasticity with Tardieu scale
Time frame: Month 1 and 3
Function with Rivermead Motor Assessment score,
Time frame: month 3
Quality of life : Reintegration to Normal Life Index
Time frame: month 3
Pain : Visual Analogic Scale
Time frame: Month 1 and 3
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 6 Apr 2026.
- Background: PubMed 40344664Montane E, Brihmat N, Cormier C, Thalamas C, Rousseau V, Tap G, De Boissezon X, Castel-Lacanal E; Baclotox Group; Marque P. Effect of Early Treatment of Spasticity After Stroke on Motor Recovery: Protocol for the Baclotox Multicenter, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 May 9;14:e62951. doi: 10.2196/62951.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Muscle Spasticity
Active, not recruiting
Effects of Whole-body Electrical Muscle Stimulation Exercise on Adults With Neuromuscular Disease
Neuromuscular Diseases (NMD), Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Recruiting
Intrathecal Baclofen and Pediatric Dystonia
Dystonic Cerebral Palsy
RecruitingPhase 4
Individualised Cryoneurolysis to Treat Pain in the Context of Spasticity in the Upper and Lower Extremities
Centreal Neurological Condition, Acquired Brain Injury (Including Stroke)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Peripheral Neurotomies of the Upper Limb in Children With Cerebral Palsy.
Cerebral Palsy Infantile, Upper Limb Spasticity
Not yet recruitingEarly Phase 1
Early Botulinum Toxin for Muscle Stiffness Reduction in First-Time Stroke Patients: Improving Recovery and Independence
Spasticity, Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Philippe MARQUE, MD, PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Toulouse
19 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing botulinum A toxin and Baclofen in people with Muscle Spasticity, run by University Hospital, Toulouse at 19 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Apr 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 19 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Motor recovery with time course of Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (time frame: month 3). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02462317, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Apr 2026.