AzTrials
AzTrials

Pelvic Organ ProlapsePhase 4IMPROVENCT02431897

Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina Using Estrogen

A Phase 4 study testing Conjugated Estrogens Cream in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urogenital Prolapse, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 3 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study randomizes postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse planning native tissue transvaginal surgical repair to 6-8 weeks of preoperative and 1-year continued postoperative vaginal estrogen cream compared to placebo cream. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 48 years and older, women only
What is being tested?
Conjugated Estrogens Cream
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
206 participants
Where
3 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2016to 17 May 2023
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 48 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Postmenopausal: no menses for >1 year
  • Minimum age: 48 years
  • Symptomatic apical and/or anterior vaginal wall prolapse, stage 2 or greater
  • No estrogen replacement within the last month (may come off current treatment, i.e. wash out, to join the study)
  • Medically fit for elective surgery
  • Physically able to apply/insert the study drug
  • Available for clinic follow-up for minimum 1yr

Who cannot join

  • Concurrent use of steroid creams for other indications (e.g. lichen sclerosis)
  • BMI >35 kg/m2
  • Recent history (within last month) of vaginal infection or vaginitis
  • Contraindications to estrogen therapy (e.g. spontaneous DVT, stroke, breast or endometrial/ hormone-responsive cancer, genital bleeding of unknown cause)
  • History of connective tissue disease
  • Any oral or transdermal estrogen, SERM, or other medication impacting vaginal milieu
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of vaginal irradiation
  • Allergy to Premarin or its constituents
  • Prior apical repair or use of mesh for prolapse repair
  • Current tobacco use

Trial locations and contacts

3 sites in 1 country.

United States3 sites
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35249

  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Women & Infants Hospital of Rhode Island

    Providence, Rhode Island, 02905

Other trials in United States

About this study

This study randomizes postmenopausal women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse planning native tissue transvaginal surgical repair to 6-8 weeks of preoperative and 1-year continued postoperative vaginal estrogen cream compared to placebo cream. This clinical trial and basic science investigation are designed to understand the mechanisms by which local estrogen treatment affects connective tissues of the pelvic floor and determine whether its use before and after prolapse repair will (i) improve success rates of the surgical intervention and minimize prolapse recurrence and (ii) impact favorably upon symptoms of other pelvic floor disorders.

Read the detailed description

This is a double-blind randomized trial of intravaginal estrogen (conjugated estrogens, 0.625mg/1g cream) vs. placebo in postmenopausal women (up to n=222 enrolled and randomized in order for 188 to undergo surgery) with symptomatic prolapse beyond the hymen planning transvaginal native tissue repairs. Medication will be started >5 weeks before surgery and continued for 1 year postoperatively, i.e. until scar remodeling is complete. The investigators aim to determine if pre- and postoperative intravaginal estrogen therapy (i) results in anatomic and patient-reported subjective improvement in pelvic organ support, and (ii) impacts other pelvic floor disorders (overactive bladder and incontinence, sexual function and pain, postoperative cystitis), satisfaction, quality of life, and vaginal wound healing. Finally, (iii) the investigators will determine the potential mechanisms by which local estrogen treatment alters pelvic organ support by examining full-thickness vaginal wall biopsies taken at the time of surgery for histologic, connective tissue, and smooth muscle synthesis and degradative changes. The investigators expect this will highlight other novel targets for future therapies in prolapse repair and prevention.

Being tested
Conjugated Estrogens Cream, Placebo Cream
Keywords
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Pelvic Floor Disorders, Therapy, Estrogen Replacement, Estrogens, Conjugated
Medical subject headings
Pelvic Organ Prolapse, Cystocele, Uterine Prolapse, Pelvic Floor Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Conjugated Estrogens CreamDrug

    Also called Premarin Vaginal Cream

    0.625mg/1g cream, 1g applied vaginally nightly for 2 weeks then 2x/week for >5 weeks before surgery, then 2x/week for 1 year after surgery.

  • Placebo CreamDrug

    1g applied vaginally nightly for 2 weeks then 2x/week for >5 weeks before surgery, then 2x/week for 1 year after surgery.

Study groups in NCT02431897
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Estrogen CreamExperimentalConjugated Estrogens cream
Receives: Drug: Conjugated Estrogens Cream
Placebo CreamPlacebo comparatorPlacebo cream
Receives: Drug: Placebo Cream

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Surgical "Failure" Defined by (i) Anatomic Assessment of Prolapse, (ii) Presence of Bulge Symptoms, and/or (Iii) Retreatment of Prolapse

    Cumulative failures, as measured by (i) anatomic assessment of prolapse, (ii) presence of bulge symptoms, and/or (iii) retreatment of pelvic organ prolapse

    Measured: 12 months

Secondary outcomes (10)
  1. Condition Specific (i.e. Pelvic Organ Prolapse) Symptom Bother as Measured by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) Questionnaire

    Questionnaire score at 12 months in overall condition-specific symptom bother as measured by Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire, which is scored from 0-300, higher scores being worse (i.e., more distressing)

    Measured: 12 months

  2. Condition Specific (i.e. Pelvic Organ Prolapse) Quality of Life as Measured by Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7)

    Questionnaire score at 12 months in overall condition-specific quality of life as measured by Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-7 (PFIQ-7) questionnaire, which is scored from 0-300, higher scores being worse (i.e., more distressing)

    Measured: 12 months

  3. Generic Quality of Life as Measured by SF-12 Questionnaire

    Generic (physical component) quality of life as measured by SF-12 questionnaire at 12 months. Scores range from 0-100, with higher scores indicating better physical functioning; the US population average is 50 points.

    Measured: 12 months

  4. Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) Questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6

    Urinary symptom bother as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating greater symptom bother.

    Measured: Time of surgery

  5. Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) Questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6

    Urinary symptom bother as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Distress Inventory-20 (PFDI-20) questionnaire, i.e. the Urinary Distress Inventory, UDI-6. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating greater symptom bother.

    Measured: 12 months

  6. Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire

    Urinary symptom impact on quality of life as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating worse impact on quality of life.

    Measured: Time of surgery

  7. Urinary Symptoms as Measured by Urinary Subscale Questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire

    Urinary symptom impact on quality of life as measured by urinary subscale questions of the Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire (PFIQ-7), i.e. the Urinary Impact Questionnaire. This is scored from 0-100, with greater scores indicating worse impact on quality of life.

    Measured: 12 months

  8. Sexual Function as Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR)

    Sexual function in sexually-active women as measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). The score ranges from 1 (worse sexual experience) to 5 (better sexual experience) with midrange scores commonly seen in women with pelvic floor disorders.

    Measured: Time of surgery

  9. Sexual Function as Measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR)

    Sexual function in sexually-active women as measured by the Pelvic Organ Prolapse/Incontinence Sexual Questionnaire, IUGA-Revised (PISQ-IR). The score ranges from 1 (worse sexual experience) to 5 (better sexual experience) with midrange scores commonly seen in women with pelvic floor disorders.

    Measured: 12 months

  10. Number of Participants With Adverse Events

    Number of participants reporting any adverse events from baseline randomization to 12 months postoperatively

    Measured: 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2016
  3. Primary completion29 Nov 2021
  4. Study completion17 May 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
206 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02431897
Sponsor's protocol ID
STU 022015-117
Acronym
IMPROVE
Status last verified
Aug 2023
First submitted
23 Apr 2015
Last updated
6 Sep 2023
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Larsen WI, Hynan LS. Design of a Randomized Clinical Trial of Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen Versus Placebo With Transvaginal Native Tissue Apical Prolapse Repair (Investigation to Minimize Prolapse Recurrence of the Vagina using Estrogen: IMPROVE). Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg. 2021 Jan 1;27(1):e227-e233. doi: 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000899.

    PubMed 32541299
  • Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Pruszynski JE. Three-year outcomes of a randomized clinical trial of perioperative vaginal estrogen as adjunct to native tissue vaginal apical prolapse repair. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Aug;231(2):263.e1-263.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2024.04.042. Epub 2024 May 4.

    PubMed 38710269
  • Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Hynan LS, Pruszynski JE. Characteristics Associated With Surgical Failure After Native Tissue Apical Prolapse Repair. Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Feb 1;143(2):312-319. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005478. Epub 2023 Dec 7.

    PubMed 38061041
  • Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Pruszynski JE, Hynan LS. Perioperative Vaginal Estrogen as Adjunct to Native Tissue Vaginal Apical Prolapse Repair: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Aug 15;330(7):615-625. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.12317.

    PubMed 37581673
  • Taithongchai A, Johnson EE, Ismail SI, Barron-Millar E, Kernohan A, Thakar R. Oestrogen therapy for treating pelvic organ prolapse in postmenopausal women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Jul 11;7(7):CD014592. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014592.pub2.

    PubMed 37431855
  • Rahn DD, Richter HE, Sung VW, Hynan LS, Pruszynski JE. Effects of preoperative intravaginal estrogen on pelvic floor disorder symptoms in postmenopausal women with pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;229(3):309.e1-309.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.023. Epub 2023 May 25.

    PubMed 37244454

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Conjugated Estrogens Cream in people with Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Urogenital Prolapse, run by University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at 3 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Sep 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 16 Dec 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Surgical "Failure" Defined by (i) Anatomic Assessment of Prolapse, (ii) Presence of Bulge Symptoms, and/or (Iii) Retreatment of Prolapse (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02431897, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Sep 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in