Essential TremorNCT02418858
Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor
A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation surgery in people with Essential Tremor, run by St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Essential Tremor
- What is being tested?
- Deep Brain Stimulation surgery
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to Jun 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 85 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Essential Tremor diagnosed by criteria listed in the Consensus statement of the Movement Disorders Society on Tremor
- Age 18 - 85 years of age
- Motor skills allowing for capability to complete evaluations
- Medically cleared for undergoing anesthesia and DBS surgery
Who cannot join
- Dementia per DSM-V criteria
- Medical or other condition precluding MRI
- History of supraspinal CNS disease other than Essential Tremor
- Alcohol use of more than 4 drinks per day
- Pregnancy
- History of suicide attempt
- Currently uncontrolled clinically significant depression (BDI>20)
- History of schizophrenia, delusions, or currently uncontrolled visual hallucinations
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85013
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.
Read the detailed description
Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Essential tremor (ET) patients undergo intra-operative test stimulation to refine the lead location and ensure the absence of sustained side effects. This can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery provokes significant anxiety and fear in some patients.
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.
If asleep DBS produces clinical results equivalent to awake DBS surgery, the possible advantages include shorter surgical time, improved patient comfort, better access to DBS for patients, and cost savings for the hospital.
To date (August 2011 - September 2014), 157 patients have undergone asleep DBS surgery and 141 patients have undergone traditional awake DBS surgery. ET patients constitute 76 of the total surgeries - 50 patients underwent awake surgery and 26 underwent asleep surgery. The safety and efficacy of the two approaches to DBS surgery have been equivalent, and we are at a position of equipoise with regard to what to offer to patients. To date, there have been no randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy and functional outcomes of the two DBS methods for patients with the diagnosis of Essential tremor. The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique. The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale), and a tremor quality of life questionnaire : Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire [QUEST]). Parkinson Meter and Life Pulse tremor readings (two iPhone accelerometer applications) will also be collected. . Patients who elect to participate in this trial will undergo a routine pre-operative neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The subjects will then be randomized to 2 groups by using random numbers in an envelope system. We anticipate that 120 total patients will need to be enrolled in this pilot study (60 awake, 60 asleep), and thus the numbers 1-120 will be placed in envelopes. An odd number will correspond to the awake DBS procedure, and an even number will indicate an asleep DBS procedure. The null hypothesis is that asleep DBS results in inferior tremor ratings 3-months after surgery when compared to awake DBS. Our secondary aim will be to evaluate any cognitive changes associated with DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) in ET patients. Current standard of care for patient selection in DBS focuses primarily on the evaluation of motor symptoms and currently there is no guidance for how a patients' DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) would impact on subsequent neurocognitive function.
- Conditions
- Essential Tremor
- Being tested
- Deep Brain Stimulation surgery
- Keywords
- Essential tremor, DBS
- Medical subject headings
- Essential Tremor
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryProcedure or surgery
Also called DBS
Deep Brain Stimulation surgery awake vs. asleep
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Awake DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Deep brain stimulation surgery: Essential tremor patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS surgery utilizing microelectrode recordings and intraoperative stimulation. Receives: Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgery |
| Asleep DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Deep brain stimulation surgery: Essential tremor patients undergoing DBS surgery under general anesthesia utilizing intraoperative imaging to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrode placement at the time of surgery. Receives: Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgery |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Functional Outcomes
The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor ADL questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale) for comparison to preoperative scores.
Measured: 12 weeks post-operatively
Quality of Life Assessment
Quality of life in Essential Tremor [QUEST] questionnaire will be collected again for comparison to preoperative scores.
Measured: 12 week post-operatively
Secondary outcomes (1)
Neurocognitive Function
Neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Questionnaire for Impulsive-Compulsive Disorders in Parkinson's Disease, Apathy Evaluation Scale; Epworth Sleepiness Scale.
Measured: 6 months post-operatively
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionJun 2017 (estimated)
Why it stopped: Lack of subject enrollment
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (11)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Essential TremorStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Francisco A Ponce, MD, Principal investigator, Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02418858
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- IRB # 14BN146
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 24 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 12 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Bain PG, Findley LJ, Atchison P, Behari M, Vidailhet M, Gresty M, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Marsden CD. Assessing tremor severity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;56(8):868-73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.8.868.
PubMed 8350102Elble R, Bain P, Forjaz MJ, Haubenberger D, Testa C, Goetz CG, Leentjens AF, Martinez-Martin P, Pavy-Le Traon A, Post B, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Weintraub D, Schrag A. Task force report: scales for screening and evaluating tremor: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2013 Nov;28(13):1793-800. doi: 10.1002/mds.25648. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
PubMed 24038576Flora ED, Perera CL, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1550-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23195.
PubMed 20623768Troster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Sep;11(6):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.05.009.
PubMed 16103000Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, Grace JK, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;115(6):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
PubMed 22944465Burchiel KJ, McCartney S, Lee A, Raslan AM. Accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode placement using intraoperative computed tomography without microelectrode recording. J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):301-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.JNS122324. Epub 2013 May 31.
PubMed 23724986Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
PubMed 19126811Pezeshkian P, DeSalles AA, Gorgulho A, Behnke E, McArthur D, Bari A. Accuracy of frame-based stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging vs frame-based stereotactic head computed tomography fused with recent magnetic resonance imaging for postimplantation deep brain stimulator lead localization. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1299-306. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069.
PubMed 21725253Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, van Herk M, Schwartz M, Barnes PD, Tarbell N, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):271-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0271.
PubMed 7616273Papanastassiou V, Rowe J, Scott R, Silburn P, Davies L, Aziz T. Use of the Radionics Image Fusiontrade mark and Stereoplantrade mark programs for target localization in functional neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 1998 Jan;5(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(98)90197-7.
PubMed 18644283Kooy HM, van Herk M, Barnes PD, Alexander E 3rd, Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 30;28(5):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90499-5.
PubMed 8175410
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial Comparing Functional Outcomes of Awake vs. Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) for Essential Tremor
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02418858
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- IRB # 14BN146
- Conditions
- Essential Tremor
- Keywords
- Essential tremor, DBS
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Lack of subject enrollment
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, PhoenixUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jun 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.
Detailed description
Traditional DBS is performed without general anesthesia with the patient awake. Local anesthetic is used to numb the skin and tissue where the incision is made, and the patients are given mild sedatives to alleviate anxiety and discomfort. Essential tremor (ET) patients undergo intra-operative test stimulation to refine the lead location and ensure the absence of sustained side effects. This can result in multiple brain penetrations during lead placement, and the entire procedure may last anywhere from 4-6 hours on average. The concept of being awake during brain surgery provokes significant anxiety and fear in some patients.
Recently, there has been increasing interest in performing DBS under general anesthesia, where the stimulated targets are located anatomically (i.e. on MRI) rather than physiologically via microelectrode recordings and intra-operative test stimulation. This technology has been termed "asleep" DBS and is performed with the patient under general anesthesia. Intraoperative imaging is utilized to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrodes placement at the time of surgery. Because stereotactic accuracy (and surgical safety) is the surgical endpoint, there is no need for the patient to be awake during the procedure.
If asleep DBS produces clinical results equivalent to awake DBS surgery, the possible advantages include shorter surgical time, improved patient comfort, better access to DBS for patients, and cost savings for the hospital.
To date (August 2011 - September 2014), 157 patients have undergone asleep DBS surgery and 141 patients have undergone traditional awake DBS surgery. ET patients constitute 76 of the total surgeries - 50 patients underwent awake surgery and 26 underwent asleep surgery. The safety and efficacy of the two approaches to DBS surgery have been equivalent, and we are at a position of equipoise with regard to what to offer to patients. To date, there have been no randomized, controlled clinical trials comparing the efficacy and functional outcomes of the two DBS methods for patients with the diagnosis of Essential tremor. The purpose of the proposed study is to demonstrate that the functional outcomes of the "asleep" technique are not inferior to those reported for traditional "awake" DBS technique. The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor Activities of Daily Living (ADL) questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale), and a tremor quality of life questionnaire : Quality of Life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire [QUEST]). Parkinson Meter and Life Pulse tremor readings (two iPhone accelerometer applications) will also be collected. . Patients who elect to participate in this trial will undergo a routine pre-operative neurocognitive evaluation consisting of the following routine evaluative tests: Wechsler Test of Adult Reading, Mattis Dementia Rating Scale 2nd Edition, Wechsler Abbreviate Scale of Intelligence 2nd Edition; Wechsler Memory Scale 3rd edition, Digit Span, Stroop Neuropsychological Screening Test, Trail Making Test, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, Controlled Oral Word Association Test, Animal Naming, Boston Naming Test, Wechsler Memory Scale 4th Edition, Logical Memory, Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised, Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised, Hooper visual Organization Test, Judgment of Line Orientation, Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory, Epworth Sleepiness Scale. The subjects will then be randomized to 2 groups by using random numbers in an envelope system. We anticipate that 120 total patients will need to be enrolled in this pilot study (60 awake, 60 asleep), and thus the numbers 1-120 will be placed in envelopes. An odd number will correspond to the awake DBS procedure, and an even number will indicate an asleep DBS procedure. The null hypothesis is that asleep DBS results in inferior tremor ratings 3-months after surgery when compared to awake DBS. Our secondary aim will be to evaluate any cognitive changes associated with DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) in ET patients. Current standard of care for patient selection in DBS focuses primarily on the evaluation of motor symptoms and currently there is no guidance for how a patients' DBS surgery selection (awake vs. asleep) would impact on subsequent neurocognitive function.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Awake DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryDeep brain stimulation surgery: Essential tremor patients undergoing traditional "awake" DBS surgery utilizing microelectrode recordings and intraoperative stimulation. |
| Asleep DBS Surgery | Active comparator | Procedure: Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryDeep brain stimulation surgery: Essential tremor patients undergoing DBS surgery under general anesthesia utilizing intraoperative imaging to verify the stereotactic accuracy of DBS electrode placement at the time of surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Essential Tremor diagnosed by criteria listed in the Consensus statement of the Movement Disorders Society on Tremor
- Age 18 - 85 years of age
- Motor skills allowing for capability to complete evaluations
- Medically cleared for undergoing anesthesia and DBS surgery
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Dementia per DSM-V criteria
- Medical or other condition precluding MRI
- History of supraspinal CNS disease other than Essential Tremor
- Alcohol use of more than 4 drinks per day
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Deep Brain Stimulation surgeryAlso: DBSDeep Brain Stimulation surgery awake vs. asleep | Procedure or surgery | Asleep DBS Surgery, Awake DBS Surgery |
Primary outcome
Functional Outcomes
Time frame: 12 weeks post-operatively
The primary data points for this study will include three month functional outcomes using accepted outcome metrics for ET, including an objective tremor rating scale (Fahn-Tolosa-Marin Tremor Rating Scale), a tremor ADL questionnaire (Bain and Findley Tremor ADL scale) for comparison to preoperative scores.
Quality of Life Assessment
Time frame: 12 week post-operatively
Quality of life in Essential Tremor [QUEST] questionnaire will be collected again for comparison to preoperative scores.
1 secondary outcome
Neurocognitive Function
Time frame: 6 months post-operatively
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 8350102Bain PG, Findley LJ, Atchison P, Behari M, Vidailhet M, Gresty M, Rothwell JC, Thompson PD, Marsden CD. Assessing tremor severity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993 Aug;56(8):868-73. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.56.8.868.
- Background: PubMed 24038576Elble R, Bain P, Forjaz MJ, Haubenberger D, Testa C, Goetz CG, Leentjens AF, Martinez-Martin P, Pavy-Le Traon A, Post B, Sampaio C, Stebbins GT, Weintraub D, Schrag A. Task force report: scales for screening and evaluating tremor: critique and recommendations. Mov Disord. 2013 Nov;28(13):1793-800. doi: 10.1002/mds.25648. Epub 2013 Sep 3.
- Background: PubMed 20623768Flora ED, Perera CL, Cameron AL, Maddern GJ. Deep brain stimulation for essential tremor: a systematic review. Mov Disord. 2010 Aug 15;25(11):1550-9. doi: 10.1002/mds.23195.
- Background: PubMed 16103000Troster AI, Pahwa R, Fields JA, Tanner CM, Lyons KE. Quality of life in Essential Tremor Questionnaire (QUEST): development and initial validation. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2005 Sep;11(6):367-73. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2005.05.009.
- Background: PubMed 22944465Ostrem JL, Galifianakis NB, Markun LC, Grace JK, Martin AJ, Starr PA, Larson PS. Clinical outcomes of PD patients having bilateral STN DBS using high-field interventional MR-imaging for lead placement. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2013 Jun;115(6):708-12. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2012.08.019. Epub 2012 Sep 1.
- Background: PubMed 23724986Burchiel KJ, McCartney S, Lee A, Raslan AM. Accuracy of deep brain stimulation electrode placement using intraoperative computed tomography without microelectrode recording. J Neurosurg. 2013 Aug;119(2):301-6. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.JNS122324. Epub 2013 May 31.
- Background: PubMed 19126811Weaver FM, Follett K, Stern M, Hur K, Harris C, Marks WJ Jr, Rothlind J, Sagher O, Reda D, Moy CS, Pahwa R, Burchiel K, Hogarth P, Lai EC, Duda JE, Holloway K, Samii A, Horn S, Bronstein J, Stoner G, Heemskerk J, Huang GD; CSP 468 Study Group. Bilateral deep brain stimulation vs best medical therapy for patients with advanced Parkinson disease: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2009 Jan 7;301(1):63-73. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.929.
- Background: PubMed 21725253Pezeshkian P, DeSalles AA, Gorgulho A, Behnke E, McArthur D, Bari A. Accuracy of frame-based stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging vs frame-based stereotactic head computed tomography fused with recent magnetic resonance imaging for postimplantation deep brain stimulator lead localization. Neurosurgery. 2011 Dec;69(6):1299-306. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e31822b7069.
- Background: PubMed 7616273Alexander E 3rd, Kooy HM, van Herk M, Schwartz M, Barnes PD, Tarbell N, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Magnetic resonance image-directed stereotactic neurosurgery: use of image fusion with computerized tomography to enhance spatial accuracy. J Neurosurg. 1995 Aug;83(2):271-6. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.2.0271.
- Background: PubMed 18644283Papanastassiou V, Rowe J, Scott R, Silburn P, Davies L, Aziz T. Use of the Radionics Image Fusiontrade mark and Stereoplantrade mark programs for target localization in functional neurosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 1998 Jan;5(1):28-32. doi: 10.1016/s0967-5868(98)90197-7.
- Background: PubMed 8175410Kooy HM, van Herk M, Barnes PD, Alexander E 3rd, Dunbar SF, Tarbell NJ, Mulkern RV, Holupka EJ, Loeffler JS. Image fusion for stereotactic radiotherapy and radiosurgery treatment planning. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1994 Mar 30;28(5):1229-34. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(94)90499-5.
Related trials for Essential Tremor
RecruitingObservational study
The Encora X1™ in a Real World Observational Study
Essential Tremor
Recruiting
Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery for Movement Disorders
Parkinson's Disease, Essential Tremor
RecruitingObservational study
Analysis of Cutaneous Phosphorylated Alpha-Synuclein to Identify Patients at Risk of Progressing From Essential Tremor to Parkinson's Disease
Essential Tremor, Movement Disorders, Essential Tremor
Recruiting
Effects of Microelectrode-based Brain Stimulation in Humans
Essential Tremor, Parkinsons Disease (PD)
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Identifying Markers of Disease Subtypes and Disease Progression in the Syndrome of Essential Tremor
Essential Tremor
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Francisco A Ponce, MD principal investigator
Barrow Neurological Institute / St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Deep Brain Stimulation surgery in people with Essential Tremor, run by St. Joseph's Hospital and Medical Center, Phoenix at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Functional Outcomes (time frame: 12 weeks post-operatively). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02418858, which also lists 11 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Oct 2015.