PainKISSNCT02417298
Ketamine Infusion for Acute Sickle Cell Crisis in the Emergency Department
A study testing Normal saline and Ketamine in people with Pain and Sickle Cell Disorder, run by Billy Sin at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Pain associated with sickle cell disease is a common emergency department visit. It is also frequently associated with a high emergency department recidivism rate for pain control and admissions to the hospital. Opiates are considered the first line therapy for acute flares and to manage chronic pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Pain, Sickle Cell Disorder
- What is being tested?
- Normal saline and Ketamine
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 12 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to 1 May 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients 18 years old and older presenting with acute sickle cell crisis pain either described as diffuse throughout the body or localized to joint/extremity/back
- Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 2 on the NRS
- Consents to IV access
- Provides informed consent
Who cannot join
- Receiving IM therapy only
- Standard therapy plan is not morphine or dilaudid
- Previous enrollment in study
- Documented fever or subjectively reported fever
- Complaint of chest pain or shortness of breath or abdominal pain or headache
- Suspicion for acute chest crisis
Show all 19Show fewer
- Patients with history or acute diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage/increased intracranial pressure
- Severe hypertension(≥180/100)
- History of CAD or hypertension
- Presence of/suspected for traumatic head injury with or without loss of consciousness
- Presence of/suspected for myocardial ischemia
- Presence of/suspected for alcohol intoxication
- Hemodynamic instability
- History of psychiatric disorders,
- Known or suspected pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Allergy to ketamine
- Administration of opioids in previous 4 hours
- Patients with language barriers
- Ilicit drug use within the past 7 days
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
Brooklyn, New York, 11201
About this study
Official title: Ketamine Infusion for Acute Sickle Cell crisiS in the Emergency Department
Pain associated with sickle cell disease is a common emergency department visit. It is also frequently associated with a high emergency department recidivism rate for pain control and admissions to the hospital. Opiates are considered the first line therapy for acute flares and to manage chronic pain. This often times leads to a stigma of being "opiate seekers" or "frequent fliers". With this study, we wish to explore whether adding ketamine to standard acute opiate therapy (morphine or dilaudid) will decrease subsequent repeat doses of opiates while improving the patient's perception of pain. In addition, we will be exploring whether ketamine as an adjuvant therapy can help reduce hospital admissions for the management of acute sickle cell crisis pain.
Read the detailed description
The total number of required patients would be 53 per arm (106 patients). The targeted study population is patients who are 18 years old or older presenting with acute sickle cell crisis pain either described as diffuse throughout the body or localized to extremity/back. The expected duration of the study is 2 years
Prior to initiation of study, the research associates would be responsible for the randomization process. The goal of this study is to enroll 106 patients total (53 per arm). Patients will be assigned to a study arm via an online random-number generator (http://www.randomization.com). Each number will correlate to a sealed opaque envelope, which will be pulled in sequential order as patients are enrolled. Within each envelope will contain the particular study medication. A primary master list will be kept in a locked and secured cabinet in pharmacy. Only pharmacy personnel and the primary/secondary investigators will have access to this list. Pharmacy will use this master list to prepare study medications. A second master list would also be secured in the EM research room for back-up purposes. The secondary master list would be assessed only if the primary master list is lost. Only the primary and secondary investigator will have access to the secondary master list.
Detailed study procedures:
Step 1: Identification of patients with chief complaints or visit reasons of sickle cell via the Emergency Department's Statusboard by Research Associate or study investigators.
Step 2: Screening of potentially eligible patients with inclusion/exclusion criteria checklist as per Data Collection instrument (See attached Form 1) by Research Associate or study investigators.
Step 3: If patient is eligible, Research Associate or study investigators would obtain informed consent and explain potential risks and benefits with receiving study interventions.
Step 4: There will be no placebo only arm. All providers, except pharmacy, will be blinded to whether the patient is receiving ketamine or saline. All patients will receive conventional standard therapy (dilaudid or morphine) which will be ordered by the emergency department resident or attending. Each patient will receive an IVP bolus with infusion and a separate IVP. Arm A will include 0.3 mg/kg IVP bolus of Ketamine followed by a 0.1 mg/kg/hr infusion for 3 hours along with an initial dose of standard therapy. Arm B will receive a IVP bolus of normal saline (utilizing the 0.3 mg/kg calculation) followed by a normal saline infusion and then a separate standard therapy dose.
Step 5: An order would be placed by the medical resident, medical attending, a study investigator who is a physician, or a pharmacist under the permission of the attending physician into Allscripts for a study intervention.
Step 6: Upon receiving the order in Allscripts, the order would be verified by the pharmacy. Once notified of which envelope has been pulled pharmacy will prepare a ketamine IVP bolus and infusion or NS IVP bolus and infusion. Conventional therapy will be pulled from the general ED accudose stock by the ED RN. ED personnel will obtain the infusion preparation from pharmacy. It will be labeled for the patient, with study number, but without other identifying marks. When the study medication is picked up, pharmacy will open the sealed envelope to confirm which medication arm was prepared in order to internally verify the correct preparation.
Step 7: The nurse assigned to the patient would administer the intervention.
Step 8: A research associate or a study investigator would approach the patient to assess and record primary outcomes, secondary outcomes at designed time intervals. The data will be recorded on the data collection instrument. If additional medication is requested by the patient, the orders would be placed by the medical resident or attending who are assigned to the patient in the ED.
Step 9: All data retrieved from the paper data collection sheets will be transcribed into an encrypted and password protected electronic database by the research associate.
- All patient identifiers would be de-identified in the database. All participants would be assigned a study participant number.This database would be stored in the Emergency Department faculty or research room. Only the research associates or study investigators would have access to the electronic database. The paper data collection sheets would be stored in a stationary and locked cabinet in the Emergency Department for safe keeping. At the end of the study, these records will be maintained according to the hospital's record-retention policy.
Step 10: At the end of study enrollment, the data will be analyzed. Blinding will be removed for final data analysis and compilation.
Step 11: At the conclusion of the study, the final results and conclusions would be presented to the IRB. All data recorded from paper would be shredded and destroyed. All data recorded on electronic databases would be deleted.
- Conditions
- Pain, Sickle Cell Disorder
- Being tested
- Normal saline, Ketamine
- Keywords
- ketamine, pain, sickle cell disorder
- Medical subject headings
- Pain, Anemia, Sickle Cell
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Normal salineDrug
Normal saline intravenous push (with volume to be administered equivalent to that of ketamine 0.3mg/kg, if the patient was to receive ketamine) followed by a normal saline infusion at the same rate as ketamine arm
KetamineDrug
0.3mg/kg IVP ketamine followed by 0.1mg/kg/hr of ketamine infusion for 3 hours
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ketamine | Active comparator | Ketamine 0.3 mg/kg intravenous push followed by ketamine infusion at 0.1 mg/kg/hr for 3 hours Receives: Drug: Ketamine |
| Saline | Placebo comparator | Normal saline intravenous push (with volume to be administered equivalent to that of ketamine 0.3mg/kg, if the patient was to receive ketamine) followed by a normal saline infusion at the same rate as ketamine arm Receives: Drug: Normal saline |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in patient's perception of pain
Pain will be assessed via the Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)
Measured: At baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after administration of intervention
Total number of patients requiring hospital admission
At the end of the study (180 minutes after initial administration of intervention) the number of patients requiring hospital admission will be quantified
Measured: 180 min after administration of intervention
Secondary outcomes (11)
Change in patient perception of pain after discharge
Pain will be assessed via the Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)
Measured: 24 and 72 hours post ED discharge
Total opiate consumed
If opiates were ordered as part of standard therapy for patient, the total amount of opiates consumed would be quantified
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Post test of disability and functional outcomes using the Sickle Cell Pain Burden Interview (SCPBI)
Measured: 180 minutes after initial study intervention
Incidence of hypertension
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of dissociative effects (characterized by hallucination, disorientation, confusion, agitation, delirium, dreams)
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of nausea
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of vomiting
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of dizziness
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of headache
Measured: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Time to patient discharge from the initiation of intervention
Measured: At the end of study period (180 minutes after initiation of study intervention)
Patient satisfaction of pain control
To be assessed via a Likert Scale
Measured: At the end of study period (180 minutes after initiation of study intervention)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completion1 Apr 2018
- Study completion1 May 2018
Why it stopped: Feasibility
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Billy Sin
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Billy Sin, The Brooklyn Hospital Center
- Investigators
- Michael Hochberg, MD, Principal investigator, The Brooklyn Hospital Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02417298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 668842
- Acronym
- KISS
- Status last verified
- May 2018
- First submitted
- 25 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 11 May 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Neri CM, Pestieau SR, Darbari DS. Low-dose ketamine as a potential adjuvant therapy for painful vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Aug;23(8):684-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12172. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
PubMed 23565738Jennings CA, Bobb BT, Noreika DM, Coyne PJ. Oral ketamine for sickle cell crisis pain refractory to opioids. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;27(2):150-4. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2013.788599. Epub 2013 May 21.
PubMed 23692261Tawfic QA, Faris AS, Kausalya R. The role of a low-dose ketamine-midazolam regimen in the management of severe painful crisis in patients with sickle cell disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
PubMed 23856095Zempsky WT, Loiselle KA, Corsi JM, Hagstrom JN. Use of low-dose ketamine infusion for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease-related pain: a case series. Clin J Pain. 2010 Feb;26(2):163-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b511ab.
PubMed 20090444Meals CG, Mullican BD, Shaffer CM, Dangerfield PF, Ramirez RP. Ketamine infusion for sickle cell crisis pain in an adult. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Sep;42(3):e7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.003. No abstract available.
PubMed 21854993Uprety D, Baber A, Foy M. Ketamine infusion for sickle cell pain crisis refractory to opioids: a case report and review of literature. Ann Hematol. 2014 May;93(5):769-71. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1954-3. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
PubMed 24232306Yawn BP, Buchanan GR, Afenyi-Annan AN, Ballas SK, Hassell KL, James AH, Jordan L, Lanzkron SM, Lottenberg R, Savage WJ, Tanabe PJ, Ware RE, Murad MH, Goldsmith JC, Ortiz E, Fulwood R, Horton A, John-Sowah J. Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members. JAMA. 2014 Sep 10;312(10):1033-48. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10517.
PubMed 25203083
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 11 May 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Ketamine Infusion for Acute Sickle Cell crisiS in the Emergency Department
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02417298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- KISS / 668842
- Conditions
- Pain, Sickle Cell Disorder
- Keywords
- ketamine, pain, sickle cell disorder
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Feasibility
- Enrolment
- 12 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Billy SinUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015
- Primary completion
- 1 Apr 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 1 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pain associated with sickle cell disease is a common emergency department visit. It is also frequently associated with a high emergency department recidivism rate for pain control and admissions to the hospital. Opiates are considered the first line therapy for acute flares and to manage chronic pain. This often times leads to a stigma of being "opiate seekers" or "frequent fliers". With this study, we wish to explore whether adding ketamine to standard acute opiate therapy (morphine or dilaudid) will decrease subsequent repeat doses of opiates while improving the patient's perception of pain. In addition, we will be exploring whether ketamine as an adjuvant therapy can help reduce hospital admissions for the management of acute sickle cell crisis pain.
Detailed description
The total number of required patients would be 53 per arm (106 patients). The targeted study population is patients who are 18 years old or older presenting with acute sickle cell crisis pain either described as diffuse throughout the body or localized to extremity/back. The expected duration of the study is 2 years
Prior to initiation of study, the research associates would be responsible for the randomization process. The goal of this study is to enroll 106 patients total (53 per arm). Patients will be assigned to a study arm via an online random-number generator (http://www.randomization.com). Each number will correlate to a sealed opaque envelope, which will be pulled in sequential order as patients are enrolled. Within each envelope will contain the particular study medication. A primary master list will be kept in a locked and secured cabinet in pharmacy. Only pharmacy personnel and the primary/secondary investigators will have access to this list. Pharmacy will use this master list to prepare study medications. A second master list would also be secured in the EM research room for back-up purposes. The secondary master list would be assessed only if the primary master list is lost. Only the primary and secondary investigator will have access to the secondary master list.
Detailed study procedures:
Step 1: Identification of patients with chief complaints or visit reasons of sickle cell via the Emergency Department's Statusboard by Research Associate or study investigators.
Step 2: Screening of potentially eligible patients with inclusion/exclusion criteria checklist as per Data Collection instrument (See attached Form 1) by Research Associate or study investigators.
Step 3: If patient is eligible, Research Associate or study investigators would obtain informed consent and explain potential risks and benefits with receiving study interventions.
Step 4: There will be no placebo only arm. All providers, except pharmacy, will be blinded to whether the patient is receiving ketamine or saline. All patients will receive conventional standard therapy (dilaudid or morphine) which will be ordered by the emergency department resident or attending. Each patient will receive an IVP bolus with infusion and a separate IVP. Arm A will include 0.3 mg/kg IVP bolus of Ketamine followed by a 0.1 mg/kg/hr infusion for 3 hours along with an initial dose of standard therapy. Arm B will receive a IVP bolus of normal saline (utilizing the 0.3 mg/kg calculation) followed by a normal saline infusion and then a separate standard therapy dose.
Step 5: An order would be placed by the medical resident, medical attending, a study investigator who is a physician, or a pharmacist under the permission of the attending physician into Allscripts for a study intervention.
Step 6: Upon receiving the order in Allscripts, the order would be verified by the pharmacy. Once notified of which envelope has been pulled pharmacy will prepare a ketamine IVP bolus and infusion or NS IVP bolus and infusion. Conventional therapy will be pulled from the general ED accudose stock by the ED RN. ED personnel will obtain the infusion preparation from pharmacy. It will be labeled for the patient, with study number, but without other identifying marks. When the study medication is picked up, pharmacy will open the sealed envelope to confirm which medication arm was prepared in order to internally verify the correct preparation.
Step 7: The nurse assigned to the patient would administer the intervention.
Step 8: A research associate or a study investigator would approach the patient to assess and record primary outcomes, secondary outcomes at designed time intervals. The data will be recorded on the data collection instrument. If additional medication is requested by the patient, the orders would be placed by the medical resident or attending who are assigned to the patient in the ED.
Step 9: All data retrieved from the paper data collection sheets will be transcribed into an encrypted and password protected electronic database by the research associate.
- All patient identifiers would be de-identified in the database. All participants would be assigned a study participant number.This database would be stored in the Emergency Department faculty or research room. Only the research associates or study investigators would have access to the electronic database. The paper data collection sheets would be stored in a stationary and locked cabinet in the Emergency Department for safe keeping. At the end of the study, these records will be maintained according to the hospital's record-retention policy.
Step 10: At the end of study enrollment, the data will be analyzed. Blinding will be removed for final data analysis and compilation.
Step 11: At the conclusion of the study, the final results and conclusions would be presented to the IRB. All data recorded from paper would be shredded and destroyed. All data recorded on electronic databases would be deleted.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ketamine | Active comparator | Drug: KetamineKetamine 0.3 mg/kg intravenous push followed by ketamine infusion at 0.1 mg/kg/hr for 3 hours |
| Saline | Placebo comparator | Drug: Normal salineNormal saline intravenous push (with volume to be administered equivalent to that of ketamine 0.3mg/kg, if the patient was to receive ketamine) followed by a normal saline infusion at the same rate as ketamine arm |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Patients 18 years old and older presenting with acute sickle cell crisis pain either described as diffuse throughout the body or localized to joint/extremity/back
- Describes pain to be greater than or equal to 2 on the NRS
- Consents to IV access
- Provides informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Receiving IM therapy only
- Standard therapy plan is not morphine or dilaudid
- Previous enrollment in study
- Documented fever or subjectively reported fever
- Complaint of chest pain or shortness of breath or abdominal pain or headache
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Normal salineNormal saline intravenous push (with volume to be administered equivalent to that of ketamine 0.3mg/kg, if the patient was to receive ketamine) followed by a normal saline infusion at the same rate as ketamine arm | Drug | Saline |
| Ketamine0.3mg/kg IVP ketamine followed by 0.1mg/kg/hr of ketamine infusion for 3 hours | Drug | Ketamine |
Primary outcome
Change in patient's perception of pain
Time frame: At baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after administration of intervention
Pain will be assessed via the Numeric Rated Scale (NRS)
Total number of patients requiring hospital admission
Time frame: 180 min after administration of intervention
At the end of the study (180 minutes after initial administration of intervention) the number of patients requiring hospital admission will be quantified
11 secondary outcomes
Change in patient perception of pain after discharge
Time frame: 24 and 72 hours post ED discharge
Total opiate consumed
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Post test of disability and functional outcomes using the Sickle Cell Pain Burden Interview (SCPBI)
Time frame: 180 minutes after initial study intervention
Incidence of hypertension
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of dissociative effects (characterized by hallucination, disorientation, confusion, agitation, delirium, dreams)
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of nausea
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of vomiting
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of dizziness
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Incidence of headache
Time frame: 0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 minutes after administration of study intervention
Time to patient discharge from the initiation of intervention
Time frame: At the end of study period (180 minutes after initiation of study intervention)
Patient satisfaction of pain control
Time frame: At the end of study period (180 minutes after initiation of study intervention)
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Feasibility). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 11 May 2018.
- Background: PubMed 23565738Neri CM, Pestieau SR, Darbari DS. Low-dose ketamine as a potential adjuvant therapy for painful vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Aug;23(8):684-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12172. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
- Background: PubMed 23692261Jennings CA, Bobb BT, Noreika DM, Coyne PJ. Oral ketamine for sickle cell crisis pain refractory to opioids. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;27(2):150-4. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2013.788599. Epub 2013 May 21.
- Background: PubMed 23856095Tawfic QA, Faris AS, Kausalya R. The role of a low-dose ketamine-midazolam regimen in the management of severe painful crisis in patients with sickle cell disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
- Background: PubMed 20090444Zempsky WT, Loiselle KA, Corsi JM, Hagstrom JN. Use of low-dose ketamine infusion for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease-related pain: a case series. Clin J Pain. 2010 Feb;26(2):163-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b511ab.
- Background: PubMed 21854993Meals CG, Mullican BD, Shaffer CM, Dangerfield PF, Ramirez RP. Ketamine infusion for sickle cell crisis pain in an adult. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Sep;42(3):e7-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.003. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24232306Uprety D, Baber A, Foy M. Ketamine infusion for sickle cell pain crisis refractory to opioids: a case report and review of literature. Ann Hematol. 2014 May;93(5):769-71. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1954-3. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
- Background: PubMed 25203083Yawn BP, Buchanan GR, Afenyi-Annan AN, Ballas SK, Hassell KL, James AH, Jordan L, Lanzkron SM, Lottenberg R, Savage WJ, Tanabe PJ, Ware RE, Murad MH, Goldsmith JC, Ortiz E, Fulwood R, Horton A, John-Sowah J. Management of sickle cell disease: summary of the 2014 evidence-based report by expert panel members. JAMA. 2014 Sep 10;312(10):1033-48. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.10517.
Related trials for Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Stress Ball Use During Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal After Coronary Angiography
Femoral Arterial Sheath Removal, Stress Ball
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingPhase 4
ESP Blocks for Posterior Spinal Fusion
Postoperative Pain
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Michael Hochberg, MD principal investigator
The Brooklyn Hospital Center
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Normal saline and Ketamine in people with Pain and Sickle Cell Disorder, run by Billy Sin at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 19 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 11 May 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Feasibility). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in patient's perception of pain (time frame: At baseline, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150 and 180 min after administration of intervention). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02417298, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 11 May 2018.