Diabetic Macular EdemaNCT02406157
577nm Micropulse Laser Versus 532nm Subthreshold Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema
A study testing 577-MPL and 532-SLP in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
This randomized, parallel controlled, clinical-trial aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema compared with 532 subthreshold laser photocoagulation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- What is being tested?
- 577-MPL and 532-SLP
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 124 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jan 2015to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Aged >18 years
- Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2
- Diagnosed as diabetic retinopathy with Clinical Significant Macular Edema
- Central retinal thickness(CRT) of more than 250μm as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)
- ETDRS visual acuity >19 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/400 or better)
- No macular laser coagulation or surgery or medicine therapy of macular edema within the last 6 months
- Blood glucose was controlled steadily(HbA1c≤10%)
Who cannot join
- Taking part in other clinical trial within 3 months
- Planning panretinal photocoagulation(PRP) within 3 months
- Performed cataract surgery in the last 3 months
- Accompanied with other retinal vascular disease that can lead to macular edema, for example branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO),central retinal vein occlusion(CRVO)
- Accompanied with severe opacity of refractive media that maybe impact therapy and observation
- Accompanied with nystagmus
- Accompanied with some history that maybe interfere with result or increase the risk of patients
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060
About this study
Official title: Pure Yellow (577nm) Micropulse Laser Versus 532nm Subthreshold Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema:A Prospective, Randomized, Paralleled Clinical Trial
This randomized, parallel controlled, clinical-trial aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema compared with 532 subthreshold laser photocoagulation.
Read the detailed description
- To evaluate the efficacy of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation with grid/focal treatment for diabetic macular edema.
- To investigate influence of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation on structure and function of macula compared with 532nm subthreshold laser photocoagulation.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Being tested
- 577-MPL, 532-SLP
- Keywords
- diabetic macular edema, micropulse, laser, subthreshold
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
577-MPLDevice
Also called 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation treatment
Device for 577nm micropulse treatment of the diabetic macular edema with the following parameters:100 microns spot size,5% duty cycle of 0.2 seconds,power is tested on micropulse mode and then reduce power to 50% of visible
532-SLPDevice
Also called 532nm subthreshold laser photocoagulation treatment
Device for 532nm subthreshold treatment of the diabetic macular edema, by decomposing a subthreshold short pulse, with 10 milliseconds, 100 microns, and power(100-1000mW) adjusted according to patient's diopter transparency and pigmentation
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 577-MPL | Experimental | 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation(577MPL) treatment to the macular area of retinal thickening with a focal or grid pattern Receives: Device: 577-MPL |
| 532-SLP | Active comparator | 532nm subthreshold laser photocoagulation(532-SLP) treatment to the macular area of retinal thickening with a focal or grid pattern Receives: Device: 532-SLP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity(BCVA)
Best Corrected Visual Acuity will be measured by standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (3)
Change in 10°retinal sensitivity
Retinal sensitivity will be measured by microperimetry
Measured: 1 year
Change of fundus autofluorescence
Fundus autofluorescence will be evaluated for different patterns(normal, increased, and decreased)before and after treatment
Measured: 1 year
Change of Central Retinal Thickness(CRT)
Central Retinal Thickness will be performed by optical coherence tomography(OCT)
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2015
- Primary completionJul 2018
- Study completionJul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular EdemaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sun Yat-sen UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Jin Chen-jin, Sun Yat-sen University
- Investigators
- Chenjin Jin, Study director, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen UniversityLijun Zhou, Principal investigator, Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02406157
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ZOC-MPLD
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 11 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 15 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Lavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LA Jr, Dare A, Farah ME, Belfort R Jr. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 17;52(7):4314-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828.
PubMed 21345996
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Pure Yellow (577nm) Micropulse Laser Versus 532nm Subthreshold Laser Photocoagulation for Diabetic Macular Edema:A Prospective, Randomized, Paralleled Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02406157
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ZOC-MPLD
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema
- Keywords
- diabetic macular edema, micropulse, laser, subthreshold
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 124 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Sun Yat-sen UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2015
- Primary completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomized, parallel controlled, clinical-trial aims to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema compared with 532 subthreshold laser photocoagulation.
Detailed description
- To evaluate the efficacy of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation with grid/focal treatment for diabetic macular edema.
- To investigate influence of 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation on structure and function of macula compared with 532nm subthreshold laser photocoagulation.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 577-MPL | Experimental | Device: 577-MPL577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation(577MPL) treatment to the macular area of retinal thickening with a focal or grid pattern |
| 532-SLP | Active comparator | Device: 532-SLP532nm subthreshold laser photocoagulation(532-SLP) treatment to the macular area of retinal thickening with a focal or grid pattern |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Aged >18 years
- Patients with diabetes mellitus type 2
- Diagnosed as diabetic retinopathy with Clinical Significant Macular Edema
- Central retinal thickness(CRT) of more than 250μm as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)
- ETDRS visual acuity >19 letters (Snellen equivalent of 20/400 or better)
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Taking part in other clinical trial within 3 months
- Planning panretinal photocoagulation(PRP) within 3 months
- Performed cataract surgery in the last 3 months
- Accompanied with other retinal vascular disease that can lead to macular edema, for example branch retinal vein occlusion(BRVO),central retinal vein occlusion(CRVO)
- Accompanied with severe opacity of refractive media that maybe impact therapy and observation
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| 577-MPLAlso: 577nm micropulse laser photocoagulation treatmentDevice for 577nm micropulse treatment of the diabetic macular edema with the following parameters:100 microns spot size,5% duty cycle of 0.2 seconds,power is tested on micropulse mode and then reduce power to 50% of visible | Device | 577-MPL |
| 532-SLPAlso: 532nm subthreshold laser photocoagulation treatmentDevice for 532nm subthreshold treatment of the diabetic macular edema, by decomposing a subthreshold short pulse, with 10 milliseconds, 100 microns, and power(100-1000mW) adjusted according to patient's diopter transparency and pigmentation | Device | 532-SLP |
Primary outcome
Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity(BCVA)
Time frame: 1 year
Best Corrected Visual Acuity will be measured by standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) protocol
3 secondary outcomes
Change in 10°retinal sensitivity
Time frame: 1 year
Change of fundus autofluorescence
Time frame: 1 year
Change of Central Retinal Thickness(CRT)
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Aug 2018.
- Background: PubMed 21345996Lavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LA Jr, Dare A, Farah ME, Belfort R Jr. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 17;52(7):4314-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828.
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Real World Evidence in China: Faricimab Use in Diabetic Macular Edema, Retinal Vein Occlusion, and Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration (The Farseeing Study)
Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular Age-related Macular Degeneration
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 2
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
CAPRI: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Chenjin Jin study director
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
Lijun Zhou principal investigator
Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing 577-MPL and 532-SLP in people with Diabetic Macular Edema, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of Best Corrected Visual Acuity(BCVA) (time frame: 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02406157, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Aug 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.