Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)Phase 2NCT07917338
Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema
A Phase 2 study testing NAC in people with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), run by Khadija Ahmed Mhrose Glal at 1 site in Egypt.
Trial summary
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable visual impairment among working-age adults, with diabetic macular edema (DME) representing one of its most important vision-threatening complications. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 19 to 69 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
- What is being tested?
- NAC
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 50 participants
- Where
- 1 siteEgypt
- Study dates
- 28 Oct 2026to 1 Oct 2027
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 19 to 69 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Adults aged >18 and <70 years.
- Patients of either sex.
- Patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the study eye and who are considered eligible for observation without immediate anti-VEGF treatment according to predefined ophthalmological criteria.
- Clear ocular media allowing good quality OCT macula imaging.
Who cannot join
- Presence of ophthalmic diseases other than diabetic retinopathy that may affect macular thickness or visual function (Age-related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction, significant cataract affecting visual assessment, retinal vein occlusion, uveitis, glaucoma, etc.)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Current use of systemic antioxidant supplements or antioxidant therapy that could interfere with the study outcomes.
- History of ocular surgery or laser.
- Systemic diseases affecting retinal microvasculature other than diabetes (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, vasculitis).
- Poor image quality (media opacity, interferes with OCT imaging).
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
Egypt1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Al-Azhar Hospital, Damietta
Damietta
Esraa Farag, +201026156317, Esraa.AhmedF@pharm.psu.edu.eg
About this study
Official title: Effect of Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable visual impairment among working-age adults, with diabetic macular edema (DME) representing one of its most important vision-threatening complications. Diabetic macular edema develops when diabetes-associated retinal vascular dysfunction leads to disruption of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), allowing fluid and plasma components to accumulate within the retinal tissue and impair macular function. The development and persistence of DME involve a complex interplay between vascular, inflammatory, metabolic, and oxidative mechanisms.
Hyperglycemia is a central driver of the molecular abnormalities underlying diabetic retinal injury. Chronic exposure to elevated glucose activates several interrelated pathways, including the polyol, advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), protein kinase C (PKC), and hexosamine pathways. These metabolic disturbances promote the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammatory signaling, endothelial dysfunction, and progressive impairment of the retinal neurovascular unit. Together, these processes contribute to damage to endothelial cells, pericytes, Müller cells, and other retinal components, ultimately compromising the integrity of the BRB.
Read more
Oxidative stress is therefore considered an important component of the pathophysiology of DR and DME. Excessive ROS production can directly damage cellular structures and can also amplify inflammatory and angiogenic signaling. This may increase the expression of several mediators implicated in retinal vascular dysfunction. The resulting vascular instability and increased permeability facilitate fluid extravasation into the retinal layers and contribute to the development and progression of DME.
Malondialdehyde (MDA), a product of lipid peroxidation, is widely used as a marker of oxidative damage. Increased MDA concentrations have been reported in patients with diabetic retinopathy and have been associated with the presence or severity of retinal disease, supporting the involvement of oxidative stress in diabetic retinal injury. Assessment of MDA may therefore provide a useful systemic indicator of the oxidative component of the disease process.
Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), an important regulator of vascular stability, has also been implicated in diabetic retinal vascular dysfunction. Increased Ang-2 can promote endothelial destabilization and enhance vascular permeability, particularly in the presence of inflammatory and VEGF-related signaling. Thus, oxidative stress and angiogenic dysregulation may represent interconnected components of the vascular injury that ultimately leads to BRB disruption and retinal fluid accumulation.
Current management of DME relies predominantly on ophthalmic interventions, with corticosteroids and laser photocoagulation having roles in selected clinical settings. Although these approaches have substantially improved visual and anatomical outcomes, persistent or recurrent edema occurs in a proportion of patients, reflecting the multifactorial nature of DME and the involvement of various pathways.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a thiol-containing compound and a precursor of L-cysteine and reduced glutathione. In addition to its established mucolytic properties, NAC has antioxidant activity through direct scavenging of reactive oxygen species and, importantly, through restoration of intracellular glutathione availability. Its ability to modulate oxidative stress has led to extensive investigation of NAC in a variety of clinical conditions characterized by oxidative and inflammatory injury.
Experimental evidence suggests that attenuation of oxidative stress with NAC may reduce diabetes-related retinal injury and suppress the expression of vascular and inflammatory mediators, including VEGF and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). However, the potential clinical relevance of oral NAC in patients with diabetic retinal disease remains insufficiently characterized.
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
- Being tested
- NAC
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NACDrug
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) at a total daily dose of 1200 mg, administered as 600 mg twice daily
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| NAC group | Active comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: NAC |
| Control | No intervention | Not described |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)
Central subfield thickness (CST), defined as the retinal thickness within the central 1-mm subfield centered on the fovea, will be measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT; DRI OCT Triton, Topcon, Japan). The change in CST from baseline to the end of the 3-month intervention period will be evaluated.
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (7)
Change from Baseline in Serum Malondialdehyde (MDA) Concentration
Serum malondialdehyde (MDA), a biomarker of oxidative stress, will be measured at baseline and at the end of the 3-month intervention period. The change in serum MDA concentration from baseline to 3 months will be assessed.
Measured: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Serum Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) Concentration
Serum angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), a biomarker of vascular destabilization and angiogenic signaling, will be measured at baseline and at the end of the 3-month intervention period. The change in serum Ang-2 concentration from baseline to 3 months will be assessed.
Measured: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured Using a Standardized Tumbling E Chart
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) will be assessed using a standardized Tumbling E chart at a distance of 6 meters with appropriate refractive correction. Visual acuity will be recorded according to the predefined chart scoring system and converted to logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for statistical analysis. The change in BCVA from baseline to 3 months will be evaluated.
Measured: 3 months
Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema During the Study Period
The number of participants requiring rescue ophthalmological treatment due to clinically significant visual deterioration or worsening of diabetic macular edema during the 3-month follow-up period will be recorded. Rescue treatments may include anti-VEGF therapy, intravitreal corticosteroids, or laser treatment, according to the treating ophthalmologist's clinical judgment and predefined study criteria.
Measured: 3 months
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event
The number of participants experiencing at least one adverse event during the intervention period will be recorded. Adverse events will be monitored through weekly telephone follow-up and mont
Measured: 3 months
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Serious Adverse Event
The number of participants experiencing at least one serious adverse event during the intervention period will be recorded and documented, with appropriate clinical management and assessment of the possible relationship to the study medication.
Measured: 3 months
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Medication Due to Adverse Events or Intolerance
The number of participants who discontinue the study medication because of adverse events, intolerance, or safety concerns during the intervention period will be recorded.
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Nov 2026
- Study start28 Oct 2026
- Primary completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Khadija Ahmed Mhrose Glal
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Khadija Ahmed Mhrose Glal, Tanta University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07917338
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NAC&DME
- Status last verified
- Nov 2026
- First submitted
- 28 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 4 Nov 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 4 Nov 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effect of Oral N-Acetylcysteine on Diabetic Macular Edema in Type 2 Diabetic Patients With Diabetic Retinopathy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07917338
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NAC&DME
- Conditions
- Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Recruiting
- Enrolment
- 50 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Khadija Ahmed Mhrose GlalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 28 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- 1 Oct 2027 (estimated)
- First posted
- 4 Nov 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is one of the leading causes of preventable visual impairment among working-age adults, with diabetic macular edema (DME) representing one of its most important vision-threatening complications. Diabetic macular edema develops when diabetes-associated retinal vascular dysfunction leads to disruption of the blood-retinal barrier (BRB), allowing fluid and plasma components to accumulate within the retinal tissue and impair macular function. The development and persistence of DME involve a complex interplay between vascular, inflammatory, metabolic, and oxidative mechanisms.
Hyperglycemia is a central driver of the molecular abnormalities underlying diabetic retinal injury. Chronic exposure to elevated glucose activates several interrelated pathways, including the polyol, advanced glycation end-products (AGEs), protein kinase C (PKC), and hexosamine pathways. These metabolic disturbances promote the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammatory signaling, endothelial dysfunction, and progressive impairment of the retinal neurovascular unit. Together, these processes contribute to damage to endothelial cells, pericytes, Müller cells, and other retinal components, ultimately compromising the integrity of the BRB.
Oxidative stress is therefore considered an important component of the pathophysiology of DR and DME. Excessive ROS production can directly damage cellular structures and can also amplify inflammatory and angiogenic signaling. This may increase the expression of several mediators implicated in retinal vascular dysfunction. The resulting vascular instability and increased permeability facilitate fluid extravasation into the retinal layers and contribute to the development and progression of DME.
Malondialdehyde (MDA), a product of lipid peroxidation, is widely used as a marker of oxidative damage. Increased MDA concentrations have been reported in patients with diabetic retinopathy and have been associated with the presence or severity of retinal disease, supporting the involvement of oxidative stress in diabetic retinal injury. Assessment of MDA may therefore provide a useful systemic indicator of the oxidative component of the disease process.
Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2), an important regulator of vascular stability, has also been implicated in diabetic retinal vascular dysfunction. Increased Ang-2 can promote endothelial destabilization and enhance vascular permeability, particularly in the presence of inflammatory and VEGF-related signaling. Thus, oxidative stress and angiogenic dysregulation may represent interconnected components of the vascular injury that ultimately leads to BRB disruption and retinal fluid accumulation.
Current management of DME relies predominantly on ophthalmic interventions, with corticosteroids and laser photocoagulation having roles in selected clinical settings. Although these approaches have substantially improved visual and anatomical outcomes, persistent or recurrent edema occurs in a proportion of patients, reflecting the multifactorial nature of DME and the involvement of various pathways.
N-acetylcysteine (NAC) is a thiol-containing compound and a precursor of L-cysteine and reduced glutathione. In addition to its established mucolytic properties, NAC has antioxidant activity through direct scavenging of reactive oxygen species and, importantly, through restoration of intracellular glutathione availability. Its ability to modulate oxidative stress has led to extensive investigation of NAC in a variety of clinical conditions characterized by oxidative and inflammatory injury.
Experimental evidence suggests that attenuation of oxidative stress with NAC may reduce diabetes-related retinal injury and suppress the expression of vascular and inflammatory mediators, including VEGF and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1). However, the potential clinical relevance of oral NAC in patients with diabetic retinal disease remains insufficiently characterized.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| NAC group | Active comparator | Drug: NAC |
| Control | No intervention | – |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 19 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus
- Adults aged >18 and <70 years.
- Patients of either sex.
- Patients with center-involving diabetic macular edema (CI-DME) with best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in the study eye and who are considered eligible for observation without immediate anti-VEGF treatment according to predefined ophthalmological criteria.
- Clear ocular media allowing good quality OCT macula imaging.
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Presence of ophthalmic diseases other than diabetic retinopathy that may affect macular thickness or visual function (Age-related macular degeneration, epiretinal membrane, vitreomacular traction, significant cataract affecting visual assessment, retinal vein occlusion, uveitis, glaucoma, etc.)
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
- Current use of systemic antioxidant supplements or antioxidant therapy that could interfere with the study outcomes.
- History of ocular surgery or laser.
- Systemic diseases affecting retinal microvasculature other than diabetes (e.g., uncontrolled hypertension, vasculitis).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NACN-acetylcysteine (NAC) at a total daily dose of 1200 mg, administered as 600 mg twice daily | Drug | NAC group |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT)
Time frame: 3 months
Central subfield thickness (CST), defined as the retinal thickness within the central 1-mm subfield centered on the fovea, will be measured using spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT; DRI OCT Triton, Topcon, Japan). The change in CST from baseline to the end of the 3-month intervention period will be evaluated.
7 secondary outcomes
Change from Baseline in Serum Malondialdehyde (MDA) Concentration
Time frame: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Serum Angiopoietin-2 (Ang-2) Concentration
Time frame: 3 months
Change from Baseline in Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) Measured Using a Standardized Tumbling E Chart
Time frame: 3 months
Number of Participants Requiring Rescue Therapy for Diabetic Macular Edema During the Study Period
Time frame: 3 months
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Adverse Event
Time frame: 3 months
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Serious Adverse Event
Time frame: 3 months
Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Medication Due to Adverse Events or Intolerance
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 4 Nov 2026.
Related trials for Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
RecruitingPhase 3
A Phase 3 Trial for Intravitreal Injection of 4D-150 in Adults With Diabetic Macular Edema (DME).
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
COMO: A Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Masked Study Comparing the Efficacy of EYP-1901 Against Aflibercept in DME
Diabetic Macular Edema, DME
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of MK-8748 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (MK-8748-005)
Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of MK-8748 Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With Diabetic Macular Edema (MK-8748-004)
Diabetic Retinopathy, Macular Edema
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Tabirafusp Tedromer Compared to Aflibercept in Participants With DME - ALTO
Diabetic Macular Edema (DME)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing NAC in people with Diabetic Macular Edema (DME), run by Khadija Ahmed Mhrose Glal at 1 site in Egypt.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Esraa Farag (+201026156317, Esraa.AhmedF@pharm.psu.edu.eg), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline in Central Subfield Thickness (CST) Measured by Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography (SD-OCT) (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2026.