AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Idiopathic ConstipationPhase 4NCT02361749

Botulinum Toxin Injection Versus Anal Myectomy in Management of Idiopathic Constipation

A Phase 4 study testing Botulinum Toxin and Anal Myectomy in people with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation and Functional Constipation, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Chronic idiopathic constipation is most common cause of Constipation in childhood with numerous cases in Egypt. Numerous conservative measures were tried but many fail. Surgical options include Longitudinal Myectomy of the muscle or injection of Botulinum toxin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 2 to 12 years
What is being tested?
Botulinum Toxin and Anal Myectomy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Sep 2014to Dec 2018
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 2 to 12 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Children with Idiopathic constipation

Who cannot join

  • Hirschsprung's disease or Anorectal malformations

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Cairo University Pediatric Hospital

    Cairo, 11432

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Comparative Study Between Botulinum Toxin Injection and Myectomy in Treatment of Idiopathic Constipation in Children

Chronic idiopathic constipation is most common cause of Constipation in childhood with numerous cases in Egypt. Numerous conservative measures were tried but many fail. Surgical options include Longitudinal Myectomy of the muscle or injection of Botulinum toxin. Objectives: Comparative study between Botulinum toxin injection and Myectomy in treatment of Idiopathic Constipation

Read the detailed description

Functional constipation (chronic idiopathic constipation) is most common cause of constipation in pediatric age group. Many cases try conservative treatment but fail to respond. These cases are treated by surgical longitudinal myectomy of the anal sphincter. Now, there have been many trials of trying injection of botulinum toxin to relax the sphincter as a treatment of functional/idiopathic constipation.

In this study, the investigators will compare the results of botulinum toxin injection versus surgical myectomy to treat functional/idiopathic constipation in children.

Being tested
Botulinum Toxin, Anal Myectomy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Botulinum ToxinDrug

    Also called Botox

    Injection of Botulinum toxin under general anesthesia. Four injections will be given into the anal sphincter into the four quadrants in one session.

  • Anal MyectomyProcedure or surgery

    Longitudinal anal myectomy will be performed under general anesthesia as a day case.

Study groups in NCT02361749
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Myectomy groupActive comparatorSubjects will undergo anal myectomy for their anal sphincter.
Receives: Procedure: Anal Myectomy
Botox GroupActive comparatorSubjects will undergo Botulinum toxin injection into their anal sphincter.
Receives: Drug: Botulinum Toxin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Absence of insufficient Rome III Diagnostic criteria (0-1 criterion)

    Rome III Diagnostic criteria for chronic idiopathic constipation include two or more of the following in a child with a developmental age of at least 4 years:

    1. Two or fewer defecations in the toilet per week
    2. At least one episode of fecal incontinence per week
    3. History of retentive posturing or excessive volitional stool retention
    4. History of painful or hard bowel movements
    5. Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum
    6. History of large diameter stools which may obstruct the toilet

    Outcome measure for Curing Chronic idiopathic constipation is denoted by absence of insufficient criteria (0-1 criterion) to diagnose Chronic idiopathic constipation after receiving corresponding arm of the study.

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Decrease in Rome III Diagnostic criteria score

    Rome III Diagnostic criteria for chronic idiopathic constipation include two or more of the following in a child with a developmental age of at least 4 years:

    1. Two or fewer defecations in the toilet per week
    2. At least one episode of fecal incontinence per week
    3. History of retentive posturing or excessive volitional stool retention
    4. History of painful or hard bowel movements
    5. Presence of a large fecal mass in the rectum
    6. History of large diameter stools which may obstruct the toilet

    Outcome measure for improving Chronic idiopathic constipation is denoted by giving each case a 6-point score system based on Chronic idiopathic constipation diagnostic criteria. Improvement is denoted by decrease in diagnostic criteria score after receiving corresponding arm of the study. The decrease is assessed, analyzed and compared between the two groups.

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted12 Feb 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2014
  3. Primary completionAug 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2018 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02361749
Sponsor's protocol ID
CAIUNIPEDSURG-CR2
Other IDs
PACTR201408000857349
Status last verified
Jan 2018
First submitted
9 Jan 2015
Last updated
30 Jan 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: WOFAPS 2016

Publications

  • Keshtgar AS, Ward HC, Sanei A, Clayden GS. Botulinum toxin, a new treatment modality for chronic idiopathic constipation in children: long-term follow-up of a double-blind randomized trial. J Pediatr Surg. 2007 Apr;42(4):672-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2006.12.045.

    PubMed 17448764
  • Irani K, Rodriguez L, Doody DP, Goldstein AM. Botulinum toxin for the treatment of chronic constipation in children with internal anal sphincter dysfunction. Pediatr Surg Int. 2008 Jul;24(7):779-83. doi: 10.1007/s00383-008-2171-3. Epub 2008 Apr 29.

    PubMed 18443801
  • Hata Y, Sasaki F, Uchino J. Sphincteromyectomy and sphincteroplasty in chronic constipation with megarectum. J Pediatr Surg. 1988 Feb;23(2):141-2. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3468(88)80143-x.

    PubMed 3343649
  • Drossman DA. The functional gastrointestinal disorders and the Rome III process. Gastroenterology. 2006 Apr;130(5):1377-90. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2006.03.008. No abstract available.

    PubMed 16678553

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Botulinum Toxin and Anal Myectomy in people with Chronic Idiopathic Constipation and Functional Constipation, run by Cairo University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jan 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Absence of insufficient Rome III Diagnostic criteria (0-1 criterion) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02361749, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jan 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in