Major Abdominal SurgeryPhase 4NCT02361060
Effects of Neuromuscular Block Reversal With Sugammadex vs Neostigmine on Postoperative Respiratory Outcomes After Major Abdominal Surgery
A Phase 4 study testing Neostigmine, Sugammadex and Atropine in people with Major Abdominal Surgery, run by Enrique Alday Muñoz at 2 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
Pulmonary complications are relatively frequent after surgery, and can be associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. Although there are several causative mechanisms that can lead to postoperative pulmonary complications, alterations in the shape and motion of the chest wall are of primary importance. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Major Abdominal Surgery
- What is being tested?
- Neostigmine, Sugammadex and Atropine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 130 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Feb 2015to 4 Jul 2016
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Every patient scheduled for major abdominal surgery (liver resection, pancreatectomy, gastrectomy or any type of colectomy) will be nominated to participate in the study.
- Informed consent will be asked for after their admission to the hospital the day before the surgery.
- Patients with postoperative epidural analgesia.
Who cannot join
- Refusal to participate.
- Entry to postoperative recovery unit under mechanical ventilation.
- Hypersensitivity reactions to any of the drugs.
- Severe asthma and mild asthma under treatment.
- Myocardial infarction or coronary occlusion three months prior to surgery.
- Myasthenia gravis.
- Emergency surgery.
- Pulmonary fibrosis or very severe chronic obstructive lung disease (GOLD IV)
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
Spain2 sites
Anesthesiology Service. Hospital Universitario La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
Madrid, Madrid, 28006
About this study
Official title: Effects of Neuromuscular Block Reversal With Sugammadex vs Neostigmine on Postoperative Respiratory Outcomes After Major Abdominal Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial
Pulmonary complications are relatively frequent after surgery, and can be associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. Although there are several causative mechanisms that can lead to postoperative pulmonary complications, alterations in the shape and motion of the chest wall are of primary importance.
In the investigator´s institution the incidence of postoperatory hypoxemia defined as pO2/FiO2 <300 is over 20% for patients after major abdominal surgery.
Read more
Observational and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that incomplete neuromuscular recovery during the early postoperative period may result in acute respiratory events (hypoxemia and airway obstruction) and an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.
A recent study in laparoscopic bariatric surgery showed that patients in which neuromuscular block reversal was done with sugammadex had less chest X-ray pathological changes than those from an historical cohort reversed with neostigmine.
The hypothesis is that differences in pulmonary complications, as atelectasis and hypoxemia, between patients reverted with sugammadex or neostigmine may be more apparent with more sensitive techniques like spirometry or lung ultrasound when they exist.
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 98%, to detect alveolar consolidation in critical ill patients while chest radiography data are known to be imprecise.The investigator would like to explore the utility of LUS in postsurgical patients and the relationship between degree of hypoxemia and consolidation area.
Objectives:
- Primary: Forced vital capacity decreases after surgery. This reduction may be relieved in the absence of residual neuromuscular block. Objective is to assess differences after reversal with neostigmine versus sugammadex in:
- Forced vital capacity (FVC)
- Secondary objectives: To assess differences after reversal with neostigmine versus sugammadex in:
- Atelectasis size determined by lung ultrasound (Plannimetry)
- pO2/FiO2 <300 1 hour after surgery
- Explore the accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) to diagnosis postoperative atelectasis and its correlation with chest Xray, FVC and pO2/FiO2.
Hypotheses:
- Sugammadex NMB reversal results in a lower reduction of forced vital capacity (FVC) as compared to NMB reversal with neostigmine.
- Atelectasis is common after major surgery. Size of atelectasis determined by lung ultrasound planimetry is lower one hour after sugammadex reversal as compared to the neostigmine group.
- The incidence of post-surgical hypoxemia is lower in the sugammadex group as compared to the neostigmine group (Hypoxemia defined as pO2/FiO2 less than 300 is expected in 20% of patients after major abdominal surgery).
- Lung ultrasound has a better capacity to detect alveolar consolidation than Chest Xray after major surgery.
- Atelectasis size determine by planimetry has a good correlation with pO2/FiO2 and decrease of FVC after surgery
- Conditions
- Major Abdominal Surgery
- Being tested
- Neostigmine, Sugammadex, Atropine
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NeostigmineDrug
40mcg/kg
SugammadexDrug
4mg/kg
AtropineDrug
10 mcg/kg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Sugammadex | Experimental | sugammadex 4 mg/kg Receives: Drug: Sugammadex |
| Neostigmine + Atropine | Active comparator | Neostigmine 40µg/kg in combination with atropine 10µg/kg. Receives: Drug: Neostigmine; Drug: Atropine |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in FVC at 1h after surgery
Measured: Basal and one hour after surgery
Secondary outcomes (7)
Atelectasis size determined by lung ultrasound (Plannimetry)
Measured: One hour after surgery
Atelectasis size determined by lung ultrasound (Plannimetry)
Measured: 24 hours after surgery
pO2/FiO2 <300
Measured: 1 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and FVC
Atelectasis size (sqr cm) will me measured by planimetry
Measured: 1 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and FVC
Atelectasis size (sqr cm) will me measured by planimetry
Measured: 24 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and pO2/FiO2
Atelectasis size (sqr cm) will me measured by planimetry
Measured: 1 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and pO2/FiO2
Atelectasis size (sqr cm) will me measured by planimetry
Measured: 24 hour after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2015
- Primary completion4 Jul 2016
- Study completion4 Jul 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Major Abdominal SurgeryStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Enrique Alday Muñoz
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Enrique Alday Muñoz, Fundación de Investigación Biomédica - Hospital Universitario de La Princesa
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02361060
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- PRIN-SUGAR-2014
- Status last verified
- Feb 2017
- First submitted
- 23 Dec 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
PubMed 18385265Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee.
PubMed 18946293Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH, Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
PubMed 19387176Staals LM, Snoeck MM, Driessen JJ, Flockton EA, Heeringa M, Hunter JM. Multicentre, parallel-group, comparative trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in patients with end-stage renal failure or normal renal function. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):492-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen216. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
PubMed 18653492Dahl V, Pendeville PE, Hollmann MW, Heier T, Abels EA, Blobner M. Safety and efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;26(10):874-84. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832c605b.
PubMed 19455040Yang LP, Keam SJ. Sugammadex: a review of its use in anaesthetic practice. Drugs. 2009;69(7):919-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969070-00008.
PubMed 19441874Abrishami A, Ho J, Wong J, Yin L, Chung F. Sugammadex, a selective reversal medication for preventing postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD007362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007362.pub2.
PubMed 19821409Ferreyra G, Long Y, Ranieri VM. Respiratory complications after major surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Aug;15(4):342-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832e0669.
PubMed 19542885Squadrone V, Coha M, Cerutti E, Schellino MM, Biolino P, Occella P, Belloni G, Vilianis G, Fiore G, Cavallo F, Ranieri VM; Piedmont Intensive Care Units Network (PICUN). Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):589-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.589.
PubMed 15687314Yu CJ, Yang PC, Wu HD, Chang DB, Kuo SH, Luh KT. Ultrasound study in unilateral hemithorax opacification. Image comparison with computed tomography. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Feb;147(2):430-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.2.430.
PubMed 8430970Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
PubMed 20442260Tusman G, Bohm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J. Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;25(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834dd1eb.
PubMed 22113182
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Neuromuscular Block Reversal With Sugammadex vs Neostigmine on Postoperative Respiratory Outcomes After Major Abdominal Surgery - A Randomized Controlled Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02361060
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- PRIN-SUGAR-2014
- Conditions
- Major Abdominal Surgery
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 130 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Enrique Alday MuñozUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2015
- Primary completion
- 4 Jul 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 4 Jul 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Feb 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Pulmonary complications are relatively frequent after surgery, and can be associated with an increase in morbidity and mortality. Although there are several causative mechanisms that can lead to postoperative pulmonary complications, alterations in the shape and motion of the chest wall are of primary importance.
In the investigator´s institution the incidence of postoperatory hypoxemia defined as pO2/FiO2 <300 is over 20% for patients after major abdominal surgery.
Observational and randomized clinical trials have demonstrated that incomplete neuromuscular recovery during the early postoperative period may result in acute respiratory events (hypoxemia and airway obstruction) and an increased risk of postoperative pulmonary complications.
A recent study in laparoscopic bariatric surgery showed that patients in which neuromuscular block reversal was done with sugammadex had less chest X-ray pathological changes than those from an historical cohort reversed with neostigmine.
The hypothesis is that differences in pulmonary complications, as atelectasis and hypoxemia, between patients reverted with sugammadex or neostigmine may be more apparent with more sensitive techniques like spirometry or lung ultrasound when they exist.
Lung ultrasound (LUS) has demonstrated a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 98%, to detect alveolar consolidation in critical ill patients while chest radiography data are known to be imprecise.The investigator would like to explore the utility of LUS in postsurgical patients and the relationship between degree of hypoxemia and consolidation area.
Objectives:
- Primary: Forced vital capacity decreases after surgery. This reduction may be relieved in the absence of residual neuromuscular block. Objective is to assess differences after reversal with neostigmine versus sugammadex in:
- Forced vital capacity (FVC)
- Secondary objectives: To assess differences after reversal with neostigmine versus sugammadex in:
- Atelectasis size determined by lung ultrasound (Plannimetry)
- pO2/FiO2 <300 1 hour after surgery
- Explore the accuracy of lung ultrasound (LUS) to diagnosis postoperative atelectasis and its correlation with chest Xray, FVC and pO2/FiO2.
Hypotheses:
- Sugammadex NMB reversal results in a lower reduction of forced vital capacity (FVC) as compared to NMB reversal with neostigmine.
- Atelectasis is common after major surgery. Size of atelectasis determined by lung ultrasound planimetry is lower one hour after sugammadex reversal as compared to the neostigmine group.
- The incidence of post-surgical hypoxemia is lower in the sugammadex group as compared to the neostigmine group (Hypoxemia defined as pO2/FiO2 less than 300 is expected in 20% of patients after major abdominal surgery).
- Lung ultrasound has a better capacity to detect alveolar consolidation than Chest Xray after major surgery.
- Atelectasis size determine by planimetry has a good correlation with pO2/FiO2 and decrease of FVC after surgery
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Sugammadex | Experimental | Drug: Sugammadexsugammadex 4 mg/kg |
| Neostigmine + Atropine | Active comparator | Drug: Neostigmine, Drug: AtropineNeostigmine 40µg/kg in combination with atropine 10µg/kg. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Every patient scheduled for major abdominal surgery (liver resection, pancreatectomy, gastrectomy or any type of colectomy) will be nominated to participate in the study.
- Informed consent will be asked for after their admission to the hospital the day before the surgery.
- Patients with postoperative epidural analgesia.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Refusal to participate.
- Entry to postoperative recovery unit under mechanical ventilation.
- Hypersensitivity reactions to any of the drugs.
- Severe asthma and mild asthma under treatment.
- Myocardial infarction or coronary occlusion three months prior to surgery.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Neostigmine40mcg/kg | Drug | Neostigmine + Atropine |
| Sugammadex4mg/kg | Drug | Sugammadex |
| Atropine10 mcg/kg | Drug | Neostigmine + Atropine |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in FVC at 1h after surgery
Time frame: Basal and one hour after surgery
7 secondary outcomes
Atelectasis size determined by lung ultrasound (Plannimetry)
Time frame: One hour after surgery
Atelectasis size determined by lung ultrasound (Plannimetry)
Time frame: 24 hours after surgery
pO2/FiO2 <300
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and FVC
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and FVC
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and pO2/FiO2
Time frame: 1 hour after surgery
Asociation between atelectasis size and pO2/FiO2
Time frame: 24 hour after surgery
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Feb 2017.
- Background: PubMed 18385265Flockton EA, Mastronardi P, Hunter JM, Gomar C, Mirakhur RK, Aguilera L, Giunta FG, Meistelman C, Prins ME. Reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular block with sugammadex is faster than reversal of cisatracurium-induced block with neostigmine. Br J Anaesth. 2008 May;100(5):622-30. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen037. Epub 2008 Apr 2.
- Background: PubMed 18946293Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee.
- Background: PubMed 19387176Lee C, Jahr JS, Candiotti KA, Warriner B, Zornow MH, Naguib M. Reversal of profound neuromuscular block by sugammadex administered three minutes after rocuronium: a comparison with spontaneous recovery from succinylcholine. Anesthesiology. 2009 May;110(5):1020-5. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31819dabb0.
- Background: PubMed 18653492Staals LM, Snoeck MM, Driessen JJ, Flockton EA, Heeringa M, Hunter JM. Multicentre, parallel-group, comparative trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of sugammadex in patients with end-stage renal failure or normal renal function. Br J Anaesth. 2008 Oct;101(4):492-7. doi: 10.1093/bja/aen216. Epub 2008 Jul 23.
- Background: PubMed 19455040Dahl V, Pendeville PE, Hollmann MW, Heier T, Abels EA, Blobner M. Safety and efficacy of sugammadex for the reversal of rocuronium-induced neuromuscular blockade in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Oct;26(10):874-84. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32832c605b.
- Background: PubMed 19441874Yang LP, Keam SJ. Sugammadex: a review of its use in anaesthetic practice. Drugs. 2009;69(7):919-42. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200969070-00008.
- Background: PubMed 19821409Abrishami A, Ho J, Wong J, Yin L, Chung F. Sugammadex, a selective reversal medication for preventing postoperative residual neuromuscular blockade. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Oct 7;(4):CD007362. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007362.pub2.
- Background: PubMed 19542885Ferreyra G, Long Y, Ranieri VM. Respiratory complications after major surgery. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2009 Aug;15(4):342-8. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e32832e0669.
- Background: PubMed 15687314Squadrone V, Coha M, Cerutti E, Schellino MM, Biolino P, Occella P, Belloni G, Vilianis G, Fiore G, Cavallo F, Ranieri VM; Piedmont Intensive Care Units Network (PICUN). Continuous positive airway pressure for treatment of postoperative hypoxemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2005 Feb 2;293(5):589-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.5.589.
- Background: PubMed 8430970Yu CJ, Yang PC, Wu HD, Chang DB, Kuo SH, Luh KT. Ultrasound study in unilateral hemithorax opacification. Image comparison with computed tomography. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993 Feb;147(2):430-4. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm/147.2.430.
- Background: PubMed 20442260Murphy GS, Brull SJ. Residual neuromuscular block: lessons unlearned. Part I: definitions, incidence, and adverse physiologic effects of residual neuromuscular block. Anesth Analg. 2010 Jul;111(1):120-8. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181da832d. Epub 2010 May 4.
- Background: PubMed 22113182Tusman G, Bohm SH, Warner DO, Sprung J. Atelectasis and perioperative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2012 Feb;25(1):1-10. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0b013e32834dd1eb.
- Sugammadex and anaphylaxis in the operating theater.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Postoperative respiratory outcomes in laparoscopic bariatric surgery: Comparison of a prospective group of patients whose neuromuscular blockade was reverted with sugammadex and a his-torical one reverted with neostigmineLink provided by the sponsor.
- labbel information Bridion®. European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products (EMEA). Acceso: octubre 2009.Link provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Major Abdominal Surgery
Not yet recruiting
Nurse-Led Prehabilitation Before Major Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Colorectal Cancer
Recruiting
Implementation of a Pain Management Plan in Major Open Abdominal Surgeries.
Abdomen Cancer, Pancreas Adenocarcinoma (MSI-H)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Arterial Stiffness During Negative Pressure Wound Therapy for Abdominal Wall Wounds
Postoperative Abdominal Wall Wound Complications, Surgical Wound Infection
Recruiting
Processed Electroencephalography-guided General Anesthesia and Outcomes in Major Abdominal Surgery
Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Early vs Postponed Parenteral Nutrition After Emergency Abdominal Surgery
Laparotomy, Bowel Obstruction
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Neostigmine, Sugammadex and Atropine in people with Major Abdominal Surgery, run by Enrique Alday Muñoz at 2 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in FVC at 1h after surgery (time frame: Basal and one hour after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02361060, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Feb 2017.