AzTrials
AzTrials

PICCNSPVCNCT02314520

Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC

A study testing peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter in people with PICC and Central Venous Catheter, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
PICC, Central Venous Catheter, Central Line
What is being tested?
peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
152 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
13 Jul 2015to 7 Dec 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adult patients admitted to the NSICU, who require central access for the treatment of their illness.

Who cannot join

  • Current or recent (within 1 month) diagnosis of bacteremia
  • Current or recent (within 1 year with confirmed resolution by imaging) deep venous thrombosis
  • Existing central access
  • Non-English speaking
  • Requirement for emergent central access and unable to obtain consent in an emergency setting

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Penn State Hershey Medical Center

    Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. After admission to the Neuroscience ICU and if they require central access, patients will be randomized to receive a PICC or CVC and complications (such as pneumothorax, deep venous thrombosis, infection, etc.) will be tracked and compared between the two interventions.

Being tested
peripherally inserted central catheter, centrally inserted central catheter

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • peripherally inserted central catheterDevice

    Any complication associated with central access

  • centrally inserted central catheterDevice

    Central access not associated with any complication

Study groups in NCT02314520
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PICCActive comparatorPatients randomly assigned to receive a peripherally inserted central catheter and they will be monitored for either having a complication or no complication.
Receives: Device: peripherally inserted central catheter
CVCActive comparatorPatients randomly assigned to receive a centrally inserted central catheter and they will be monitored for either having a complication or no complication.
Receives: Device: centrally inserted central catheter

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion

    Aggregation of all complications associated with central access including insertion

    Measured: up to 10 weeks

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of Participants With Deep Venous Thrombosis

    Measured: up to 10 weeks

  2. Number of Patients With Complications Related to Insertion

    Any complication of insertion including technical failure

    Measured: From the time of insertion until first confirmatory chest X-ray

  3. Number of Participants With a Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection

    A Central access associated infection (CLABSI)

    Measured: up to 10 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Dec 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start13 Jul 2015
  3. Primary completion7 Dec 2016
  4. Study completion7 Dec 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
152 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02314520
Sponsor's protocol ID
STUDY00000582
Acronym
NSPVC
Status last verified
Jun 2017
First submitted
26 Nov 2014
Last updated
19 Jul 2017
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
Individual data sharing
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter in people with PICC and Central Venous Catheter, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion (time frame: up to 10 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in