PICCNSPVCNCT02314520
Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC
A study testing peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter in people with PICC and Central Venous Catheter, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- PICC, Central Venous Catheter, Central Line
- What is being tested?
- peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 152 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- 13 Jul 2015to 7 Dec 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Adult patients admitted to the NSICU, who require central access for the treatment of their illness.
Who cannot join
- Current or recent (within 1 month) diagnosis of bacteremia
- Current or recent (within 1 year with confirmed resolution by imaging) deep venous thrombosis
- Existing central access
- Non-English speaking
- Requirement for emergent central access and unable to obtain consent in an emergency setting
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
About this study
The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. After admission to the Neuroscience ICU and if they require central access, patients will be randomized to receive a PICC or CVC and complications (such as pneumothorax, deep venous thrombosis, infection, etc.) will be tracked and compared between the two interventions.
- Conditions
- PICC, Central Venous Catheter, Central Line, Neuro ICU, Neuroscience ICU, CVC
- Being tested
- peripherally inserted central catheter, centrally inserted central catheter
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
peripherally inserted central catheterDevice
Any complication associated with central access
centrally inserted central catheterDevice
Central access not associated with any complication
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| PICC | Active comparator | Patients randomly assigned to receive a peripherally inserted central catheter and they will be monitored for either having a complication or no complication. Receives: Device: peripherally inserted central catheter |
| CVC | Active comparator | Patients randomly assigned to receive a centrally inserted central catheter and they will be monitored for either having a complication or no complication. Receives: Device: centrally inserted central catheter |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion
Aggregation of all complications associated with central access including insertion
Measured: up to 10 weeks
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Deep Venous Thrombosis
Measured: up to 10 weeks
Number of Patients With Complications Related to Insertion
Any complication of insertion including technical failure
Measured: From the time of insertion until first confirmatory chest X-ray
Number of Participants With a Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection
A Central access associated infection (CLABSI)
Measured: up to 10 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Study start13 Jul 2015
- Primary completion7 Dec 2016
- Study completion7 Dec 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for PICCStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Chris Zacko, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02314520
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- STUDY00000582
- Acronym
- NSPVC
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 26 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 19 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Complications Associated With Central Venous Access in the NSICU: PICC vs CVC
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02314520
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NSPVC / STUDY00000582
- Conditions
- PICC, Central Venous Catheter, Central Line, Neuro ICU, Neuroscience ICU, CVC
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 152 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 13 Jul 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 7 Dec 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Dec 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Dec 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 19 Jul 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The goal of this study is to determine whether Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter or Centrally Inserted Venous Catheters have lower complication rates in the Neuroscience Intensive Care Unit. After admission to the Neuroscience ICU and if they require central access, patients will be randomized to receive a PICC or CVC and complications (such as pneumothorax, deep venous thrombosis, infection, etc.) will be tracked and compared between the two interventions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| PICC | Active comparator | Device: peripherally inserted central catheterPatients randomly assigned to receive a peripherally inserted central catheter and they will be monitored for either having a complication or no complication. |
| CVC | Active comparator | Device: centrally inserted central catheterPatients randomly assigned to receive a centrally inserted central catheter and they will be monitored for either having a complication or no complication. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Adult patients admitted to the NSICU, who require central access for the treatment of their illness.
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Current or recent (within 1 month) diagnosis of bacteremia
- Current or recent (within 1 year with confirmed resolution by imaging) deep venous thrombosis
- Existing central access
- Non-English speaking
- Requirement for emergent central access and unable to obtain consent in an emergency setting
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| peripherally inserted central catheterAny complication associated with central access | Device | PICC |
| centrally inserted central catheterCentral access not associated with any complication | Device | CVC |
Primary outcome
Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion
Time frame: up to 10 weeks
Aggregation of all complications associated with central access including insertion
3 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Deep Venous Thrombosis
Time frame: up to 10 weeks
Number of Patients With Complications Related to Insertion
Time frame: From the time of insertion until first confirmatory chest X-ray
Number of Participants With a Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection
Time frame: up to 10 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 Jul 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for PICC
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Construction and Multicenter External Validation of an Early Warning Model for Asymptomatic PICC-related Upper Extremity Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients Based on LASSO-XGBoost
PICC-associated Thrombosis
Enrolling by invitation
Evaluating the Use of Grip Exercises to Decrease Deep Vein Thrombosis in Adult Patients With PICC Lines
Deep Vein Thrombosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) Prophylaxis With REGN7508 and REGN9933 in Adult and Adolescent Participants With a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC)
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Efficacy and Safety of Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters
Critical Illness, Catheter-Related Infections
Not yet recruiting
Reduction of Complications Associated With Extraluminal PICC Management.
Treatment (ProudMe), Vascular Access
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing peripherally inserted central catheter and centrally inserted central catheter in people with PICC and Central Venous Catheter, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Jul 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Participants With Complications With Central Access Including Insertion (time frame: up to 10 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Jul 2017.