Relapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisPhase 3CONNECTNCT02283853
Phase 3 Efficacy and Safety Study of BG00012 in Pediatric Participants With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (RRMS)
A Phase 3 study testing dimethyl fumarate and Interferon β-1a in people with Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, run by Biogen at 62 sites in 18 countries.
Trial summary
The main objectives of Part 1 are as follows: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of BG00012 in pediatric participants with RRMS, as compared with a disease-modifying treatment and to assess health outcomes and evolution of disability. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
- What is being tested?
- dimethyl fumarate and Interferon β-1a
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 156 participants
- Where
- 62 sitesin 18 countries
- Study dates
- 28 Aug 2014to 8 Jul 2025
- Phase
- Phase 3
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 10 to 17 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Males and females aged from 10 to less than 18 years old at the time of informed consent or assent.
- Must have a body weight of ≥30 kg.
- Must have a diagnosis of RRMS (consensus definition for pediatric RRMS [Krupp 2013]).
- Must be ambulatory with a baseline EDSS score between 0 and 5.5, inclusive.
- Must have experienced at least 1 of the following 3 conditions: a) at least 1 relapse within the last 12 months prior to Day 1 with a prior brain MRI demonstrating lesions consistent with MS; b) at least 2 relapses within the last 24 months prior to Day 1, with a prior brain MRI demonstrating lesions consistent with MS; c) evidence of Gd-enhancing lesions of the brain on an MRI performed within the 6 weeks prior to Day 1.
- Must be neurologically stable, with no evidence of relapse within 50 days prior to Day 1 and no evidence of corticosteroid treatment within 30 days prior to Day 1.
- Participants of childbearing potential who are sexually active must be willing to practice effective contraception during the study and be willing and able to continue contraception for at least 30 days after their final dose of study treatment.
Who cannot join
- Primary progressive, secondary progressive, or progressive relapsing MS (as defined by [Lublin and Reingold 1996]). These conditions require the presence of continuous clinical disease worsening over a period of at least 3 months. Participants with these conditions may also have superimposed relapses but are distinguished from relapsing-remitting participants by the lack of clinically stable periods or clinical improvement.
- Disorders mimicking MS, such as other demyelinating disorders (e.g., acute disseminated encephalomyelitis), systemic autoimmune disorders (e.g., Sjögren disease, lupus erythematosus), metabolic disorders (e.g., dystrophies), and infectious disorders.
- History of premalignant or malignant disease. Participants with basal cell carcinoma that has been completely excised prior to screening will remain eligible.
- History of severe allergic or anaphylactic reactions, or known drug hypersensitivity to DMF, fumaric acid esters, or interferon beta-1a (IFN Beta-1a).
- History of abnormal laboratory results indicative of any significant endocrinologic, hematologic, hepatic, immunologic, metabolic, urologic, renal, and/or any other major disease that would preclude participation in a clinical study.
- History of clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, GI, dermatologic, growth, developmental, psychiatric (including depression), neurologic (other than MS), and/or other major disease that would preclude participation in a clinical study.
Show all 10Show fewer
- History of human immunodeficiency virus.
- An MS relapse that has occurred within 50 days prior to Day 1 AND/OR the participant has not stabilized from a previous relapse prior to Day 1.
- Other unspecified reasons that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Biogen Idec, make the participant unsuitable for enrollment.
- NOTE: Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Trial locations and contacts
62 sites in 18 countries.
62 sites in 18 countries
France11 sites
CHU Amiens - Hopital Sud
Amiens, Somme, 80054
Hopital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer
Bron, Rhone, 69677
CHU Clermont Ferrand - Hôpital d'Estaing
Clermont-Ferrand, Puy De Dome, 63003
CHU Dijon -BOCAGE CENTRAL
Dijon, Côte-d'Or, 21079
Hôpital Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, Val De Marne, 94275
Hopital Roger Salengro - CHU Lille
Lille, Nord, 59037
Hôpital de la Timone
Marseille, Bouches-du-Rhône, 13385
Hopital Gui de Chauliac
Montpellier, Herault, 34295
CHU Rennes - Hopital Pontchaillou
Rennes, Ille Et Vilaine, 35033
CHU Strasbourg - Hôpital Hautepierre
Strasbourg, Bas Rhin, 67098
Hôpital de Brabois Enfants
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe Et Moselle, 54500
Italy9 sites
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Consorziale Policlinico di Bari
Bari, 70124
Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale della Valle Olona (presidio di Gallarate)
Gallarate, Varese, 21013
IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino
Genova, 16132
Ospedale San Raffaele
Milan, 20132
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria 'Federico II'
Naples, 80131
Azienda Ospedale-Università di Padova
Padova, 35128
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Policlinico Paolo Giaccone
Palermo, 90127
Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
Roma, 00165
Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea-Università di Roma La Sapienza
Roma, 00189
Poland5 sites
SPZOZ Uniwersytecki Dzieciecy Szpital Kliniczny im. L. Zamenhofa
Bialystok, 15-274
Uniwersyteckie Centrum Kliniczne
Gdansk, 80-211
Instytut Centrum Zdrowia Matki Polki
Lodz, 93-338
Szpital Kliniczny im.Heliodora Swiecickiego Uniwersytetu Medycznego im.K. Marcinkowskiego w Poznaniu
Poznan, 60-355
Instytut 'Pomnik - Centrum Zdrowia Dziecka'
Warsaw, 04-730
Czechia4 sites
Fakultni nemocnice u sv. Anny v Brne
Brno, 656 91
Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, 500 05
Nemocnice Jihlava p.o.
Jihlava, 58633
Fakultni nemocnice Ostrava
Ostrava, 708 52
Spain4 sites
Hospital Universitario Reina Sofia
Córdoba, Córdoba, 14011
Hospital Sant Joan de Deu
Esplugues de Llobregat, Barcelona, 8950
Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena
Seville, 41009
Hospital Universitario de Torrejon
Torrejón de Ardoz, Madrid, 28850
United Kingdom4 sites
Birmingham Children's Hospital
Birmingham, West Midlands, B4 6NH
Evelina London Children's Hospital
London, Greater London, SE1 7EH
The National Hospital for Neurology & Neurosurgery
London, Greater London, WC1N 3BG
Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children
London, Greater London, WC1N 3JH
Denmark3 sites
Århus Universitetshospital
Aarhus N, 8200
Rigshospitalet
Copenhagen, 2100
Odense Universitetshospital
Odense, 5000
Germany3 sites
Universitaetsklinikum Augsburg
Augsburg, Bavaria, 86156
Katholisches Klinikum Bochum gGmbH
Bochum, North Rhine-Westphalia, 44791
Klinikum der Universitaet Muenchen
Munich, Bavaria, 80337
Israel3 sites
Hadassah University Hospital - Ein Kerem
Jerusalem, 91120
Schneider Children's Medical Center
Petah Tikva, 4920235
Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Ramat Gan, 5265601
Serbia3 sites
Clinic of Neurology and Psychiatry for Children and Youth
Belgrade, 11000
Mother and Child Health Care Institute of Serbia ,,Dr Vukan Cupic''
Belgrade, 11000
University Clinical Center Kragujevac
Kragujevac, 34000
United States2 sites
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 2115
The Rector and Visitors of the University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903
Belgium2 sites
Universitair Kinderziekenhuis Koningin Fabiola
Brussels, 1020
Universitair Ziekenhuis Ghent
Ghent, 9000
Hungary2 sites
Semmelweis Egyetem
Budapest, 1083
Heim Pal Orszagos Gyermekgyogyaszati Intezet
Budapest, 1089
Sweden2 sites
Sahlgrenska Sjukhuset
Gothenburg, 41345
Karolinska
Stockholm, SE-113 61
Turkey (Türkiye)2 sites
Hacettepe University Medical Faculty
Ankara, 06100
Akdeniz University Faculty of Medicine
Antalya, 07070
Canada1 site
University of Calgary - Alberta Children's Hospital
Calgary, Alberta, T3B 6A8
About this study
Official title: Open-Label, Randomized, Multicenter, Multiple-Dose, Active-Controlled, Parallel-Group, Efficacy and Safety Study of BG00012 in Children From 10 to Less Than 18 Years of Age With Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis, With Optional Open-Label Extension
The main objectives of Part 1 are as follows: To evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of BG00012 in pediatric participants with RRMS, as compared with a disease-modifying treatment and to assess health outcomes and evolution of disability. The primary objective of Part 2 is to evaluate the long-term safety of BG00012 in participants who completed Week 96 in Part 1 of Study 109MS306. The secondary objective of Part 2 is to describe the long-term MS outcomes of BG00012 in participants who completed Week 96 in Part 1 of Study 109MS306.
- Conditions
- Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
- Being tested
- dimethyl fumarate, Interferon β-1a
- Keywords
- Pediatrics
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
dimethyl fumarateDrug
Also called BG00012, Tecfidera
administered orally
Interferon β-1aDrug
Also called Avonex
administered by intramuscular injection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| BG00012 | Experimental | Participants will receive the recommended dose of 240 mg orally, twice a day Receives: Drug: dimethyl fumarate |
| IFN β-1a (Avonex) | Active comparator | Participants will receive the recommended dose of 30 μg (weekly) Receives: Drug: Interferon β-1a |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Part 1: Proportion of Participants Free of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions on Brain Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Scans
Participants who were free of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions were assessed on Brain MRI scans.
Measured: At Week 96
Part 2: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal assessment such as an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. TEAEs were defined as AEs occurring or worsening after beginning study treatment (after the first dose).
Measured: From Week 96 up to last follow-up visit (up to Week 340)
Part 2: Number of Participants Who Discontinued Study Treatment Due to an AE
An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal assessment such as an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product.
Measured: From Week 96 up to last follow-up visit (up to Week 340)
Secondary outcomes (39)
Part 1: Number of New or Newly Enlarged T2 Hyperintense Lesions on Brain MRI Scans
The number of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions that developed in each participant was assessed on Brain MRI scans.
Measured: At Weeks 24 and Week 96
Part 1: Proportion of Participants Free of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions on Brain MRI Scans
Participants who were free of new or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions were assessed on Brain MRI scans.
Measured: At Weeks 24 and 48
Part 1: Proportion of Participants Free of New MRI Activity as Measured by Brain MRI Scans
Participants free of Gd-enhancing MRI lesions and new or newly enlarging T2 MRI lesions were assessed on Brain MRI Scans.
Measured: At Weeks 24, 48, and 96
Part 1: Time to First Relapse
Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the examining neurologist. The time to first relapse was defined as the time from the first dose in Part 1 up to the first relapse. Time to First Relapse was estimated by Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Part 1: Proportion of Relapse-Free Participants
Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the examining neurologist. The proportion of relapse-free participants was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Part 1: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
ARR is calculated as the total number of relapses that occurred during the study divided by the total number of participant-years. ARR was analyzed using negative binomial regression model.
Measured: At Weeks 48 and 96
Part 1: Number of Participants With TEAEs and TESAEs
An AE was any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal assessment such as an abnormal laboratory value), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational) product, whether or not related to the medicinal (investigational) product. An SAE was any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose resulted in death, in the view of the Investigator, placed the participant at immediate risk of death, required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, resulted in a birth defect. TEAEs were defined as AEs occurring or worsening after beginning study treatment (after the first dose).
Measured: From Day 1 up to Week 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Temperature)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in temperature.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Pulse Rate)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in pulse rate.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in blood pressure.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Respiratory Rate)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in respiratory rate.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 4, 8, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96
Part 1: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Electrocardiograms (ECG) Abnormalities
Clinical significance of abnormalities in ECG was determined based on the investigator's discretion. Shift to abnormal indicated values that were normal or unknown at baseline and shifted to abnormal values post-baseline.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Part 1: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters (Hematology Parameters)
Hematology parameters included leukocytes, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicated values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline values. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Coagulation Parameters [Activated Partial Thromboplastin Time (aPTT)]
A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in aPTT.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48 and 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Coagulation Parameters [Prothrombin Time (PT)]
A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in PT.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48 and 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in Coagulation Parameters [International Normalized Ratio (INR)]
A negative change from baseline indicated a reduction in clotting time.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24, 48 and 96
Part 1: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters (Blood Chemistry Parameters)
Parameters included sodium, potassium, chloride, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, urea nitrogen, creatinine, bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, urate and glucose. These parameters were flagged as low, normal or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by Investigator. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicated values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high values postbaseline. Categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 96
Part 1: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis Parameters)
Urinalysis included assessments of glucose, ketones, occult blood, protein, specific gravity. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by the Investigator. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicated values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 96
Part 1: Fatigue Score Measured by the Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) Multidimensional Fatigue Scale
The PedsQL multidimensional fatigue questionnaire was answered by the participant (self-assessment) and parent. The fatigue scale contains 18 questions in 3 fatigue dimensions: general fatigue, sleep/rest fatigue and cognitive fatigue. Each item was scored on 5-point Likert scale (0=never to 4=almost always). Each individual score was then reversed (subtracted from 4) and linearly transformed as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. For each dimension, total score was calculated as the sum of all the items/number of items answered. A higher total score indicated fewer problems.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Part 1: Quality of Life (QOL) as Measured by the PedsQL
The PedsQL QOL questionnaire was answered by the participant (self-assessment) and parent. The QoL scale contains 23 questions in 4 dimensions: Physical Functioning, Emotional Fatigue, Social Fatigue and School Fatigue. Each item was scored on 5-point Likert scale (0=never to 4=almost always). Each individual score was then reversed (subtracted from 4) and linearly transformed as follows: 0=100, 1=75, 2=50, 3=25, 4=0. For each dimension, total score was calculated as the sum of all the items/number of items answered. A higher total score indicated better quality of life.
Measured: Up to Week 96
Part 1: Change From Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score
The EDSS measures the disability status of participants with multiple sclerosis on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10. The first levels 1.0 to 4.5 refer to people with a high degree of ambulatory ability and the subsequent levels 5.0 to 9.5 refer to the loss of ambulatory ability. The range of main categories include (0) = normal neurologic exam; to (5) = ambulatory without aid or rest for 200 meters; disability severe enough to impair full daily activities; to (10) = death due to MS with higher scores indicating more disability. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in the disability.
Measured: Baseline, Week 96
Part 2: Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
ARR is calculated as the total number of relapses that occurred during the study divided by the total number of participant-years. ARR was analyzed using negative binomial regression model.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 96) up to Week 336
Part 2: Change From Baseline in the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) Score
The EDSS measures the disability status of participants with multiple sclerosis on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10. The first levels 1.0 to 4.5 refer to people with a high degree of ambulatory ability and the subsequent levels 5.0 to 9.5 refer to the loss of ambulatory ability. The range of main categories include (0) = normal neurologic exam; to (5) = ambulatory without aid or rest for 200 meters; disability severe enough to impair full daily activities; to (10) = death due to MS. A negative change from baseline indicated an improvement in the disability.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Week 336
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Brief Visuospatial Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) Score
BVMT-R is used to assess learning/memory. In this test, six abstract designs are presented for 10 sec. The display is removed from view, and participants render the stimuli via pencil on paper, manual responses. Each design receives from 0 to 2 points, representing accuracy and location. There are three Learning Trials, and the score is reported as the total number of points earned over the trials. Thus, scores range from 0 to 12 per trial; total score range is 0 to 36 for all three trials. Scores were converted to standardized scores using normative data, ranging from 2-86. The lower the score, the more severe the cognitive impairment while higher scores reflect better visuospatial memory.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 144,192, 240, 288 and 336
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Symbol Digit Modalities Test (SDMT) Score
SDMT is used to assess processing speed. It consists of 9 abstract symbols. Each symbol is paired with a single digit. The participant is provided with a key, showing each symbol digit pair. In addition, the participants are shown several rows of the 9 symbols, which are arranged pseudo-randomly, without the digit. Participants are asked to voice the digit associated with each symbol as rapidly as possible for 90 seconds. The SDMT score ranges from 0 to 110, where higher scores indicate improvement in cognitive functioning and lower scores indicate worsening.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 144,192, 240, 288 and 336
Part 2: Number of Participants With or Without School Progression
Participants or caregivers were posed the following question: "During the past year, did [you/the participant] progress from one [class/grade-level] to the next in school?" Responses were recorded as Yes (participant advanced to the next grade) or No (participant did not advance).
Measured: At Weeks 144, 192, 240, 288 and 336
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Temperature)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in temperature.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 120,144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, and 340
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Pulse Rate)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in pulse rate.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 120,144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, and 340
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Blood Pressure)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in blood pressure.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 120,144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, and 340
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Vital Signs (Respiratory Rate)
Negative change from baseline indicated reduction in respiratory rate.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 120,144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, and 340
Part 2: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in ECG Abnormalities
Clinical significance of abnormalities in ECG was determined based on the investigator's discretion. Shift to abnormal indicated values that were normal or unknown at baseline and shifted to abnormal values post-baseline.
Measured: From Baseline (Week 96) to Week 336
Part 2: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters (Hematology Parameters)
Hematology parameters included leukocytes, erythrocytes, hemoglobin, hematocrit, platelets, eosinophils, lymphocytes, monocytes and neutrophils. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicated values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline values. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96) up to Week 340
Part 2: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters (Blood Chemistry Parameters)
Parameters included potassium, bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, gamma glutamyl transferase, urea nitrogen, creatinine, bicarbonate, calcium, magnesium, phosphate, urate and glucose. These parameters were flagged as low, normal or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by Investigator. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicated values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high values postbaseline. Categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96) up to Week 340
Part 2: Number of Participants With Shifts From Baseline in Clinical Laboratory Parameters (Urinalysis Parameters)
Urinalysis included assessments of erythrocytes, leukocytes and specific gravity. These parameters were flagged as low, normal, or high relative to parameter's normal range or as unknown if no result was available, by the Investigator. Here, shift to low indicated values that were normal, high or unknown at baseline and shifted to low values postbaseline. Shift to high indicated values that were normal, low or unknown at baseline and shifted to high postbaseline. The categories with at least one participant with shift from baseline in these parameters are reported.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 340
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Height
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 120,144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, and 340
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Weight
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 120,144, 168, 192, 216, 240, 264, 288, 312, 336, and 340
Part 2: Change From Baseline in Bone Age
Bone age was tested until the participant reached a bone age of 16 years.
Measured: Baseline (Week 96), Weeks 144, 192 and 240
Part 2: Number of Male Participants by Tanner Stage Assessment
Tanner pubertal staging in males was assessed for testes and scrotum development and pubic hair growth, progressing from stage 1 (prepubertal) to stage 5 (adult). Assessments ended when bone age reached ≥16 years. Testes and scrotum stages were: 1-prepubertal; 2-enlargement of testes, scrotum reddens, texture change; 3-Enlargement of penis, further growth of testes; 4-Increased size of penis with growth in breadth and development of glans; testes and scrotum larger, scrotum skin darker; 5-adult genitalia. Pubic hair stages were: 1-prepubertal; 2-Sparse growth of long, slightly pigmented hair, straight or curled; 3-Darker, coarser and more curled hair, spreading sparsely over junction of pubes; 4-Hair adult in type, but covering smaller area than in adult; no spread to medial surface of thighs; 5-Adult in type and quantity, with horizontal distribution.
Measured: At Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288 and 336
Part 2: Number of Female Participants by Tanner Stage Assessment
Tanner pubertal staging in females was assessed for breast development and pubic hair growth, progressing from stage 1 (prepubertal) to stage 5 (adult). Assessments ended when bone age reached ≥16 years or the participant was post-menarche. Breast development stages: 1-prepubertal; 2-breast bud stage with elevation of breast and papilla; enlargement of areola, 3-further enlargement of breast and areola; no separation of their contour; 4-areola and papilla form secondary mound above level of breast; 5-mature stage: projection of papilla only, related to recession of areola. Pubic hair stages: 1-prepubertal (can see velus hair similar to abdominal wall); 2-sparse growth of long, slightly pigmented hair, straight or curled, mainly on labia; 3-Darker, coarser and more curled hair, spreading sparsely over junction of pubes; 4-hair adult in type, but covering smaller area than in adult; no spread to medial surface of thighs; 5-adult in type and quantity, with horizontal distribution.
Measured: At Weeks 96, 144, 192, 240, 288 and 336
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Nov 2014 (estimated)
- Study start28 Aug 2014
- Primary completion8 Jul 2025
- Study completion8 Jul 2025
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Relapsing-Remitting Multiple SclerosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by BiogenThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 156 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Biogen
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Medical Director, Study director, Biogen
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02283853
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 109MS306
- Other IDs
- 2013-002318-11
- Acronym
- CONNECT
- Status last verified
- May 2026
- First submitted
- 3 Nov 2014
- Last updated
- 19 May 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: In accordance with Biogen's Clinical Trial Transparency and Data Sharing Policy on https://www.biogentrialtransparency.com/.
Publications
Vermersch P, Scaramozza M, Levin S, Alroughani R, Deiva K, Pozzilli C, Lyons J, Mokliatchouk O, Pultz J, N'Dure F, Liu S, Badwan R, Branco F, Hood-Humphrey V, Franchimont N, Hanna J, Maghzi AH. Effect of Dimethyl Fumarate vs Interferon beta-1a in Patients With Pediatric-Onset Multiple Sclerosis: The CONNECT Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Sep 1;5(9):e2230439. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.30439.
PubMed 36169959