Aphasia, BrocaPhase 3Aphasia-ACVNCT02241213
Effects of MTS-r on Speech Production in Non-fluent Aphasia Post-ischemic Stroke Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r) in people with Aphasia, Broca, run by Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia at 1 site in Colombia.
Trial summary
Aphasia is one of the most disabling complications in language production in patients with left hemisphere stroke. About 19% of patients who experience aphasia may have a spontaneously recovery after several weeks or months. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aphasia, Broca
- What is being tested?
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteColombia
- Study dates
- Aug 2014to Dec 2017
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Men and women age range from 50-70 years.
- School-level equal to or more than 5 years approved.
- Right hand dominance, determined through the Edinburgh Inventory (score above 40) .
- Ischemic stroke, at the territory of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA - Left).
- Aphasia diagnosis determined by the test for aphasia Boston.
- Patients who have previously received speech therapy
Show all 18Show fewer
- Patients who gave their written informed consent
- Exclusion Criteria: Criteria defined by Wasserman, 1995 [59, 60] for rTMS:
- Pre-symptomatic diagnosis of stroke in more than one occasion.
- Diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases such dementia and Parkinson's disease.
- Pre- Epilepsy diagnosis
- Diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus Type I or II
- Diagnosis of liver disease or renal
- Diagnosis of Diseases-terminal to prevent tracking
- Diagnosis of psychiatric illnesses such as major depressive disorder (MDD) or other.
- Global cognitive impairment or previous diagnosis of dementia
- Visual or auditory deficit
- Patients with metal implants, cardiac pacemakers or drug infusion pumps.
Who cannot join
None listed.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Colombia1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia
Bucaramanga, Santander Department, 0000
Federico A Silva, MD,MSc, 037-639-9292 ext. 255, federicosilva@fcv.org
Federico A Silva
About this study
Official title: Effects of Repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation of Low Frequency on Speech Production in Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia Post-ischemic Stroke
Aphasia is one of the most disabling complications in language production in patients with left hemisphere stroke. About 19% of patients who experience aphasia may have a spontaneously recovery after several weeks or months. Some studies have reported that repetitive low frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r) in patients with ischemic stroke generates left modulation of cortical excitability by facilitating and promoting functional reorganization and recovery of language production. In spite of this, most of the studies in patients with post-stroke aphasia, are small cases series without controls that correspond to a descriptive design and does not perform long-term follow up. Currently the population is heterogeneous respect to etiology, type of stroke and aphasia severity; also several authors have concluded that the exact location of the site, would be possible through the neuronavigation technique, to obtain better results.
OVERALL OBJECTIVE Determine the efficacy of repetitive low-frequency TMS on oral language recovery in post-ischemic stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia
Read more
ESPECIFIC OBJETIVES
- Estimate the effect of repetitiveTMS treatment on right Lowe Frontal Gyrus (GFI), in the evolution of the neuropsychological language test results in patients with non-fluent aphasia, compared to placebo.
- Describe the behavior of depression and anxiety levels in both treatment groups (active and placebo), through Zung anxiety and depression test, to establish their correlation with production testing language.
- Evaluate the effect of repetitiveTMS technique compared to placebo, on the overall functionality of the subject through Barthel scale.
- Describe the impact of language behavior on the quality of life of patients treated with placebo and active EMT, assessed by the EuroQol test.
METHODOLOGY A placebo double blind controlled and randomize trial, to evaluate the efficacy of low frequency EMT-r in language recovery in 100 patients with first ischemic stroke event among the first 4-8 months postinfarction and non-fluent aphasia. The patient will agree and will sign the informed consent, in order to application aphasia diagnosis Boston test, Edinburgh test, Barthel scale, Zung anxiety and depression test, and EuroQol scale, Neuropsi. Subsequently the subjects will be randomizate to any of two arms of the study. A week before the start of the stimulation sessions, the following tests will be applied to assess language production: Boston Test and Verbal Fluency (FAS). Each patient will have a daily session EMT-r low-frequency active or inactive coil with a biphasic stimulator pulses applied for ten days in two weeks on the triangular area - homologous to injury Lower Front Gyrus (LFG), (right brain hemisphere). Complete the treatment schedule of two weeks, the language production will be evaluate again, and also scales as Barthel an Rankin-m, Zung anxiety and depression and EuroQol. This monitoring will be achieved in five stages: after one week, one month, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months post-stimulation, with the intention of determining the duration and effectiveness effects in language production of the EMT-r.
Read the detailed description
Some studies have reported that low frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in patients with ischemic stroke generates left modulation of cortical excitability by facilitating, and promoting functional reorganization and facilitate the language production.
Stroke is a major public health problem, one-third of patients do not survive the first year after the vascular event, cause of severe disability and also is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Two-thirds of the survivors have neurologic deficits including aphasia (19%) generating functional disability, compromise on their daily living activities, and impact on the quality of life (93% of patients with aphasia after stroke compared with 50% of those survive without aphasia). Aphasia is an additional risk factor for depression (prevalence 5-63%), and also interfering with the functional and cognitive recovery, increasing the risk of mortality.
Generally the treatment of aphasia is based on speech therapy and drug therapy oriented comorbidities such as depression or anxiety. However, it has studied different interventions in an effort to improve the speech recovery of aphasia, as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), which facilitates recovery by stimulating contralesional and lesional regions. Most studies have been based on the transcallosal disinhibition theory, which consist on blocking homotopic regions through low frequency stimulation in the right posterior GFI (triangular portion) to produce a GFI disinhibition from right to left and facilitate neuroplasticity brain process.
EMT technique is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction, proposed by Michael Faraday (1831), in which posits that magnetic field depends on the stimulation time, generating an electric field that eventually causes neuronal excitability.The strength of the electric current produced in the coil between 5-10 Ka (Kiloamperes), while the strength of the induced magnetic field is about 1 to 2 Tesla, and the cortical area to stimulated is about 3 cm² and 2 cm depth. The magnetic field generated may have sufficient magnitude and density to depolarize cortical neurons tract, directly through axonal cone or indirectly through interneurons. When TMS pulses are applied repeatedly, which is known as repetitive TMS (r-TMS) produce modulation of the cortical excitability, increasing or decreasing, depending on the stimulation parameters. Those effects may persist beyond the train stimulation; defined as repetitive series of regular pulses.
Fundamental mechanisms of EMT, are not yet fully understood, because due inter-session and inter-subject variability have been observed in the modulation of induced excitability. The EMT-r may also induce changes in hormonal and neurotransmitter systems, such as, serotonin, dopamine, NMDA receptors, taurine, aspartate, serine axis and can regulate the expression of some genes; cfos, c-jung, which are important for synaptic plasticity. It has been studied several possible mechanisms involved in the functional regulation exerted by the EMT-r, such as synaptic plasticity, which is the most explored one, changes in excitability of neuronal networks, activation of feedback loops and metaplasticity, understood plasticity as synaptic plasticity. However, although but not yet, been established whether the source of the clinical benefit of any scheme of stimulation is a direct or indirect result of the modulation of the excitability, is believed to be associated with neuromodulators release and growth factors such as neurotrophic factor derived from the brain, which play an important role in the mechanism of EMT.
- Conditions
- Aphasia, Broca
- Being tested
- Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r), Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
- Keywords
- Stroke, Aphasia, Broca
- Medical subject headings
- Aphasia, Broca, Stroke, Aphasia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r)Device
10 sessions, each session of EMT-r will be low frequency (1 Hz for 20 minutes and a total of 1200 pulses) using a biphasic pulse stimulator, with active coil (coil-shaped focal or inactive coil "placebo" for 2 weeks from Monday to Friday, target: triangular portion - homologous to injury Inferior front Gyrus (GFI).
Placebo Transcranial Magnetic StimulationDevice
10 sesions of Non- active coil, that will simulate the sound of the TMS, holding the coil on the scalp at an angle of 45 degrees in the selected area
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation TMS- r | Active comparator | Application of single stimulation pulses and regularly repeated ones, the frequency may be divided into high frequency EMT (> 1 Hz), low frequency (<1 Hz) This classification is based on physiological effects (stimulation or inhibition neuronal respectively). In this particular case, we will use low frequency <1 Hz with repetitive pulses. Receives: Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r) |
| Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Placebo comparator | Placebo coil that will simulate the sound of the pulses. Receives: Device: Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Boston-test for aphasia diagnosis
Evaluates the different domains of language to determine the severity degree of aphasia. Applicable in patients from 16 years old and its duration is approximately 90 minutes. This test has various scales such as intonation, phrase extension, language articulation, grammar, paraphasias, repetition, word search and listening
Measured: 3 years
Secondary outcomes (4)
Zung- Depression and anxiety
Evaluates the level of depression in patients with a depressive disorder. This scale is conformed by 20 items assessing 4 common characteristics of depression: the dominant effect, physiological equivalents, other disturbances, and psychomotor activities. Each question is rated on a scale of 1-4 categorized in (1 = few times, 2 = some times, 3 = a good part of the time and 4 = most of the time). The score range is 20-80. Where scores between 5-49 equivalent to a normal range; 50-59 slightly depressed; 60-69 moderately depressed and severely depressed 70 or more [56].
Measured: 3 years
Barthel-Scale
Instrument for measuring the basic activities of daily living (ADL), used especially in patients with acute cerebrovascular disease. Rate the ability of a person to perform in a dependent or independent 10 ABVD, assigning a score (0, 5, 10,15) depending on the time spent on its implementation and the need for help to carry it out. The final score ranges from 0 to 100 where the values are equivalent to between 95-100 independent.; 91-99 mild dependent; 61-90: moderately dependent; 21-60; dependent grave; 0-20 totally dependent [57].
Measured: 3 Years
Scale quality of life (EuroQol, EQ-5D)
Evaluate two aspects:The first is the description of the state of health in five dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort and anxiety / depression), each of which is defined with three levels of severity, as measured by a Likert scale (no problems, some problems and many problems or inability to activity) type. The state of health of the individual is a combination of severity in each five dimensions, expressed by a numerical data. On the other hand, in the second part of the questionnaire the subject must score on a visual millimeter analogue scale his auto perception condition health at the time, considering the ends of the scale as the worst health status (0) and better health [61, 62]
Measured: 3 Years
Edinburgh-Scale
Is used to assess handedness in daily activities. This inventory can be scored through observation or patient self-report. Interpretation: scores below -40 correspond to left dominance; scores between -40 and +40 is ambidextrous and above +40 right dominance [55].
Measured: 3 Years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2014
- Primary completionAug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Aphasia, BrocaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Federico A Silva, MD,MSc, Principal investigator, Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02241213
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- fcv-Aphasia
- Other IDs
- 656656933492
- Acronym
- Aphasia-ACV
- Status last verified
- Sep 2014
- First submitted
- 9 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 16 Sep 2014
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 16 Sep 2014. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Effects of Repetitive Magnetic Transcranial Stimulation of Low Frequency on Speech Production in Patients With Non-fluent Aphasia Post-ischemic Stroke
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02241213
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- Aphasia-ACV / fcv-Aphasia
- Conditions
- Aphasia, Broca
- Keywords
- Stroke, Aphasia, Broca
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Fundación Cardiovascular de ColombiaUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Instituto Colombiano para el Desarrollo de la Ciencia y la Tecnología (COLCIENCIAS)
- Study start
- Aug 2014
- Primary completion
- Aug 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 16 Sep 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Aphasia is one of the most disabling complications in language production in patients with left hemisphere stroke. About 19% of patients who experience aphasia may have a spontaneously recovery after several weeks or months. Some studies have reported that repetitive low frequency Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r) in patients with ischemic stroke generates left modulation of cortical excitability by facilitating and promoting functional reorganization and recovery of language production. In spite of this, most of the studies in patients with post-stroke aphasia, are small cases series without controls that correspond to a descriptive design and does not perform long-term follow up. Currently the population is heterogeneous respect to etiology, type of stroke and aphasia severity; also several authors have concluded that the exact location of the site, would be possible through the neuronavigation technique, to obtain better results.
OVERALL OBJECTIVE Determine the efficacy of repetitive low-frequency TMS on oral language recovery in post-ischemic stroke patients with non-fluent aphasia
ESPECIFIC OBJETIVES
- Estimate the effect of repetitiveTMS treatment on right Lowe Frontal Gyrus (GFI), in the evolution of the neuropsychological language test results in patients with non-fluent aphasia, compared to placebo.
- Describe the behavior of depression and anxiety levels in both treatment groups (active and placebo), through Zung anxiety and depression test, to establish their correlation with production testing language.
- Evaluate the effect of repetitiveTMS technique compared to placebo, on the overall functionality of the subject through Barthel scale.
- Describe the impact of language behavior on the quality of life of patients treated with placebo and active EMT, assessed by the EuroQol test.
METHODOLOGY A placebo double blind controlled and randomize trial, to evaluate the efficacy of low frequency EMT-r in language recovery in 100 patients with first ischemic stroke event among the first 4-8 months postinfarction and non-fluent aphasia. The patient will agree and will sign the informed consent, in order to application aphasia diagnosis Boston test, Edinburgh test, Barthel scale, Zung anxiety and depression test, and EuroQol scale, Neuropsi. Subsequently the subjects will be randomizate to any of two arms of the study. A week before the start of the stimulation sessions, the following tests will be applied to assess language production: Boston Test and Verbal Fluency (FAS). Each patient will have a daily session EMT-r low-frequency active or inactive coil with a biphasic stimulator pulses applied for ten days in two weeks on the triangular area - homologous to injury Lower Front Gyrus (LFG), (right brain hemisphere). Complete the treatment schedule of two weeks, the language production will be evaluate again, and also scales as Barthel an Rankin-m, Zung anxiety and depression and EuroQol. This monitoring will be achieved in five stages: after one week, one month, 4 months, 8 months and 12 months post-stimulation, with the intention of determining the duration and effectiveness effects in language production of the EMT-r.
Detailed description
Some studies have reported that low frequency repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in patients with ischemic stroke generates left modulation of cortical excitability by facilitating, and promoting functional reorganization and facilitate the language production.
Stroke is a major public health problem, one-third of patients do not survive the first year after the vascular event, cause of severe disability and also is the third leading cause of death worldwide. Two-thirds of the survivors have neurologic deficits including aphasia (19%) generating functional disability, compromise on their daily living activities, and impact on the quality of life (93% of patients with aphasia after stroke compared with 50% of those survive without aphasia). Aphasia is an additional risk factor for depression (prevalence 5-63%), and also interfering with the functional and cognitive recovery, increasing the risk of mortality.
Generally the treatment of aphasia is based on speech therapy and drug therapy oriented comorbidities such as depression or anxiety. However, it has studied different interventions in an effort to improve the speech recovery of aphasia, as Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS), which facilitates recovery by stimulating contralesional and lesional regions. Most studies have been based on the transcallosal disinhibition theory, which consist on blocking homotopic regions through low frequency stimulation in the right posterior GFI (triangular portion) to produce a GFI disinhibition from right to left and facilitate neuroplasticity brain process.
EMT technique is based on the principle of electromagnetic induction, proposed by Michael Faraday (1831), in which posits that magnetic field depends on the stimulation time, generating an electric field that eventually causes neuronal excitability.The strength of the electric current produced in the coil between 5-10 Ka (Kiloamperes), while the strength of the induced magnetic field is about 1 to 2 Tesla, and the cortical area to stimulated is about 3 cm² and 2 cm depth. The magnetic field generated may have sufficient magnitude and density to depolarize cortical neurons tract, directly through axonal cone or indirectly through interneurons. When TMS pulses are applied repeatedly, which is known as repetitive TMS (r-TMS) produce modulation of the cortical excitability, increasing or decreasing, depending on the stimulation parameters. Those effects may persist beyond the train stimulation; defined as repetitive series of regular pulses.
Fundamental mechanisms of EMT, are not yet fully understood, because due inter-session and inter-subject variability have been observed in the modulation of induced excitability. The EMT-r may also induce changes in hormonal and neurotransmitter systems, such as, serotonin, dopamine, NMDA receptors, taurine, aspartate, serine axis and can regulate the expression of some genes; cfos, c-jung, which are important for synaptic plasticity. It has been studied several possible mechanisms involved in the functional regulation exerted by the EMT-r, such as synaptic plasticity, which is the most explored one, changes in excitability of neuronal networks, activation of feedback loops and metaplasticity, understood plasticity as synaptic plasticity. However, although but not yet, been established whether the source of the clinical benefit of any scheme of stimulation is a direct or indirect result of the modulation of the excitability, is believed to be associated with neuromodulators release and growth factors such as neurotrophic factor derived from the brain, which play an important role in the mechanism of EMT.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation TMS- r | Active comparator | Device: Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r)Application of single stimulation pulses and regularly repeated ones, the frequency may be divided into high frequency EMT (> 1 Hz), low frequency (<1 Hz) This classification is based on physiological effects (stimulation or inhibition neuronal respectively). In this particular case, we will use low frequency <1 Hz with repetitive pulses. |
| Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation | Placebo comparator | Device: Placebo Transcranial Magnetic StimulationPlacebo coil that will simulate the sound of the pulses. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Men and women age range from 50-70 years.
- School-level equal to or more than 5 years approved.
- Right hand dominance, determined through the Edinburgh Inventory (score above 40) .
- Ischemic stroke, at the territory of the left middle cerebral artery (MCA - Left).
- Aphasia diagnosis determined by the test for aphasia Boston.
Key exclusion criteria (0 listed)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r)10 sessions, each session of EMT-r will be low frequency (1 Hz for 20 minutes and a total of 1200 pulses) using a biphasic pulse stimulator, with active coil (coil-shaped focal or inactive coil "placebo" for 2 weeks from Monday to Friday, target: triangular portion - homologous to injury Inferior front Gyrus (GFI). | Device | Active Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation TMS- r |
| Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation10 sesions of Non- active coil, that will simulate the sound of the TMS, holding the coil on the scalp at an angle of 45 degrees in the selected area | Device | Placebo Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation |
Primary outcome
Boston-test for aphasia diagnosis
Time frame: 3 years
Evaluates the different domains of language to determine the severity degree of aphasia. Applicable in patients from 16 years old and its duration is approximately 90 minutes. This test has various scales such as intonation, phrase extension, language articulation, grammar, paraphasias, repetition, word search and listening
4 secondary outcomes
Zung- Depression and anxiety
Time frame: 3 years
Barthel-Scale
Time frame: 3 Years
Scale quality of life (EuroQol, EQ-5D)
Time frame: 3 Years
Edinburgh-Scale
Time frame: 3 Years
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 16 Sep 2014.
Related trials for Aphasia, Broca
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Recruiting
Music Therapy for Rehabilitation in Post-stroke Non-fluent Aphasia: the Indian Adaptation
Stroke Rehabilitation, Aphasia, Broca
Recruiting
Sensory-Motor Integration for Speech Rehabilitation in Patients With Post-stroke Aphasia
Aphasia Non Fluent, Stroke
Active, not recruiting
Mirror Speech Entrainment: A Novel Technique for Voice Personalized Speech Entrainment for Nonfluent Aphasia
Aphasia Non Fluent, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Combined Intervention Program for Non-fluent Aphasia Based on Neuroplasticity
Non-fluent Aphasia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Federico A Silva, MD,MSc principal investigator
Fundacion Cardiovascular de Colombia
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS-r) in people with Aphasia, Broca, run by Fundación Cardiovascular de Colombia at 1 site in Colombia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 18 inclusion and 0 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Sep 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Colombia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Federico A Silva, MD,MSc (037- 639-9292 ext. 255, federicosilva@fcv.org), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Boston-test for aphasia diagnosis (time frame: 3 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Sep 2014.