AzTrials
AzTrials

Incomplete MiscarriageHY-PERNCT02201732

Effectiveness of Hysteroscopy in the Treatment of Intrauterine Trophoblastic Retentions

A study testing Hysteroscopy and Curettage in people with Incomplete Miscarriage, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study of is to compare subsequent fertility rates between hysteroscopy and aspirative curettage in the surgical treatment of incomplete spontaneous abortion Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 44 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Incomplete Miscarriage
What is being tested?
Hysteroscopy and Curettage
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
577 participants
Where
1 siteFrance
Study dates
5 Nov 2014to 3 Jul 2020
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 44 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Major, under 45 years with intrauterine trophoblastic retention after incomplete miscarriage in the first quarter (termination of pregnancy < 14 WA),
  • With desire of pregnancy ;
  • Intrauterine trophoblastic retention diagnosed by transvaginal pelvic ultrasound finding a intrauterine heterogeneous image or intrauterine gestational sac more than 15 mm in thickness, complicated or not of endometritis ;
  • Decision to surgical management of incomplete miscarriage by the health care team ;
  • Patient beneficiary or affiliated to a health insurance
  • Informed and signed consent

Who cannot join

  • Will not be included in the protocol patients :
  • having a uterine malformation known ;
  • having received surgical treatment for the current intrauterine retention ;
  • with intrauterine retention diagnosed by transvaginal pelvic ultrasound of more than 50 mm in thickness ;
  • requiring a haemostatic act in urgency for heavy vaginal bleeding (miscarriage haemorrhage) ;
  • bearer of intrauterine device ;
Show all 10Show fewer
  • having an evolutive pregnancy;
  • having an ectopic pregnancy;
  • having a trophoblastic retention following a voluntary abortion ;
  • having a pregnancy achieved by medically assisted procreation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

France1 site
  • Centre hospitalier intercommunal de poissy-saint germain en Laye

    Poissy, 78300

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Assessment of the Effectiveness of Hysteroscopy in the Treatment of Intrauterine Trophoblastic Retentions

The purpose of this study of is to compare subsequent fertility rates between hysteroscopy and aspirative curettage in the surgical treatment of incomplete spontaneous abortion

Read the detailed description

Incomplete spontaneous abortion (ISA) is defined by the intrauterine retention of conceptual product after incomplete or partial expulsion of the conceptual product. Treatment such retention may be expectant care, medical treatment or surgery. Currently, curettage is the standard surgical treatment in most centers. However, operative hysteroscopy, in addition to the direct visualization of the retained conceptual product, in contrast to the curettage, would allow elective evacuation of retention while reducing surgical complications. Studies of low effective, retrospective, have found an fertility's increase in patients treated by operative hysteroscopy. These data need to be confirmed by a randomized controlled trial in order to change the standard surgical treatment of this disease if hysteroscopy procedure would found to be superior.

We propose a multicenter - single blind - randomized - therapeutic study. Randomization will concern the surgical procedure in patients treated surgically for intrauterine retention after spontaneous miscarriage. Randomization will be performed at the admission to the patient in the operating room by electronic means using a secure internet platform, single-blind for the patient with unblinding at the end of the trial or in case of complication. The patient will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment arms following:

  • Arm A : Operative hysteroscopy
  • Arm B : Aspirative curettage The inclusion will be performed at time of diagnosis (incomplete miscarriage) with an ultrasound of intrauterine retention for which surgical treatment has been decided. The initial medical examination (inclusion visit) will include a complete gynecological examination. The diagnosis of incomplete miscarriage will be performed using a transvaginal pelvic ultrasound. Transvaginal ultrasound will be performed according to a technique of standardized pelvic ultrasound ; the retention will be diagnosed in the presence of a heterogeneous image or intrauterine gestational sac more than 15 mm in thickness. On this visit, the patient will complete a questionnaire concerning her medical histories and the aborted pregnancy.

Patients will have a care in accordance with center practices for the hospital stay. Surgical treatment will be performed within the time depending on the availability of the operating room of participating center.

A hospitalization report indicating the participation to the study, but not mentioning the treatment group, will be sent to the attending physician and the patient. An information form with postoperative instructions will be given to patients included in this protocol without mentioning the surgical arm. The operative report will be given to the patient at the end of her participation in the trial.

A total of five visits (including final visit) are scheduled for this trial. The patient will be monitored in the form of telephone conversation or questionnaire sent by email or post. Monitoring will be done by the investigator that enrolled the patient with the help of the URC in charge of the project. In case of complications, failure of the intervention or diagnosis of a uterine cavity pathology, the care will be left to the discretion of the medical center team.

Being tested
Hysteroscopy, Curettage
Keywords
Incomplete miscarriage, Hysteroscopy, curettage, pregnancy, RCT
Medical subject headings
Abortion, Incomplete

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HysteroscopyProcedure or surgery

    Performed under general or local anesthesia, antibioprophylaxis in accordance to center practices may be administered. Cervical dilatation, will be made in order to introduce the hysteroscope. Operative hysteroscope used will include a handle. The distension of the uterine cavity will be performed with physiological saline or glycocoll, depending on the polarity of the high frequency generator necessary for resection system (monopolar or bipolar), with a pressure of maximum irrigation of 110 mm Hg.

  • CurettageProcedure or surgery

    Performed under general or local anesthesia, the used material may be rigid or flexible vacurette. In the same way, the prophylactic antibiotic, the diameter of the used vacurette, the importance of cervical dilation necessary and a possible peroperative ultrasound guidance will be left at the discretion of the operator and habits of the center. A check of the uterine vacuity by foam curette will be conducted at the end of curettage.

Study groups in NCT02201732
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm A : Operative hysteroscopyExperimentaloperative hysteroscopy with direct visualization
Receives: Procedure: Hysteroscopy
Arm B : Aspirative curettageActive comparatorcurettage is the standard surgical treatment in most centers
Receives: Procedure: Curettage

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Progressive intrauterine pregnancy > 22 WA

    Questionnaire

    Measured: Until 2 years post surgery

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Next pregnancy

    Measured: Until 2 years post surgery

  2. Surgical complications' rate

    Clavien-Dindo classification

    Measured: until 2 years post surgery

  3. Surgical reinterventions

    Measured: until 2 years post surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jul 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study start5 Nov 2014
  3. Primary completion15 Nov 2019
  4. Study completion3 Jul 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
577 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02201732
Sponsor's protocol ID
P130920
Other IDs
2014-A00340-47
Acronym
HY-PER
Status last verified
Aug 2025
First submitted
17 Jul 2014
Last updated
5 Sep 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Huchon C, Drioueche H, Koskas M, Agostini A, Bauville E, Bourdel N, Fernandez H, Fritel X, Graesslin O, Legendre G, Lucot JP, Panel P, Raiffort C, Giraudet G, Bussieres L, Fauconnier A. Operative Hysteroscopy vs Vacuum Aspiration for Incomplete Spontaneous Abortion: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2023 Apr 11;329(14):1197-1205. doi: 10.1001/jama.2023.3415.

    PubMed 37039805
  • Huchon C, Koskas M, Agostini A, Akladios C, Alouini S, Bauville E, Bourdel N, Fernandez H, Fritel X, Graesslin O, Legendre G, Lucot JP, Matheron I, Panel P, Raiffort C, Fauconnier A. Operative hysteroscopy versus vacuum aspiration for incomplete spontaneous abortion (HY-PER): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Aug 19;16:363. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0900-1.

    PubMed 26282937
  • Ghosh J, Papadopoulou A, Devall AJ, Jeffery HC, Beeson LE, Do V, Price MJ, Tobias A, Tuncalp O, Lavelanet A, Gulmezoglu AM, Coomarasamy A, Gallos ID. Methods for managing miscarriage: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 1;6(6):CD012602. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012602.pub2.

    PubMed 34061352

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hysteroscopy and Curettage in people with Incomplete Miscarriage, run by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris at 1 site in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Sep 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Progressive intrauterine pregnancy > 22 WA (time frame: Until 2 years post surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02201732, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Sep 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in