Esophageal NeoplasmsNCT02182804
A Diagnostic Study of the Advanced Endoscopy to Detect Early Esophageal Cancer
A study testing Olympus and Cellvizio in people with Esophageal Neoplasms, run by King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
Trial summary
This descriptive cross sectional study aims to directly compare the diagnostic capability of the probed-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and the magnifying narrow band imaging (M-NBI) in the Lugol's voiding lesions. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- What is being tested?
- Olympus and Cellvizio
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2013to Jun 2014
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age over 20 years
- Having histological-confirmed diagnosis of head and neck cancer
- Having no esophageal symptoms
Who cannot join
- Having index cancer of nasopharynx
- History of esophageal surgery
- Having esophageal stricture or obstruction
- Having esophageal varices
- Known case of esophageal cancer
- Uncorrectable coagulopathy and thrombocytopenia
Show all 10Show fewer
- Pregnancy
- Thyrotoxicosis
- Creatinine clearance less than 30 ml/min
- Allergy to iodine or fluorescein.
About this study
Official title: Diagnostic Values of Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Magnifying Narrow Band Imaging (M-NBI) for Early Neoplasms Detection in Esophageal Lugol'S-voiding Lesions.
This descriptive cross sectional study aims to directly compare the diagnostic capability of the probed-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and the magnifying narrow band imaging (M-NBI) in the Lugol's voiding lesions.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Being tested
- Olympus, Cellvizio
- Keywords
- Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, Narrow Band Imaging, Lugol Chromoendoscopy, Esophageal Neoplasm, Head and Neck Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Head and Neck Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
OlympusDevice
narrow band imaging with magnification
CellvizioDevice
probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Study | Experimental | probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy narrow band imaging with magnification Receives: Device: Olympus; Device: Cellvizio |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy
Diagnostic performance of the pCLE and M-NBI in Lugol's voiding lesions size larger than 5 millimeters.
Measured: an expected average of 2 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2013
- Primary completionJun 2014
- Study completionJun 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Esophageal NeoplasmsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chulalongkorn University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Rapat Pittayanon, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
- Investigators
- Rapat Pittayanon, M.D., Principal investigator, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02182804
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RP008
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 1 Jul 2014
- Last updated
- 28 Aug 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Aug 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Diagnostic Values of Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy (pCLE) and Magnifying Narrow Band Imaging (M-NBI) for Early Neoplasms Detection in Esophageal Lugol'S-voiding Lesions.
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02182804
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RP008
- Conditions
- Esophageal Neoplasms
- Keywords
- Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, Narrow Band Imaging, Lugol Chromoendoscopy, Esophageal Neoplasm, Head and Neck Cancer
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- King Chulalongkorn Memorial HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Chulalongkorn University
- Study start
- Feb 2013
- Primary completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Jul 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 28 Aug 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This descriptive cross sectional study aims to directly compare the diagnostic capability of the probed-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and the magnifying narrow band imaging (M-NBI) in the Lugol's voiding lesions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Study | Experimental | Device: Olympus, Device: Cellvizioprobe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy narrow band imaging with magnification |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Age over 20 years
- Having histological-confirmed diagnosis of head and neck cancer
- Having no esophageal symptoms
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Having index cancer of nasopharynx
- History of esophageal surgery
- Having esophageal stricture or obstruction
- Having esophageal varices
- Known case of esophageal cancer
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Olympusnarrow band imaging with magnification | Device | Study |
| Cellvizioprobe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy | Device | Study |
Primary outcome
Accuracy
Time frame: an expected average of 2 weeks
Diagnostic performance of the pCLE and M-NBI in Lugol's voiding lesions size larger than 5 millimeters.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Aug 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Esophageal Neoplasms
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Rapat Pittayanon, M.D. principal investigator
King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Olympus and Cellvizio in people with Esophageal Neoplasms, run by King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Aug 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 28 Aug 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy (time frame: an expected average of 2 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Aug 2020.