Chronic PaintDCSNCT02161302
THE EFFECT OF tDCS IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
A study testing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in people with Chronic Pain and Endometriosis, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 55 years, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Chronic Pain, Endometriosis
- What is being tested?
- transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteBrazil
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to May 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 55 years
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- age > 18 years old, non-menopausal, with the diagnosis of endometriosis by videolaparoscopy and biopsy, able to understand and write the Portuguese language, in treatment with isolated progestin for at least one month, who have the worst daily pain in the analogue visual scale > 4 cm on most of the days in the last month
Who cannot join
- left-handed women, endometriosis implantation in intestine, bladder or urether (surgical treatment indication), history of intense or frequent headache, chronic dermatologic disease, previous adverse effects to treatment with tDCS, seizures, severe cranial trauma with alteration of the cranial anatomy, metallic intracranial implants or pacemaker, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, non-compensated psychiatric disease, non-collaborative patients, history of neurologic, oncologic disease, heart, renal or hepatic failure.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Brazil1 site
Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre
Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, 90035-903
About this study
Official title: THE EFFECT OF TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION (tDCS) IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
The purpose of this study is to determine if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Endometriosis
- Being tested
- transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
- Keywords
- Endometriosis, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Near Infrared Spectroscopy, NIRS, Chronic Pelvic Pain
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Pain, Endometriosis
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Device
Also called tDCS
The stimulation will be administered with a pair of surface electrodes, sponge coated, soaked in saline. A battery-powered constant current stimulator will be used for this purpose (tDCS device Soterix 1X1). The stimulation is performed by placing the anodal electrode in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal one in the contralateral supraorbital area and it will use a 2 mA current.
Sham Transcranial Direct Current StimulationDevice
Also called Sham tDCS
The sham tDCS consists of the same montage of the active tDCS, but the device is turned off 30 seconds after initiating stimulation (without letting the patient notice it). Rest of the montage is kept identical as the active one during the 20 minutes that the session lasts.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Experimental | tDCS will be applied in the head of the patients in 20 minute sessions, daily from Monday to Friday for 2 weeks (10 sessions total). The stimulation will be administered with a pair of surface electrodes, sponge coated, soaked in saline. A battery-powered constant current stimulator will be used for this purpose (tDCS device Soterix 1X1). The stimulation is performed by placing the anodal electrode in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal one in the contralateral supraorbital area, and it will use a 2 mA current. Receives: Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) |
| tDCS Sham | Sham comparator | The sham tDCS consists of the same montage of the active tDCS, but the device is turned off 30 seconds after initiating stimulation (without letting the patient notice it). Rest of the montage is kept identical as the active one during the 20 minutes that the session lasts. Receives: Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in worst daily pain assessed with the visual analogue scale.
Patients will be asked to write down their worst pain level (assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale, self-administered) in a paper diary with different scores: global pain, pain during menses, pain during sexual intercourse, pain during urination, pain during defecation. They will also be asked to daily write the analgesic drug intake. Total evaluations: 35 days.
Measured: Once Daily. Start 7 days before treatment, everyday during treatment period and every day during follow-up period (total = 35 days)
Changes in motor cortex blood flow assessed by near infrared spectroscopy
Motor cortex blood flow will be assessed before the first session of tDCS (on Treatment day 1), after the end of treatment period (Day 15) and after the follow-up period (Day 29). Total = 3 evaluations.
Measured: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS); Day 15 (at the end of treatment period) and Day 29 (at the end of follow-up period)
Change in Functional Pain Scale
The Functional Pain Scale will be assessed by the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (B-PCP:S) once a week, as follows: on Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS, considered baseline), on Treatment Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, and Day 29. Total = 5 evaluations.
Measured: Once a week - Treatment Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
Change in the temperature pain threshold
It will be assessed by the Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) in the dominant (right) forearm. The heat pain tolerance and pain threshold to the heat and the temperature defined as pain 6/10 by the participant. The temperature starts at 32°C, and it heat at a 1.0 °C/sec rate and cools down after a button is pressed or whenever it reaches the max temperature of 52°C. The participant will be asked to press the button at the first sensation of pain to determine the pain threshold; to press the button whenever she can not stand the heat anymore for the pain tolerance determination and, for last, to press the button at the temperature she fells pain equivalent to 6/10 in the numeric scale of pain. The pain threshold and the temperature of pain 6/10 will be determined by the arithmetic mean of 3 evaluations each. Total of 3 test days: Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS), after the end of the Treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day 29).
Measured: up to Day 29
Change in effect of the descendent modulator system of pain
It will be assessed by the Conditioned Pain Modulation test (CPM). A nociceptive tonic conditioning stimulus - immersion of the non-dominant hand in cold water (0°C for 1 minute) - will be applied concomitant to the progressive thermal stimulus in the dominant forearm as applied in the QST pattern until it reaches the 6/10 pain temperature previously determined by the participant. It will be tested in Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS - considered baseline), after the end of the Treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day 29) - Total = 3 evaluation.
Measured: up to Day 29
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in serum biomarkers level: The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and interleukins
A blood sample will be collected to measure BDNF and interleukins on Treatment Day 1 (right before the first tDCS session - considered baseline), after the end of the treatment period (day 15,) and after the end of the follow-up period (day 29). Total = 3 evaluations
Measured: up to Day 29
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted11 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completionMay 2015
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Chronic PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Wolnei Caumo, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02161302
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 14-0092
- Acronym
- tDCS
- Status last verified
- Jan 2026
- First submitted
- 10 Jun 2014
- Last updated
- 15 Jan 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Valle A, Roizenblatt S, Botte S, Zaghi S, Riberto M, Tufik S, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial. J Pain Manag. 2009;2(3):353-361.
PubMed 21170277Nacul AP, Spritzer PM. [Current aspects on diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;32(6):298-307. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000600008. Portuguese.
PubMed 20945016Boros K, Poreisz C, Munchau A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Mar;27(5):1292-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.x. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
PubMed 18312584Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255-76. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. No abstract available.
PubMed 14677403Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
PubMed 20633386Fenton BW, Palmieri PA, Boggio P, Fanning J, Fregni F. A preliminary study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain. Brain Stimul. 2009 Apr;2(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.009. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
PubMed 20633407Caumo W, Ruehlman LS, Karoly P, Sehn F, Vidor LP, Dall-Agnol L, Chassot M, Torres IL. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the profile of chronic pain: screen for a Brazilian population. Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01528.x. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
PubMed 23171145Sehn F, Chachamovich E, Vidor LP, Dall-Agnol L, de Souza IC, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pain catastrophizing scale. Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01492.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
PubMed 23036076
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Jan 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- THE EFFECT OF TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION (tDCS) IN THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC PELVIC PAIN ASSOCIATED WITH ENDOMETRIOSIS
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02161302
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- tDCS / 14-0092
- Conditions
- Chronic Pain, Endometriosis
- Keywords
- Endometriosis, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, tDCS, Near Infrared Spectroscopy, NIRS, Chronic Pelvic Pain
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hospital de Clinicas de Porto AlegreUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- May 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 11 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to determine if transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is effective in the treatment of chronic pelvic pain associated with endometriosis
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Active tDCS | Experimental | Device: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)tDCS will be applied in the head of the patients in 20 minute sessions, daily from Monday to Friday for 2 weeks (10 sessions total). The stimulation will be administered with a pair of surface electrodes, sponge coated, soaked in saline. A battery-powered constant current stimulator will be used for this purpose (tDCS device Soterix 1X1). The stimulation is performed by placing the anodal electrode in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal one in the contralateral supraorbital area, and it will use a 2 mA current. |
| tDCS Sham | Sham comparator | Device: Sham Transcranial Direct Current StimulationThe sham tDCS consists of the same montage of the active tDCS, but the device is turned off 30 seconds after initiating stimulation (without letting the patient notice it). Rest of the montage is kept identical as the active one during the 20 minutes that the session lasts. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 55 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age > 18 years old, non-menopausal, with the diagnosis of endometriosis by videolaparoscopy and biopsy, able to understand and write the Portuguese language, in treatment with isolated progestin for at least one month, who have the worst daily pain in the analogue visual scale > 4 cm on most of the days in the last month
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- left-handed women, endometriosis implantation in intestine, bladder or urether (surgical treatment indication), history of intense or frequent headache, chronic dermatologic disease, previous adverse effects to treatment with tDCS, seizures, severe cranial trauma with alteration of the cranial anatomy, metallic intracranial implants or pacemaker, history of pelvic inflammatory disease, non-compensated psychiatric disease, non-collaborative patients, history of neurologic, oncologic disease, heart, renal or hepatic failure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)Also: tDCSThe stimulation will be administered with a pair of surface electrodes, sponge coated, soaked in saline. A battery-powered constant current stimulator will be used for this purpose (tDCS device Soterix 1X1). The stimulation is performed by placing the anodal electrode in the primary motor cortex (M1) and the cathodal one in the contralateral supraorbital area and it will use a 2 mA current. | Device | Active tDCS |
| Sham Transcranial Direct Current StimulationAlso: Sham tDCSThe sham tDCS consists of the same montage of the active tDCS, but the device is turned off 30 seconds after initiating stimulation (without letting the patient notice it). Rest of the montage is kept identical as the active one during the 20 minutes that the session lasts. | Device | tDCS Sham |
Primary outcome
Change in worst daily pain assessed with the visual analogue scale.
Time frame: Once Daily. Start 7 days before treatment, everyday during treatment period and every day during follow-up period (total = 35 days)
Patients will be asked to write down their worst pain level (assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale, self-administered) in a paper diary with different scores: global pain, pain during menses, pain during sexual intercourse, pain during urination, pain during defecation. They will also be asked to daily write the analgesic drug intake. Total evaluations: 35 days.
Changes in motor cortex blood flow assessed by near infrared spectroscopy
Time frame: Treatment Day 1 (before receiving the 1st session of tDCS); Day 15 (at the end of treatment period) and Day 29 (at the end of follow-up period)
Motor cortex blood flow will be assessed before the first session of tDCS (on Treatment day 1), after the end of treatment period (Day 15) and after the follow-up period (Day 29). Total = 3 evaluations.
Change in Functional Pain Scale
Time frame: Once a week - Treatment Day 1, Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, Day 29
The Functional Pain Scale will be assessed by the Brazilian Profile of Chronic Pain: Screen (B-PCP:S) once a week, as follows: on Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS, considered baseline), on Treatment Day 8, Day 15, Day 22, and Day 29. Total = 5 evaluations.
Change in the temperature pain threshold
Time frame: up to Day 29
It will be assessed by the Quantitative Sensory Test (QST) in the dominant (right) forearm. The heat pain tolerance and pain threshold to the heat and the temperature defined as pain 6/10 by the participant. The temperature starts at 32°C, and it heat at a 1.0 °C/sec rate and cools down after a button is pressed or whenever it reaches the max temperature of 52°C. The participant will be asked to press the button at the first sensation of pain to determine the pain threshold; to press the button whenever she can not stand the heat anymore for the pain tolerance determination and, for last, to press the button at the temperature she fells pain equivalent to 6/10 in the numeric scale of pain. The pain threshold and the temperature of pain 6/10 will be determined by the arithmetic mean of 3 evaluations each. Total of 3 test days: Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS), after the end of the Treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day 29).
Change in effect of the descendent modulator system of pain
Time frame: up to Day 29
It will be assessed by the Conditioned Pain Modulation test (CPM). A nociceptive tonic conditioning stimulus - immersion of the non-dominant hand in cold water (0°C for 1 minute) - will be applied concomitant to the progressive thermal stimulus in the dominant forearm as applied in the QST pattern until it reaches the 6/10 pain temperature previously determined by the participant. It will be tested in Treatment Day 1 (before the first session of tDCS - considered baseline), after the end of the Treatment period (Day 15) and at the end of the follow-up period (Day 29) - Total = 3 evaluation.
1 secondary outcome
Change in serum biomarkers level: The brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and interleukins
Time frame: up to Day 29
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Jan 2026.
- Background: PubMed 21170277Valle A, Roizenblatt S, Botte S, Zaghi S, Riberto M, Tufik S, Boggio PS, Fregni F. Efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the treatment of fibromyalgia: results of a randomized, sham-controlled longitudinal clinical trial. J Pain Manag. 2009;2(3):353-361.
- Background: PubMed 20945016Nacul AP, Spritzer PM. [Current aspects on diagnosis and treatment of endometriosis]. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2010 Jun;32(6):298-307. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032010000600008. Portuguese.
- Background: PubMed 18312584Boros K, Poreisz C, Munchau A, Paulus W, Nitsche MA. Premotor transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) affects primary motor excitability in humans. Eur J Neurosci. 2008 Mar;27(5):1292-300. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2008.06090.x. Epub 2008 Feb 29.
- Background: PubMed 14677403Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation--technical, safety and functional aspects. Suppl Clin Neurophysiol. 2003;56:255-76. doi: 10.1016/s1567-424x(09)70230-2. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20633386Nitsche MA, Cohen LG, Wassermann EM, Priori A, Lang N, Antal A, Paulus W, Hummel F, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial direct current stimulation: State of the art 2008. Brain Stimul. 2008 Jul;1(3):206-23. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.06.004. Epub 2008 Jul 1.
- Background: PubMed 20633407Fenton BW, Palmieri PA, Boggio P, Fanning J, Fregni F. A preliminary study of transcranial direct current stimulation for the treatment of refractory chronic pelvic pain. Brain Stimul. 2009 Apr;2(2):103-7. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2008.09.009. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
- Background: PubMed 23171145Caumo W, Ruehlman LS, Karoly P, Sehn F, Vidor LP, Dall-Agnol L, Chassot M, Torres IL. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the profile of chronic pain: screen for a Brazilian population. Pain Med. 2013 Jan;14(1):52-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01528.x. Epub 2012 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 23036076Sehn F, Chachamovich E, Vidor LP, Dall-Agnol L, de Souza IC, Torres IL, Fregni F, Caumo W. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Brazilian Portuguese version of the pain catastrophizing scale. Pain Med. 2012 Nov;13(11):1425-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1526-4637.2012.01492.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4.
Related trials for Chronic Pain
Recruiting
Empowered Relief® for Cancer Survivors With Chronic Pain
Chronic Pain Due to Cancer, Pain Catastrophizing
RecruitingObservational study
Pain Phenotypes in Individuals With Multiple Sclerosis
Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Pectoral Nerve Block (PECS) Using Magnesium Sulfate Added to Dexamethasone on Quality of Recovery and Chronic Post-Mastectomy Pain
Breast Cancer, Postoperative Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Wolnei Caumo, MD, PhD principal investigator
Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in people with Chronic Pain and Endometriosis, run by Hospital de Clinicas de Porto Alegre at 1 site in Brazil.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Jan 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in worst daily pain assessed with the visual analogue scale. (time frame: Once Daily. Start 7 days before treatment, everyday during treatment period and every day during follow-up period (total = 35 days)). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02161302, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Jan 2026.