PeriodontitisNCT02154906
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects in Humans
A study testing DFDBA and autologous platelet rich fibrin in people with Periodontitis, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Inflammatory periodontal disease often results in loss of bone around the teeth. Bone defects that have a certain size and shape (called intrabony or intraosseous defects) may be improved by using a graft material in the bony defect. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 99 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Periodontitis
- What is being tested?
- DFDBA and autologous platelet rich fibrin
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 44 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2013to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 99 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patient currently a patient at dental school or eligible for treatment at dental school
- Patient resides within 50 mile radius of dental school and is eligible for treatment in Graduate Periodontics Clinic
- Diagnosis of chronic periodontitis with a treatment plan that includes surgical treatment of an intrabony defect adjacent to a natural tooth
- Willing and able to provide informed consent and be available for multiple follow-up visits for the duration of the study
- One or more sites with 1) a probing depth of 6mm or greater (>6mm), 2) a radiographic bony defect depth of greater than 3mm (>3mm), 3) sufficient keratinized tissue to allow complete coverage of the defect with gingival flaps, and 4) radiographic base of bony defect at least 2mm coronal to the apex of the tooth
- Female patients who have undergone a hysterectomy, tubal ligation or menopause, and non-pregnant women of child-bearing potential
Who cannot join
- not meeting inclusion criteria above
- Failure to attain adequate oral hygiene prior to surgery (minimum 80% plaque-free surfaces)
- History within the last 6 months of daily use of smokeless tobacco, pipe or cigar smoking, or cigarette smoking exceeding 10 cigarettes per day. Former smokers who quit more than 6 months before the study are eligible for enrollment. Current smokers who smoke less than 10 cigarettes per day are eligible for enrollment.
- Untreated acute or chronic infections in the region of the study site
- Tooth mobility of Grade 2 or higher at the tooth with the potential test site
- Clinical or radiographic signs of apical pathology, root fracture, untreated carious lesions on the root surface or at the CEJ, subgingival restorations on the tooth with the potential test site
- Sensitivity or allergy to Bacitracin, Gentamycin, Polymyxin B Sulfate, alcohol and/or surfactants
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UT Health Science Center School of Dentistry
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
About this study
Inflammatory periodontal disease often results in loss of bone around the teeth. Bone defects that have a certain size and shape (called intrabony or intraosseous defects) may be improved by using a graft material in the bony defect. The purpose of this study is to compare healing of periodontal intrabony defects that are treated using demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) versus autogenous platelet-rich fibrin.
The null hypotheses is that there will be no significant differences in bone fill, CAL gain, PD reduction or recession at sites treated with PRF compared to sites treated with DFDBA.
Read the detailed description
This entire protocol involves procedures that are standard care. The purpose of the research is to evaluate whether there are any differences in results of periodontal surgical treatment using PRF in intrabony defects versus using DFDBA in intrabony defects. The DFDBA used in this study is an approved product and will be used in an approved manner. The PRF used in this study is an autologous product derived from the patient's own blood and is also being used in an approved manner during this study.
The primary outcomes evaluated in this study will include the soft tissue parameter of gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) and the hard tissue parameter of bone fill (BF). Secondary outcomes evaluated will include the soft tissue parameters of probing depth (PD) reduction and change in gingival recession (GR). These parameters will be evaluated over a 6-month period following intraoperative application of the material in advanced periodontal defects in 44 subjects (22 subjects per group with expected completion of 15 subjects per group). Six months after surgery, final post-operative clinical and radiographic measurements will be made.
Each subject will randomly be assigned (1:1) to receive either flap surgery with autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) placed into the intrabony defect (test) or flap surgery with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) placed into the intrabony defect (control). Subjects will be randomized by drawing a sealed envelope from a stack of envelopes, each of which will contain a slip of paper on which is written PRF or DFDBA. The number of envelopes per group will equal the total number of subjects to be enrolled per group. Because collection and processing of PRF requires specific equipment, subjects will be randomized just prior to the surgical procedure being performed (before delivery of local anesthesia) rather than after flap reflection and debridement.
Each subject will contribute only 1 study site. If a subject has more than one interproximal bony defect in the area being treated surgically, only 1 such site will be chosen as the study site. The site with the deepest CEJ-BD measurement will be chosen. All other nonstudy sites in the surgical area will be treated with the same material as the adjacent study site (PRF or DFDBA). Clinical measurements at the time of surgery and at the 6-month follow-up will be made by one of two examiners who are masked as to study group. The same clinical examiner who makes measurements at the time of surgery will also make measurements at the 6-month follow-up.
Patients will be given post-operative antibiotics for 7 days after surgery as part of standard care (amoxicillin 500mg three times a day for 7 days; if allergic to amoxicillin, patients will receive doxycycline 100mg twice a day for 7 days). Subjects will be seen 10-14 days after surgery for routine follow-up procedures including removal of sutures and removal of visible plaque. Subjects will be followed again for routine postoperative procedures at 1 month, 2 months, and 4 months after surgery. The final postoperative visit will take place at 6 months post-surgery and will include final radiographic and clinical assessments of the study site. The study is over after this 6-month follow-up visit.
Routine radiographs will be made as standard care procedures pre-operatively and at the 6-month follow-up time point. Radiographs will be standardized using Rinn XCP holders with customized bite registrations, and a 1mm radiopaque square grid (Fixott-Everett grid) will be placed over digital sensor plates to allow ease of linear measurement on the digital radiographic images. Radiographic measurements will be made by a masked examiner. Hard tissue measurements made from the radiographs at baseline and 6-month follow-up will include CEJ to base of bony defect (CEJ-BD).Measurements will be made to the nearest 0.5mm.Bone fill is the linear change (in mm) in CEJ-BD measurement between baseline examination and 6-month follow-up.
Soft tissue measurements made at baseline and 6-month follow-up will include probing depth (PD = gingival margin to base of soft tissue pocket), clinical attachment level (CAL = CEJ to base of soft tissue pocket), and gingival recession (GR = CEJ to gingival margin) at each defect site. North Carolina 15mm (UNC-15) periodontal probes will be used and measurements will be rounded to the nearest 0.5mm.
Intraoperatively, the bony defect will be measured from CEJ-BD to the nearest 0.5mm. This measurement will be made from both the facial and lingual aspect of the interproximal defect (i.e., the depth of the interproximal bony defect will be measured from both the facial and lingual aspect to its deepest depth). In addition, the number of bony walls will be characterized into one of 7 categories: 1) 1-wall, 2) 2-wall, 3) 3-wall, 4) combination 1,2-wall defect, 5) combination 1,3-wall defect, 6) combination 2,3-wall, or 7) circumferential defects. At 6-month follow-up, clinical evaluation of bone fill will be made using transgingival probing in the periodontal pocket from the CEJ to the bony crest. This measurement will also be made from both the facial and lingual aspect of the interproximal defect. This standard care procedure is done using topical anesthetic. Surgical re-entry will not be performed.
For final analysis, the defect will be characterized at the location having the deepest CEJ-BD measurement at the time of surgery. For example, if treating a defect on the distal aspect of tooth #19 in which the CEJ-BD measurement is 8.5mm from the facial aspect and 7.5mm from the lingual at the time of surgery, changes in soft tissue parameters (CAL, PD, recession) and hard tissue parameters (bone fill) for that defect will be determined using PD, CAL, recession and bone fill measurements taken from the facial aspect only (rather than using the mean of facial and lingual measurements to characterize the defect).
- Conditions
- Periodontitis
- Being tested
- DFDBA, autologous platelet rich fibrin
- Keywords
- periodontal disease, periodontitis
- Medical subject headings
- Periodontitis, Periodontal Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DFDBADevice
autologous platelet rich fibrinDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| DFDBA | Active comparator | DFDBA used to graft intrabony defect Receives: Device: DFDBA |
| autologous platelet rich fibrin | Experimental | autologous platelet rich fibrin used to graft intrabony defect Receives: Device: autologous platelet rich fibrin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
measurement of CAL at the time of surgical intervention will be compared with measurement of CAL and bone level 6 months after surgery
Measured: baseline and 6 months after surgery
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change in Radiographic Bone Level
measurement of radiographic bone level at the time of surgical intervention will be compared with measurement of bone level 6 months after surgery
Measured: baseline and 6 months after surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2013
- Primary completionApr 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for PeriodontitisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Brian L Mealey, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02154906
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HSC20130439H
- Status last verified
- Jun 2016
- First submitted
- 29 May 2014
- Last updated
- 1 Jul 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Chadwick JK, Mills MP, Mealey BL. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects in Humans. J Periodontol. 2016 Nov;87(11):1253-1260. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160309. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
PubMed 27353441
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Jul 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Versus Platelet Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects in Humans
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02154906
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HSC20130439H
- Conditions
- Periodontitis
- Keywords
- periodontal disease, periodontitis
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 44 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2013
- Primary completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Jun 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 1 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Inflammatory periodontal disease often results in loss of bone around the teeth. Bone defects that have a certain size and shape (called intrabony or intraosseous defects) may be improved by using a graft material in the bony defect. The purpose of this study is to compare healing of periodontal intrabony defects that are treated using demineralized freeze dried bone allograft (DFDBA) versus autogenous platelet-rich fibrin.
The null hypotheses is that there will be no significant differences in bone fill, CAL gain, PD reduction or recession at sites treated with PRF compared to sites treated with DFDBA.
Detailed description
This entire protocol involves procedures that are standard care. The purpose of the research is to evaluate whether there are any differences in results of periodontal surgical treatment using PRF in intrabony defects versus using DFDBA in intrabony defects. The DFDBA used in this study is an approved product and will be used in an approved manner. The PRF used in this study is an autologous product derived from the patient's own blood and is also being used in an approved manner during this study.
The primary outcomes evaluated in this study will include the soft tissue parameter of gain in clinical attachment level (CAL) and the hard tissue parameter of bone fill (BF). Secondary outcomes evaluated will include the soft tissue parameters of probing depth (PD) reduction and change in gingival recession (GR). These parameters will be evaluated over a 6-month period following intraoperative application of the material in advanced periodontal defects in 44 subjects (22 subjects per group with expected completion of 15 subjects per group). Six months after surgery, final post-operative clinical and radiographic measurements will be made.
Each subject will randomly be assigned (1:1) to receive either flap surgery with autologous platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) placed into the intrabony defect (test) or flap surgery with demineralized freeze-dried bone allograft (DFDBA) placed into the intrabony defect (control). Subjects will be randomized by drawing a sealed envelope from a stack of envelopes, each of which will contain a slip of paper on which is written PRF or DFDBA. The number of envelopes per group will equal the total number of subjects to be enrolled per group. Because collection and processing of PRF requires specific equipment, subjects will be randomized just prior to the surgical procedure being performed (before delivery of local anesthesia) rather than after flap reflection and debridement.
Each subject will contribute only 1 study site. If a subject has more than one interproximal bony defect in the area being treated surgically, only 1 such site will be chosen as the study site. The site with the deepest CEJ-BD measurement will be chosen. All other nonstudy sites in the surgical area will be treated with the same material as the adjacent study site (PRF or DFDBA). Clinical measurements at the time of surgery and at the 6-month follow-up will be made by one of two examiners who are masked as to study group. The same clinical examiner who makes measurements at the time of surgery will also make measurements at the 6-month follow-up.
Patients will be given post-operative antibiotics for 7 days after surgery as part of standard care (amoxicillin 500mg three times a day for 7 days; if allergic to amoxicillin, patients will receive doxycycline 100mg twice a day for 7 days). Subjects will be seen 10-14 days after surgery for routine follow-up procedures including removal of sutures and removal of visible plaque. Subjects will be followed again for routine postoperative procedures at 1 month, 2 months, and 4 months after surgery. The final postoperative visit will take place at 6 months post-surgery and will include final radiographic and clinical assessments of the study site. The study is over after this 6-month follow-up visit.
Routine radiographs will be made as standard care procedures pre-operatively and at the 6-month follow-up time point. Radiographs will be standardized using Rinn XCP holders with customized bite registrations, and a 1mm radiopaque square grid (Fixott-Everett grid) will be placed over digital sensor plates to allow ease of linear measurement on the digital radiographic images. Radiographic measurements will be made by a masked examiner. Hard tissue measurements made from the radiographs at baseline and 6-month follow-up will include CEJ to base of bony defect (CEJ-BD).Measurements will be made to the nearest 0.5mm.Bone fill is the linear change (in mm) in CEJ-BD measurement between baseline examination and 6-month follow-up.
Soft tissue measurements made at baseline and 6-month follow-up will include probing depth (PD = gingival margin to base of soft tissue pocket), clinical attachment level (CAL = CEJ to base of soft tissue pocket), and gingival recession (GR = CEJ to gingival margin) at each defect site. North Carolina 15mm (UNC-15) periodontal probes will be used and measurements will be rounded to the nearest 0.5mm.
Intraoperatively, the bony defect will be measured from CEJ-BD to the nearest 0.5mm. This measurement will be made from both the facial and lingual aspect of the interproximal defect (i.e., the depth of the interproximal bony defect will be measured from both the facial and lingual aspect to its deepest depth). In addition, the number of bony walls will be characterized into one of 7 categories: 1) 1-wall, 2) 2-wall, 3) 3-wall, 4) combination 1,2-wall defect, 5) combination 1,3-wall defect, 6) combination 2,3-wall, or 7) circumferential defects. At 6-month follow-up, clinical evaluation of bone fill will be made using transgingival probing in the periodontal pocket from the CEJ to the bony crest. This measurement will also be made from both the facial and lingual aspect of the interproximal defect. This standard care procedure is done using topical anesthetic. Surgical re-entry will not be performed.
For final analysis, the defect will be characterized at the location having the deepest CEJ-BD measurement at the time of surgery. For example, if treating a defect on the distal aspect of tooth #19 in which the CEJ-BD measurement is 8.5mm from the facial aspect and 7.5mm from the lingual at the time of surgery, changes in soft tissue parameters (CAL, PD, recession) and hard tissue parameters (bone fill) for that defect will be determined using PD, CAL, recession and bone fill measurements taken from the facial aspect only (rather than using the mean of facial and lingual measurements to characterize the defect).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| DFDBA | Active comparator | Device: DFDBADFDBA used to graft intrabony defect |
| autologous platelet rich fibrin | Experimental | Device: autologous platelet rich fibrinautologous platelet rich fibrin used to graft intrabony defect |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 99 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient currently a patient at dental school or eligible for treatment at dental school
- Patient resides within 50 mile radius of dental school and is eligible for treatment in Graduate Periodontics Clinic
- Diagnosis of chronic periodontitis with a treatment plan that includes surgical treatment of an intrabony defect adjacent to a natural tooth
- Willing and able to provide informed consent and be available for multiple follow-up visits for the duration of the study
- One or more sites with 1) a probing depth of 6mm or greater (>6mm), 2) a radiographic bony defect depth of greater than 3mm (>3mm), 3) sufficient keratinized tissue to allow complete coverage of the defect with gingival flaps, and 4) radiographic base of bony defect at least 2mm coronal to the apex of the tooth
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- not meeting inclusion criteria above
- Failure to attain adequate oral hygiene prior to surgery (minimum 80% plaque-free surfaces)
- History within the last 6 months of daily use of smokeless tobacco, pipe or cigar smoking, or cigarette smoking exceeding 10 cigarettes per day. Former smokers who quit more than 6 months before the study are eligible for enrollment. Current smokers who smoke less than 10 cigarettes per day are eligible for enrollment.
- Untreated acute or chronic infections in the region of the study site
- Tooth mobility of Grade 2 or higher at the tooth with the potential test site
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DFDBA | Device | DFDBA |
| autologous platelet rich fibrin | Device | autologous platelet rich fibrin |
Primary outcome
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL)
Time frame: baseline and 6 months after surgery
measurement of CAL at the time of surgical intervention will be compared with measurement of CAL and bone level 6 months after surgery
1 secondary outcome
Change in Radiographic Bone Level
Time frame: baseline and 6 months after surgery
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Jul 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27353441Chadwick JK, Mills MP, Mealey BL. Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of Demineralized Freeze-Dried Bone Allograft Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin for the Treatment of Periodontal Intrabony Defects in Humans. J Periodontol. 2016 Nov;87(11):1253-1260. doi: 10.1902/jop.2016.160309. Epub 2016 Jun 28.
Related trials for Periodontitis
Recruiting
Effect of Cryotherapeutic and Nanotherapeutic Sodium Hypochlorite on Post-Operative Endodontic Pain.
Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis, Symptomatic Apical Periodontitis
Active, not recruitingObservational study
A Retrospective Comparative Evaluation of Omega-3 and Resveratrol Supplementation in Patients With Periodontitis
Periodontitis
Recruiting
Probiotics Versus Antibiotics as an Adjuvant to Non-surgical Periodontal Treatment Among Smokers With Stage II, Grade B Periodontitis
Probiotics, Antibiotics
Recruiting
Effects of Different Activation Techniques on Antimicrobial Photodynamic Therapy in Apical Periodontitis
Apical Periodontitis, Endodontic Retreatment
Recruiting
Ozone Gel Versus Chlorohexidine Gel as an Adjunct to Non-Surgical Treatment of Stage II Periodontitis Grade B Among Smokers Patients
Ozone Gel, Chlorohexidine Gel
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing DFDBA and autologous platelet rich fibrin in people with Periodontitis, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Jul 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 1 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Clinical Attachment Level (CAL) (time frame: baseline and 6 months after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02154906, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Jul 2016.