AzTrials
AzTrials

Bladder CancerNCT02113501

Optimized Treatment Strategy for HighGrade1 (HGT1) Bladder Cancer Based on Substaging: a Prospective Observational Cohort Study

An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer of High Grade stage T1 (HGT1), has up to 20% risk of progression to invasive disease. Because the depth of substaging seems to identify two separate groups with different progression risk (HighGradeT1a and HighGradeT1b), we design a differential treatment strategy for each group. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Bladder Cancer
How many people
200 participants
Where
1 siteSpain
Study dates
Apr 2005to Dec 2013
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Initial HGT1 bladder cancer patients that have undergone a complete TUR and are willing to enter the protocol.

Who may be able to join

  • HGT1 bladder cancer at initial diagnosis and after a complete TUR

Who cannot join

  • abscence of muscularis propria in the TUR specimen

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Spain1 site
  • Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain

    Barcelona, Barcelona, 08035

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Optimized Treatment Strategy for HighGradeT1 (HGT1) Bladder Cancer Based on Substaging (Depth of Lamina Propria Invasion): a Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Non-muscle invasive bladder cancer of High Grade stage T1 (HGT1), has up to 20% risk of progression to invasive disease. Because the depth of substaging seems to identify two separate groups with different progression risk (HighGradeT1a and HighGradeT1b), we design a differential treatment strategy for each group. The main hypothesis is that HighGradeT1a bladder cancer can spare a second endoscopic procedure.

Read the detailed description

Only cases of initial diagnosis of HighGradeT1 and with a complete transurethral endoscopic resection (TUR) of bladder tumor) can enter this protocol. HighGradeT1a will only receive standard BCG treatment (induction and maintenance). HighGradeT1b will undergo a second transurethral endoscopic resection (TUR) after the induction of Bacillus de Calmette-Guerin (BCG) and then continue mantenaince BCG and standard follow-up.

Conditions
Bladder Cancer
Keywords
HGT1, high risk bladder cancer, substaging, repeat transurethral resection (reTUR), lamina propria
Medical subject headings
Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02113501
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HGT1aHGT1a bladder cancer patients will undergo BCG induction and maintenance followed by conventional follow-up (cystoscopy and cytology at 3months and then every 6months).
HGT1bHGT1b bladder cancer patients will undergo a 2nd TUR after BCG induction. If negative, continue with maintenance BCG followed by conventional follow-up (cystoscopy and cytology every 6months).

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. progression

    Measured: 5year

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. recurrence

    Measured: 5year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted14 Apr 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2005
  3. Primary completionDec 2013
  4. Study completionDec 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
200 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02113501
Sponsor's protocol ID
HighGradeT1 Bladder Cancer HVH
Status last verified
Apr 2014
First submitted
31 Mar 2014
Last updated
14 Apr 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Orsola A, Cecchini L, Raventos CX, Trilla E, Planas J, Landolfi S, de Torres I, Morote J. Risk factors for positive findings in patients with high-grade T1 bladder cancer treated with transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TUR) and bacille Calmette-Guerin therapy and the decision for a repeat TUR. BJU Int. 2010 Jan;105(2):202-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08694.x. Epub 2009 Jun 24.

    PubMed 19558557

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute at 1 site in Spain.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Apr 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

progression (time frame: 5year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02113501, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Apr 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in