ObesityFNPANCT02067728
Family Nutrition Physical Activity Tool Use During Well Child Visits
A study testing FNPA tool in people with Obesity, run by University of Illinois Chicago at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The main aim of the study would be to examine the effect of using a health behavior screening tool and a brief patient centered conversation on health behavior goal setting during well-child visits. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 4 to 17 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Obesity
- What is being tested?
- FNPA tool
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 430 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Apr 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 4 to 17 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- All children ages 4-17 years scheduled for well child visits
Who cannot join
- -Patients with chronic medical conditions or developmental delays that preclude age appropriate nutrition and physical activity habits will be excluded. -
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
UnityPointHealth Methodist in Peoria
Peoria, Illinois, 61636
About this study
Official title: Family Nutrition, Physical Activity (FNPA) Tool: a Motivational Interviewing-based Practice Intervention to Address Pediatric Health Behaviors
The main aim of the study would be to examine the effect of using a health behavior screening tool and a brief patient centered conversation on health behavior goal setting during well-child visits.
Read the detailed description
Rationale and Significance: Although much research aimed at preventing childhood obesity focuses on community, environment, and school-based initiatives, there is significant potential for healthcare systems and primary care providers to aid in preventing obesity. All children, one-third of whom are overweight, have multiple well-child and acute encounters with their providers. Provider counseling regarding Body Mass Index (BMI) is strongly correlated with a parent's perception of his or her child's weight, and parents who perceive BMI as a health problem are 10 times more likely to make healthy lifestyle changes.As a result, a practice intervention aimed at improving behavior change goals employed during well-child encounters provide an optimal opportunity for physicians to impact family lifestyle behaviors and hopefully reduce the trajectory of obesity rates in their patient population.
To our knowledge, there is little published evidence regarding the use of validated, brief, screening and coaching tools paired with MI-enhanced conversations related to obesigenic behaviors during health supervision visits. The proposed project, a practice-based intervention that pairs Brief Action Planning (BAP)focused on targeted obesigenic behaviors identified by the Family Nutrition Physical Activity (FNPA ) tool, addresses many of the barriers of existing current practice approaches and will enable providers to implement a focused conversation to establish realistic behavior change goals. The study brings primary care providers to the forefront of obesity prevention while allowing the patient to direct the path to behavior change. The intervention includes a patient-centered approach and has been proven to be feasible and acceptable among providers and patients. The potential impact of this project is to increase provider and patient collaboration for goal-setting, which will then result in a reduction of obesigenic behaviors. Evidence from this investigation will give providers specific and feasible methods for counseling on behaviors associated with obesity.
Procedures:
Practice Recruitment: For 3 months, practice recruitment meetings will be held with offices from three healthcare networks during which the research protocol will be explained, roles and responsibilities of research staff and practices will be outlined, and written agreements signed. At baseline, all practices will complete a practice and provider demographic questionnaire to characterize any baseline procedures and documentation practices related to obesity prevention as well as previous provider training in obesity prevention and MI (questionnaire is available on request). Practices will then be matched and randomly assigned.
Practice training: Practitioners will have a four-month period to undergo three 1.5-hour training sessions to learn the principles of MI and BAP and get familiar with using the FNPA tool. Research staff and trainers who are licensed clinical professional counselors (LCPC) certified in BAP will lead trainings. A PhD psychologist researcher will develop the curriculum and oversee trainers. Competency will be measured by successful certification of a BAP encounter and correctly interpreting three FNPA tools. Trained research staff will teach office staff correct techniques in anthropometrics and FNPA scoring. Competency will be measured by three accurate measurements and correct scoring of three FNPA tools. Scales and stadiometers at each enrolled practice will be calibrated for consistency in measurement across sites.
Subject Recruitment: Subject recruitment will occur one month before implementation. Eligible subjects with scheduled well-child visits will receive a letter signed by their provider and the PI (Amy Christison, MD). The letter will briefly describe the study and offer the opportunity to enroll. They will be given an opt-out phone number to call within one week of mailing this letter if they do not want to participate. If the research coordinator does not receive a call, he/she will contact the family by phone to answer questions and send a consent form to the family. The subject will be considered enrolled after obtaining a signed written consent from the family.
Implementation Period: The FNPA tool will be routinely used during all health supervision visits in the implementation practices during 6 months, regardless of patient is enrolled or not. During scheduled well child visits, treatment group practices will implement the FNPA tool using BAP. Parents/guardians of all patients, ages 4 to 11, will be asked to answer the FNPA child questionnaire, and patients, ages 12 to 17, with their parents will answer the FNPA adolescent questionnaire. The practice staff will score it, and providers will 1) engage the family in a patient-centered discussion about the patient's body mass index (BMI) percentage ,2) discuss healthy and obesigenic behaviors identified on the tool, 3) mutually decide on any goals for change, 4) determine the patient's confidence for change, and 5) offer follow-up by phone or appointment regarding stated goals, and 6) offer follow-up appointments for focused counseling of patients identified as overweight or obese as per American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations. Goals and follow-up plans will be documented on the FNPA tool, and copies will be given to the family and retained in the chart. For healthy weight children, if follow-up by phone call is chosen, it will be implemented at the time selected by the patient and by the clinical research staff trained in BAP so that lack of support staff in a particular site for such calls is not a confounding variable.
Control group practices will provide usual well-child care per AAP recommendations.Their patients will complete an FNPA assessment questionnaire directly after their appointment for the purposes of comparing baseline and end point measures. Importantly, this approach prevents the possibility of providers commenting on the results.
Both treatment and control group parents/guardians of patients attending appointments will provide demographic data including parent-reported parent weight and height, and income range. Age, sex, and patient calculated BMI and z-score will be abstracted from the medical record.
Outcomes Measurement Procedures:
- Treatment group patients will rate their impressions of the FNPA tool at the end of the appointment. If patients are adolescents (12 years or older), both the patient and the attending parent will complete the survey. Parents of younger children will complete surveys for those patients.
- A research assistant blinded to treatment group will perform all phone surveys. At 1 month, patients from both groups will be will be asked to rate how patient centered their encounter was. Behavior change surveys will be performed at 1 month and 6 months following the encounter.
- All subjects will be asked to return to their practices for weight and height measurements 6 months after their initial encounter and to fill out a second FNPA tool. This will be performed by un-blinded research staff as using blinding in this setting would not be feasible.
- Audit of charting regarding goal setting documentation, successful identification of overweight and obese patients, and compliance with recommended follow-up appointments will be performed of both groups.
- Treatment group providers will have a baseline and two random encounters audio recorded midway and at the end of the intervention period. They will be scored for fidelity to the BAP-approach by a trained and blinded coder. This is done to understand the effectiveness of the BAP training for the provider. They will also receive feedback from the coding results and given a refresher if needed. Control group providers will have one baseline encounter recorded and scored for fidelity and comparison to treatment group providers.
- Providers will be surveyed regarding their satisfaction with the FNPA intervention at the end of the 6-month intervention time.
Analysis: Analysis will be done with Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.3 or the latest version. A significance level of p<=0.05 is accepted as significant. Descriptive statistics (mean, median, mode, range) will be examined and the data set cleaned. To compare the two study groups for univariate analysis, t-tests will be computed for interval variables, Mann-Whitney U for ordinal variables, and Chi-square for nominal variables. Generalized Linear Mixed Models will be employed for multivariate analysis with repeated measures and multi-level effects. Subjects who drop out or are lost to follow-up will be compared to completed subjects in differences related to demographics, socioeconomic status, and BMI.
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Being tested
- FNPA tool, Usual Care
- Keywords
- obesity prevention
- Medical subject headings
- Obesity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FNPA toolBehavioural
Intervention practice will train to use FNPA screening paired with Brief Action Planning. They will implement this approach during well child visits.
Usual CareBehavioural
Practices not undergoing intervention with FNPA tool will provide usual care to patients during well-child visits.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Usual care is provided to patients in practice groups not undergoing intervention of FNPA tool Receives: Behavioral: Usual Care |
| FNPA tool intervention | Experimental | FNPA tool practice intervention comprising of two components: 1) FNPA assessment which screens for obesigenic behaviors; 2) Brief Action Planning conversation designed to assist the family develop a health behavior change goal based on obesigenic risks on the assessment tool. Receives: Behavioral: FNPA tool |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Percentage of Patients With Documented Goal Setting
Health behavior change goal documented in charting of well-child visits.
Measured: 2 weeks from encounter
Secondary outcomes (8)
Obesiogenic Goal Setting Success
Degree to which an obesiogenic goal was set and carried out at 1 month after the encounter. Success defined as response of 2-4 on health behaviors survey, with 2=success some of the time, 3=success most of the time, and 4=success almost always.
Measured: 1 month after the encounter
Obesiogenic Goal Setting Success
Degree to which an obesiogenic goal was set and carried out at 6 months after the encounter. Success defined as response of 2-4 on survey, with 2=success some of the time, 3=success most of the time, and 4=success almost always.
Measured: 6 months after encounter
Success of Obesiogenic Goals
Degree to which an obesiogenic goal was set and successfully carried out at 1 month post encounter. Success is defined as rating of 3 or 4 on the 1 month health behavior survey, with 3=goal met most of the time and 4= goal met almost always.
Measured: 1 month post encounter
Success of Obesiogenic Goals
Degree to which an obesiogenic goal was set and successfully carried out at 6 months post encounter. Success is defined as rating of 3 or 4 on the 1 month health behavior survey, with 3=goal met most of the time and 4= goal met almost always.
Measured: 6 months post encounter
Success of Other Health Goals
Degree to which other health behavior goals (non-obesiogenic) were set and carried out at 1 month post encounter. Success defined as response of 2-4 on health behaviors survey, with 2=success some of the time, 3=success most of the time, and 4=success almost always.
Measured: 1 month post encounter
Success of Other Health Goals
Degree to which other health behavior goals (non-obesiogenic) were set and carried out at 6 months post encounter. Success defined as response of 2-4 on health behaviors survey, with 2=success some of the time, 3=success most of the time, and 4=success almost always.
Measured: 6 months post encounter
BMI Z-score Change for Ages 4-10 Years
Measured: Baseline and 6 months post encounter
BMI Z-score Change for Ages 11-17 Years
Measured: Baseline and 6 months post encounter
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionApr 2015
- Study completionApr 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for ObesityStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of Illinois ChicagoThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 430 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Illinois Chicago
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc., Northwestern University, New York University
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy Christison, M.D., University of Illinois Chicago
- Investigators
- Amy Christison, MD, Principal investigator, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02067728
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 297832
- Acronym
- FNPA
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Campbell K, Waters E, O'Meara S, Summerbell C. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD001871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.
PubMed 11686999Gutnick D. Brief Action Planning to Facilitate Behavior Change and Support Patient Self-Management.Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management 21(1):17-29, 2014
Taveras EM, Gortmaker SL, Hohman KH, Horan CM, Kleinman KP, Mitchell K, Price S, Prosser LA, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gillman MW. Randomized controlled trial to improve primary care to prevent and manage childhood obesity: the High Five for Kids study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):714-22. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.44. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
PubMed 21464376Barlow SE; Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S164-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329C.
PubMed 18055651Huang JS, Donohue M, Golnari G, Fernandez S, Walker-Gallego E, Galvan K, Briones C, Tamai J, Becerra K. Pediatricians' weight assessment and obesity management practices. BMC Pediatr. 2009 Mar 5;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-19.
PubMed 19265553Perrin EM, Flower KB, Garrett J, Ammerman AS. Preventing and treating obesity: pediatricians' self-efficacy, barriers, resources, and advocacy. Ambul Pediatr. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):150-6. doi: 10.1367/A04-104R.1.
PubMed 15913408Story MT, Neumark-Stzainer DR, Sherwood NE, Holt K, Sofka D, Trowbridge FL, Barlow SE. Management of child and adolescent obesity: attitudes, barriers, skills, and training needs among health care professionals. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 2):210-4.
PubMed 12093997Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L, Ahrens L, Smith K. A brief motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. Health Educ Res. 1999 Jun;14(3):399-410. doi: 10.1093/her/14.3.399.
PubMed 10539230Erickson SJ, Gerstle M, Feldstein SW. Brief interventions and motivational interviewing with children, adolescents, and their parents in pediatric health care settings: a review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Dec;159(12):1173-80. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1173. No abstract available.
PubMed 16330743Taveras EM, Mitchell K, Gortmaker SL. Parental confidence in making overweight-related behavior changes. Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):151-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2892.
PubMed 19564295Schwartz RP, Hamre R, Dietz WH, Wasserman RC, Slora EJ, Myers EF, Sullivan S, Rockett H, Thoma KA, Dumitru G, Resnicow KA. Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May;161(5):495-501. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.495.
PubMed 17485627Bodenheimer T, Handley MA. Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: an exploration and status report. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
PubMed 19560895Shilts MK, Horowitz M, Townsend MS. Goal setting as a strategy for dietary and physical activity behavior change: a review of the literature. Am J Health Promot. 2004 Nov-Dec;19(2):81-93. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-19.2.81.
PubMed 15559708Gans KM, Ross E, Barner CW, Wylie-Rosett J, McMurray J, Eaton C. REAP and WAVE: new tools to rapidly assess/discuss nutrition with patients. J Nutr. 2003 Feb;133(2):556S-62S. doi: 10.1093/jn/133.2.556S.
PubMed 12566502Patrick K, Sallis JF, Prochaska JJ, Lydston DD, Calfas KJ, Zabinski MF, Wilfley DE, Saelens BE, Brown DR. A multicomponent program for nutrition and physical activity change in primary care: PACE+ for adolescents. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001 Aug;155(8):940-6. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.155.8.940.
PubMed 11483123
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Family Nutrition, Physical Activity (FNPA) Tool: a Motivational Interviewing-based Practice Intervention to Address Pediatric Health Behaviors
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02067728
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FNPA / 297832
- Conditions
- Obesity
- Keywords
- obesity prevention
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 430 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of Illinois ChicagoUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- American Cancer Society, Inc., Northwestern University, New York University
- Study start
- Feb 2014
- Primary completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Mar 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main aim of the study would be to examine the effect of using a health behavior screening tool and a brief patient centered conversation on health behavior goal setting during well-child visits.
Detailed description
Rationale and Significance: Although much research aimed at preventing childhood obesity focuses on community, environment, and school-based initiatives, there is significant potential for healthcare systems and primary care providers to aid in preventing obesity. All children, one-third of whom are overweight, have multiple well-child and acute encounters with their providers. Provider counseling regarding Body Mass Index (BMI) is strongly correlated with a parent's perception of his or her child's weight, and parents who perceive BMI as a health problem are 10 times more likely to make healthy lifestyle changes.As a result, a practice intervention aimed at improving behavior change goals employed during well-child encounters provide an optimal opportunity for physicians to impact family lifestyle behaviors and hopefully reduce the trajectory of obesity rates in their patient population.
To our knowledge, there is little published evidence regarding the use of validated, brief, screening and coaching tools paired with MI-enhanced conversations related to obesigenic behaviors during health supervision visits. The proposed project, a practice-based intervention that pairs Brief Action Planning (BAP)focused on targeted obesigenic behaviors identified by the Family Nutrition Physical Activity (FNPA ) tool, addresses many of the barriers of existing current practice approaches and will enable providers to implement a focused conversation to establish realistic behavior change goals. The study brings primary care providers to the forefront of obesity prevention while allowing the patient to direct the path to behavior change. The intervention includes a patient-centered approach and has been proven to be feasible and acceptable among providers and patients. The potential impact of this project is to increase provider and patient collaboration for goal-setting, which will then result in a reduction of obesigenic behaviors. Evidence from this investigation will give providers specific and feasible methods for counseling on behaviors associated with obesity.
Procedures:
Practice Recruitment: For 3 months, practice recruitment meetings will be held with offices from three healthcare networks during which the research protocol will be explained, roles and responsibilities of research staff and practices will be outlined, and written agreements signed. At baseline, all practices will complete a practice and provider demographic questionnaire to characterize any baseline procedures and documentation practices related to obesity prevention as well as previous provider training in obesity prevention and MI (questionnaire is available on request). Practices will then be matched and randomly assigned.
Practice training: Practitioners will have a four-month period to undergo three 1.5-hour training sessions to learn the principles of MI and BAP and get familiar with using the FNPA tool. Research staff and trainers who are licensed clinical professional counselors (LCPC) certified in BAP will lead trainings. A PhD psychologist researcher will develop the curriculum and oversee trainers. Competency will be measured by successful certification of a BAP encounter and correctly interpreting three FNPA tools. Trained research staff will teach office staff correct techniques in anthropometrics and FNPA scoring. Competency will be measured by three accurate measurements and correct scoring of three FNPA tools. Scales and stadiometers at each enrolled practice will be calibrated for consistency in measurement across sites.
Subject Recruitment: Subject recruitment will occur one month before implementation. Eligible subjects with scheduled well-child visits will receive a letter signed by their provider and the PI (Amy Christison, MD). The letter will briefly describe the study and offer the opportunity to enroll. They will be given an opt-out phone number to call within one week of mailing this letter if they do not want to participate. If the research coordinator does not receive a call, he/she will contact the family by phone to answer questions and send a consent form to the family. The subject will be considered enrolled after obtaining a signed written consent from the family.
Implementation Period: The FNPA tool will be routinely used during all health supervision visits in the implementation practices during 6 months, regardless of patient is enrolled or not. During scheduled well child visits, treatment group practices will implement the FNPA tool using BAP. Parents/guardians of all patients, ages 4 to 11, will be asked to answer the FNPA child questionnaire, and patients, ages 12 to 17, with their parents will answer the FNPA adolescent questionnaire. The practice staff will score it, and providers will 1) engage the family in a patient-centered discussion about the patient's body mass index (BMI) percentage ,2) discuss healthy and obesigenic behaviors identified on the tool, 3) mutually decide on any goals for change, 4) determine the patient's confidence for change, and 5) offer follow-up by phone or appointment regarding stated goals, and 6) offer follow-up appointments for focused counseling of patients identified as overweight or obese as per American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommendations. Goals and follow-up plans will be documented on the FNPA tool, and copies will be given to the family and retained in the chart. For healthy weight children, if follow-up by phone call is chosen, it will be implemented at the time selected by the patient and by the clinical research staff trained in BAP so that lack of support staff in a particular site for such calls is not a confounding variable.
Control group practices will provide usual well-child care per AAP recommendations.Their patients will complete an FNPA assessment questionnaire directly after their appointment for the purposes of comparing baseline and end point measures. Importantly, this approach prevents the possibility of providers commenting on the results.
Both treatment and control group parents/guardians of patients attending appointments will provide demographic data including parent-reported parent weight and height, and income range. Age, sex, and patient calculated BMI and z-score will be abstracted from the medical record.
Outcomes Measurement Procedures:
- Treatment group patients will rate their impressions of the FNPA tool at the end of the appointment. If patients are adolescents (12 years or older), both the patient and the attending parent will complete the survey. Parents of younger children will complete surveys for those patients.
- A research assistant blinded to treatment group will perform all phone surveys. At 1 month, patients from both groups will be will be asked to rate how patient centered their encounter was. Behavior change surveys will be performed at 1 month and 6 months following the encounter.
- All subjects will be asked to return to their practices for weight and height measurements 6 months after their initial encounter and to fill out a second FNPA tool. This will be performed by un-blinded research staff as using blinding in this setting would not be feasible.
- Audit of charting regarding goal setting documentation, successful identification of overweight and obese patients, and compliance with recommended follow-up appointments will be performed of both groups.
- Treatment group providers will have a baseline and two random encounters audio recorded midway and at the end of the intervention period. They will be scored for fidelity to the BAP-approach by a trained and blinded coder. This is done to understand the effectiveness of the BAP training for the provider. They will also receive feedback from the coding results and given a refresher if needed. Control group providers will have one baseline encounter recorded and scored for fidelity and comparison to treatment group providers.
- Providers will be surveyed regarding their satisfaction with the FNPA intervention at the end of the 6-month intervention time.
Analysis: Analysis will be done with Statistical Analysis System (SAS) 9.3 or the latest version. A significance level of p<=0.05 is accepted as significant. Descriptive statistics (mean, median, mode, range) will be examined and the data set cleaned. To compare the two study groups for univariate analysis, t-tests will be computed for interval variables, Mann-Whitney U for ordinal variables, and Chi-square for nominal variables. Generalized Linear Mixed Models will be employed for multivariate analysis with repeated measures and multi-level effects. Subjects who drop out or are lost to follow-up will be compared to completed subjects in differences related to demographics, socioeconomic status, and BMI.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Usual Care | Active comparator | Behavioral: Usual CareUsual care is provided to patients in practice groups not undergoing intervention of FNPA tool |
| FNPA tool intervention | Experimental | Behavioral: FNPA toolFNPA tool practice intervention comprising of two components: 1) FNPA assessment which screens for obesigenic behaviors; 2) Brief Action Planning conversation designed to assist the family develop a health behavior change goal based on obesigenic risks on the assessment tool. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 4 to 17 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All children ages 4-17 years scheduled for well child visits
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- -Patients with chronic medical conditions or developmental delays that preclude age appropriate nutrition and physical activity habits will be excluded. -
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FNPA toolIntervention practice will train to use FNPA screening paired with Brief Action Planning. They will implement this approach during well child visits. | Behavioural | FNPA tool intervention |
| Usual CarePractices not undergoing intervention with FNPA tool will provide usual care to patients during well-child visits. | Behavioural | Usual Care |
Primary outcome
Percentage of Patients With Documented Goal Setting
Time frame: 2 weeks from encounter
Health behavior change goal documented in charting of well-child visits.
8 secondary outcomes
Obesiogenic Goal Setting Success
Time frame: 1 month after the encounter
Obesiogenic Goal Setting Success
Time frame: 6 months after encounter
Success of Obesiogenic Goals
Time frame: 1 month post encounter
Success of Obesiogenic Goals
Time frame: 6 months post encounter
Success of Other Health Goals
Time frame: 1 month post encounter
Success of Other Health Goals
Time frame: 6 months post encounter
BMI Z-score Change for Ages 4-10 Years
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post encounter
BMI Z-score Change for Ages 11-17 Years
Time frame: Baseline and 6 months post encounter
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Mar 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 11686999Campbell K, Waters E, O'Meara S, Summerbell C. Interventions for preventing obesity in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(3):CD001871. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001871.
- BackgroundGutnick D. Brief Action Planning to Facilitate Behavior Change and Support Patient Self-Management.Journal of Clinical Outcomes Management 21(1):17-29, 2014
- Background: PubMed 21464376Taveras EM, Gortmaker SL, Hohman KH, Horan CM, Kleinman KP, Mitchell K, Price S, Prosser LA, Rifas-Shiman SL, Gillman MW. Randomized controlled trial to improve primary care to prevent and manage childhood obesity: the High Five for Kids study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2011 Aug;165(8):714-22. doi: 10.1001/archpediatrics.2011.44. Epub 2011 Apr 4.
- Background: PubMed 18055651Barlow SE; Expert Committee. Expert committee recommendations regarding the prevention, assessment, and treatment of child and adolescent overweight and obesity: summary report. Pediatrics. 2007 Dec;120 Suppl 4:S164-92. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-2329C.
- Background: PubMed 19265553Huang JS, Donohue M, Golnari G, Fernandez S, Walker-Gallego E, Galvan K, Briones C, Tamai J, Becerra K. Pediatricians' weight assessment and obesity management practices. BMC Pediatr. 2009 Mar 5;9:19. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-9-19.
- Background: PubMed 15913408Perrin EM, Flower KB, Garrett J, Ammerman AS. Preventing and treating obesity: pediatricians' self-efficacy, barriers, resources, and advocacy. Ambul Pediatr. 2005 May-Jun;5(3):150-6. doi: 10.1367/A04-104R.1.
- Background: PubMed 12093997Story MT, Neumark-Stzainer DR, Sherwood NE, Holt K, Sofka D, Trowbridge FL, Barlow SE. Management of child and adolescent obesity: attitudes, barriers, skills, and training needs among health care professionals. Pediatrics. 2002 Jul;110(1 Pt 2):210-4.
- Background: PubMed 10539230Berg-Smith SM, Stevens VJ, Brown KM, Van Horn L, Gernhofer N, Peters E, Greenberg R, Snetselaar L, Ahrens L, Smith K. A brief motivational intervention to improve dietary adherence in adolescents. The Dietary Intervention Study in Children (DISC) Research Group. Health Educ Res. 1999 Jun;14(3):399-410. doi: 10.1093/her/14.3.399.
- Background: PubMed 16330743Erickson SJ, Gerstle M, Feldstein SW. Brief interventions and motivational interviewing with children, adolescents, and their parents in pediatric health care settings: a review. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2005 Dec;159(12):1173-80. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.159.12.1173. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19564295Taveras EM, Mitchell K, Gortmaker SL. Parental confidence in making overweight-related behavior changes. Pediatrics. 2009 Jul;124(1):151-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-2892.
- Background: PubMed 17485627Schwartz RP, Hamre R, Dietz WH, Wasserman RC, Slora EJ, Myers EF, Sullivan S, Rockett H, Thoma KA, Dumitru G, Resnicow KA. Office-based motivational interviewing to prevent childhood obesity: a feasibility study. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007 May;161(5):495-501. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.161.5.495.
- Background: PubMed 19560895Bodenheimer T, Handley MA. Goal-setting for behavior change in primary care: an exploration and status report. Patient Educ Couns. 2009 Aug;76(2):174-80. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jun 27.
Related trials for Obesity
RecruitingObservational study
Endoscopic Sleeve Gastroplasty (ESG) Prospective Trial for Obesity (EGO-Trial)
Obesity
Active, not recruitingPhase 4
Effects of Sequential Therapy With Mexidol® (Intravenous) and Mexidol® FORTE 250 (Oral) on Functional Brain Activity Assessed by Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Biochemical Parameters in Patients With Chronic Cerebral Ischemia: A Comparison of Patients With and Without Metabolic Disorders
Metabolic Abnormalities, Obesity & Overweight
Recruiting
Exercise Training and Vitamin D Metabolism
Obesity & Overweight, Vitamin D
Recruiting
Metabolic Health, Bones and Nuts During Weight Loss in Adults
Weight Loss, Bone Density
Active, not recruiting
Effect of Probiotics on Insulin Sensitivity in Overweight and Obese Pregnancy
Obesity & Overweight, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy Christison, MD principal investigator
University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing FNPA tool in people with Obesity, run by University of Illinois Chicago at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Mar 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Percentage of Patients With Documented Goal Setting (time frame: 2 weeks from encounter). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02067728, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Mar 2016.