Ulcerative Colitis (UC)Phase 3NCT02065622
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Two Adalimumab Dosing Regimens in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Ulcerative Colitis
A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab in people with Ulcerative Colitis (UC), run by AbbVie at 173 sites in 20 countries.
Trial summary
To evaluate safety and efficacy of two adalimumab dosing regimens for induction and maintenance (standard and higher dosing) in achieving clinical remission in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
- What is being tested?
- Adalimumab
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 952 participants
- Where
- 173 sitesin 20 countries
- Study dates
- 27 Mar 2014to 11 Nov 2019
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) for at least 90 days, confirmed by endoscopy during Screening period.
- Active UC with Mayo Score of 6 to 12 points and endoscopy subscore of 2 to 3 despite concurrent or prior treatment with a full and adequate course, in the opinion of the Investigator, with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants or both. Mayo Score is confirmed by central reader.
Who cannot join
- Subject with Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (IC).
- Current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon.
- Subjects with disease limited to the rectum (ulcerative proctitis) during the screening endoscopy.
- Chronic recurring infections or active tuberculosis (TB).
Trial locations and contacts
173 sites in 20 countries.
173 sites in 20 countries
United States42 sites
University of Michigan Hospitals /ID# 122240
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Atlanta Gastro Assoc /ID# 122336
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342
University of Maryland Med Ctr /ID# 169734
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Charlotte Gastro Hepatology /ID# 122235
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207
Erlanger Institute for Clinica /ID# 129009
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37403
MGG Group, Inc.Chevy Chase Clinical Research /ID# 122238
Chevy Chase, Maryland, 20815
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine /ID# 122183
Chicago, Illinois, 60611-2927
University of Chicago /ID# 122302
Chicago, Illinois, 60637-1443
New River Valley Research Inst /ID# 127801
Christiansburg, Virginia, 24073
Consultants for Clinical Res /ID# 122304
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45219
Gastro Florida /ID# 170619
Clearwater, Florida, 33756
Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast /ID# 127844
Dothan, Alabama, 36305
Dayton Gastroenterology, Inc. /ID# 127804
Englewood, Ohio, 45415
DHAT Research Institute /ID# 170616
Garland, Texas, 75044-2208
Gastro One /ID# 122339
Germantown, Tennessee, 38138
NYU Langone Long Island CRA /ID# 122177
Great Neck, New York, 11021
Medical Research Ctr CT /ID# 122179
Hamden, Connecticut, 06518
Biopharma Informatic Research /ID# 171150
Houston, Texas, 77024-2420
Ucsd /Id# 122313
La Jolla, California, 92093
Gastro Assoc of Central GA /ID# 122318
Macon, Georgia, 31201
Ctr for Digest and Liver Dis /ID# 122182
Mexico, Missouri, 65265
Research Associates of South Florida,LLC /ID# 170309
Miami, Florida, 33156
WI Center for Advanced Res /ID# 122178
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53215
Froedtert & the Medical College of Wisconsin /ID# 122261
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226-3522
Gastroenterology Group Naples /ID# 127806
Naples, Florida, 34102
Vanderbilt Univ Med Ctr /ID# 125496
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-0011
Icahn School of Med Mt. Sinai /ID# 127047
New York, New York, 10029
Advanced Research Institute /ID# 126147
Ogden, Utah, 84403
Austin Center for Clinical Research /ID# 125396
Pflugerville, Texas, 78660
University of Pittsburgh MC /ID# 122331
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15260
The Oregon Clinic- Gastro West /ID# 135273
Portland, Oregon, 97225
Wake Research Associates, LLC /ID# 122157
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Mayo Clinic - Rochester /ID# 122244
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905-0001
University of Utah /ID# 122333
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84112-5500
University of Washington /ID# 169721
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Louisiana Research Ctr. LLC /ID# 141655
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71105-6800
Texas Digestive Disease Consul /ID# 141677
Southlake, Texas, 76092
Texas Digestive Disease Consul /ID# 141678
Southlake, Texas, 76092
Gastro United of Tulsa /ID# 125436
Tulsa, Oklahoma, 74135
Carle Foundation Hospital /ID# 135955
Urbana, Illinois, 61801
Rocky Mountain Clinical Resear /ID# 122180
Wheat Ridge, Colorado, 80033
Shafran Gastroenterology Ctr /ID# 122320
Winter Park, Florida, 32789
Japan24 sites
Medical Hospital of Tokyo Medical and Dental University /ID# 128315
Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, 113-8519
Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital /ID# 124155
Chikushino-shi, Fukuoka, 818-8502
Kyushu University Hospital /ID# 124495
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 812-8582
Hamamatsu South Hospital /ID# 124481
Hamamatsu, Shizuoka, 430-0846
Hiroshima University Hospital /ID# 124496
Hiroshima, Hiroshima, 734-8551
Saitama Medical Center /ID# 128875
Kawagoe-shi, Saitama, 350-8550
Aoyama Clinic /ID# 127836
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0015
Hidaka Clinic of Coloproctology /ID# 125477
Kurume, Fukuoka, 839-0809
Kurume University Hospital /ID# 125275
Kurume-shi, Fukuoka, 830-0011
Japanese Red Cross Kyoto Daiichi Hos /ID# 127540
Kyoto, Kyoto, 605-0981
Kitasato Univ Kitasato Inst Ho /ID# 127001
Minato-ku, Tokyo, 108-8642
Kyorin University Hospital /ID# 148184
Mitaka-shi, Tokyo, 181-8611
Yokoyama IBD Clinic /ID# 151560
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 460-0022
Nagoya City University Hospital /ID# 124517
Nagoya, Aichi-ken, 467-8602
Hyogo College of Medicine College Hospital /Id# 127539
Nishinomiya-shi, Hyōgo, 663-8501
Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital /ID# 127675
Ōtsu, Shiga, 520-2192
Kitasato University Hospital /ID# 137694
Sagamihara-shi, Kanagawa, 252-0375
Toho University Sakura Medical Center /ID# 124497
Sakura-shi, Chiba, 285-8741
Hokkaido P.W.F.A.C. Sapporo-Kosei General Hospital /ID# 124480
Sapporo, Hokkaido, 060-0033
Susaki Kuroshio Hospital /ID# 125202
Susaki-shi, Kochi, 785-8501
Osaka Medical College Hospital /ID# 126451
Takatsuki-shi, Osaka, 569-8686
Tokyo Yamate Medical Center /ID# 125201
Tokyo, 169-0073
Wakayama Medical University /ID# 124635
Wakayama, Wakayama, 641-8510
COLO-PROCTOLOGY CENTER Matsushima Clinic /ID# 148423
Yokohama, Kanagawa, 220-0045
Poland12 sites
Szpital Uniwersytecki Nr 2 im. dr J.Biziela w Bydgoszczy /ID# 127141
Bydgoszcz, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 85-168
Centrum Medyczne LukaMed Joanna Luka /ID# 170302
Chojnice, 89-600
Centrum Medyczne Sw. Lukaza /ID# 126515
Częstochowa, 42-200
Centrum Medyczne Pratia Gdynia /ID# 170301
Gdynia, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 81-338
NZOZ All-Medicus /ID# 128740
Katowice, Silesian Voivodeship, 40-659
Centrum Diagnostyczno Lecznicze Barska /ID# 170304
Lodz, 91-347
C.M. Szpital Swietej Rodziny /ID# 127838
Lodz, Łódź Voivodeship, 90-302
KO-Med Centra Kliniczne Pulawy /ID# 127219
Puławy, 24-100
H-T.Centrum Medyczne-Endoterapia /ID# 170305
Tychy, Silesian Voivodeship, 43-100
Centrum Zdrowia MDM /ID# 170303
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 00-635
Endoterapia PFG Sp. z.o.o. /ID# 126513
Warsaw, Masovian Voivodeship, 02-653
NZOZ Vivamed /ID# 127218
Warsaw, 03-580
Germany11 sites
Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin Campus Virchow Klinikum /ID# 127203
Berlin, 10117
Mross, Berlin, DE /ID# 127201
Berlin, 10318
Gastrostudien GbR /ID# 169246
Berlin, D-10825
Universitatsklinikum Frankfurt /ID# 170300
Frankfurt am Main, Hesse, 60590
Asklepios Westklinikum Hamburg /ID# 127198
Hamburg, 22559
Universitaetsklinikum Jena /ID# 127205
Jena, 07747
Univ Hosp Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik furer Innere Medizin /ID# 127199
Kiel, Schleswig-Holstein, 24105
EUGASTRO GmbH /ID# 127202
Leipzig, 04103
Universitatsklinikum Magdeburg /ID# 127200
Magdeburg, 39120
Gastro Campus Research GbR /ID# 126743
Münster, 48159
Universitatsklinik Regensburg /ID# 201265
Regensburg, Bavaria, 93053
France10 sites
CHU Amiens Picardie /ID# 127194
Amiens, Somme, 80054
CHU Estaing /ID# 127848
Clermont-Ferrand, 63100
CHU Dijon /ID# 127861
Dijon, 21000
CHU de Grenoble - Albet Michal /ID# 127195
Grenoble, 38043
CHRU Lille - Hôpital Claude Huriez /ID# 127197
Lille, Hauts-de-France, 59045
CHU Saint ELOI /ID# 169007
Montpellier, 34295
CHU de Nice /ID# 127193
Nice, 06202
CHU de Saint-Etienne, Hopital Nord /ID# 134490
Saint-Etienne, 42270
Hopital Rangueil /ID# 127192
Toulouse, 31059
CHU NANCY - Hôpital Brabois Adultes /ID# 127196
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, 54511
Italy10 sites
A.O.U. Policlinico S.Orsola-Malpighi /ID# 129322
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliera Spedali Civili /ID# 127236
Brescia, 25123
Fondazione IRCCS Ca Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico /ID# 127138
Milan, Lombardy, 20122
Universita di Padova /ID# 127214
Padova, 35128
Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-C /ID# 129323
Palermo, 90146
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini /ID# 127216
Rome, Lazio, 00152
Policlinico Agostino Gemelli /ID# 127217
Rome, Lazio, 00168
Policlinico Univ Tor Vergata /ID# 129321
Rome, 00133
IBD Center - IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas /ID# 127215
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
IRCCS Casa Sollievo /ID# 127811
San Giovanni Rotondo, 71013
Spain10 sites
Hospital General Universitario de Alicante /ID# 129261
Alicante, 03550
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona /ID# 138147
Barcelona, 08036
Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Ferrol /ID# 127840
Ferrol, 15405
Hospital Univ Dr. Negrin /ID# 127841
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, 35010
Hospital Univ de la Princesa /ID# 135828
Madrid, 28006
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Maranon /ID# 127224
Madrid, 28007
Hosp Univ 12 de Octubre /ID# 129257
Madrid, 28041
Hospital Universitario La Paz /ID# 127223
Madrid, 28046
Hosp Clin Univ de Valencia /ID# 170306
Valencia, 46010
Hosp Clin Univ Lozano Blesa /ID# 129255
Zaragoza, 50009
Canada8 sites
University of Calgary /ID# 125715
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4Z6
Zeidler Ledcor Centre /ID# 125713
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2X8
Qe Ii Hsc /Id# 127045
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7
London Health Sciences Centre /ID# 127055
London, Ontario, N6A 5A5
McGill Univ HC /ID# 127046
Montreal, Quebec, H3G 1A4
Mount Sinai Hosp.-Toronto /ID# 126590
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5
Toronto Digestive Disease Asso /ID# 127075
Vaughan, Ontario, L4L 4Y7
Winnipeg Regional Health Autho /ID# 125712
Winnipeg, Manitoba, R3A 1R9
United Kingdom8 sites
Western General Hospital /ID# 204801
Edinburgh, EH4 2XU
St. Mark's Hospital /ID# 127226
Harrow, HA1 3UJ
Hull and East Yorkshire Hospitals NHS Trust /ID# 127225
Hull, HU8 9HE
Norfolk and Norwich Univ Hosp /ID# 127139
Norwich, Norfolk, NR4 7UY
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust The John Radcliffe Hospital /ID# 129324
Oxford, OX3 9DU
Southampton General Hospital /ID# 127228
Southampton, SO16 6YD
Royal Hampshire County Hosp /ID# 169250
Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 5DG
The Royal Wolverhampton NHS Tr /ID# 127227
Wolverhampton, WV10 0QP
Romania6 sites
CMDTA Neomed SRL /ID# 127142
Brasov, 500283
Spitalul Clinic Judetean de Urgenta /ID# 125418
Cluj-Napoca, 400006
Tvm Med Serv Srl /Id# 127221
Cluj-Napoca, 400132
Cabinet Medical Dr. Fratila SRL, Specialitatea Medicina Interna /ID# 127002
Oradea, 410167
Institutul Clinic Fundeni /ID# 127839
Sector 2, Bucharest, 022328
Salvo-San-Ciobanca SRL /ID# 127140
Zalău, 450117
Austria5 sites
Ordination Hainburg an der Don /ID# 127185
Hainburg an der Donau, 2410
KH der Elisabethinen Linz GmbH /ID# 127184
Linz, Upper Austria, 4010
Universitaetsklinik fuer Innere Medizin 1 /ID# 125944
Salzburg, 5020
KH der Barmherzigen Brueder /ID# 127183
Sankt Veit an der Glan, 9300
Medizinische Universitat Wien /ID# 127186
Vienna, State of Vienna, 1090
Israel5 sites
Soroka University Medical Center /ID# 127213
Beersheba, 84101
Hadassah University Hospital /ID# 127211
Jerusalem, 91120
Rabin Medical Center /ID# 127212
Petakh Tikva, Tel Aviv, 4941492
Kaplan Medical Center /ID# 127210
Rehovot, 76100
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center /ID# 201365
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, 6423906
Ukraine5 sites
GI National Institute of Therapy named by L.T. Malaya /ID# 127231
Kharkiv, Kharkiv Oblast, 61039
Public Institution Kherson City Clinical Hospital named after le.le. Karabelesh /ID# 127233
Kherson, 73000
Municipal Clinical Hospital #8 /ID# 127235
Kiev, 04201
Lviv City Clinical Hospital NO.4 /ID# 127232
Lviv, 79011
CNPE City Hospital No.6 of Zaporizhzhia City Counsil /ID# 127137
Zaporizhzhya, 69035
Hungary4 sites
Magyar Elhizastudomanyi KKft. /ID# 126589
Budapest, 1124
Pannonia Maganorvosi Centrum Kft. /ID# 127207
Budapest, 1136
Pecsi Tudomanyegyetem Klinikai Kozpont I. sz. Belgyogyaszati Klinika /ID# 127209
Pécs, Pecs, 7624
Szegedi Tudomanyegyetem /ID# 127208
Szeged, 6720
Belgium3 sites
AZ Sint-Lucas /ID# 127187
Ghent, 9000
UZ Leuven /ID# 126739
Leuven, 3000
CHU de Liege /ID# 126740
Liège, 4000
Slovakia3 sites
Gastroenterologicke centrum ASSIDUO a IBD centrum /ID# 127222
Bratislava, 831 04
Gastroenterologicka Ambulancia /ID# 125632
Bratislava, 851 01
Vseobecna Nemocnica s poliklinikou Lucenec /ID# 127322
Lučenec, 984 01
Czechia2 sites
Hepato-Gastroenterologie HK s.r.o. /ID# 127188
Hradec Králové, 500 12
ISCARE a.s. /ID# 127837
Prague, 190 00
Denmark2 sites
Herlev Hospital /ID# 127191
Herlev, Capital Region, 2730
Regionhospital Silkeborg /ID# 127190
Silkeborg, 8600
Switzerland2 sites
Kantonsspital St. Gallen /ID# 127843
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007
University Hospital Zurich /ID# 127842
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8006
Netherlands1 site
Academisch Medisch Centrum /ID# 126741
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1105 AZ
About this study
Official title: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
To evaluate safety and efficacy of two adalimumab dosing regimens for induction and maintenance (standard and higher dosing) in achieving clinical remission in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
- Being tested
- Adalimumab, Placebo
- Keywords
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Medical subject headings
- Colitis, Ulcerative
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
AdalimumabDrug
Also called Humira
PlaceboOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-SD | Experimental | Induction Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Week 0 followed by 80 mg at Week 2, 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Other: Placebo |
| Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-HD | Experimental | Induction Higher Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3 followed by 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab |
| Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-SD | Experimental | Maintenance Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), for 44 weeks. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Other: Placebo |
| Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-HD | Experimental | Maintenance Higher Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every week (ew) for 44 weeks. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab |
| Maintenance (Main Study): TDM Regimen | Experimental | Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg eow at Week 8 and Week 10, with possible dose adjustments at Weeks 12, 24, and 37 based on criteria assessing blinded adalimumab serum concentration and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) assessments. Receives: Drug: Adalimumab; Other: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Induction Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per Full Mayo Score (FMS) at Week 8
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 8
Maintenance Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders (per FMS) are defined as participants with a decrease in Full Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 52
Secondary outcomes (21)
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 8
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Endoscopic improvement is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Fecal Calprotectin < 150 mg/kg at Week 8
Measured: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response (Increase of IBDQ ≥ 16 From Baseline) at Week 8
The IBDQ is a self-administered 32-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: bowel, systemic, social and emotional. Responses to each question range from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). Total IBDQ score is the sum of the responses to the individual IBDQ questions, and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per FMS at Week 8
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Clinical response is defined as a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from baseline, plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Endoscopic remission is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 6: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Week 8
The IBDQ is a self-administered 32-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: bowel, systemic, social and emotional. Responses to each question range from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). The range for Bowel Symptom domain score is 10 (severe problem) to 70 (normal health). Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom domain is defined as an increase of IBDQ Bowel Symptom domain score ≥ 6.
Measured: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 7: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in IBDQ Fatigue Item at Week 8
The IBDQ is a self-administered 32-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: bowel, systemic, social and emotional. Responses to each question range from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). The IBDQ Fatigue item score range is from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). Response is defined as an increase of IBDQ Fatigue item score ≥ 1.
Measured: Week 8
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders are defined as participants with a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. Endoscopic improvement is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Week 8 Responders With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders, per FMS, are defined as participants with a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Week 8 Responders With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days and With Clinical Remission at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders, per FMS, are defined as participants with a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. Clinical remission is defined as FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 remitters are defined as participants with clinical remission (per FMS) at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1. Endoscopy subscore provided by the central reader.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 remitters are defined as participants with clinical remission (per FMS) at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1. Endoscopic improvement is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0 or 1. Endoscopy subscore provided by the central reader.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 6: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 remitters are defined as participants with clinical remission (per FMS) at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 7: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days and With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 remitters are defined as participants with clinical remission (per FMS) at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 8: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With IBDQ Response (Increase of IBDQ ≥ 16 From Baseline) at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders are defined as participants with a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. The IBDQ is a self-administered 32-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: bowel, systemic, social and emotional. Responses to each question range from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). Total IBDQ score is the sum of responses to the individual IBDQ questions, and ranges from 32 to 224 with higher scores indicating a better quality of life.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 9: Percentage of Week 8 Non-Responders With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 non-responders are defined as participants not meeting the criteria of response (defined as a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from baseline, plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1) at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 10: Percentage of Week 8 Non-Remitters With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 non-remitters are defined as participants not meeting the criteria of clinical remission at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 11: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders (per Full Mayo score) are defined as participants with a decrease in Full Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. Endoscopic remission is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 12: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 remitters are defined as participants with clinical remission (per FMS) at Week 8. Clinical remission is defined as a FMS ≤ 2 with no subscore > 1. Endoscopic remission is defined as an endoscopy subscore of 0.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 13: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders are defined as participants with a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore [RBS] ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. The IBDQ is a self-administered 32-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: bowel, systemic, social and emotional. Responses to each question range from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). Bowel Symptom domain score range is 10 (severe problem) to 70 (normal health). Response is defined as increase of Bowel Symptom domain score ≥ 6 from baseline.
Measured: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 14: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Response in IBDQ Fatigue Item at Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders are defined as participants with a decrease in FMS of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. The IBDQ is a self-administered 32-item questionnaire to evaluate quality of life across 4 dimensional scores: bowel, systemic, social and emotional. Responses to each question range from 1 (severe problem) to 7 (normal health). Response in IBDQ fatigue item (range 1 [severe problem] to 7 [normal health]) is defined as increase of IBDQ fatigue item ≥ 1 from baseline.
Measured: Week 52
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Study start27 Mar 2014
- Primary completion5 Sep 2019
- Study completion11 Nov 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Ulcerative Colitis (UC)Studies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by AbbVieThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 952 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVie
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- AbbVie Inc., Study director, AbbVie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02065622
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- M14-033
- Other IDs
- 2013-001682-16
- Status last verified
- Sep 2020
- First submitted
- 17 Feb 2014
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Publications
Reppell M, Zheng X, Dreher I, Blaes J, Regan E, Haslberger T, Guay H, Pivorunas V, Smaoui N. HLA-DQA1*05 Associates With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Immunogenicity and Low Adalimumab Trough Concentrations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients From the SERENE Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease Studies. J Crohns Colitis. 2025 Jan 11;19(1):jjae129. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae129.
PubMed 39162746Verstockt B, Pivorunas V, Al Mahi N, Smaoui N, Guay H, Kennedy NA, Goodhand JR, Lin S, Bai BYH, Hanauer SB, Ferrante M, Panes J, Vermeire S. Baseline TREM-1 Whole Blood Gene Expression Does Not Predict Response to Adalimumab Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease in the SERENE Studies. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Apr 23;18(4):493-505. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad170.
PubMed 37801628Ponce-Bobadilla AV, Stodtmann S, Chen MJ, Winzenborg I, Mensing S, Blaes J, Haslberger T, Laplanche L, Dreher I, Mostafa NM. Assessing the Impact of Immunogenicity and Improving Prediction of Trough Concentrations: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Adalimumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Apr;62(4):623-634. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01221-x. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
PubMed 36905528Greener T, Boland K, Milgrom R, Ben-Bassat O, Steinhart AH, Silverberg MS, Narula N. Higher adalimumab maintenance regimen is more effective than standard dose in anti-TNF experienced Crohn's disease patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 1;33(10):1274-1279. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002250.
PubMed 34402466
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Double-Blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study of Higher Versus Standard Adalimumab Dosing Regimens for Induction and Maintenance Therapy in Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02065622
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- M14-033
- Conditions
- Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
- Keywords
- Ulcerative Colitis
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 952 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- AbbVieIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 27 Mar 2014 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Sep 2019 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Nov 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Feb 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 8 Oct 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To evaluate safety and efficacy of two adalimumab dosing regimens for induction and maintenance (standard and higher dosing) in achieving clinical remission in subjects with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 5
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-SD | Experimental | Drug: Adalimumab, Other: PlaceboInduction Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Week 0 followed by 80 mg at Week 2, 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6. |
| Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-HD | Experimental | Drug: AdalimumabInduction Higher Dose: Double-blind adalimumab regimen of 160 mg at Weeks 0, 1, 2, and 3 followed by 40 mg at Week 4, and 40 mg at Week 6. |
| Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-SD | Experimental | Drug: Adalimumab, Other: PlaceboMaintenance Standard Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every other week (eow), for 44 weeks. |
| Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-HD | Experimental | Drug: AdalimumabMaintenance Higher Dose: Double-blind adalimumab 40 mg every week (ew) for 44 weeks. |
| Maintenance (Main Study): TDM Regimen | Experimental | Drug: Adalimumab, Other: PlaceboDouble-blind adalimumab 40 mg eow at Week 8 and Week 10, with possible dose adjustments at Weeks 12, 24, and 37 based on criteria assessing blinded adalimumab serum concentration and rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) assessments. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Diagnosis of Ulcerative Colitis (UC) for at least 90 days, confirmed by endoscopy during Screening period.
- Active UC with Mayo Score of 6 to 12 points and endoscopy subscore of 2 to 3 despite concurrent or prior treatment with a full and adequate course, in the opinion of the Investigator, with oral corticosteroids or immunosuppressants or both. Mayo Score is confirmed by central reader.
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Subject with Crohn's disease (CD) or indeterminate colitis (IC).
- Current diagnosis of fulminant colitis and/or toxic megacolon.
- Subjects with disease limited to the rectum (ulcerative proctitis) during the screening endoscopy.
- Chronic recurring infections or active tuberculosis (TB).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| AdalimumabAlso: Humira | Drug | Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-HD, Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-SD, Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-HD, Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-SD, Maintenance (Main Study): TDM Regimen |
| Placebo | Other | Induction (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): I-SD, Maintenance (Main Study + Japan Sub-study): M-SD, Maintenance (Main Study): TDM Regimen |
Primary outcome
Induction Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per Full Mayo Score (FMS) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
Maintenance Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
The Mayo score is a tool designed to measure disease activity for ulcerative colitis. The FMS ranges from 0 (normal or inactive disease) to 12 (severe disease) and is calculated as the sum of 4 subscores (stool frequency, rectal bleeding, endoscopy [confirmed by a central reader], and physician's global assessment), each of which ranges from 0 (normal) to 3 (severe disease). Negative changes indicate improvement. Week 8 responders (per FMS) are defined as participants with a decrease in Full Mayo score of ≥ 3 points and ≥ 30% from Baseline plus a decrease from baseline in the rectal bleeding subscore (RBS) ≥ 1 or an absolute RBS ≤ 1. Clinical remission per FMS is defined as Mayo Score ≤ 2 and no individual subscore > 1.
21 secondary outcomes
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Participants With Fecal Calprotectin < 150 mg/kg at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Participants With Inflammatory Bowel Disease Questionnaire (IBDQ) Response (Increase of IBDQ ≥ 16 From Baseline) at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Response Per FMS at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Participants With Endoscopic Remission at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 6: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Induction Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 7: Percentage of Participants Achieving Response in IBDQ Fatigue Item at Week 8
Time frame: Week 8
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 1: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 2: Percentage of Week 8 Responders With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 3: Percentage of Week 8 Responders With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days and With Clinical Remission at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 4: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 5: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Improvement at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 6: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 7: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Steroid Usage at Baseline and Steroid Free at Least 90 Days and With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 8: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With IBDQ Response (Increase of IBDQ ≥ 16 From Baseline) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 9: Percentage of Week 8 Non-Responders With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 10: Percentage of Week 8 Non-Remitters With Clinical Remission (Per FMS) at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 11: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 12: Percentage of Week 8 Remitters (Per FMS) With Endoscopic Subscore of 0 at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 13: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Response in IBDQ Bowel Symptom Domain at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Maintenance Period Ranked Secondary Endpoint 14: Percentage of Week 8 Responders (Per FMS) With Response in IBDQ Fatigue Item at Week 52
Time frame: Week 52
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39162746Reppell M, Zheng X, Dreher I, Blaes J, Regan E, Haslberger T, Guay H, Pivorunas V, Smaoui N. HLA-DQA1*05 Associates With Anti-Tumor Necrosis Factor Immunogenicity and Low Adalimumab Trough Concentrations in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients From the SERENE Ulcerative Colitis and Crohn's Disease Studies. J Crohns Colitis. 2025 Jan 11;19(1):jjae129. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjae129.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37801628Verstockt B, Pivorunas V, Al Mahi N, Smaoui N, Guay H, Kennedy NA, Goodhand JR, Lin S, Bai BYH, Hanauer SB, Ferrante M, Panes J, Vermeire S. Baseline TREM-1 Whole Blood Gene Expression Does Not Predict Response to Adalimumab Treatment in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis or Crohn's Disease in the SERENE Studies. J Crohns Colitis. 2024 Apr 23;18(4):493-505. doi: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad170.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36905528Ponce-Bobadilla AV, Stodtmann S, Chen MJ, Winzenborg I, Mensing S, Blaes J, Haslberger T, Laplanche L, Dreher I, Mostafa NM. Assessing the Impact of Immunogenicity and Improving Prediction of Trough Concentrations: Population Pharmacokinetic Modeling of Adalimumab in Patients with Crohn's Disease and Ulcerative Colitis. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2023 Apr;62(4):623-634. doi: 10.1007/s40262-023-01221-x. Epub 2023 Mar 11.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34402466Greener T, Boland K, Milgrom R, Ben-Bassat O, Steinhart AH, Silverberg MS, Narula N. Higher adalimumab maintenance regimen is more effective than standard dose in anti-TNF experienced Crohn's disease patients. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Oct 1;33(10):1274-1279. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000002250.
- Related InfoLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. AbbVie is committed to responsible data sharing regarding the clinical trials we sponsor. This includes access to anonymized, individual and trial-level data (analysis data sets), as well as other information (e.g., protocols and clinical study reports), as long as the trials are not part of an ongoing or planned regulatory submission. This includes requests for clinical trial data for unlicensed products and indications.
Related trials for Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
RecruitingObservational study
Ibd CAncer and seRious Infections in France (I-CARE 2)
IBD, Ulcerative Colitis
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Non-Invasive Biomarker Monitoring in UC on Biologics
Ulcerative Colitis
RecruitingPhase 2
LY4268989 in Adults With Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis (UC), Ulcerative Colitis, Active Moderate
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Safety, Dosage, and Microbiome Engraftment Study of MGT-006 for Ulcerative Colitis (ROOT Study)
Ulcerative Colitis (UC), Ulcerative Colitis, Active Moderate
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of XmAb942 in Healthy Participants and Participants With Ulcerative Colitis
Ulcerative Colitis (UC)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
AbbVie Inc. study director
AbbVie
173 sites in 20 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Adalimumab in people with Ulcerative Colitis (UC), run by AbbVie at 173 sites in 20 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 173 sites in United States, Japan, Poland, Germany, France and 15 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 8 Oct 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Induction Period Primary Endpoint: Percentage of Participants With Clinical Remission Per Full Mayo Score (FMS) at Week 8 (time frame: Week 8). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02065622, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2020.