Critical Limb IschemiaDISAPEARNCT02043795
Drug Impregnated Bioabsorbable Stent in Asian Population Extremity Arterial Revascularization (DISAPEAR Study)
A study testing BVS, Abbott Vascular in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Changi General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to study the safety and clinical efficacy of a novel Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular) in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the tibial arteries. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- What is being tested?
- BVS, Abbott Vascular
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 15 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSingapore
- Study dates
- 1 Jul 2013to Feb 2019
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Stenotic (> 50%) or occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the infrapopliteal arteries
- A maximum of 2 target lesions in one or more infrapopliteal vessels
- Minimum of 1mm overlap of stents
- Reference vessel diameter should be 2-4.0 mm
- Symptomatic critical limb ischemia (Rutherford 4, 5, 6)
- The patient must be > 21 years of age
Show all 10Show fewer
- Life-expectancy of more than 12 months
- The patient has no child bearing potential or negative serum pregnancy test within 7 days of the index procedure
- The patient must be willing and able to return to the appropriate follow-up times for the duration of the study
- The patient must provide written patient informed consent
Who cannot join
- Patient refusing treatment
- The reference segment diameter is not suitable for available stent design
- Unsuccessfully treated (>50% residual stenosis) proximal inflow limiting arterial stenosis
- Untreatable lesion located at the distal outflow arteries
- Lesion location requiring kissing stent procedure
- The patient has a known allergy to heparin, Aspirin or other anticoagulant/anti-platelet therapies or a bleeding diatheses or is unable, or unwilling, to tolerate such therapies.
Show all 10Show fewer
- The patient takes Phenprocoumon (Marcumar).
- The patient is currently breast-feeding, pregnant or intends to become pregnant.
- Subject is receiving immunosuppression therapy, or has known serious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus), or has severe autoimmune disease that requires chronic immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, etc.) The patient should also not receive inhibitors of CYP3A (such as Itraconazole, and Erythromycin), or inducers of CYP3A (such as Rifampin) within 90 days following the procedure.
- Use of alternative therapy (e.g. atherectomy, cutting balloon, laser, radiation therapy) as part of the index procedure to the target vessel
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
The aim of this study is to study the safety and clinical efficacy of a novel Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular) in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the tibial arteries.
Read the detailed description
Background
Currently, DM foot admissions account for up to 2% of all admissions in CGH, with up to 50% of patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). CGH Vascular service performs 100-150 peripheral angioplasties for limb ischaemia per 6 months, the majority of which are for limb salvage procedures. The angioplasty procedure is performed below the knee (BTK) and the BTK vessels are involved in more than 80% of the time. Restenosis is common in peripheral interventions.
In the recently published DESTINY trial, the superiority of Everolimus DES (XIENCE, Abbott Vascular) was proven over BMS (Bare Metal Stents). This landmark study suggests that for short lesions in the BTK segment, DES improved patency rates and reduced the need for re-interventions for restenosis.
Re-interventions for previously stented arteries are technically difficult. In the coronary bed, the Bioabsorbable stents have been developed to provide the functions of a drug eluting stent but yet provide a temporary scaffold to allow the vessel to heal. The absence of a permanent metallic implant in the vascular tissue may facilitate any required re-interventions on the target vessel / lesion or side branches either by percutaneous or surgical means, thus enabling a broader range of treatment options after bioresorption of the scaffold. In addition, unlike permanent metal implants, polymeric implants do not cause imaging artifacts during non-invasive CT or MR evaluation providing additional benefit
Rationate and justification for the study
The safety of the BVS has already been demonstrated in man in the Coronary Bed. It is currently CE marked for this indication.
In the ABSORB Cohort A Study, it showed excellent long term clinical outcomes with low MACE rates out to 4 years with absence of any target lesion revascularization, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and scaffold thrombosis. Cohort B confirms these findings out to 1 year; including patency comparable to XIENCE V. Absorb BVS thus performs all the functions of a drug-eluting stent while offering future potential benefits resulting from the absence of a permanent metallic implant.
An optimal post procedural follow-up imaging technique is as yet uncertain for this stent. Assessment of conventional stents with CT angiography has been limited by streak and susceptibility artefact on MRA. Doppler Ultrasound is known to be time intensive. Hence, if MRA or CTA proof to be accurate modalities for evaluation, it would be easier for follow-up and evaluation of these patients.
The aims of this study are:
- to study which non-invasive imaging modality would be most appropriate in follow-up for Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular) patency deployed in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the tibial arteries. The aim is to establish stent patency as well as imaging features of the stent.
- to investigate the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) in patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia CLI) and Below the Knee (BTK) lesions in an Asian Population. One of the side arms of the study is to establish imaging features of this new stent system with Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography and MR angiography. The study aims to establish stent patency, as well as imaging features of stent as it bio reabsorbs.
Study design
The study will prospectively collect consecutive cases treated with BVS for patients with CLI and BTK lesions recruited over a 2 year period and followed up for 1 year. The results of these patients will be compared to a similar historical cohort consecutively treated with XIENCE DES (metallic Drug Eluting Stents, Abbott Vascular).
This pilot study will involve recruitment of 12 patients x 1 year followed by another year of post implantation follow-up. If feasible, the recruitment will be extended to another year for another 12 patients giving a total of 24 patients.
Patients not on chronic antiplatelets therapy should receive a loading dose of Plavix 300 mg and Aspirin 300 mg started 6 to 72 hours prior and not later than 1 hour after the procedure. Pre procedure clinical assessment including pulses and Transcutaneous O2 measurement around the affected wound. In the absence of a wound, this will be performed on the dorsum of the foot. Demographic data including comorbidities, medication history, Rutherford class will be recorded.
Symptomatic patients would be screened with a duplex ultrasound prior to intervention. After informed consent for a standard angiography/intervention, the patient will undergo a planned intervention under general or local anaesthesia in an angiographic facility. Either antegrade or retrograde approach is allowed. After common femoral artery sheath access, a diagnostic angiogram will be performed as per any standard angioplasty procedure. 2 plane angiography of the target lesions will be performed. Of note will be the lesion characteristics like length, location, and degree of stenosis and calcification. Degree of runoff will also be assessed on angiography. If the 2 plane angiography confirms > 50% stenosis or occlusion, the patient will be eligible for BVS. The target vessel chosen should preferably be but should not limited to, the wound relate artery in accordance to the angiosome concept. There should at least be one vessel runoff to the foot.
After angiographic assessment for suitability for BVS, heparin 2500 to 5000 IU will be administered intra-arterially as per standard angioplasty according to body weight. The stenosis of occlusion will be crossed (true lumen or subintimal crossing is allowed) with a guidewire of choice and pre-dilatation with a balloon catheter will be performed. Pre-dilatation should be in accordance with manufacturer guidelines an should not extend beyond the proposed treated segment
Post intervention angiography will subsequently be performed to assess the success of treatment repeat balloon inflation is allowed. Any residual stenosis and the degree of stenosis at the end of the intervention will also be recorded. Post dilatation should be confined to the previously scaffolded area and not exceed manufacturer recommendations with respect to size. Subsequent treatment of the runoff tibial vessels is allowed.
Post procedure, standard post angioplasty regimes will be followed. Patients will be started on supplementary Clopidogrel (Plavix) 75 mg once a day together with Aspirin 100mg once a day i.e. dual antiplatelets for 6month post intervention followed by Aspirin for life unless contraindicated.
Clinical follow-up will be performed immediately post procedure at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year post intervention. Assessment of the pulse, clinical patency will be performed at each visit. TCOMs will be performed at 6 and 12 months. Duplex ultrasound to assess for re-stenosis will be performed at 6 and 12 months, while CT angiography and MR angiography will be performed at 12-month post-procedure.
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Being tested
- BVS, Abbott Vascular
- Keywords
- Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Stent
- Medical subject headings
- Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BVS, Abbott VascularDevice
Also called Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System
The aim of this study is to study the safety and clinical efficacy of a novel Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treated with BVS | Other | Symptomatic patients would be screened with a duplex ultrasound as per clinical practice prior to intervention. After informed consent for a standard angiography/intervention, the patient will undergo a planned intervention under general or local anaesthesia in an angiographic facility. Receives: Device: BVS, Abbott Vascular |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Re-stenosis rates between 6 months and 12 months
defined at stenosis >=50% of the treated segment on duplex ultrasound, CT angiography or MR angiography
Measured: 6 months and 12 months
Secondary outcomes (6)
Change in Mean Transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOMs) between 6 months and 12 months
Change in Mean Transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOMs)
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Change in Amputation free survival between 6 months and 12 months
Measured: 6 months and 12 months
Change in Freedom from Target lesion revascularization between 6 months and 12 months
Measured: 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline in Rutherford class at 6 months and 12 months
Measured: Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Number of Participants with major adverse limb events (MALE)
Freedom from major adverse limb events (MALE) within 1 year
Measured: within 1 year
Number of Participants with Peri-procedural death (POD)
Freedom from peri-procedural (30-day) death (POD)
Measured: within 30-day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study start1 Jul 2013
- Primary completion19 Mar 2018
- Study completionFeb 2019
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Critical Limb IschemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Changi General Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Steven Kum, MD, Principal investigator, Changi General Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02043795
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2013/539/C
- Acronym
- DISAPEAR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2020
- First submitted
- 29 Oct 2013
- Last updated
- 8 Oct 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Oct 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Drug Impregnated Bioabsorbable Stent in Asian Population Extremity Arterial Revascularization (DISAPEAR Study)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02043795
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DISAPEAR / 2013/539/C
- Conditions
- Critical Limb Ischemia
- Keywords
- Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System, Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty, Stent
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 15 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Changi General HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Jul 2013 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 19 Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2019 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to study the safety and clinical efficacy of a novel Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular) in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the tibial arteries.
Detailed description
Background
Currently, DM foot admissions account for up to 2% of all admissions in CGH, with up to 50% of patients with peripheral vascular disease (PVD). CGH Vascular service performs 100-150 peripheral angioplasties for limb ischaemia per 6 months, the majority of which are for limb salvage procedures. The angioplasty procedure is performed below the knee (BTK) and the BTK vessels are involved in more than 80% of the time. Restenosis is common in peripheral interventions.
In the recently published DESTINY trial, the superiority of Everolimus DES (XIENCE, Abbott Vascular) was proven over BMS (Bare Metal Stents). This landmark study suggests that for short lesions in the BTK segment, DES improved patency rates and reduced the need for re-interventions for restenosis.
Re-interventions for previously stented arteries are technically difficult. In the coronary bed, the Bioabsorbable stents have been developed to provide the functions of a drug eluting stent but yet provide a temporary scaffold to allow the vessel to heal. The absence of a permanent metallic implant in the vascular tissue may facilitate any required re-interventions on the target vessel / lesion or side branches either by percutaneous or surgical means, thus enabling a broader range of treatment options after bioresorption of the scaffold. In addition, unlike permanent metal implants, polymeric implants do not cause imaging artifacts during non-invasive CT or MR evaluation providing additional benefit
Rationate and justification for the study
The safety of the BVS has already been demonstrated in man in the Coronary Bed. It is currently CE marked for this indication.
In the ABSORB Cohort A Study, it showed excellent long term clinical outcomes with low MACE rates out to 4 years with absence of any target lesion revascularization, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and scaffold thrombosis. Cohort B confirms these findings out to 1 year; including patency comparable to XIENCE V. Absorb BVS thus performs all the functions of a drug-eluting stent while offering future potential benefits resulting from the absence of a permanent metallic implant.
An optimal post procedural follow-up imaging technique is as yet uncertain for this stent. Assessment of conventional stents with CT angiography has been limited by streak and susceptibility artefact on MRA. Doppler Ultrasound is known to be time intensive. Hence, if MRA or CTA proof to be accurate modalities for evaluation, it would be easier for follow-up and evaluation of these patients.
The aims of this study are:
- to study which non-invasive imaging modality would be most appropriate in follow-up for Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular) patency deployed in subjects with critical limb ischemia (CLI) following percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) of the tibial arteries. The aim is to establish stent patency as well as imaging features of the stent.
- to investigate the effects of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty using Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffold (BVS) in patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia CLI) and Below the Knee (BTK) lesions in an Asian Population. One of the side arms of the study is to establish imaging features of this new stent system with Doppler ultrasound, CT angiography and MR angiography. The study aims to establish stent patency, as well as imaging features of stent as it bio reabsorbs.
Study design
The study will prospectively collect consecutive cases treated with BVS for patients with CLI and BTK lesions recruited over a 2 year period and followed up for 1 year. The results of these patients will be compared to a similar historical cohort consecutively treated with XIENCE DES (metallic Drug Eluting Stents, Abbott Vascular).
This pilot study will involve recruitment of 12 patients x 1 year followed by another year of post implantation follow-up. If feasible, the recruitment will be extended to another year for another 12 patients giving a total of 24 patients.
Patients not on chronic antiplatelets therapy should receive a loading dose of Plavix 300 mg and Aspirin 300 mg started 6 to 72 hours prior and not later than 1 hour after the procedure. Pre procedure clinical assessment including pulses and Transcutaneous O2 measurement around the affected wound. In the absence of a wound, this will be performed on the dorsum of the foot. Demographic data including comorbidities, medication history, Rutherford class will be recorded.
Symptomatic patients would be screened with a duplex ultrasound prior to intervention. After informed consent for a standard angiography/intervention, the patient will undergo a planned intervention under general or local anaesthesia in an angiographic facility. Either antegrade or retrograde approach is allowed. After common femoral artery sheath access, a diagnostic angiogram will be performed as per any standard angioplasty procedure. 2 plane angiography of the target lesions will be performed. Of note will be the lesion characteristics like length, location, and degree of stenosis and calcification. Degree of runoff will also be assessed on angiography. If the 2 plane angiography confirms > 50% stenosis or occlusion, the patient will be eligible for BVS. The target vessel chosen should preferably be but should not limited to, the wound relate artery in accordance to the angiosome concept. There should at least be one vessel runoff to the foot.
After angiographic assessment for suitability for BVS, heparin 2500 to 5000 IU will be administered intra-arterially as per standard angioplasty according to body weight. The stenosis of occlusion will be crossed (true lumen or subintimal crossing is allowed) with a guidewire of choice and pre-dilatation with a balloon catheter will be performed. Pre-dilatation should be in accordance with manufacturer guidelines an should not extend beyond the proposed treated segment
Post intervention angiography will subsequently be performed to assess the success of treatment repeat balloon inflation is allowed. Any residual stenosis and the degree of stenosis at the end of the intervention will also be recorded. Post dilatation should be confined to the previously scaffolded area and not exceed manufacturer recommendations with respect to size. Subsequent treatment of the runoff tibial vessels is allowed.
Post procedure, standard post angioplasty regimes will be followed. Patients will be started on supplementary Clopidogrel (Plavix) 75 mg once a day together with Aspirin 100mg once a day i.e. dual antiplatelets for 6month post intervention followed by Aspirin for life unless contraindicated.
Clinical follow-up will be performed immediately post procedure at 1 month, 6 months and 1 year post intervention. Assessment of the pulse, clinical patency will be performed at each visit. TCOMs will be performed at 6 and 12 months. Duplex ultrasound to assess for re-stenosis will be performed at 6 and 12 months, while CT angiography and MR angiography will be performed at 12-month post-procedure.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Other
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treated with BVS | Other | Device: BVS, Abbott VascularSymptomatic patients would be screened with a duplex ultrasound as per clinical practice prior to intervention. After informed consent for a standard angiography/intervention, the patient will undergo a planned intervention under general or local anaesthesia in an angiographic facility. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Stenotic (> 50%) or occlusive atherosclerotic disease of the infrapopliteal arteries
- A maximum of 2 target lesions in one or more infrapopliteal vessels
- Minimum of 1mm overlap of stents
- Reference vessel diameter should be 2-4.0 mm
- Symptomatic critical limb ischemia (Rutherford 4, 5, 6)
Key exclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Patient refusing treatment
- The reference segment diameter is not suitable for available stent design
- Unsuccessfully treated (>50% residual stenosis) proximal inflow limiting arterial stenosis
- Untreatable lesion located at the distal outflow arteries
- Lesion location requiring kissing stent procedure
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BVS, Abbott VascularAlso: Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold SystemThe aim of this study is to study the safety and clinical efficacy of a novel Bioabsorbable Everolimus Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System (BVS, Abbott Vascular). | Device | Treated with BVS |
Primary outcome
Change in Re-stenosis rates between 6 months and 12 months
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
defined at stenosis >=50% of the treated segment on duplex ultrasound, CT angiography or MR angiography
6 secondary outcomes
Change in Mean Transcutaneous oxygen measurement (TCOMs) between 6 months and 12 months
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Change in Amputation free survival between 6 months and 12 months
Time frame: 6 months and 12 months
Change in Freedom from Target lesion revascularization between 6 months and 12 months
Time frame: 6 and 12 months
Change from baseline in Rutherford class at 6 months and 12 months
Time frame: Baseline, 6 and 12 months
Number of Participants with major adverse limb events (MALE)
Time frame: within 1 year
Number of Participants with Peri-procedural death (POD)
Time frame: within 30-day
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Oct 2020.
Related trials for Critical Limb Ischemia
RecruitingObservational study
miRNAs in Critical Limb Ischemia (miRNACLI)
Critical Limb Ischemia
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Laser Atherectomy and Sirolimus-eluting Balloon Angioplasty for CLTI
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Recruiting
Radiotracer-Based Perfusion Imaging of Patients With Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral Artery Disease, Diabetes Mellitus
RecruitingObservational study
Vessel Recoil in Specific CLTI Populations
Chronic Limb Threatening Ischemia
Not yet recruiting
DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease
Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug Coated Balloon
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven Kum, MD principal investigator
Changi General Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing BVS, Abbott Vascular in people with Critical Limb Ischemia, run by Changi General Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Re-stenosis rates between 6 months and 12 months (time frame: 6 months and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.