AzTrials
AzTrials

Femoropopliteal DiseaseDASBAD-NCNCT07764016

DCB Outcomes After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring in Patients With Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease

A study testing Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA) and Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB) in people with Femoropopliteal Disease and Drug Coated Balloon, run by Marc Sirvent.

Not yet recruiting

Opening soon. The study is approved but enrolment has not started yet. Sites may already take enquiries.

Sites and contacts
Official record

Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether vessel preparation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty provides superior procedural and clinical outcomes compared with vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon in patients with chronic limb-threatening… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA) and Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
142 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Dec 2026to Dec 2030
Phase
Interventional

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • ≥18 years of age.
  • Rutherford class 4-5.
  • Estimated life expectancy >1 year, per investigator's judgment.
  • Significant atherosclerotic lesions (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) in the femoropopliteal segment, including in-stent restenosis.
  • Signed informed consent.
  • Willingness to comply with follow-up visits.
  • ≥1 patent infragenicular artery (<50% stenosis) at the end of the procedure.
  • Target vessel diameter ≤8 mm.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant or planning pregnancy during the study.
  • Participation in another drug/device trial.
  • Inability to cross the target lesion with a guidewire. Successful crossing is defined as advancement of the guidewire tip distal to the target lesion without vessel perforation or flow-limiting dissection.
  • Inadequate treatment of proximal lesion (>30% residual stenosis).
  • Severe calcification of the target vessel [group 4 of Fanelli classification17 defined as circumferential calcification (270º-360º)], evidenced before contrast injection or digital subtraction angiography.
  • Thrombus in the target vessel.
Show all 19Show fewer
  • Anastomotic stenosis of a bypass.
  • Use of atherectomy, thrombectomy, laser, or similar devices.
  • Prior or planned above-the-ankle amputation of the target limb.
  • Coagulopathy, hypercoagulable state, bleeding diathesis, platelets <80 000/µL or >700 000/µL, or other blood disorder.
  • Gastrointestinal bleeding requiring transfusion within 3 months.
  • Contraindication to antiplatelet/anticoagulant/thrombolytic therapy.
  • Acute coronary syndrome within 30 days.
  • Stroke or TIA within 90 days.
  • Hypersensitivity/contraindication to nitinol.
  • Comorbidities precluding treatment or follow-up (per investigator).
  • Hypersensitivity/allergy to contrast not manageable medically.
  • Hypersensitivity/allergy to heparin, aspirin, paclitaxel, clopidogrel, or other antiplatelet/anticoagulant agents.
  • Contraindication to dual antiplatelet therapy.

Trial locations and contacts

No sites are listed yet. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

About this study

Official title: Drug-coated Balloon Angioplasty After Non-Compliant Balloon Vessel Preparation With or Without Scoring for Femoropopliteal Arterial Disease: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this clinical trial is to determine whether vessel preparation with a non-compliant scoring balloon before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty provides superior procedural and clinical outcomes compared with vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (CLTI) undergoing femoropopliteal endovascular intervention.

The main questions the study aims to answer are:

Read more
  • Does non-compliant scoring balloon vessel preparation reduce the need for bailout stenting during the index procedure?
  • Does it improve primary patency after DCB angioplasty?
  • Does it improve clinically relevant outcomes such as wound healing, freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, limb salvage and health-related quality of life?
  • Does it provide procedural and economic advantages compared with non-compliant plain balloon vessel preparation?

Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo vessel preparation using either a non-compliant plain balloon or the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon, followed by angioplasty with the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon. Patients will undergo clinical, duplex ultrasound and quality-of-life follow-up for 24 months.

Read the detailed description

The DASBAD-NC trial is a prospective, multicentre, randomised, patient-blinded, controlled clinical investigation designed to compare two vessel preparation strategies before drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial disease in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischaemia (Rutherford classification 4-5).

Eligible patients with significant atherosclerotic femoropopliteal disease (≥50% stenosis or chronic total occlusion) will be randomised in a 1:1 ratio, after successful guidewire crossing of the target lesion and confirmation of all eligibility criteria, to one of two treatment strategies:

  • Vessel preparation using a non-compliant plain balloon (PBA arm), followed by Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon angioplasty.
  • Vessel preparation using the DKutting™ non-compliant scoring balloon (SB arm), followed by Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon angioplasty.

Vessel preparation will be performed using a 1:1 balloon-to-reference vessel diameter ratio with a minimum inflation time of 180 seconds. Predilatation with a smaller balloon will only be permitted if the allocated study balloon cannot cross the lesion. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty will subsequently be performed using the Legflow XP™ drug-coated balloon according to the study protocol. Bailout stenting will only be permitted in the presence of residual stenosis ≥30% and/or flow-limiting dissection after DCB treatment.

The co-primary endpoints are bailout stenting during the index procedure and primary patency at 12 months. Secondary endpoints include freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularisation, target limb major amputation, all-cause mortality, wound healing, health-related quality of life, procedural success, slow-flow phenomenon, procedural costs and other prespecified clinical and imaging outcomes.

Duplex ultrasound follow-up examinations will undergo blinded central review by an independent duplex ultrasound core laboratory. Procedural angiographic outcomes will undergo an independent blinded quality assurance review after database lock by experienced investigators according to the prespecified study methodology. Clinical events will be adjudicated by an independent Clinical Events Committee according to prespecified endpoint definitions.

Patients will be followed for 24 months after the index procedure.

Being tested
Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA), Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)
Keywords
Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischaemia (CLTI), Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD), Femoropopliteal Disease, Drug-Coated Balloon (DCB), Vessel Preparation, Scoring Balloon, Non-Compliant Balloon, Primary Patency, Bailout Stenting
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Arterial Disease, Chronic Limb-Threatening Ischemia

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA)Device

    Also called Control group, Group 0

    The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant plain balloon before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany).

  • Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)Device

    Also called Treatment group, Intervention group, Group 1

    The intervention consists of preparing the artery with a non-compliant scoring balloon (DKutting™; Manufacturer: DK Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) before using the DCB (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany) as definitve treatment.

Study groups in NCT07764016
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Non-compliant plain balloon (PBA)Active comparator* Vessel preparation using non-compliant plain balloon * Definitive treatment: drug-coated balloon angioplasty (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany).
Receives: Device: Non-compliant Plain Balloon angioplasty (PBA)
Scoring balloon (SB)Active comparator* Vessel preparation using non-compliant scoring balloon (DKutting™; Manufacturer: DK Medical Technology Co., Ltd., Suzhou, China) * Definitive treatment: drug-coated balloon angioplasty (Legflow XP™; Manufacturer: Cardionovum GmbH Bonn, Germany) as definitve treatment.
Receives: Device: Non-compliant Scoring Balloon Angioplasty (SB)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bailout stenting

    The need for bailout stenting during the index procedure, defined as stent implantation due to residual stenosis >30% or a flow-limiting dissection (type C according to the Kobayashi classification)

    Measured: At index procedure

  2. Primary Patency

    Primary patency at 12 months defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio<2.5) and no clinically driven target lesion revascularisation (CD-TLR), as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee.

    Measured: At 12 months

Secondary outcomes (14)
  1. Device success

    Device success, defined as successful delivery, inflation, and retrieval of the assigned balloon catheter, resulting in a residual stenosis <30% without flow-limiting dissection (FLD) on final angiography.

    Measured: During the index procedure

  2. Technical success

    Technical success, defined as successful use of a device or technique to re-establish vessel patency with a residual stenosis <30% by visual estimation and <50% by duplex during the index procedure.

    Measured: During the index procedure.

  3. Procedural cost

    Procedural cost, defined as the total acquisition cost (€) of all lesion preparation balloons (including adjunctive predilatation balloons, if required) and bailout stents used during the index procedure for the target lesion.

    Measured: During the index procedure

  4. Slow-flow phenomenon

    Slow-flow phenomenon, defined as an angiographic reduction in antegrade flow occurring after DCB inflation compared with the immediately preceding angiogram, in the absence of residual stenosis >30%, flow-limiting dissection, or vasospasm. The presence or absence of slow-flow phenomenon will be determined by the independent blinded angiographic review.

    Measured: During the index procedure

  5. Procedural success

    Procedural success, defined as technical success with absence of rupture, distal embolization, thrombosis, access complications, or major adverse cardiovascular events. These events should be listed as occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the procedure.

    Measured: Occurring <24 hours and <1 month of the index procedure.

  6. Freedom from device and procedure-related death

    Freedom from device and procedure-related death through 30 days post-procedure.

    Measured: Until 30 days post-procedure

  7. Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE)

    Freedom from Major Adverse Events (MAE) up to 24 months post-procedure.

    MAE are defined as the composite of:

    • Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events (MACE), including all-cause death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or major bleeding requiring transfusion or surgical intervention.
    • Major Adverse Limb Events (MALE), including above-the-ankle target limb amputation or major re-intervention involving the target lesion, defined as new bypass graft, jump/interposition graft revision, thrombectomy, thrombolysis or endovascular reintervention.

    Measured: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  8. Primary patency

    Primary patency at 6 and 24 months post-procedure, defined as absence of ≥50% restenosis (peak systolic velocity ratio<2.5) and no CD-TLR, as adjudicated by the duplex core laboratory and the Clinical Events Committee (CEC).

    Measured: At 6 and 24 months post-procedure

  9. Freedom from CD-TLR

    Freedom from CD-TLR up to 24 months post-procedure.

    • CD-TLR is defined as any repeat revascularisation procedure performed to maintain or restore patency within the treated segment, including 5 mm proximal and 5 mm distal to the edges of the originally treated lesion, due to clinical deterioration.
    • Clinical deterioration is defined as a ≥1-category worsening in Rutherford classification, impaired wound healing, or new or recurrent ulceration or rest pain attributable to the target lesion

    Measured: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  10. Change in Rutherford classification

    Change in Rutherford classification up to 24 months post-procedure.

    Measured: Up to 24 months post-procedure.

  11. Change in EQ-5D questionnaire

    Change in EQ-5D questionnaire from baseline up to 24 months post-procedure

    Measured: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  12. Amputation free survival

    Amputation free survival up to 24 months post-procedure.

    • Amputation free survival is defined as survival without above-the-ankle amputation of the target limb.

    Measured: Up to 24 months post-procedure.

  13. Wound healing evolution

    Wound healing evolution up to 24 months post-procedure, assessed according to the following predefined ordinal classification:

    • Healed: Complete epithelialisation of the target wound maintained for at least 14 consecutive days.
    • Improved: Reduction in target wound area >50% compared with baseline.
    • Unchanged: Increase or decrease in target wound area ≤50% compared with baseline.
    • Worsened: Increase in target wound area >50% compared with baseline. The target wound will be defined as the largest or clinically most relevant wound identified at baseline.

    Measured: Up to 24 months post-procedure

  14. Wound healing time

    Wound healing time is defined as the number of days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound, without drainage or need for dressing, as assessed by the treating physician.

    • Major amputation of the index limb or death prior to complete wound healing will be considered failure of the wound healing endpoint.

    Measured: Days from the index procedure to complete epithelialisation of the target wound

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Aug 2026
  2. Study startDec 2026 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2029 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2030 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
142 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT07764016
Sponsor's protocol ID
DASBAD-NC
Acronym
DASBAD-NC
Status last verified
Oct 2026
First submitted
9 Aug 2026
Last updated
7 Oct 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No: Data collected within the DASBAD-NC study will be made available to researchers upon reasonable request. Access to the data is controlled to ensure the protection of participant privacy and compliance with applicable data protection laws and regulations. Data will be shared upon revision and approval based on scientific merit by the DASBAD-NC management group (which includes a qualified statistician) of a detailed proposal for their use. The data required for the approved, specified purposes and the trial protocol will be provided after the completion of a data-sharing agreement that will be set up by the principal investigator and his team. All data provided will be anonymized to respect the privacy of patients who have participated in the trial. Estimated timeframe for response will be within 30 days. Requests for data should be addressed to the sponsor and PI (msirvent@fphag.org).

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in