AzTrials
AzTrials

Acute Lymphoblastic LeukemiaPhase 3NCT02042690

Haplo-identical HSCT Versus Chemotherapy for Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients

A Phase 3 study testing Haplo-identical HSCT and Chemotherapy in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Peking University at 5 sites in China.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The survival of adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) need to improve. We want to compare the efficacy of haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with chemotherapy for adult(age:18-39 years old) ALL patients in first phase of complete remission (CR1) Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 39 years
Conditions the study is for
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia
What is being tested?
Haplo-identical HSCT and Chemotherapy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
131 participants
Where
5 sitesChina
Study dates
Jul 2014to Apr 2019
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 39 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • acute lymphoblastic leukemia
  • 18-39 years old
  • in first complete remission -Adequate hepatic function defined as: total bilirubin ≤2.0 times the institutional upper limit of normal (ULN); alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase(AST) ≤2.5 times the institutional ULN -
  • Adequate renal function defined as creatinine ≤3 times the institutional ULN
  • No uncontrollable infection
  • Performance Status(PS)score 0-2(WHO)
  • Subjects able to provide written informed consent

Who cannot join

  • having HLA-matched donor
  • high-risk ALL: (1)Ph+ALL (2)Hypodiploidy (3)t(v;11q23) (4) complex karyotype(≥5 chromosome abnormalities)(5)high white blood cell (WBC) count (B-ALL≥30×109/L;T-ALL ≥100×109/L).
  • pregnancy
  • Loss of ability to freely provide consent due to psychiatric or physical illness

Trial locations and contacts

5 sites in 1 country.

5 sites in 1 country

China5 sites
  • Aerospace Center Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100044

  • General Hospital of PLA

    Beijing

  • Peking Union Hospital

    Beijing

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University

    Suzhou, Jiangsu

  • Wuhan Union Hospital

    Wuhan, Hubei

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Phase III Study to Compare Haplo-identical HSCT Versus Chemotherapy in First Remission for Standard-risk Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

The survival of adult patients with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) need to improve. We want to compare the efficacy of haplo-identical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) with chemotherapy for adult(age:18-39 years old) ALL patients in first phase of complete remission (CR1)

Read the detailed description

Although the high complete remission rate (80%-90%) can be achieved, the long-term survival rate of standard-risk adult patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia(ALL) is only 25%-55% when they receive chemotherapy alone. The survival rate can be further improved uo to 50%-75% when they receive HLA-matched HSCT However, the chance of finding a HLA-matched donor is low, especially in China. Alternative donor such as halpo-identical related donor might be an choice.

Our retrospective analysis showed about 59% overall survival could be achieved when standard-risk adult ALL patients received halpo-identical HSCT.Therefore, we start this randomization controlled trial to compare the efficacy of haplo-identical HSCT with chemotherapy for adult(age:18-39 years old) ALL patients in CR1.

Being tested
Haplo-identical HSCT, Chemotherapy
Keywords
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, chemotherapy
Medical subject headings
Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Haplo-identical HSCTProcedure or surgery

    Haplo-identical Protocol: myeloablative human leukocyte antigen (HLA) haploidentical stem cell transplantation (haplo-SCT) using pretransplant ATG and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF)-stimulated grafts (ATG+G-CSF) GVHD prevention regimen: CSA/MMF/MTX, CSA 1.25mg/kg/d, i.v administrated in two doses from day -109 until bowel function returned to normal, at which time patients receive oral CSA until 12months after HRD-HSC and then gradually tapered. Every 12h, 0.5g MMF(0.25g for children) was administrated orally from day -10 to +30 and subsequently 0.25g from days +30 to +60. MTX was administrated at a dose of 15mg/m2 on day +1 and 10mg/m2 on days +3,+6, and +11.

  • ChemotherapyDrug

    Also called Methotrexate, arabinoside, cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin

    Patients receive 6 cycles of consolidation chemotherapy after randomization, including Hyper-CVAD-B regimen-Hyper-CVAD-A regimen/Hyper-CVAD-B regimen/Hyper-CVAD-A regimen/Hyper-CVAD-B regimen/Hyper-CVAD-A regimen.Maintenance treatment includes MTX 20mg/m2/w,po,6-mercaptopurine 60 mg/m2/d,po,d1-d28,VP(VDS 4mg,d1, Prednisone 1mg/kg d1-7) every one month for 2 years.

Study groups in NCT02042690
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
chemotherapyActive comparatorDrugs: Drug:Methotrexate 1g/m2 d1,IV (in the vein) , used in cycle 1,3,5 Drug:arabinoside 2-3g/m2,q12h, d2-3, IV, used in cycle 1,3,5 Drug:cyclophosphamide:300mg/m2 q12h, d1-3, IV,used in cycle 2,4,6 Drug:Epirubicin 60mg/m2.d,d4,used in cycle 2,4,6 Drug:Vindesin 4mg/d,d4,d11, IV,in cycle 2,4,6 Drug:dexamethasone 40mg/d,d1-4,d11-14, IV, in cycle 2,4,6 Drug:Methotrexate 20 mg/m2/w,po, during maintenance treatment for 2 years Drug:6-mercaptopurine 60 mg/m2/d,po,d1-d28,during maintenance treatment for 2 years Drug:Vindesin 4mg/d,Predisone:1mg/kg, d1-7, every month during maintenance treatment for 2 years
Receives: Drug: Chemotherapy
Haplo-identical HSCTExperimentalHaplo-identical HSCT Protocol:G, donor treatment with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rhG-CSF); I, intensified immunologic suppression; A, antihuman thymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) for the prevention of GVHD; C, combination of peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (PBSCT), and bone marrow transplantation (BMT),named GIAC regimen. Graft versus-host disease(GVHD) prevention regimen: CSA/MMF/MTX, cyclosporine A(CSA) 1.25mg/kg/d, i.v administrated in two doses from day -109 until bowel function returned to normal, at which time patients receive oral CSA until 12months after HSCt and then gradually tapered. Every 12h, 0.5g mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)(0.25g for children) was administrated orally from day -10 to +30 and subsequently 0.25g from days +30 to +60. Methotrexate (MTX) was administrated at a dose of 15mg/m2 on day +1 and 10mg/m2 on days +3,+6, and +11.
Receives: Procedure: Haplo-identical HSCT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Disease-free survival

    Measured: At 2 years from study entry

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Rate of cumulative incidence of relapse

    Measured: At 2 years from study entry

  2. Overall survival (OS) rate

    Measured: At 2 years from study entry

  3. nonrelapse mortality

    Measured: At 2 years from study entry

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted23 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2014
  3. Primary completionFeb 2018
  4. Study completionApr 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
After 1 year of enrollment, randomization was terminated because of the patients's intention to crossover between the two intervention groups (total enrolled n=16). The sample size was recalculated in July 2015, and the ethics committee agreed to modify the randomization scheme to intention-to-therapy (ITT). Patients who met the recruitment criteria after the second consolidation participated fully in discussions with their doctors and then made decisions on their own regarding their intention to receive haplo-SCT. For each patient, informed consent was obtained from that patient or his/her guardian in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
131 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02042690
Sponsor's protocol ID
ALL-13
Status last verified
May 2019
First submitted
29 Nov 2013
Last updated
29 May 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Lv M, Jiang Q, Zhou DB, Hu Y, Liu DH, Wu DP, Wang JB, Jiang H, Wang J, Chang YJ, Wang Y, Zhang XH, Xu LP, Liu KY, Huang XJ. Comparison of haplo-SCT and chemotherapy for young adults with standard-risk Ph-negative acute lymphoblastic leukemia in CR1. J Hematol Oncol. 2020 May 15;13(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s13045-020-00879-1.

    PubMed 32414392

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Haplo-identical HSCT and Chemotherapy in people with Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, run by Peking University at 5 sites in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 5 sites in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Disease-free survival (time frame: At 2 years from study entry). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02042690, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 May 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in