AzTrials
AzTrials

Bacterial VaginosisPhase 4NCT02042287

Treatment Comparison of Antibiotics Versus Vaginal Lactic Acid in Non-pregnant Women With Acute Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis

A Phase 4 study testing Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel and Metronidazole in people with Bacterial Vaginosis, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age. Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older, women only
Conditions the study is for
Bacterial Vaginosis
What is being tested?
Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel and Metronidazole
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
32 participants
Where
1 siteSwitzerland
Study dates
Jun 2014to 19 Mar 2020
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • > 18 years old
  • Acute symptomatic BV
  • Signed informed consent

Who cannot join

  • Insufficient knowledge of German
  • Illiteracy
  • Pregnancy
  • Acute illness
  • Known allergies against ingredients of the investigational products

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Switzerland1 site
  • Dep. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital, Bern

    Bern, 3010

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Parallel Group Pilot Study With 2 Treatment Arms in Non-pregnant Women With Acute Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age. Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. It is of importance to treat women with BV, as this condition is associated with serious risks, such as an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women, and particular vulnerability to the acquisition of sexually transmitted disease (STD). The pathophysiology of BV consists of changes in the microbiologic composition of the vaginal flora. The treatment of choice for BV is oral metronidazole for 7 days. Although the available antibiotic therapies produce good results in the short term, symptomatic BV persists or recurs at 3 months in up to 50% to 70% of patients, with long-term recurrence approaching 85%. An alternative treatment option may be a vaginal acid gel which aims to optimize the vaginal milieu. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy of Gynofit® vaginal gel (lactic acid and glycogen) compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of BV.

Read the detailed description

Background

Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age, with an estimated prevalence of 29% in the general population of women aged 14 to 49 years.

Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. However, only the minority of women with BV is symptomatic.

Regardless of the symptoms, it may be of importance to treat women with BV, as this condition is associated with serious risks, such as an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women, particular vulnerability to the acquisition of sexually transmitted disease (STD), including gonorrhea, chlamydia trachomatis, genital herpes and HIV and a possibly higher risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Moreover, endometrial bacterial colonization, plasma-cell endometritis, postpartum fever, post-hysterectomy vaginal cluff cellulitis and post-abortal infection seem to be associated with BV.

The pathophysiology of BV consists of changes in the microbiologic composition of the vaginal flora. In the healthy vaginal flora, lactobacilli are the predominant bacteria, producing lactic acid and H2O2, maintaining a pH<4.5 and inhibiting the growth of other organisms. In BV, the concentration of H2O2-producing lactobacilli is reduced and other species become more prevalent, notably Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella species, Porphyromonas species, Bacteroides species, Peptostreptococcus species, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mobiluncus species. These vaginal anaerobes produce carboxylase enzymes, breaking down peptides to amines, which get volatile and malodorous with the increased pH. More over the amines increase vaginal transudation and squamous epithelial cell exfoliation, leading to the typical discharge in BV. With the increased pH, Gardnerella vaginalis can adhere to squamous epithelial cells and create a biofilm. The mechanism by which this floral imbalance occurs is not clear, but sexual activity seems to be a major risk factor, as BV does not occur in sexual inactive women. Additionally, multiple or new sexual partners, frequency of vaginal intercourse, vaginal douching, and cigarette smoking have also been identified as risk factors, whereas the use of condoms had a protective effect.

BV can be diagnosed by the use of clinical criteria or Gram stain. For standard clinical use, practical diagnostic criteria were proposed by Amsel et al.. Amsel criteria include: (a) an adherent grayish-white discharge; (b) a positive whiff test (a fishy odor of the vaginal discharge before or after addition of 10% potassium hydroxide); (c) an elevated vaginal pH (pH > 4.5); and (d) the presence of clue cells on microscopy. The diagnosis of BV is made, if 3 of these 4 symptoms are present.

A Gram stain (Nugent Score) is considered the gold standard laboratory method for diagnosing BV and determines the relative concentration of Gram-positive lactobacilli, Gram-negative and Gram-variable rods and cocci and curved Gram-negative rods characteristic of BV.

BV resolves spontaneously in up to one-third of non-pregnant and one-half of pregnant women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a treatment for all non-pregnant women with symptomatic BV to relieve vaginal symptoms and signs of infection. Treatment is also indicated to prevent postoperative infection in those with asymptomatic infection prior to abortion or hysterectomy. Some experts recommend treating all women with BV, for reducing the risk of acquiring STDs.

The treatment of choice for BV is oral metronidazole 500 mg orally twice a day for 7 days. Other recommended regimens are metronidazole gel 0.75%, one full applicator (5 g) intravaginally, once a day for 5 days; or clindamycin cream 2%, one full applicator (5 g) intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days. Alternative regimens are tinidazole 2 g orally once daily for 2 days; or tinidazole 1 g orally once daily for 5 days; or clindamycin 300 mg orally twice daily for 7 days; or clindamycin ovules 100 mg intravaginally once a bedtime for 3 days. Oral metronidazole is considered the treatment of choice with a cure rate of 80 - 90%.

Although the available antibiotic therapies produce good results in the short term, symptomatic BV persists or recurs at 1 month in approximately 11% to 29% of patients. At 3 months, recurrence of BV has been reported in 50% to 70% of patients, with long-term recurrence approaching 85%.

Although the causes of recurrence are not known, it has been found that the vaginal biofilm with Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae persisted after treatment, probably explaining the high recurrence rates.

In in vitro studies lactobacilli were able to disrupt the biofilm and reduce the risk of BV. Thus, it is being investigated, if recolonizing the vagina with healthy stains of H2O2-producing lactobacilli could prevent relapse after treatment. Systemic reviews of trials investigating probiotics for treatment of BV have not found sufficient evidence for or against efficacy.

Acidification is another treatment option, as lowering the vaginal pH encourages the growth of lactobacilli. In one study, acid gel was as effective as metronidazole in the treatment of BV. Similarly, in an observational study, the use of acetic acid vaginal gel after the treatment of BV significantly reduced the rate of recurrence. However, data on the treatment and prevention efficacy by acidification is scarce and controversial.

Objective

The principal exploratory goal of the present pilot study is to assess the efficacy of Gynofit® vaginal gel (lactic acid and glycogen) compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of BV.

Methods

In this pilot study clinical efficacy of treatment will be assessed using the Amsel criteria, which are diagnostic criteria used in standard clinical practice. The Nugent score, a laboratory method for diagnosing BV, will be measured as well to confirm clinical findings. Finally, subjective BV symptoms are assessed by means of a questionnaire to determine the subjective effectiveness of treatment.

The following collaborator is providing support for this study: Dr. rer. nat. Ulrich Stefenelli, Würzburg, Germany.

Being tested
Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel, Metronidazole
Keywords
Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Health Occupations
Medical subject headings
Vaginosis, Bacterial, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gelDevice

    Medical device (registration number: 10-355-717, first licensed 12.08.2010)

  • MetronidazoleDrug

    Oral antibiotic

Study groups in NCT02042287
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
1: Gynofit®ExperimentalVaginal lactic acid gel
Receives: Device: Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel
2: metronidazoleActive comparatorOral antibiotic
Receives: Drug: Metronidazole

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Amsel criteria at week 3.

    This is a binary parameter indicating remission from BV.

    Measured: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Nugent score at week 3.

    This is a binary parameter indicating remission from BV.

    Measured: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)

  2. Mean symptom score-changes (as pre-post-difference) regarding severity of BV at week 3

    Unpleasant vaginal discharge, unpleasant smell, vaginal pain, itching, burning, dryness

    Measured: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)

  3. Percentage of patients with a complete relief from symptoms

    Measured: Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (day 21), Visit 3 (day 84) and Visit 4 (day 252

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted22 Jan 2014 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2014
  3. Primary completion19 Mar 2020
  4. Study completion19 Mar 2020

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
32 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02042287
Sponsor's protocol ID
026/13
Status last verified
Mar 2022
First submitted
20 Jan 2014
Last updated
8 Apr 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Schwebke JR. Gynecologic consequences of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;30(4):685-94. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(03)00086-x.

    PubMed 14719845
  • Hill GB. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 2):450-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90339-k.

    PubMed 8357043
  • Saunders S, Bocking A, Challis J, Reid G. Effect of Lactobacillus challenge on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007 Apr 1;55(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.040. Epub 2006 Dec 9.

    PubMed 17234391
  • Wilson JD, Shann SM, Brady SK, Mammen-Tobin AG, Evans AL, Lee RA. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: the use of maintenance acidic vaginal gel following treatment. Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Nov;16(11):736-8. doi: 10.1258/095646205774763081.

    PubMed 16303068
  • Andersch B, Forssman L, Lincoln K, Torstensson P. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with an acid cream: a comparison between the effect of lactate-gel and metronidazole. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1986;21(1):19-25. doi: 10.1159/000298923.

    PubMed 3485071
  • Holley RL, Richter HE, Varner RE, Pair L, Schwebke JR. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of vaginal acidification versus placebo for the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Apr;31(4):236-8. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000118423.20985.e7.

    PubMed 15028938
  • Boeke AJ, Dekker JH, van Eijk JT, Kostense PJ, Bezemer PD. Effect of lactic acid suppositories compared with oral metronidazole and placebo in bacterial vaginosis: a randomised clinical trial. Genitourin Med. 1993 Oct;69(5):388-92. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.5.388.

    PubMed 8244360
  • Tidbury F, Brulhart G, Muller G, Pavicic E, Weidlinger S, Eichner G, von Wolff M, Stute P. Effectiveness and tolerability of lactic acid vaginal gel compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of acute symptomatic bacterial vaginosis: a multicenter, randomized-controlled, head-to-head pilot study. BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03513-1.

    PubMed 39762879

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel and Metronidazole in people with Bacterial Vaginosis, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Amsel criteria at week 3. (time frame: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02042287, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in