Bacterial VaginosisPhase 4NCT02042287
Treatment Comparison of Antibiotics Versus Vaginal Lactic Acid in Non-pregnant Women With Acute Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis
A Phase 4 study testing Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel and Metronidazole in people with Bacterial Vaginosis, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age. Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Bacterial Vaginosis
- What is being tested?
- Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel and Metronidazole
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Jun 2014to 19 Mar 2020
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- > 18 years old
- Acute symptomatic BV
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- Insufficient knowledge of German
- Illiteracy
- Pregnancy
- Acute illness
- Known allergies against ingredients of the investigational products
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Dep. of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Bern University Hospital, Bern
Bern, 3010
About this study
Official title: Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Parallel Group Pilot Study With 2 Treatment Arms in Non-pregnant Women With Acute Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age. Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. It is of importance to treat women with BV, as this condition is associated with serious risks, such as an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women, and particular vulnerability to the acquisition of sexually transmitted disease (STD). The pathophysiology of BV consists of changes in the microbiologic composition of the vaginal flora. The treatment of choice for BV is oral metronidazole for 7 days. Although the available antibiotic therapies produce good results in the short term, symptomatic BV persists or recurs at 3 months in up to 50% to 70% of patients, with long-term recurrence approaching 85%. An alternative treatment option may be a vaginal acid gel which aims to optimize the vaginal milieu. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy of Gynofit® vaginal gel (lactic acid and glycogen) compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of BV.
Read the detailed description
Background
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age, with an estimated prevalence of 29% in the general population of women aged 14 to 49 years.
Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. However, only the minority of women with BV is symptomatic.
Regardless of the symptoms, it may be of importance to treat women with BV, as this condition is associated with serious risks, such as an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women, particular vulnerability to the acquisition of sexually transmitted disease (STD), including gonorrhea, chlamydia trachomatis, genital herpes and HIV and a possibly higher risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Moreover, endometrial bacterial colonization, plasma-cell endometritis, postpartum fever, post-hysterectomy vaginal cluff cellulitis and post-abortal infection seem to be associated with BV.
The pathophysiology of BV consists of changes in the microbiologic composition of the vaginal flora. In the healthy vaginal flora, lactobacilli are the predominant bacteria, producing lactic acid and H2O2, maintaining a pH<4.5 and inhibiting the growth of other organisms. In BV, the concentration of H2O2-producing lactobacilli is reduced and other species become more prevalent, notably Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella species, Porphyromonas species, Bacteroides species, Peptostreptococcus species, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mobiluncus species. These vaginal anaerobes produce carboxylase enzymes, breaking down peptides to amines, which get volatile and malodorous with the increased pH. More over the amines increase vaginal transudation and squamous epithelial cell exfoliation, leading to the typical discharge in BV. With the increased pH, Gardnerella vaginalis can adhere to squamous epithelial cells and create a biofilm. The mechanism by which this floral imbalance occurs is not clear, but sexual activity seems to be a major risk factor, as BV does not occur in sexual inactive women. Additionally, multiple or new sexual partners, frequency of vaginal intercourse, vaginal douching, and cigarette smoking have also been identified as risk factors, whereas the use of condoms had a protective effect.
BV can be diagnosed by the use of clinical criteria or Gram stain. For standard clinical use, practical diagnostic criteria were proposed by Amsel et al.. Amsel criteria include: (a) an adherent grayish-white discharge; (b) a positive whiff test (a fishy odor of the vaginal discharge before or after addition of 10% potassium hydroxide); (c) an elevated vaginal pH (pH > 4.5); and (d) the presence of clue cells on microscopy. The diagnosis of BV is made, if 3 of these 4 symptoms are present.
A Gram stain (Nugent Score) is considered the gold standard laboratory method for diagnosing BV and determines the relative concentration of Gram-positive lactobacilli, Gram-negative and Gram-variable rods and cocci and curved Gram-negative rods characteristic of BV.
BV resolves spontaneously in up to one-third of non-pregnant and one-half of pregnant women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a treatment for all non-pregnant women with symptomatic BV to relieve vaginal symptoms and signs of infection. Treatment is also indicated to prevent postoperative infection in those with asymptomatic infection prior to abortion or hysterectomy. Some experts recommend treating all women with BV, for reducing the risk of acquiring STDs.
The treatment of choice for BV is oral metronidazole 500 mg orally twice a day for 7 days. Other recommended regimens are metronidazole gel 0.75%, one full applicator (5 g) intravaginally, once a day for 5 days; or clindamycin cream 2%, one full applicator (5 g) intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days. Alternative regimens are tinidazole 2 g orally once daily for 2 days; or tinidazole 1 g orally once daily for 5 days; or clindamycin 300 mg orally twice daily for 7 days; or clindamycin ovules 100 mg intravaginally once a bedtime for 3 days. Oral metronidazole is considered the treatment of choice with a cure rate of 80 - 90%.
Although the available antibiotic therapies produce good results in the short term, symptomatic BV persists or recurs at 1 month in approximately 11% to 29% of patients. At 3 months, recurrence of BV has been reported in 50% to 70% of patients, with long-term recurrence approaching 85%.
Although the causes of recurrence are not known, it has been found that the vaginal biofilm with Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae persisted after treatment, probably explaining the high recurrence rates.
In in vitro studies lactobacilli were able to disrupt the biofilm and reduce the risk of BV. Thus, it is being investigated, if recolonizing the vagina with healthy stains of H2O2-producing lactobacilli could prevent relapse after treatment. Systemic reviews of trials investigating probiotics for treatment of BV have not found sufficient evidence for or against efficacy.
Acidification is another treatment option, as lowering the vaginal pH encourages the growth of lactobacilli. In one study, acid gel was as effective as metronidazole in the treatment of BV. Similarly, in an observational study, the use of acetic acid vaginal gel after the treatment of BV significantly reduced the rate of recurrence. However, data on the treatment and prevention efficacy by acidification is scarce and controversial.
Objective
The principal exploratory goal of the present pilot study is to assess the efficacy of Gynofit® vaginal gel (lactic acid and glycogen) compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of BV.
Methods
In this pilot study clinical efficacy of treatment will be assessed using the Amsel criteria, which are diagnostic criteria used in standard clinical practice. The Nugent score, a laboratory method for diagnosing BV, will be measured as well to confirm clinical findings. Finally, subjective BV symptoms are assessed by means of a questionnaire to determine the subjective effectiveness of treatment.
The following collaborator is providing support for this study: Dr. rer. nat. Ulrich Stefenelli, Würzburg, Germany.
- Conditions
- Bacterial Vaginosis
- Being tested
- Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel, Metronidazole
- Keywords
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Health Occupations
- Medical subject headings
- Vaginosis, Bacterial, Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gelDevice
Medical device (registration number: 10-355-717, first licensed 12.08.2010)
MetronidazoleDrug
Oral antibiotic
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Gynofit® | Experimental | Vaginal lactic acid gel Receives: Device: Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel |
| 2: metronidazole | Active comparator | Oral antibiotic Receives: Drug: Metronidazole |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Amsel criteria at week 3.
This is a binary parameter indicating remission from BV.
Measured: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)
Secondary outcomes (3)
Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Nugent score at week 3.
This is a binary parameter indicating remission from BV.
Measured: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)
Mean symptom score-changes (as pre-post-difference) regarding severity of BV at week 3
Unpleasant vaginal discharge, unpleasant smell, vaginal pain, itching, burning, dryness
Measured: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)
Percentage of patients with a complete relief from symptoms
Measured: Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (day 21), Visit 3 (day 84) and Visit 4 (day 252
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2014
- Primary completion19 Mar 2020
- Study completion19 Mar 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Bacterial VaginosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tentan AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Petra Stute, MD, Study chair, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Inselspital Bern
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02042287
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 026/13
- Status last verified
- Mar 2022
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2014
- Last updated
- 8 Apr 2022
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Schwebke JR. Gynecologic consequences of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;30(4):685-94. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(03)00086-x.
PubMed 14719845Hill GB. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 2):450-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90339-k.
PubMed 8357043Saunders S, Bocking A, Challis J, Reid G. Effect of Lactobacillus challenge on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007 Apr 1;55(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.040. Epub 2006 Dec 9.
PubMed 17234391Wilson JD, Shann SM, Brady SK, Mammen-Tobin AG, Evans AL, Lee RA. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: the use of maintenance acidic vaginal gel following treatment. Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Nov;16(11):736-8. doi: 10.1258/095646205774763081.
PubMed 16303068Andersch B, Forssman L, Lincoln K, Torstensson P. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with an acid cream: a comparison between the effect of lactate-gel and metronidazole. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1986;21(1):19-25. doi: 10.1159/000298923.
PubMed 3485071Holley RL, Richter HE, Varner RE, Pair L, Schwebke JR. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of vaginal acidification versus placebo for the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Apr;31(4):236-8. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000118423.20985.e7.
PubMed 15028938Boeke AJ, Dekker JH, van Eijk JT, Kostense PJ, Bezemer PD. Effect of lactic acid suppositories compared with oral metronidazole and placebo in bacterial vaginosis: a randomised clinical trial. Genitourin Med. 1993 Oct;69(5):388-92. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.5.388.
PubMed 8244360Tidbury F, Brulhart G, Muller G, Pavicic E, Weidlinger S, Eichner G, von Wolff M, Stute P. Effectiveness and tolerability of lactic acid vaginal gel compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of acute symptomatic bacterial vaginosis: a multicenter, randomized-controlled, head-to-head pilot study. BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03513-1.
PubMed 39762879
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 8 Apr 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Controlled, Multicenter, Randomized Parallel Group Pilot Study With 2 Treatment Arms in Non-pregnant Women With Acute Symptomatic Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02042287
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 026/13
- Conditions
- Bacterial Vaginosis
- Keywords
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Health Occupations
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital BernUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Tentan AG
- Study start
- Jun 2014
- Primary completion
- 19 Mar 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 19 Mar 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Jan 2014 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age. Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. It is of importance to treat women with BV, as this condition is associated with serious risks, such as an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women, and particular vulnerability to the acquisition of sexually transmitted disease (STD). The pathophysiology of BV consists of changes in the microbiologic composition of the vaginal flora. The treatment of choice for BV is oral metronidazole for 7 days. Although the available antibiotic therapies produce good results in the short term, symptomatic BV persists or recurs at 3 months in up to 50% to 70% of patients, with long-term recurrence approaching 85%. An alternative treatment option may be a vaginal acid gel which aims to optimize the vaginal milieu. The aim of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy of Gynofit® vaginal gel (lactic acid and glycogen) compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of BV.
Detailed description
Background
Bacterial vaginosis (BV) is the most common cause of vaginitis in women of childbearing age, with an estimated prevalence of 29% in the general population of women aged 14 to 49 years.
Women with symptomatic BV may present with malodorous discharge that is off-white, thin, and homogenous and has a fishy smell especially after intercourse. However, only the minority of women with BV is symptomatic.
Regardless of the symptoms, it may be of importance to treat women with BV, as this condition is associated with serious risks, such as an increased risk of preterm birth in pregnant women, particular vulnerability to the acquisition of sexually transmitted disease (STD), including gonorrhea, chlamydia trachomatis, genital herpes and HIV and a possibly higher risk of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID). Moreover, endometrial bacterial colonization, plasma-cell endometritis, postpartum fever, post-hysterectomy vaginal cluff cellulitis and post-abortal infection seem to be associated with BV.
The pathophysiology of BV consists of changes in the microbiologic composition of the vaginal flora. In the healthy vaginal flora, lactobacilli are the predominant bacteria, producing lactic acid and H2O2, maintaining a pH<4.5 and inhibiting the growth of other organisms. In BV, the concentration of H2O2-producing lactobacilli is reduced and other species become more prevalent, notably Gardnerella vaginalis, Prevotella species, Porphyromonas species, Bacteroides species, Peptostreptococcus species, Mycoplasma hominis, Ureaplasma urealyticum, and Mobiluncus species. These vaginal anaerobes produce carboxylase enzymes, breaking down peptides to amines, which get volatile and malodorous with the increased pH. More over the amines increase vaginal transudation and squamous epithelial cell exfoliation, leading to the typical discharge in BV. With the increased pH, Gardnerella vaginalis can adhere to squamous epithelial cells and create a biofilm. The mechanism by which this floral imbalance occurs is not clear, but sexual activity seems to be a major risk factor, as BV does not occur in sexual inactive women. Additionally, multiple or new sexual partners, frequency of vaginal intercourse, vaginal douching, and cigarette smoking have also been identified as risk factors, whereas the use of condoms had a protective effect.
BV can be diagnosed by the use of clinical criteria or Gram stain. For standard clinical use, practical diagnostic criteria were proposed by Amsel et al.. Amsel criteria include: (a) an adherent grayish-white discharge; (b) a positive whiff test (a fishy odor of the vaginal discharge before or after addition of 10% potassium hydroxide); (c) an elevated vaginal pH (pH > 4.5); and (d) the presence of clue cells on microscopy. The diagnosis of BV is made, if 3 of these 4 symptoms are present.
A Gram stain (Nugent Score) is considered the gold standard laboratory method for diagnosing BV and determines the relative concentration of Gram-positive lactobacilli, Gram-negative and Gram-variable rods and cocci and curved Gram-negative rods characteristic of BV.
BV resolves spontaneously in up to one-third of non-pregnant and one-half of pregnant women. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend a treatment for all non-pregnant women with symptomatic BV to relieve vaginal symptoms and signs of infection. Treatment is also indicated to prevent postoperative infection in those with asymptomatic infection prior to abortion or hysterectomy. Some experts recommend treating all women with BV, for reducing the risk of acquiring STDs.
The treatment of choice for BV is oral metronidazole 500 mg orally twice a day for 7 days. Other recommended regimens are metronidazole gel 0.75%, one full applicator (5 g) intravaginally, once a day for 5 days; or clindamycin cream 2%, one full applicator (5 g) intravaginally at bedtime for 7 days. Alternative regimens are tinidazole 2 g orally once daily for 2 days; or tinidazole 1 g orally once daily for 5 days; or clindamycin 300 mg orally twice daily for 7 days; or clindamycin ovules 100 mg intravaginally once a bedtime for 3 days. Oral metronidazole is considered the treatment of choice with a cure rate of 80 - 90%.
Although the available antibiotic therapies produce good results in the short term, symptomatic BV persists or recurs at 1 month in approximately 11% to 29% of patients. At 3 months, recurrence of BV has been reported in 50% to 70% of patients, with long-term recurrence approaching 85%.
Although the causes of recurrence are not known, it has been found that the vaginal biofilm with Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae persisted after treatment, probably explaining the high recurrence rates.
In in vitro studies lactobacilli were able to disrupt the biofilm and reduce the risk of BV. Thus, it is being investigated, if recolonizing the vagina with healthy stains of H2O2-producing lactobacilli could prevent relapse after treatment. Systemic reviews of trials investigating probiotics for treatment of BV have not found sufficient evidence for or against efficacy.
Acidification is another treatment option, as lowering the vaginal pH encourages the growth of lactobacilli. In one study, acid gel was as effective as metronidazole in the treatment of BV. Similarly, in an observational study, the use of acetic acid vaginal gel after the treatment of BV significantly reduced the rate of recurrence. However, data on the treatment and prevention efficacy by acidification is scarce and controversial.
Objective
The principal exploratory goal of the present pilot study is to assess the efficacy of Gynofit® vaginal gel (lactic acid and glycogen) compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of BV.
Methods
In this pilot study clinical efficacy of treatment will be assessed using the Amsel criteria, which are diagnostic criteria used in standard clinical practice. The Nugent score, a laboratory method for diagnosing BV, will be measured as well to confirm clinical findings. Finally, subjective BV symptoms are assessed by means of a questionnaire to determine the subjective effectiveness of treatment.
The following collaborator is providing support for this study: Dr. rer. nat. Ulrich Stefenelli, Würzburg, Germany.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| 1: Gynofit® | Experimental | Device: Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gelVaginal lactic acid gel |
| 2: metronidazole | Active comparator | Drug: MetronidazoleOral antibiotic |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- > 18 years old
- Acute symptomatic BV
- Signed informed consent
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Insufficient knowledge of German
- Illiteracy
- Pregnancy
- Acute illness
- Known allergies against ingredients of the investigational products
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gelMedical device (registration number: 10-355-717, first licensed 12.08.2010) | Device | 1: Gynofit® |
| MetronidazoleOral antibiotic | Drug | 2: metronidazole |
Primary outcome
Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Amsel criteria at week 3.
Time frame: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)
This is a binary parameter indicating remission from BV.
3 secondary outcomes
Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Nugent score at week 3.
Time frame: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)
Mean symptom score-changes (as pre-post-difference) regarding severity of BV at week 3
Time frame: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)
Percentage of patients with a complete relief from symptoms
Time frame: Visit 1 (day 0), Visit 2 (day 21), Visit 3 (day 84) and Visit 4 (day 252
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 8 Apr 2022.
- Background: PubMed 14719845Schwebke JR. Gynecologic consequences of bacterial vaginosis. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 2003 Dec;30(4):685-94. doi: 10.1016/s0889-8545(03)00086-x.
- Background: PubMed 8357043Hill GB. The microbiology of bacterial vaginosis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1993 Aug;169(2 Pt 2):450-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90339-k.
- Background: PubMed 17234391Saunders S, Bocking A, Challis J, Reid G. Effect of Lactobacillus challenge on Gardnerella vaginalis biofilms. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces. 2007 Apr 1;55(2):138-42. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.11.040. Epub 2006 Dec 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 16303068Wilson JD, Shann SM, Brady SK, Mammen-Tobin AG, Evans AL, Lee RA. Recurrent bacterial vaginosis: the use of maintenance acidic vaginal gel following treatment. Int J STD AIDS. 2005 Nov;16(11):736-8. doi: 10.1258/095646205774763081.
- Results publication: PubMed 3485071Andersch B, Forssman L, Lincoln K, Torstensson P. Treatment of bacterial vaginosis with an acid cream: a comparison between the effect of lactate-gel and metronidazole. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 1986;21(1):19-25. doi: 10.1159/000298923.
- Results publication: PubMed 15028938Holley RL, Richter HE, Varner RE, Pair L, Schwebke JR. A randomized, double-blind clinical trial of vaginal acidification versus placebo for the treatment of symptomatic bacterial vaginosis. Sex Transm Dis. 2004 Apr;31(4):236-8. doi: 10.1097/01.olq.0000118423.20985.e7.
- Results publication: PubMed 8244360Boeke AJ, Dekker JH, van Eijk JT, Kostense PJ, Bezemer PD. Effect of lactic acid suppositories compared with oral metronidazole and placebo in bacterial vaginosis: a randomised clinical trial. Genitourin Med. 1993 Oct;69(5):388-92. doi: 10.1136/sti.69.5.388.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 39762879Tidbury F, Brulhart G, Muller G, Pavicic E, Weidlinger S, Eichner G, von Wolff M, Stute P. Effectiveness and tolerability of lactic acid vaginal gel compared to oral metronidazole in the treatment of acute symptomatic bacterial vaginosis: a multicenter, randomized-controlled, head-to-head pilot study. BMC Womens Health. 2025 Jan 6;25(1):7. doi: 10.1186/s12905-024-03513-1.
Related trials for Bacterial Vaginosis
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Infection After Hysterectomy by Addition of Vaginal Clindamycin
Surgical Site Infection, Vaginal Cuff Cellulitis
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
WST03 Capsule Combined With Metronidazole for Bacterial Vaginosis
Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)
RecruitingPhase 1
A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Active-controlled Phase Ib Study to Evaluate the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of Multiple Intravaginal Doses of GenSci142 in Patients With Bacterial Vaginosis (BV)
Randomized, Open-label
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
A Study to Test New Investigational Drugs (LCFA-01and LC103) for Bacterial Vaginosis (BV) Treatment
Bacterial Vaginosis
Recruiting
Multi-Gyn ActiGel Plus for Treatment of Bacterial Vaginosis
Bacterial Vaginoses
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Petra Stute, MD study chair
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Inselspital Bern
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Vaginal lactic acid and glycogen gel and Metronidazole in people with Bacterial Vaginosis, run by Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Apr 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion (percentage) of patients with treatment success based on the Amsel criteria at week 3. (time frame: Visit 1 (day 0) and Visit 2 (day 21)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02042287, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Apr 2022.