Surgical Site InfectionNCT07888101
Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Infection After Hysterectomy by Addition of Vaginal Clindamycin
An observational study of Surgical Site Infection and Vaginal Cuff Cellulitis, run by Baylor Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
This study seeks to determine ways to reduce the hospitals surgical site infection rate during hysterectomy operations. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older, women only
- Conditions the study is for
- Surgical Site Infection, Vaginal Cuff Cellulitis, Bacterial Vaginosis
- What is being tested?
- Clindamycin Vaginal Gel
- How many people
- 900 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2026to Dec 2028
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- Not yet: the study is under way
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- Women only
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Women, 18 years and older, receiving a hysterectomy
Who may be able to join
- All hysterectomies (TAH, TVH, TLH, robotic), including oncology cases and those in conjunction with pelvic floor reconstruction cases (estimated 900 cases/year) performed at Baylor Scott and White Memorial Hospital over a three-year period.
- Ages 18 years old and older
Who cannot join
- Pre-existing infection, including known untreated bacterial vaginosis.
- Allergies to clindamycin
- Pregnancy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.
United States1 site
Baylor Scott and White Medical Center- Temple
Temple, Texas, 76508
About this study
Official title: Vaginal Clindamycin for Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Infections at Time of Hysterectomy
This study seeks to determine ways to reduce the hospitals surgical site infection rate during hysterectomy operations.
Read the detailed description
This is a retrospective review and prospective observational study involving a historical comparison which aims to compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) from the time frame of January 2023 to June 2024, among approximately 900 hysterectomies who received traditional IV antibiotics, to a matched number of hysterectomies starting in December 2026. This study seeks to determine if a one-time dose of Xaciato postoperatively can reduce the hospitals vaginal cuff infections, to investigate effective means of preventing gynecologic SSI and to test for the presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) causing pathogens after administration of pre-operative vaginal prep.
- Being tested
- Clindamycin Vaginal Gel
- Keywords
- surgical site infection, hysterectomy
- Medical subject headings
- Surgical Wound Infection, Vaginosis, Bacterial
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Clindamycin Vaginal GelDrug
Also called Xaciato
Vaginal clindamycin gel placed at the end of hysterectomy to prevent surgical site infection
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| One-time dose of Xaciato | Women who are undergoing a hysterectomy will recieve a one-time dose of Xaciato after the operation to determine if it can reduce vaginal cuff infections. Receives: Drug: Clindamycin Vaginal Gel |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Surgical site infection
To investigate effective means of preventing gynecologic surgical site infection (SSI) following hysterectomy
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (2)
Preventing vaginal cuff cellulitis
To investigate effective means of preventing vaginal cuff cellulitis following hysterectomy.
Measured: 30 days
Bacterial Vaginosis
To test for the presence of BV causing pathogens after administration of pre-operative vaginal prep.
Measured: 24 hours following surgery
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Oct 2026
- Study startDec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completionDec 2028 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (15)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Surgical Site InfectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Baylor Research InstituteThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor Research Institute
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Joanna Stacey, Principal investigator, Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07888101
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 024-515
- Status last verified
- Oct 2026
- First submitted
- 15 Oct 2026
- Last updated
- 22 Oct 2026
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Roelens K, Temmerman M. Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jun 28;12:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-148.
PubMed 22742642World Health Organization. (2023). Bacterial Vaginosis [Fact Sheet]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/bacterial-vaginosis
Qi AC, Peacock K, Luke AA, Barker A, Olsen MA, Joynt Maddox KE. Associations Between Social Risk Factors and Surgical Site Infections After Colectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912339. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12339.
PubMed 31577353Till SR, Morgan DM, Bazzi AA, Pearlman MD, Abdelsattar Z, Campbell DA, Uppal S. Reducing surgical site infections after hysterectomy: metronidazole plus cefazolin compared with cephalosporin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):187.e1-187.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
PubMed 28363438Slomski A. Single-Dose Clindamycin Gel Highly Effective for Bacterial Vaginosis. JAMA. 2022 Jun 28;327(24):2386. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10377. No abstract available.
PubMed 35762996Sobel JD, Mitchell C. Bacterial vaginosis: Clinical Manifestations and diagnosis. In: UpToDate, Eckler, K (ed), Wolters Kluwer. (Accessed on January 28, 2024.)
Sabet F, Ravan S, Shahraki AD. Prophylaxis Effect of Metronidazole Vaginal Gel in Decreasing the Risk of Surgical Site Infections after Elective Hysterectomy. J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Nov 27;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_66_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
PubMed 38213606Murphy PB, Bistas KG, Patel P, et al. Clindamycin. [Updated 2024 Feb 28]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519574/
Mauck CK, Atiee GJ, McCulloh J, Reynolds L, Zack N, Friend DR. A Phase 1 pharmacokinetic study of a single-dose bioadhesive clindamycin 2% gel for bacterial vaginosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Dec 23;78(1):257-262. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac386.
PubMed 36418189Mauck C, Hillier SL, Gendreau J, Dart C, Chavoustie S, Sorkin-Wells V, Nicholson-Uhl C, Perez B, Jacobs M, Zack N, Friend D. Single-Dose, Bioadhesive Clindamycin 2% Gel for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1092-1102. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004805. Epub 2022 May 2.
PubMed 35675606de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun;37(5):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
PubMed 19398246Lachiewicz MP, Moulton LJ, Jaiyeoba O. Pelvic surgical site infections in gynecologic surgery. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2015;2015:614950. doi: 10.1155/2015/614950. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
PubMed 25788822Kuznicki M, Mallen A, McClung EC, Robertson SE, Todd S, Boulware D, Martin S, Quilitz R, Vargas RJ, Apte SM. Dual antibiotic prevention bundle is associated with decreased surgical site infections. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 Sep;30(9):1411-1417. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2020-001515. Epub 2020 Jul 29.
PubMed 32727930Koumans EH, Sternberg M, Bruce C, McQuillan G, Kendrick J, Sutton M, Markowitz LE. The prevalence of bacterial vaginosis in the United States, 2001-2004; associations with symptoms, sexual behaviors, and reproductive health. Sex Transm Dis. 2007 Nov;34(11):864-9. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e318074e565.
PubMed 17621244Johnson, Melissa. Clindamycin Overview. In: UpToDate, Bogorodaya M (Ed), Wolters Kluwer. (Accessed on January 28, 2024.)
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Oct 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Vaginal Clindamycin for Prevention of Vaginal Cuff Infections at Time of Hysterectomy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT07888101
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 024-515
- Keywords
- surgical site infection, hysterectomy
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Enrolling by invitation
- Enrolment
- 900 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Baylor Research InstituteUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2026 (estimated)
- Primary completion
- Dec 2027 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Dec 2028 (estimated)
- First posted
- 22 Oct 2026 (actual)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study seeks to determine ways to reduce the hospitals surgical site infection rate during hysterectomy operations.
Detailed description
This is a retrospective review and prospective observational study involving a historical comparison which aims to compare the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) from the time frame of January 2023 to June 2024, among approximately 900 hysterectomies who received traditional IV antibiotics, to a matched number of hysterectomies starting in December 2026. This study seeks to determine if a one-time dose of Xaciato postoperatively can reduce the hospitals vaginal cuff infections, to investigate effective means of preventing gynecologic SSI and to test for the presence of bacterial vaginosis (BV) causing pathogens after administration of pre-operative vaginal prep.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| One-time dose of Xaciato | – | Drug: Clindamycin Vaginal GelWomen who are undergoing a hysterectomy will recieve a one-time dose of Xaciato after the operation to determine if it can reduce vaginal cuff infections. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Women, 18 years and older, receiving a hysterectomy
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- All hysterectomies (TAH, TVH, TLH, robotic), including oncology cases and those in conjunction with pelvic floor reconstruction cases (estimated 900 cases/year) performed at Baylor Scott and White Memorial Hospital over a three-year period.
- Ages 18 years old and older
Key exclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Pre-existing infection, including known untreated bacterial vaginosis.
- Allergies to clindamycin
- Pregnancy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Clindamycin Vaginal GelAlso: XaciatoVaginal clindamycin gel placed at the end of hysterectomy to prevent surgical site infection | Drug | One-time dose of Xaciato |
Primary outcome
Surgical site infection
Time frame: 30 days
To investigate effective means of preventing gynecologic surgical site infection (SSI) following hysterectomy
2 secondary outcomes
Preventing vaginal cuff cellulitis
Time frame: 30 days
Bacterial Vaginosis
Time frame: 24 hours following surgery
Results and safety
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Oct 2026.
- Background: PubMed 22742642Verstraelen H, Verhelst R, Roelens K, Temmerman M. Antiseptics and disinfectants for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis: a systematic review. BMC Infect Dis. 2012 Jun 28;12:148. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-12-148.
- BackgroundWorld Health Organization. (2023). Bacterial Vaginosis [Fact Sheet]. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/bacterial-vaginosis
- Background: PubMed 31577353Qi AC, Peacock K, Luke AA, Barker A, Olsen MA, Joynt Maddox KE. Associations Between Social Risk Factors and Surgical Site Infections After Colectomy and Abdominal Hysterectomy. JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Oct 2;2(10):e1912339. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.12339.
- Background: PubMed 28363438Till SR, Morgan DM, Bazzi AA, Pearlman MD, Abdelsattar Z, Campbell DA, Uppal S. Reducing surgical site infections after hysterectomy: metronidazole plus cefazolin compared with cephalosporin alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;217(2):187.e1-187.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2017.03.019. Epub 2017 Mar 28.
- Background: PubMed 35762996Slomski A. Single-Dose Clindamycin Gel Highly Effective for Bacterial Vaginosis. JAMA. 2022 Jun 28;327(24):2386. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.10377. No abstract available.
- BackgroundSobel JD, Mitchell C. Bacterial vaginosis: Clinical Manifestations and diagnosis. In: UpToDate, Eckler, K (ed), Wolters Kluwer. (Accessed on January 28, 2024.)
- Background: PubMed 38213606Sabet F, Ravan S, Shahraki AD. Prophylaxis Effect of Metronidazole Vaginal Gel in Decreasing the Risk of Surgical Site Infections after Elective Hysterectomy. J Res Pharm Pract. 2023 Nov 27;12(1):9-14. doi: 10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_66_21. eCollection 2023 Jan-Mar.
- BackgroundMurphy PB, Bistas KG, Patel P, et al. Clindamycin. [Updated 2024 Feb 28]. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2024 Jan-. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK519574/
- Background: PubMed 36418189Mauck CK, Atiee GJ, McCulloh J, Reynolds L, Zack N, Friend DR. A Phase 1 pharmacokinetic study of a single-dose bioadhesive clindamycin 2% gel for bacterial vaginosis. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2022 Dec 23;78(1):257-262. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkac386.
- Background: PubMed 35675606Mauck C, Hillier SL, Gendreau J, Dart C, Chavoustie S, Sorkin-Wells V, Nicholson-Uhl C, Perez B, Jacobs M, Zack N, Friend D. Single-Dose, Bioadhesive Clindamycin 2% Gel for Bacterial Vaginosis: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1092-1102. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004805. Epub 2022 May 2.
- Background: PubMed 19398246de Lissovoy G, Fraeman K, Hutchins V, Murphy D, Song D, Vaughn BB. Surgical site infection: incidence and impact on hospital utilization and treatment costs. Am J Infect Control. 2009 Jun;37(5):387-397. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2008.12.010. Epub 2009 Apr 23.
- Background: PubMed 25788822Lachiewicz MP, Moulton LJ, Jaiyeoba O. Pelvic surgical site infections in gynecologic surgery. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2015;2015:614950. doi: 10.1155/2015/614950. Epub 2015 Feb 18.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Pilot Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of OPTILENE® SILVER MESH ELASTIC in Prevention of Surgical Site Infection (SSI) and Incisional Hernia (IH)
Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm, Morbid Obesity
RecruitingPhase 2
A Single Arm Phase II Trial in p16-positive Oropharynx Cancer of Selective Dose De-escalation of nodAl VolumEs at Minimal Risk and Primary Site Disease (SAVED)
Head and Neck Cancer, Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancer
Recruiting
Safety and Efficacy of NTP in Thyroid Surgery: Pilot Study on Morbidity Prevention and Adjuvant Oncological Control
Thyroid Diseases, Wound Healing
RecruitingObservational study
Novosyn® CHD vs Polyglactin 910 Suture to Close Wounds After Emergency or Elective Laparotomy or Laparoscopic Surgery
Surgical Site Infection
Not yet recruiting
Safety Assessment of Placing a Single Dental Implant Without Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Simple Cases: A Pilot Study
Tooth Loss and Rehabillitation, Dental Implant Failure
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part.
Joanna Stacey principal investigator
Baylor Scott & White Medical Center - Temple
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Surgical Site Infection and Vaginal Cuff Cellulitis, run by Baylor Research Institute at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: enrolling by invitation, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Oct 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Surgical site infection (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT07888101, which also lists 15 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Oct 2026.