AphasiaNORTHSTARNCT02020421
NOn-invasive Repeated THerapeutic STimulation for Aphasia Recovery
A study testing rTMS and tDCS in people with Aphasia, run by Dr. Alexander Thiel at 6 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The current standard of care for rehabilitation of patients with aphasia after stroke is conventional speech and language therapy (SLT). Due to economic realities on most stroke units, SLT can often not be given with optimal intensity in the first weeks after the stroke. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Aphasia
- What is being tested?
- rTMS and tDCS
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 63 participants
- Where
- 6 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Dec 2013to Mar 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 50 to 85 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ischemic stroke in the left MCA territory
- between 5 and 30 days post stroke
- right-handedness
- English, French or German as language of daily use
- score below the lower limit of the norm on at least one of the primary outcome measures
Who cannot join
- prior symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- severe comprehension deficit that may compromise informed consent or understanding of instructions
- contraindications to MRI and/or TMS/tDCS
- neurodegenerative or psychiatric disease
- epilepsy or EEG-documented epileptic discharges
- chronic renal or liver failure
- life-threatening diseases
- auditory or visual deficits that cannot be corrected and might impair testing
Trial locations and contacts
6 sites in 3 countries.
6 sites in 3 countries
Canada4 sites
CHUM Notre-Dame
Montreal, Quebec, H2L 4M1
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
Sunnybrook Research Institute
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - UHN
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4
United States1 site
Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute
White Plains, New York, 10605
About this study
The current standard of care for rehabilitation of patients with aphasia after stroke is conventional speech and language therapy (SLT). Due to economic realities on most stroke units, SLT can often not be given with optimal intensity in the first weeks after the stroke. Developing new adjuvant therapies which may render SLT sessions more effective is thus one approach to improve rehabilitation outcome. Recent functional imaging studies in post-stroke aphasia have shown that the recruitment of brain regions in the unaffected hemisphere seems to be an inferior strategy for recovery of language function as compared to re-activation of brain regions in the vicinity of the infarct. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are new methods to modulate brain activity. Evidence from our own feasibility study in sub-acute stroke suggests that these new techniques, when applied in conjunction with conventional SLT, may help to normalize brain activation patterns and might yield better rehabilitation outcome than SLT alone. With NORTHSTAR, we propose a multicenter proof-of-concept study to investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of these new non-invasive brain stimulation methods as adjuvant therapies for subacute post-stroke aphasia.
Our goal is to determine the most effective brain stimulation modality to decrease inhibition onto the left side of the brain. We will assess if a combination of brain stimulation and speech and language therapy will improve language recovery. We will quantify language recovery (expressive and comprehensive skills) using specific tests, commonly used by speech and language therapists.
We will invite patients recently admitted to the stroke unit of the study centers to participate in our research project. Once patients consent to our study we will randomly assign them to one of three experimental groups. For 12 days, all groups of patients will be setup with brain stimulation during their usual rehabilitation sessions. Two of those groups (treatment groups) will each receive a different type of brain stimulation (rTMS and tDCS), in the third group, patients will not receive real stimulation (placebo group). By comparing the extent of aphasia recovery between groups, we will determine the benefits attributable to brain stimulation relative to SLT alone.
Read the detailed description
Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that any type of non-invasive brain stimulation in combination with conventional SLT results in better aphasia recovery at 1 and 30 days after end of treatment than SLT with sham stimulation.
Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that tDCS in combination with SLT is non-inferior to rTMS in combination with SLT but both are superior to SLT with sham stimulation.
Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that there will be no difference in the frequency of adverse events between the treatment groups.
Aim 4: To test the hypothesis that there is a differential influence of attention, time to treatment, infarct location and bilingualism on the treatment effect.
Aim 5: To test the hypothesis that the extent of functional and structural connectivity between the stimulation site over the triangular part of the right inferior frontal gyrus and the left hemisphere primary language centers determines effectiveness of the therapy.
Description of study population
Additional information: The eligibility criteria have been selected such that the resulting study population will reflect a typical clinical population of aphasic stroke patients. Stroke location and aphasia type are thus not inclusion or exclusion criterion but will be documented in order to ensure a similar distribution between treatment groups and allow for subgroup analysis.
Study design
Additional information: All patients will receive 45 minutes of model-oriented individualized aphasia therapy administered by a certified therapist and focused on the individual specific linguistic problems as determined by the therapeutic team according to SLT best-practice guidelines.
Stimulation procedure
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): Using a figure-of-8 shaped electromagnetic coil, a rapidly changing (1Hz) magnetic field is applied to the scull over the target stimulation site (Broca Area's homologue in the non-dominant hemisphere, non-dominant BA45). At a frequency of 1Hz, these currents have been shown to interfere with normal neuronal activity by down regulating it. The suppressive effect of 20 minutes of 1Hz rTMS with a stimulation intensity that would elicit muscle contractions (motor evoked potentials, MEP) when applied over the motor cortex (resting motor threshold, RMT) lasts about 45 minutes. SLT sessions will be given immediately following the stimulation procedure. For sham-stimulation, the coil will be placed over the inter-hemispheric fissure at the vertex and stimulation will be performed with low intensity (10% RMT). This will cause similar skin sensations as real stimulation but will not induce currents in language relevant areas.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): For tDCS a 5 cm2 sponge electrode (cathode) will be placed over the target area (Broca Area's homologue in the non-dominant hemisphere) and the anode on the forehead over the contralateral eye. A direct current of 2mA will be applied between electrodes. A negative current applied to the brain area under the cathode will cause a decrease in resting membrane potential of the underlying neurons thus reducing their excitability. tDCS will start immediately before the SLT session and last throughout the session. tDCS only evokes a tingling sensation on the skin when turned on and off. For sham stimulation the current will be turned on for 30 seconds to elicit a typical skin sensation and then turned off for the duration of the therapy. The same will be done at the end of the session.
Localization of stimulation sites: Stimulation sites will be localized using a modification of the surface distance measurements (SDM) method. Study centres will send the patient's T1-weighted MRI to the study coordinating centre. Surface renderings of the MRI will be generating using the 3D-Tool. Reference measures relative to the nasion-inion line will be identified on these reconstructions and sent to the participating centre. The person preparing the stimulation can verify the distances on the real patient's head and determine the respective stimulation site. The method has an accuracy of approx. 8 mm for localizing Broca's Area when compared to neuronavigation. Having designed the study with broad and cost-effective applicability in mind, we chose this approach although the centres do have advanced neuronavigation available.
Determination of resting motor threshold (RMT): The RMT will be defined iteratively as previously described over the right M1 prior to each treatment session. Within M1 the position which elicits the highest MEP-Amplitude in the left first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) with 80% or higher stimulator output will be maintained and stimulation intensity will be reduced first in 5% intervals until less than 5 consecutive MEPs with amplitude greater 50µV in 10 stimulation trials are obtained. Stimulation intensity will then be set up in 5% intervals until 5 consecutive MEPs with amplitude greater 50µV in 10 stimulation trials are obtained. The intensity at this point is used as RMT.
MR imaging procedures: MRI will be performed on a 3T SIEMENS MAGNETOM TrioTim syngo MR B17. We will acquire volumetric data-sets with 1mm resolution comprising one T1-weighted image for determination of stimulation site (ADNI-MPRAGE, 10 minutes, 192 sagittal slices, 1mm thickness, TR 2300 ms, TE 2.98ms), fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences (axial FLAIR, 3.5 minutes, 60 slices, 2mm thickness, flip angle 150 deg, TR 900ms, TE 70ms) for infarct localization and quantification of infarct volume followed by two 10 minute resting state fMRI sequences (BOLD MOSAIC 64, 10 minutes, 34 slices, 4mm thickness, 90deg flip angle, TR 1810ms, TE 30ms) and a 10 minute diffusion sequence (63 slices, 2mm thickness, TR 8400ms, TE 90ms, 64 directions)
Measurements and study instruments
The present study will use three tests of elementary language function as primary outcome variables (verbal fluency, comprehension and picture naming) for which comparable age-matched norms for all languages (English, French and German) of the participating countries exist. Language specific test batteries as well as the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) will be used as secondary outcome measures and for classification of aphasia types.
In the absence of a single test for aphasic impairment validated in all three languages, measures of aphasic impairment will only be considered as secondary outcome measures. Each participant will be assessed with a test battery that is commonly used by the majority of speech and language therapists in the corresponding languages: the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT) in German; the Protocole Montréal-Toulouse 86 (MT) in French; and the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) in English. The tests will be repeated 1 and 30 days after the last treatment session. In addition the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) will be used, in order to validate its sensitivity to detected changes in language performance during aphasia recovery for future studies.
In addition, the following tests will be performed:
Initial Testing (baseline) - before treatment: Demographics (including education) and medical history questionnaire, Neurological exam, cognitive testing (MoCA), NIHSS, CETI, Barthel Index, modified Rankin scale After each treatment session: Assessment of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) 1 and 30 days after last treatment session: Neurological exam, cognitive testing (MoCA), NIHSS, Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI), Barthel Index, modified Rankin scale.
Data analysis plan
Primary hypothesis:
1 - I Patients treated with any type of non-invasive brain stimulation will show a significantly larger increase in picture naming, token-test or semantic verbal fluency scores than any sham treated patients at 1 day and 30 days after last therapy session
1 - II tDCS will not be inferior to rTMS but superior to sham stimulation with respect to treatment effects at 1 day and 30 days after last therapy session
- - III There will be no difference in the frequency of AE/SAE between treatment groups Secondary hypothesis:
- - I Both treatment groups will show a larger increase in the global test scores than sham-groups at 1 day and 30 days after last treatment.
2 - II Patients with lesions in the anterior MCA-territory (frontal and basal ganglia) will show greater treatment effects in verbal fluency than patients with lesions in the posterior MCA territory at 1 day after last session.
2 - III Patients with lesions in the posterior MCA territory (temporo-parietal) will show greater treatment effects in Token test than patients with lesions in the anterior MCA territory at 1 day after last session.
2 - IV There will be differential influence of attention, time to treatment, infarct location and bilingualism on the improvement in picture naming, token-test and semantic verbal fluency in the three treatment groups.
2 - V Time series of BOLD-signal fluctuations measured in the triangular part of the right inferior frontal gyrus will be 2-VI fractional anisotropy values in transcallosal fiber tracts between primary language areas will be correlated with improvement in clinical outcome measures.
In order to test these hypotheses, the following primary outcome variables will be derived from the primary outcome measures: difference between semantic verbal fluency test scores at baseline and and 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (dSF1, dSF30), difference between picture naming test scores at baseline and 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (dPN1, dPN30), difference between Token test scores at baseline and 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (dTT1, dTT30) and a cumulative number of AE and SAE during 10 days of therapy (AE1) and during the 30 days follow-up period (AE30).
Secondary outcome variables will be: Percent difference of global aphasia test scores at follow-ups (1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period) relative to baseline (dAT1, dAT30). The stratification variables will be TRT: treatment (levels: any stimulation, sham), STT: stimulation type (levels: rTMS, tDCS, sham) and LOC: infarct location (levels: MCA-ant, MCA-post).
Planned statistical tests for primary and secondary outcome variables are ANOVA for between group effects with the respective stratification variables as factors as required by each of the hypotheses. A significance level of P<0.01 corrected for multiple comparisons will be accepted.
Confounding variables: sex, age, intelligence, socioeconomic status and aphasia type have been shown to correlate with initial aphasia severity but NOT with recovery. We will thus control for these variables by randomization. Multivariate analysis: We will use multiple regression to test whether time of therapy onset after stroke, attention, bilingualism and infarct location are differentially correlated with recovery in the treatment groups.
Resting state fMRI data will be analyzed following a previously published protocol for functional connectivity in language networks. Time series of BOLD-signal fluctuations within the right inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis, seed region) will be correlated with signal fluctuations in the non-infarcted gray matter of the left hemisphere on voxel by voxel basis using the MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity implemented in SPM. We expect interhemispheric connectivity of the right inferior frontal gyrus with left hemisphere language cortex to be higher in those patients who will show the greatest response to therapy.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging data will be analyzed following our previously established protocol. Transcallosal fibers will be traced between homotopic primary language regions in both hemispheres and fractional anisotropy will be measured within those traced fibre bundles as surrogate marker of fibre tract integrity as previously described. FA values will then be correlated with clinical primary outcome measures in each treatment group to test the hypothesis that fibre tract integrity predicts therapeutic response.
- Conditions
- Aphasia
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, rehabilitation, aphasia, non-invasive brain stimulation
- Medical subject headings
- Aphasia, Ischemic Stroke
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
rTMSDevice
Low frequency (1Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the center of the right Pars Triangularis for 15 minutes (900 pulses) prior to each Speech-Language therapy session. Stimulation intensity will be set at 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) of the left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle.
tDCSDevice
2mA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right Pars Triangularis. The anode will be placed on the forehead over the contralateral eye. tDCS will start immediately before the speech-language therapy session and last throughout the session.
Sham rTMSDevice
Low frequency (1Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the Vertex for 15 minutes (900 pulses) prior to each Speech-Language therapy session. Stimulation intensity will be set at 10% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) of the left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle.
Sham tDCSDevice
Sham cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right Pars Triangularis. The anode will be placed on the forehead over the contralateral eye. To elicit the typical skin sensation of real tDCS (tingling sensation on the skin when tDCS is turned on and off), the current will be turned on for 30 seconds and then turned off for the duration of the speech-language therapy session. The same procedure will be done at the end of the session.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| rTMS | Experimental | Participants will receive real rTMS and sham tDCS Receives: Device: rTMS; Device: Sham tDCS |
| tDCS | Experimental | Participants will receive real tDCS and sham rTMS Receives: Device: tDCS; Device: Sham rTMS |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Participants will receive both sham rTMS and sham tDCS Receives: Device: Sham rTMS; Device: Sham tDCS |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from baseline in verbal fluency on the Verbal fluency test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Verbal fluency test
Measured: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Change from baseline in language comprehension on the Token test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Token test
Measured: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Cumulative number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events during 10 days of therapy
Cumulative number of Adverse Effects and Serious Adverse Effects during 10 days of therapy
Measured: at each days of treatment
Change from baseline in naming ability on the Boston naming test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Boston Naming Test
Measured: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Cumulative number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events during 30 days following completion of the treatment
Cumulative number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events during 30 days following completion of the treatment
Measured: at each day during 30 days following completion of the treatment
Secondary outcomes (1)
Change from baseline in Aphasia global test scores on standard aphasia test batteries at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Western Aphasia Battery, Montréal-Toulouse 86, Aachener Aphasie Test
Measured: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted24 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2013
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionMar 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for AphasiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Alexander Thiel
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Dr. Alexander Thiel, Thiel, Alexander, M.D.
- Investigators
- Alexander Thiel, M.D., Principal investigator, Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec)Sandra Black, M.D., Principal investigator, Sunnybrook Research Institute (Toronto, Ontario)Elizabeth Rochon, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - UHNSylvain Lanthier, M.D., Principal investigator, Hôpital Notre-Dame (Montreal, Quebec)Wolf-Dieter Heiss, M.D., Principal investigator, Max-Planck-Institut fur Neurologische Forschung (Cologne, Germany)Dylan Edwards, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Burke-Cornell Medical Research Institute (New-York)
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02020421
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- NORTHSTAR
- Acronym
- NORTHSTAR
- Status last verified
- Oct 2021
- First submitted
- 10 Dec 2013
- Last updated
- 26 Oct 2021
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Zumbansen A, Black SE, Chen JL, J Edwards D, Hartmann A, Heiss WD, Lanthier S, Lesperance P, Mochizuki G, Paquette C, Rochon EA, Rubi-Fessen I, Valles J, Kneifel H, Wortman-Jutt S, Thiel A; NORTHSTAR-study group. Non-invasive brain stimulation as add-on therapy for subacute post-stroke aphasia: a randomized trial (NORTHSTAR). Eur Stroke J. 2020 Dec;5(4):402-413. doi: 10.1177/2396987320934935. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
PubMed 33598559Jo D, Hildesheim FE, Dancause N, Thiel A, Edwards JD. Sex-Specific Differences in Response to Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Recovery From Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Retrospective Analysis of the NORTHSTAR Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2026 Sep 7:15459683261477086. doi: 10.1177/15459683261477086. Online ahead of print.
PubMed 42703961Zumbansen A, Kneifel H, Lazzouni L, Ophey A, Black SE, Chen JL, Edwards D, Funck T, Hartmann AE, Heiss WD, Hildesheim F, Lanthier S, Lesperance P, Mochizuki G, Paquette C, Rochon E, Rubi-Fessen I, Valles J, Wortman-Jutt S, Thiel A; NORTHSTAR-study group. Differential Effects of Speech and Language Therapy and rTMS in Chronic Versus Subacute Post-stroke Aphasia: Results of the NORTHSTAR-CA Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Apr;36(4-5):306-316. doi: 10.1177/15459683211065448. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
PubMed 35337223
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Oct 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- NOn-invasive Repeated THerapeutic STimulation for Aphasia Recovery
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02020421
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NORTHSTAR / NORTHSTAR
- Conditions
- Aphasia
- Keywords
- ischemic stroke, rehabilitation, aphasia, non-invasive brain stimulation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 63 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Dr. Alexander Thiel
- Study start
- Dec 2013
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 24 Dec 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The current standard of care for rehabilitation of patients with aphasia after stroke is conventional speech and language therapy (SLT). Due to economic realities on most stroke units, SLT can often not be given with optimal intensity in the first weeks after the stroke. Developing new adjuvant therapies which may render SLT sessions more effective is thus one approach to improve rehabilitation outcome. Recent functional imaging studies in post-stroke aphasia have shown that the recruitment of brain regions in the unaffected hemisphere seems to be an inferior strategy for recovery of language function as compared to re-activation of brain regions in the vicinity of the infarct. Non-invasive brain stimulation techniques, such as repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) or transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) are new methods to modulate brain activity. Evidence from our own feasibility study in sub-acute stroke suggests that these new techniques, when applied in conjunction with conventional SLT, may help to normalize brain activation patterns and might yield better rehabilitation outcome than SLT alone. With NORTHSTAR, we propose a multicenter proof-of-concept study to investigate the safety, feasibility and efficacy of these new non-invasive brain stimulation methods as adjuvant therapies for subacute post-stroke aphasia.
Our goal is to determine the most effective brain stimulation modality to decrease inhibition onto the left side of the brain. We will assess if a combination of brain stimulation and speech and language therapy will improve language recovery. We will quantify language recovery (expressive and comprehensive skills) using specific tests, commonly used by speech and language therapists.
We will invite patients recently admitted to the stroke unit of the study centers to participate in our research project. Once patients consent to our study we will randomly assign them to one of three experimental groups. For 12 days, all groups of patients will be setup with brain stimulation during their usual rehabilitation sessions. Two of those groups (treatment groups) will each receive a different type of brain stimulation (rTMS and tDCS), in the third group, patients will not receive real stimulation (placebo group). By comparing the extent of aphasia recovery between groups, we will determine the benefits attributable to brain stimulation relative to SLT alone.
Detailed description
Aim 1: To test the hypothesis that any type of non-invasive brain stimulation in combination with conventional SLT results in better aphasia recovery at 1 and 30 days after end of treatment than SLT with sham stimulation.
Aim 2: To test the hypothesis that tDCS in combination with SLT is non-inferior to rTMS in combination with SLT but both are superior to SLT with sham stimulation.
Aim 3: To test the hypothesis that there will be no difference in the frequency of adverse events between the treatment groups.
Aim 4: To test the hypothesis that there is a differential influence of attention, time to treatment, infarct location and bilingualism on the treatment effect.
Aim 5: To test the hypothesis that the extent of functional and structural connectivity between the stimulation site over the triangular part of the right inferior frontal gyrus and the left hemisphere primary language centers determines effectiveness of the therapy.
Description of study population
Additional information: The eligibility criteria have been selected such that the resulting study population will reflect a typical clinical population of aphasic stroke patients. Stroke location and aphasia type are thus not inclusion or exclusion criterion but will be documented in order to ensure a similar distribution between treatment groups and allow for subgroup analysis.
Study design
Additional information: All patients will receive 45 minutes of model-oriented individualized aphasia therapy administered by a certified therapist and focused on the individual specific linguistic problems as determined by the therapeutic team according to SLT best-practice guidelines.
Stimulation procedure
Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS): Using a figure-of-8 shaped electromagnetic coil, a rapidly changing (1Hz) magnetic field is applied to the scull over the target stimulation site (Broca Area's homologue in the non-dominant hemisphere, non-dominant BA45). At a frequency of 1Hz, these currents have been shown to interfere with normal neuronal activity by down regulating it. The suppressive effect of 20 minutes of 1Hz rTMS with a stimulation intensity that would elicit muscle contractions (motor evoked potentials, MEP) when applied over the motor cortex (resting motor threshold, RMT) lasts about 45 minutes. SLT sessions will be given immediately following the stimulation procedure. For sham-stimulation, the coil will be placed over the inter-hemispheric fissure at the vertex and stimulation will be performed with low intensity (10% RMT). This will cause similar skin sensations as real stimulation but will not induce currents in language relevant areas.
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): For tDCS a 5 cm2 sponge electrode (cathode) will be placed over the target area (Broca Area's homologue in the non-dominant hemisphere) and the anode on the forehead over the contralateral eye. A direct current of 2mA will be applied between electrodes. A negative current applied to the brain area under the cathode will cause a decrease in resting membrane potential of the underlying neurons thus reducing their excitability. tDCS will start immediately before the SLT session and last throughout the session. tDCS only evokes a tingling sensation on the skin when turned on and off. For sham stimulation the current will be turned on for 30 seconds to elicit a typical skin sensation and then turned off for the duration of the therapy. The same will be done at the end of the session.
Localization of stimulation sites: Stimulation sites will be localized using a modification of the surface distance measurements (SDM) method. Study centres will send the patient's T1-weighted MRI to the study coordinating centre. Surface renderings of the MRI will be generating using the 3D-Tool. Reference measures relative to the nasion-inion line will be identified on these reconstructions and sent to the participating centre. The person preparing the stimulation can verify the distances on the real patient's head and determine the respective stimulation site. The method has an accuracy of approx. 8 mm for localizing Broca's Area when compared to neuronavigation. Having designed the study with broad and cost-effective applicability in mind, we chose this approach although the centres do have advanced neuronavigation available.
Determination of resting motor threshold (RMT): The RMT will be defined iteratively as previously described over the right M1 prior to each treatment session. Within M1 the position which elicits the highest MEP-Amplitude in the left first dorsal interosseus muscle (FDI) with 80% or higher stimulator output will be maintained and stimulation intensity will be reduced first in 5% intervals until less than 5 consecutive MEPs with amplitude greater 50µV in 10 stimulation trials are obtained. Stimulation intensity will then be set up in 5% intervals until 5 consecutive MEPs with amplitude greater 50µV in 10 stimulation trials are obtained. The intensity at this point is used as RMT.
MR imaging procedures: MRI will be performed on a 3T SIEMENS MAGNETOM TrioTim syngo MR B17. We will acquire volumetric data-sets with 1mm resolution comprising one T1-weighted image for determination of stimulation site (ADNI-MPRAGE, 10 minutes, 192 sagittal slices, 1mm thickness, TR 2300 ms, TE 2.98ms), fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequences (axial FLAIR, 3.5 minutes, 60 slices, 2mm thickness, flip angle 150 deg, TR 900ms, TE 70ms) for infarct localization and quantification of infarct volume followed by two 10 minute resting state fMRI sequences (BOLD MOSAIC 64, 10 minutes, 34 slices, 4mm thickness, 90deg flip angle, TR 1810ms, TE 30ms) and a 10 minute diffusion sequence (63 slices, 2mm thickness, TR 8400ms, TE 90ms, 64 directions)
Measurements and study instruments
The present study will use three tests of elementary language function as primary outcome variables (verbal fluency, comprehension and picture naming) for which comparable age-matched norms for all languages (English, French and German) of the participating countries exist. Language specific test batteries as well as the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) will be used as secondary outcome measures and for classification of aphasia types.
In the absence of a single test for aphasic impairment validated in all three languages, measures of aphasic impairment will only be considered as secondary outcome measures. Each participant will be assessed with a test battery that is commonly used by the majority of speech and language therapists in the corresponding languages: the Aachen Aphasia Test (AAT) in German; the Protocole Montréal-Toulouse 86 (MT) in French; and the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) in English. The tests will be repeated 1 and 30 days after the last treatment session. In addition the Bilingual Aphasia Test (BAT) will be used, in order to validate its sensitivity to detected changes in language performance during aphasia recovery for future studies.
In addition, the following tests will be performed:
Initial Testing (baseline) - before treatment: Demographics (including education) and medical history questionnaire, Neurological exam, cognitive testing (MoCA), NIHSS, CETI, Barthel Index, modified Rankin scale After each treatment session: Assessment of adverse events (AE) and serious adverse events (SAE) 1 and 30 days after last treatment session: Neurological exam, cognitive testing (MoCA), NIHSS, Communicative Effectiveness Index (CETI), Barthel Index, modified Rankin scale.
Data analysis plan
Primary hypothesis:
1 - I Patients treated with any type of non-invasive brain stimulation will show a significantly larger increase in picture naming, token-test or semantic verbal fluency scores than any sham treated patients at 1 day and 30 days after last therapy session
1 - II tDCS will not be inferior to rTMS but superior to sham stimulation with respect to treatment effects at 1 day and 30 days after last therapy session
- - III There will be no difference in the frequency of AE/SAE between treatment groups Secondary hypothesis:
- - I Both treatment groups will show a larger increase in the global test scores than sham-groups at 1 day and 30 days after last treatment.
2 - II Patients with lesions in the anterior MCA-territory (frontal and basal ganglia) will show greater treatment effects in verbal fluency than patients with lesions in the posterior MCA territory at 1 day after last session.
2 - III Patients with lesions in the posterior MCA territory (temporo-parietal) will show greater treatment effects in Token test than patients with lesions in the anterior MCA territory at 1 day after last session.
2 - IV There will be differential influence of attention, time to treatment, infarct location and bilingualism on the improvement in picture naming, token-test and semantic verbal fluency in the three treatment groups.
2 - V Time series of BOLD-signal fluctuations measured in the triangular part of the right inferior frontal gyrus will be 2-VI fractional anisotropy values in transcallosal fiber tracts between primary language areas will be correlated with improvement in clinical outcome measures.
In order to test these hypotheses, the following primary outcome variables will be derived from the primary outcome measures: difference between semantic verbal fluency test scores at baseline and and 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (dSF1, dSF30), difference between picture naming test scores at baseline and 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (dPN1, dPN30), difference between Token test scores at baseline and 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (dTT1, dTT30) and a cumulative number of AE and SAE during 10 days of therapy (AE1) and during the 30 days follow-up period (AE30).
Secondary outcome variables will be: Percent difference of global aphasia test scores at follow-ups (1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period) relative to baseline (dAT1, dAT30). The stratification variables will be TRT: treatment (levels: any stimulation, sham), STT: stimulation type (levels: rTMS, tDCS, sham) and LOC: infarct location (levels: MCA-ant, MCA-post).
Planned statistical tests for primary and secondary outcome variables are ANOVA for between group effects with the respective stratification variables as factors as required by each of the hypotheses. A significance level of P<0.01 corrected for multiple comparisons will be accepted.
Confounding variables: sex, age, intelligence, socioeconomic status and aphasia type have been shown to correlate with initial aphasia severity but NOT with recovery. We will thus control for these variables by randomization. Multivariate analysis: We will use multiple regression to test whether time of therapy onset after stroke, attention, bilingualism and infarct location are differentially correlated with recovery in the treatment groups.
Resting state fMRI data will be analyzed following a previously published protocol for functional connectivity in language networks. Time series of BOLD-signal fluctuations within the right inferior frontal gyrus (pars triangularis, seed region) will be correlated with signal fluctuations in the non-infarcted gray matter of the left hemisphere on voxel by voxel basis using the MATLAB toolbox for functional connectivity implemented in SPM. We expect interhemispheric connectivity of the right inferior frontal gyrus with left hemisphere language cortex to be higher in those patients who will show the greatest response to therapy.
Diffusion Tensor Imaging data will be analyzed following our previously established protocol. Transcallosal fibers will be traced between homotopic primary language regions in both hemispheres and fractional anisotropy will be measured within those traced fibre bundles as surrogate marker of fibre tract integrity as previously described. FA values will then be correlated with clinical primary outcome measures in each treatment group to test the hypothesis that fibre tract integrity predicts therapeutic response.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| rTMS | Experimental | Device: rTMS, Device: Sham tDCSParticipants will receive real rTMS and sham tDCS |
| tDCS | Experimental | Device: tDCS, Device: Sham rTMSParticipants will receive real tDCS and sham rTMS |
| Sham | Sham comparator | Device: Sham rTMS, Device: Sham tDCSParticipants will receive both sham rTMS and sham tDCS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 50 to 85 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- ischemic stroke in the left MCA territory
- between 5 and 30 days post stroke
- right-handedness
- English, French or German as language of daily use
- score below the lower limit of the norm on at least one of the primary outcome measures
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- prior symptomatic ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke
- severe comprehension deficit that may compromise informed consent or understanding of instructions
- contraindications to MRI and/or TMS/tDCS
- neurodegenerative or psychiatric disease
- epilepsy or EEG-documented epileptic discharges
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| rTMSLow frequency (1Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the center of the right Pars Triangularis for 15 minutes (900 pulses) prior to each Speech-Language therapy session. Stimulation intensity will be set at 90% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) of the left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. | Device | rTMS |
| tDCS2mA cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right Pars Triangularis. The anode will be placed on the forehead over the contralateral eye. tDCS will start immediately before the speech-language therapy session and last throughout the session. | Device | tDCS |
| Sham rTMSLow frequency (1Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) over the Vertex for 15 minutes (900 pulses) prior to each Speech-Language therapy session. Stimulation intensity will be set at 10% of the resting motor threshold (RMT) of the left first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle. | Device | Sham, tDCS |
| Sham tDCSSham cathodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) over the right Pars Triangularis. The anode will be placed on the forehead over the contralateral eye. To elicit the typical skin sensation of real tDCS (tingling sensation on the skin when tDCS is turned on and off), the current will be turned on for 30 seconds and then turned off for the duration of the speech-language therapy session. The same procedure will be done at the end of the session. | Device | Sham, rTMS |
Primary outcome
Change from baseline in verbal fluency on the Verbal fluency test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Time frame: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Verbal fluency test
Change from baseline in language comprehension on the Token test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Time frame: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Token test
Cumulative number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events during 10 days of therapy
Time frame: at each days of treatment
Cumulative number of Adverse Effects and Serious Adverse Effects during 10 days of therapy
Change from baseline in naming ability on the Boston naming test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Time frame: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Boston Naming Test
Cumulative number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events during 30 days following completion of the treatment
Time frame: at each day during 30 days following completion of the treatment
Cumulative number of Adverse Events and Serious Adverse Events during 30 days following completion of the treatment
1 secondary outcome
Change from baseline in Aphasia global test scores on standard aphasia test batteries at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Time frame: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Oct 2021.
- Background: PubMed 33598559Zumbansen A, Black SE, Chen JL, J Edwards D, Hartmann A, Heiss WD, Lanthier S, Lesperance P, Mochizuki G, Paquette C, Rochon EA, Rubi-Fessen I, Valles J, Kneifel H, Wortman-Jutt S, Thiel A; NORTHSTAR-study group. Non-invasive brain stimulation as add-on therapy for subacute post-stroke aphasia: a randomized trial (NORTHSTAR). Eur Stroke J. 2020 Dec;5(4):402-413. doi: 10.1177/2396987320934935. Epub 2020 Jun 30.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42703961Jo D, Hildesheim FE, Dancause N, Thiel A, Edwards JD. Sex-Specific Differences in Response to Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation for Recovery From Post-Stroke Aphasia: A Retrospective Analysis of the NORTHSTAR Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2026 Sep 7:15459683261477086. doi: 10.1177/15459683261477086. Online ahead of print.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35337223Zumbansen A, Kneifel H, Lazzouni L, Ophey A, Black SE, Chen JL, Edwards D, Funck T, Hartmann AE, Heiss WD, Hildesheim F, Lanthier S, Lesperance P, Mochizuki G, Paquette C, Rochon E, Rubi-Fessen I, Valles J, Wortman-Jutt S, Thiel A; NORTHSTAR-study group. Differential Effects of Speech and Language Therapy and rTMS in Chronic Versus Subacute Post-stroke Aphasia: Results of the NORTHSTAR-CA Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2022 Apr;36(4-5):306-316. doi: 10.1177/15459683211065448. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
Related trials for Aphasia
Not yet recruiting
BrainGate2: Feasibility Study of an Intracortical Neural Interface System for Persons With Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-01)
Expressive Aphasia, Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
Recruiting
Effect of Anomia Rehabilitation Combined With Metacognitive Training in Patients With Chronic Vascular Aphasia
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
Restoring Speech With an Intracortical Neuroprosthesis for Post-Stroke Agrammatic Aphasia (BG-Aphasia-02)
Aphasia, ALS
Not yet recruiting
Cerebellar Brain Stimulation Plus Language Therapy for People at Risk of Poor Aphasia Recovery After Stroke
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Detecting and Predicting Post-stroke Cognitive Impairment Using the Oxford Cognitive Screen
Stroke, Ischemic Stroke
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Alexander Thiel, M.D. principal investigator
Jewish General Hospital (Montreal, Quebec)
Sandra Black, M.D. principal investigator
Sunnybrook Research Institute (Toronto, Ontario)
Elizabeth Rochon, Ph.D. principal investigator
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute - UHN
6 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing rTMS and tDCS in people with Aphasia, run by Dr. Alexander Thiel at 6 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Oct 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 6 sites in Canada, United States, Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from baseline in verbal fluency on the Verbal fluency test at 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period (time frame: at baseline, 1 and 30 days after completion of the treatment period). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02020421, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Oct 2021.