AzTrials
AzTrials

General AnesthesiaNCT01980069

A Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel Design Study to Compare the Effectiveness of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine in Improving Surgical Condition in Subjects Undergoing Laryngeal Microsurgery

A study testing Sugammadex and Neostigmine in people with General Anesthesia, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Investigators hypothesized that the surgical condition will be improved with the use of sugammadex in patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery. Investigators will compare the effect of sugammadex and neostigmine on the surgical condition during laryngeal microsurgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 20 to 90 years
Conditions the study is for
General Anesthesia
What is being tested?
Sugammadex and Neostigmine
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
72 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Nov 2013to Oct 2014
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 20 to 90 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • adult patients of age over 20 years
  • scheduled for laryngeal microsurgery under general anesthesia

Who cannot join

  • anticipated difficult intubation, cervical spine disease, neuromuscular disease, acute or chronic renal failure, liver cirrhosis or liver failure
  • history of allergy to nondepolarizing muscle relaxant
  • history of malignant hyperthermia
  • pregnant woman
  • body mass index over 35 kg/m2

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Severance Hospital

    Seoul, Seodaemun-gu, 120-752

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Investigators hypothesized that the surgical condition will be improved with the use of sugammadex in patients undergoing laryngeal microsurgery. Investigators will compare the effect of sugammadex and neostigmine on the surgical condition during laryngeal microsurgery.

Being tested
Sugammadex, Neostigmine
Keywords
Sugammadex, Neostigmine, Surgery

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • SugammadexDrug

    In sugammadex group, sugammadex (Bridion, Merck Shart and Dohme (MSD), Oss, the Netherlands) will be administered intravenously in different doses according to the degree of muscle relaxation. Sugammadex 8 mg/kg will be administered if there is no response on post-tetanic count (PTC) stimulus. Sugammadex 4 mg/kg will be administered if PTC is more than 1 or 2. Sugammadex 2 mg/kg will be administered if T2 response appears on train-of-four (TOF) stimulus.

  • NeostigmineDrug

    In neostigmine group, neostigmine 50 ㎍/kg will be administered intravenously with glycopyrrolate 10 ㎍/kg when the T2 response appears on TOF stimuli.

Study groups in NCT01980069
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Neostigmine armExperimentalNeostigmine arm
Receives: Drug: Neostigmine
Sugammadex armActive comparatorSugammadex arm
Receives: Drug: Sugammadex

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. surgical condition

    Primary outcome is the proportion of patients who have clinically acceptable surgical condition. The surgeon will evaluate the surgical condition as a surgical rating scale during surgery (extremely poor condition, poor condition, acceptable condition, good condition, optimal condition).

    Measured: up to 1 hour after the end of surgery

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted8 Nov 2013 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2013
  3. Primary completionOct 2014
  4. Study completionOct 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
72 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01980069
Sponsor's protocol ID
4-2013-0451
Status last verified
Apr 2015
First submitted
1 Nov 2013
Last updated
23 Apr 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Kim HJ, Lee K, Park WK, Lee BR, Joo HM, Koh YW, Seo YW, Kim WS, Yoo YC. Deep neuromuscular block improves the surgical conditions for laryngeal microsurgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Dec;115(6):867-72. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev368.

    PubMed 26582847

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Sugammadex and Neostigmine in people with General Anesthesia, run by Yonsei University at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

surgical condition (time frame: up to 1 hour after the end of surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01980069, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Apr 2015; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 27 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in