Esophageal CancerPhase 2NCT01787006
Definitive Radiochemotherapy Plus/Minus Cetuximab in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer
A Phase 2 study testing Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU and Radiotherapy in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein at 1 site in Germany.
Trial summary
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor. Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer
- What is being tested?
- Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU and Radiotherapy
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion, Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 74 participants
- Where
- 1 siteGermany
- Study dates
- Sep 2011to 6 Sep 2018
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Dated and signed written informed consent
- Male or female patients between 18 years and 75 years; patients > 75 years if their karnofsky performance status is ≥ 80.
- Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus which is not curatively resectable. Resectability has to be defined by a surgeon before radiochemotherapy. The tumor is considered unresectable due to T-stage, N-stage, performance status, nutritional status, co-morbidity (pulmonal function, other), tumor location upper third or other reasons
- Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test
- Adequate cardial-, pulmonal- and ear function
Show all 19Show fewer
- Adequate bone marrow function:
- leukocytes ≥ 3.0 x 10^9/L
- neutrophiles ≥ 1.5 x 10^9/L
- thrombocytes ≥ 100 x 10^9/L
- hemoglobin ≥ 10.0 g/dl
- Adequate liver function:
- bilirubin ≤ 2.0 mg/dl
- transaminases (serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase (SGPT), serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase (SGOT), gamma-GT) ≤ 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
- Adequate kidney function:
- serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 mg/dl
- creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min according to Cockcroft-Gault Formula
- no known allergies against chimeric antibodies
- effective contraception for male and female patients if there is a risk of conception
Who cannot join
- distant metastasis
- previous treatment of esophageal cancer
- previous therapy with monoclonal antibodies and / or EGFR-targeted therapy
- previous second malignancies with exception of a history of a previous curatively treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or pre-invasive cervix carcinoma
- serious concomitant disease or medical condition
- lung function: forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1)) < 1.1
Show all 13Show fewer
- clinically relevant coronary artery diseases or known myocardial infarction within the last 12 months or ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below normal
- every active dermatological condition > grade 1
- contraindications to receive cisplatin, 5-FU or cetuximab
- concurrent treatment with other experimental drugs or participation in another clinical trial within 30 days before study start
- patient pregnant or breast feeding
- known drug abuse, medication abuse, alcohol abuse
- social situations limiting the compliance with the study requirements
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Germany1 site
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Klinik für Strahlentherapie
Lübeck, 23538
About this study
Official title: Definitive Radiochemotherapy With 5-FU / Cisplatin Plus/Minus Cetuximab in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: a Phase II Study
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor. Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor.
During the last years the combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy has mainly be investigated in clinical trials focusing on colorectal and/or head and neck cancer.
Read more
The results obtained from theses studies were very encouraging and led to the initiation of active clinical research in esophageal cancer patients with antibody inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
The first data in this indication are encouraging showing that cetuximab can safely be added to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients with first hints of efficacy.
Based on the experiences with cetuximab in colorectal cancer and in combination with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of a combined treatment of cetuximab with continuous infusional 5-FU, cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess if the overall survival rates can be increased by addition of an EGFR-targeted therapy.
Read the detailed description
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive neoplasm which is fatal in the great majority of patients. On a global basis, cancer of the esophagus is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In fact, gastric and esophageal cancers together accounted for nearly 1.3 million new cases and 980,000 deaths worldwide in 2000 - more than lung, breast, or colorectal cancer. With advances in surgical techniques and treatment, the prognosis of esophageal cancer has slowly improved over the past decades. However, with a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 14%, at the time of development of the LEOPARD-II protocol, survival was poor, even in comparison with the dismal survival rates (4%) from the 1970s. Underlying reasons for this disappointingly low survival rate are above all the difficulties in cancer detection at an advanced stage, with over 50% of patients with unresectable disease or distant metastasis at presentation and the limited survival achieved with palliative chemotherapy alone for patients with metastatic or unresectable disease.
Clearly, additional strategies are needed to improve the systemic treatment options for esophageal cancer.
The optimal treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, a potentially curable disease, is controversial. Through several non-randomized cooperative group trials, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation or surgery alone represent acceptable standards of care for patients with resectable tumors.
Metastatic or unresectable esophageal cancer is found at presentation in more than 50% of patients and is considered incurable. At the time of protocol development, chemotherapy was palliative, improving quality of life and dysphagia in 60%-80% of patients. Typical clinical and radiographic responses lasted for fewer than 4 months, with a median overall survival time of 8-10 months.
Combination chemotherapies have been demonstrated to be superior to best supportive care and chemotherapy given as a single agent, with occasional patients achieving complete responses (0%-11%). However, even with the combination regimens, the median survival time remained less than 10 months.
An improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer has facilitated the development of novel agents designed to target critical pathways involved in cancer development and progression. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a crucial role in tumour growth. EGFR-dependent signaling is involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastatic spread.
The overexpression of EGFR has repeatedly been shown to predict poor prognosis in both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastro esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. EGFR blockade through monoclonal antibodies (Cetuximab, Matuzumab and Panitumumab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib) has translated into promising evidence of clinical benefit in clinical trials.
Cetuximab is a targeted therapeutic agent, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the EGFR with high affinity, internalising the receptor and preventing ligands from interacting with the receptors and thus effectively blocking ligand-induced EGFR phosphorylation. In addition, cetuximab had been found to potentiate the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in experimental systems. The dose of cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 and subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2) has been found to be generally safe and effective in several studies in major tumor types expressing the EGFR. These included colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with cetuximab given either in combination studies with chemotherapy and radiotherapy or as monotherapy.
In two phase I studies prior to LEOPARD-II, EGFR-directed antibodies had shown activity in patients with esophageal cancer. In the phase I study of the humanized EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) EMD72000, one patient with metastatic, pretreated squamous cell carcinoma had had a durable, 6-month partial response.
In addition, a phase I trial with a fully human EGFR mAb, had reported stable disease for 7 months in one esophageal cancer patient. Preclinical and these early clinical studies suggested potential activity and minimal toxicities with EGFR antibodies for esophageal cancer.
Furthermore, a randomised phase II compared cisplatin + 5-FU (CF) to cisplatin + 5-FU + cetuximab (CET-CF) (n=62). Cetuximab did not increase grade 3/4 toxicity, except for rash (6% versus 0%) and diarrhea (16% versus 0%). The overall response rates were 19% and 13% for the CET-CF and CF arms respectively, and the disease control rates were 75% and 57%, respectively. The median progression free survival was 5.9 and 3.6 months and median overall survival 9.5 and 5.5 months for CET-CF and CF, respectively.
With respect to the combination of Cetuximab with radiotherapy, preclinical studies have shown, that Cetuximab enhanced the radiosensitivity of EGFR expressing tumour cells in vitro and in tumour xenografts and the repopulation of epithelial tumour cells after exposure to radiation was related to the activation and expression of EGFR. Cetuximab also enhanced the efficacy of docetaxel chemoradiotherapy in human adenocarcinoma xenografts.
Rationale for the LEOPARD-II study Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor and one of the most frequent malignant diseases worldwide.
Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor. During the last years before protocol development the combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy had mainly been investigated in clinical trials focusing on colorectal and/or head and neck cancer. The results obtained from these studies had been very encouraging and led to the initiation of active clinical research in esophageal cancer patients with antibody inhibition of the EGFR. The first data in this indication were encouraging showing that cetuximab could safely be added to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients with first hints of efficacy. Based on the experiences with cetuximab in colorectal cancer and in combination with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, the aim of the LEOPARD-II study was to evaluate the feasibility of a combined treatment of cetuximab with continuous infusional 5-FU, cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess if the overall survival rates could be increased by addition of an EGFR-targeted therapy.
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Being tested
- Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy
- Keywords
- non resectable, locally advanced, Cetuximab, radiation
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CetuximabDrug
Also called Erbitux
Initial doses 400mg/m2 (day 1), followed by weekly doses of 250mg/m2 for 14 weeks in total
Cisplatin, 5-FUDrug
Also called CDDP, 5-fluorouracil
5-FU: 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 of cycle 1 and 2, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 of cycle 3 and 4
Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle
RadiotherapyRadiation
Also called Irradiation
59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy | Experimental | Cetuximab: Initial doses 400mg/m2 (day 1), followed by weekly doses of 250mg/m2 for 14 weeks in total, IV
5-fluorouracil (5-FU): 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 8-11 and 36-39, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 71-74 and 99-102
Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle (day 8-11, 36-39, 71-74 and 99-102)
radiotherapy: 59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery. Receives: Drug: Cetuximab; Drug: Cisplatin, 5-FU; Radiation: Radiotherapy |
| Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy | Active comparator | 5-FU: 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 and 29-32, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 64-67 and 92-95
Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle (day 1-4, 29-32, 64-67 and 92-95)
radiotherapy: 59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery. Receives: Drug: Cisplatin, 5-FU; Radiation: Radiotherapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 2 Years
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as freedom from death of any cause. Time to death was calculated from the day of randomization, and the patients were followed for a maximum of 24 months (2 years).
Measured: 2 years
Secondary outcomes (10)
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 1 Year
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as freedom from death of any cause. Time to death was calculated from the day of randomization.
Measured: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Progression of Disease at 1 Year
For progression-free survival (PFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of radiologically proven progression or clinical progression or death due to progressive disease. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.
Measured: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Progression of Disease at 2 Years
For progression-free survival (PFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of radiologically proven progression or clinical progression or death due to progressive disease. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.
Measured: 2 years
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade >=3 Toxicity
Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) (version 4.03).
Measured: up to 2 years
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Distant Metastases at 1 Year
For metastases-free survival (MFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of distant metastasis. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.
Measured: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Distant Metastases at 2 Years
For metastases-free survival (MFS), the event was defined as first occurrence of distant metastasis. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.
Measured: 2 years
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least Partial Response (Responders)
Response was defined according to the RECIST criteria (Version 1.1) based on the assessments (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging or other) for target lesions, non-target lesions as well as considering the occurrence of new lesions.
The best overall response (RECIST) was chosen for each patient out of all valid tumour assessments before start of next-line therapy (complete response=CR being the best and progressive disease=PD the worst). Frequencies with percentages were to be given for each category (CR, partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), PD) by treatment group. The data were to be presented as the dichotomous endpoint of objective response, for which patients with best overall response of CR or PR were considered as responders, and those with best overall response of SD or PD as non-responders. The difference between objective response rates in the two treatment arms was to be compared with a Chi-square test.
Measured: up to 2 years
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Loco-regional Failure at 1 Year
Loco-regional failure was defined as progressive primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes on endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound or computed tomography.Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.
Measured: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Loco-regional Failure at 2 Years
Loco-regional failure was defined as progressive primary tumor and/or regional lymph nodes on endoscopy, endoscopic ultrasound or computed tomography. Time to event was referenced from the day of randomization.
Measured: 2 years
Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and End of Treatment (After 5 to 13 Weeks)
Quality of Life was assessed with EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OES18 questionnaires. For QLQ-C30, global health status, functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning) and symptom scales (fatigue, nausea/vomiting, pain, dyspnea, loss of appetite, constipation, diarrhea, financial difficulties) were calculated. Scores ranged from 0 to 100; higher scores represented higher levels of quality of life, functioning, or symptoms/problems. Score were calculated using mean values.
For QLQ-OES18, symptom scales (problems with eating, reflux, pain, problems swallowing saliva, dry mouth, taste disorders, problems while coughing or speaking) and functional scale (dysphagia) were assessed the same way.
A change between two time points, i.e. baseline (prior to treatment) and end of treatment (after 5 to 13 weeks, depending on treatment arm (6.5 weeks without and 13 weeks with cetuximab) and achievement of resectability (end of treatment after 5 weeks), is reported.
Measured: end of treatment (after 5 to 13 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted8 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Study startSep 2011
- Primary completion6 Sep 2018
- Study completion6 Sep 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Prof. Dirk Rades, MD, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
- Investigators
- Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr., Principal investigator, Universität zu Lübeck, Klinik für Strahlentherapie
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01787006
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- LEOPARD II
- Other IDs
- 2010-023427-18
- Status last verified
- Mar 2020
- First submitted
- 5 Feb 2013
- Last updated
- 10 Mar 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Rades D, Bartscht T, Hunold P, Schmidberger H, Konig L, Debus J, Belka C, Homann N, Spillner P, Petersen C, Kuhnt T, Fietkau R, Ridwelski K, Karcher-Kilian K, Kranich A, Mannikko S, Schild SE, Maderer A, Moehler M. Radiochemotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer: final results of a randomized phase 2 trial (LEOPARD-2). Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Sep;196(9):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01646-4. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
PubMed 32533228
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 10 Mar 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Definitive Radiochemotherapy With 5-FU / Cisplatin Plus/Minus Cetuximab in Unresectable Locally Advanced Esophageal Cancer: a Phase II Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01787006
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- LEOPARD II
- Conditions
- Esophageal Cancer
- Keywords
- non resectable, locally advanced, Cetuximab, radiation
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 74 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Schleswig-HolsteinUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Sep 2011
- Primary completion
- 6 Sep 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 6 Sep 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 8 Feb 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Mar 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor. Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor.
During the last years the combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy has mainly be investigated in clinical trials focusing on colorectal and/or head and neck cancer.
The results obtained from theses studies were very encouraging and led to the initiation of active clinical research in esophageal cancer patients with antibody inhibition of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR).
The first data in this indication are encouraging showing that cetuximab can safely be added to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients with first hints of efficacy.
Based on the experiences with cetuximab in colorectal cancer and in combination with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, the aim of the present study is to evaluate the feasibility of a combined treatment of cetuximab with continuous infusional 5-FU, cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess if the overall survival rates can be increased by addition of an EGFR-targeted therapy.
Detailed description
Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive neoplasm which is fatal in the great majority of patients. On a global basis, cancer of the esophagus is the sixth leading cause of cancer death worldwide. In fact, gastric and esophageal cancers together accounted for nearly 1.3 million new cases and 980,000 deaths worldwide in 2000 - more than lung, breast, or colorectal cancer. With advances in surgical techniques and treatment, the prognosis of esophageal cancer has slowly improved over the past decades. However, with a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 14%, at the time of development of the LEOPARD-II protocol, survival was poor, even in comparison with the dismal survival rates (4%) from the 1970s. Underlying reasons for this disappointingly low survival rate are above all the difficulties in cancer detection at an advanced stage, with over 50% of patients with unresectable disease or distant metastasis at presentation and the limited survival achieved with palliative chemotherapy alone for patients with metastatic or unresectable disease.
Clearly, additional strategies are needed to improve the systemic treatment options for esophageal cancer.
The optimal treatment of locally advanced esophageal cancer, a potentially curable disease, is controversial. Through several non-randomized cooperative group trials, concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiation or surgery alone represent acceptable standards of care for patients with resectable tumors.
Metastatic or unresectable esophageal cancer is found at presentation in more than 50% of patients and is considered incurable. At the time of protocol development, chemotherapy was palliative, improving quality of life and dysphagia in 60%-80% of patients. Typical clinical and radiographic responses lasted for fewer than 4 months, with a median overall survival time of 8-10 months.
Combination chemotherapies have been demonstrated to be superior to best supportive care and chemotherapy given as a single agent, with occasional patients achieving complete responses (0%-11%). However, even with the combination regimens, the median survival time remained less than 10 months.
An improved understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of cancer has facilitated the development of novel agents designed to target critical pathways involved in cancer development and progression. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) plays a crucial role in tumour growth. EGFR-dependent signaling is involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, angiogenesis, and metastatic spread.
The overexpression of EGFR has repeatedly been shown to predict poor prognosis in both esophageal squamous cell carcinoma and gastro esophageal junction adenocarcinoma. EGFR blockade through monoclonal antibodies (Cetuximab, Matuzumab and Panitumumab) and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (gefitinib, erlotinib) has translated into promising evidence of clinical benefit in clinical trials.
Cetuximab is a targeted therapeutic agent, a chimeric monoclonal antibody that specifically binds to the EGFR with high affinity, internalising the receptor and preventing ligands from interacting with the receptors and thus effectively blocking ligand-induced EGFR phosphorylation. In addition, cetuximab had been found to potentiate the effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy in experimental systems. The dose of cetuximab (initial dose 400 mg/m2 and subsequent weekly doses of 250 mg/m2) has been found to be generally safe and effective in several studies in major tumor types expressing the EGFR. These included colorectal cancer and squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, with cetuximab given either in combination studies with chemotherapy and radiotherapy or as monotherapy.
In two phase I studies prior to LEOPARD-II, EGFR-directed antibodies had shown activity in patients with esophageal cancer. In the phase I study of the humanized EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb) EMD72000, one patient with metastatic, pretreated squamous cell carcinoma had had a durable, 6-month partial response.
In addition, a phase I trial with a fully human EGFR mAb, had reported stable disease for 7 months in one esophageal cancer patient. Preclinical and these early clinical studies suggested potential activity and minimal toxicities with EGFR antibodies for esophageal cancer.
Furthermore, a randomised phase II compared cisplatin + 5-FU (CF) to cisplatin + 5-FU + cetuximab (CET-CF) (n=62). Cetuximab did not increase grade 3/4 toxicity, except for rash (6% versus 0%) and diarrhea (16% versus 0%). The overall response rates were 19% and 13% for the CET-CF and CF arms respectively, and the disease control rates were 75% and 57%, respectively. The median progression free survival was 5.9 and 3.6 months and median overall survival 9.5 and 5.5 months for CET-CF and CF, respectively.
With respect to the combination of Cetuximab with radiotherapy, preclinical studies have shown, that Cetuximab enhanced the radiosensitivity of EGFR expressing tumour cells in vitro and in tumour xenografts and the repopulation of epithelial tumour cells after exposure to radiation was related to the activation and expression of EGFR. Cetuximab also enhanced the efficacy of docetaxel chemoradiotherapy in human adenocarcinoma xenografts.
Rationale for the LEOPARD-II study Esophageal cancer is a highly aggressive tumor and one of the most frequent malignant diseases worldwide.
Treatment options are various and range from chemotherapy to radiotherapy and several surgical techniques. Nevertheless, the overall survival rates for this disease remain poor. During the last years before protocol development the combination of cetuximab with standard chemotherapy or radiotherapy had mainly been investigated in clinical trials focusing on colorectal and/or head and neck cancer. The results obtained from these studies had been very encouraging and led to the initiation of active clinical research in esophageal cancer patients with antibody inhibition of the EGFR. The first data in this indication were encouraging showing that cetuximab could safely be added to chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients with first hints of efficacy. Based on the experiences with cetuximab in colorectal cancer and in combination with radiotherapy in head and neck cancer, the aim of the LEOPARD-II study was to evaluate the feasibility of a combined treatment of cetuximab with continuous infusional 5-FU, cisplatin and radiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer and to assess if the overall survival rates could be increased by addition of an EGFR-targeted therapy.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy | Experimental | Drug: Cetuximab, Drug: Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiation: RadiotherapyCetuximab: Initial doses 400mg/m2 (day 1), followed by weekly doses of 250mg/m2 for 14 weeks in total, IV 5-fluorouracil (5-FU): 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 8-11 and 36-39, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 71-74 and 99-102 Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle (day 8-11, 36-39, 71-74 and 99-102) radiotherapy: 59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery. |
| Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy | Active comparator | Drug: Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiation: Radiotherapy5-FU: 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 and 29-32, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 64-67 and 92-95 Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle (day 1-4, 29-32, 64-67 and 92-95) radiotherapy: 59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- Dated and signed written informed consent
- Male or female patients between 18 years and 75 years; patients > 75 years if their karnofsky performance status is ≥ 80.
- Histologically proven squamous cell carcinoma or adenocarcinoma of the esophagus which is not curatively resectable. Resectability has to be defined by a surgeon before radiochemotherapy. The tumor is considered unresectable due to T-stage, N-stage, performance status, nutritional status, co-morbidity (pulmonal function, other), tumor location upper third or other reasons
- Karnofsky Performance Status ≥ 70
- Women of child-bearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- distant metastasis
- previous treatment of esophageal cancer
- previous therapy with monoclonal antibodies and / or EGFR-targeted therapy
- previous second malignancies with exception of a history of a previous curatively treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or pre-invasive cervix carcinoma
- serious concomitant disease or medical condition
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CetuximabAlso: ErbituxInitial doses 400mg/m2 (day 1), followed by weekly doses of 250mg/m2 for 14 weeks in total | Drug | Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy |
| Cisplatin, 5-FUAlso: CDDP, 5-fluorouracil5-FU: 1000mg/m2 per day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 of cycle 1 and 2, 750mg/m2/day as continuous infusion on day 1-4 of cycle 3 and 4 Cisplatin 20mg/m2/day as intravenous bolus over 60 min on day 1-4 of every cycle | Drug | Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy |
| RadiotherapyAlso: Irradiation59.4 Gy (33 fractions of 1.8 Gy) over 6.5-7 weeks (5 x 1.8 Gy per week)on primary tumor. 50.4 Gy on locoregional lymphnodes. If resectability is reached after 4-4.5 weeks (36-41.4 Gy) the radiotherapy stops after 45 Gy and the patient undergoes surgery. | Radiation | Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy, Cisplatin, 5-FU, Radiotherapy |
Primary outcome
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Overall Survival (OS) was defined as freedom from death of any cause. Time to death was calculated from the day of randomization, and the patients were followed for a maximum of 24 months (2 years).
10 secondary outcomes
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 1 Year
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Progression of Disease at 1 Year
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Progression of Disease at 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Participants Experiencing at Least One Grade >=3 Toxicity
Time frame: up to 2 years
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Distant Metastases at 1 Year
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Distant Metastases at 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Number of Participants Who Achieved at Least Partial Response (Responders)
Time frame: up to 2 years
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Loco-regional Failure at 1 Year
Time frame: 1 year
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive Without Loco-regional Failure at 2 Years
Time frame: 2 years
Change in Quality of Life Between Baseline and End of Treatment (After 5 to 13 Weeks)
Time frame: end of treatment (after 5 to 13 weeks)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 10 Mar 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 32533228Rades D, Bartscht T, Hunold P, Schmidberger H, Konig L, Debus J, Belka C, Homann N, Spillner P, Petersen C, Kuhnt T, Fietkau R, Ridwelski K, Karcher-Kilian K, Kranich A, Mannikko S, Schild SE, Maderer A, Moehler M. Radiochemotherapy with or without cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer: final results of a randomized phase 2 trial (LEOPARD-2). Strahlenther Onkol. 2020 Sep;196(9):795-804. doi: 10.1007/s00066-020-01646-4. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Dirk Rades, Prof. Dr. principal investigator
Universität zu Lübeck, Klinik für Strahlentherapie
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cetuximab, Cisplatin, 5-FU and Radiotherapy in people with Esophageal Cancer, run by University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein at 1 site in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Mar 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Rate of Participants Who Were Alive at 2 Years (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01787006, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Mar 2020.