Lung DiseasesPhase 3NCT01763879
Pressure-controlled vs Volume Controlled Ventilation on RV Function During OLV
A Phase 3 study testing The PCV-VCV group and The VCV-PCV group in people with Lung Diseases, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
Trial summary
The use of pressure controlled ventilation (TV) during one lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery is associated with comparable oxygenation with volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with added benefits of decreasing airway pressures and shunt fraction. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Lung Diseases
- What is being tested?
- The PCV-VCV group and The VCV-PCV group
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 28 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSaudi Arabia
- Study dates
- Apr 2012to Mar 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class from II to III
Who cannot join
- decompensated cardiac (New York Heart Association >II)
- pulmonary (vital capacity or FEV1% < 50% of the predicted values)
- asthma
- hepatic diseases.
- renal diseases
- arrhythmias
Show all 9Show fewer
- pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary artery pressure >30 mm Hg)
- body mass index >35 kg/m2
- previous history of pneumonectomy, bilobectomy, or lobectomy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Saudi Arabia1 site
Anesthesiology Department
Khobar, Eastern Province, 31592
About this study
Official title: Right Ventricular Function During One-lung Ventilation: The Effects of Pressure Controlled and Volume Controlled Ventilation
The use of pressure controlled ventilation (TV) during one lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery is associated with comparable oxygenation with volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with added benefits of decreasing airway pressures and shunt fraction. The later may improve the right ventricular (RV) function during OLV. We postulate that the use of PCV during OLV for thoracic surgery would preserve RV function than during VCV. After local ethics committee approval and informed consent, we will randomly allocate 28 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery OLV to randomly crossed from PCV to VCV mode (n= 14 for each) during with VT of 6 mL/kg, I: E ratio 1: 2.5, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, recruitment maneuvers and respiratory rate will be adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Intraoperative changes in the right ventricular function (peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and RV fractional area changes (RV-FAC)), hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters, peak and plateau airway pressures, compliance will be recorded.
Read the detailed description
One-lung ventilation (OLV) provides excellent operative field for thoracic procedures, but is opposed by the harmful impairment of cardiac index and right ventricular (RV) function which may influence postoperative morbidity and mortality. In our previous study, we demonstrated significant reductions in RV ejection fraction (REF) and CI values after the initiation of OLV attributable to the increased right ventricular afterload, stroke work and end-diastolic volume augmented by increased airway pressures. This may be harmful with the patients with advanced obstructive lung diseases and those with pulmonary hypertension. Thus there is no doubt that decreases in airway pressures will be associated with better RV function.
Volume controlled ventilation (VCV) is the commonly used traditional ventilation mode for OLV during thoracic procedures but its use is associated with deleterious increases in airway pressure which may impede RV function.
Pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) is an alternative mode of ventilation which is widely used in the patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute lung injury (ALI), whereby high initial flow rates are delivered to quickly achieve and maintain the set inspiratory pressure followed by rapidly decelerating flow.These high initial flow rates lead to a more rapid alveolar inflation.
PCV has been suggested as a useful tool to improve oxygenation as well as decreases in intra-pulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) and airway pressures compared with VCV during OLV for patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Whereas, others demonstrated comparable arterial oxygenation with the use of PCV and VCV during OLV.
However, the use of PCV offers advantages over VCV during OLV in the term of reducing mean and bronchial peak airway pressures and intrapulmonary shunt, hence limiting the risk for barotrauma and impaired RV function.
Up to the investigators knowledge, there is no available study of the effects of PCV and VCV on RV function during OLV after thoracic surgery.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of PCV during OLV will be associated with preserved RV function than during the use of VCV. They will compare the effects of the use of PCV and VCV with 5 cm H2O level of PEEP and recruitment maneuvers during OLV on the right ventricular function (peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and RV fractional area changes (RV-FAC)), hemodynamic parameters (heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure, (MAP)), oxygenation parameters (arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tension (PaO2 and PaCO2, respectively), and arterial tension to inspired fraction of oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio), ventilation parameters (peak and plateau airway pressures (Ppk and Ppl, respectively) and compliance) and the ICU and hospital length-of-stays, morbidity and 30-day mortality.
Sample size calculation:
A priori power analysis of the previous published data11 showed that the investigators will need to study 13 pairs to detect a 20% difference in the mean maximal systolic TAV values (7.0 cm/s) with a SD of 1.4 cm/s, after start of OLV, a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. We will add 10% more patients for a final sample size of 28 patients to account for patients dropping out during the study.
Interventions:
In all patients, standard monitors will be applied. A thoracic epidural or paravertebral catheter will be inserted with no more use of local anesthetics during the study to avoid their effects on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.12 An arterial line (20 G) and a right internal jugular vein catheter will be inserted. Anesthetic technique will be standardized in all studied patients. Anesthesiologists who will give the anaesthetic will be not involved in the patient's assessment. General anesthesia will be induced with propofol (2-3 mg/kg), fentanyl (2-3 µg/kg), and cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) will be given to facilitate tracheal intubation with a left-sided double-lumen tube (DLT). The correct position of its tip will be confirmed with a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Anesthesia will be maintained with 1-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane and increments of fentanyl (0.5µg/kg) and cisatracurium (0.04 mg/kg).
The patients' lungs will be mechanically ventilated using VCV mode, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.5 in air, tidal volume (VT) of 8 mL/kg (predicted body weight), inspiratory to expiratory [I: E] ratio of 1:2.5, a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate (R.R) will be adjusted to achieve an PaCO2 of 35-45 mm Hg, peak inspiratory pressures (Ppk) will be limited to 35 cm H2O and a low fresh gas flow (FGF) (<2 L/min) in a semi closed circuit system.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) will be inserted and the right ventricular function will be assessed with the measurements of EDV, ESV, RVEF, both maximal systolic and diastolic TAV at the tricuspid annulus at the RV free wall recorded from the apical 4-chamber views using pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging.
All operations will be performed by the same surgeons. Intraoperative hypoxemia will be defined as decrease in arterial oxygen saturation less than 90% will be treated with increasing of FiO2 to 1.0. Addition of low level of 2 cm H2O of CPAP will be considered if the later fails to correct hypoxemia. 1 Intraoperative fluid therapy will include intravenous infusion of 2 ml/kg/hour of Lactated Ringer's solution and blood losses will be compensated with colloids and with red blood cell concentrates if the hemoglobin levels decreases below 8 to 9 g/dL. Mean arterial blood pressure will be maintained greater than 60 mm Hg using bolus doses of ephedrine 5 mg or phenylephrine 100 ug. Urine output will be maintained to be greater than 0.5 ml/kg/hour.
At the end of surgery, the nondependent will be re-expanded and TLV will be resumed as before surgery, sevoflurane will be discontinued, the residual neuromuscular block will be antagonized, and the patient will be extubated. Postoperative analgesia will be accomplished with the use of continuous epidural/paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl 2 µg/mL.
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Fisher exact test will be used for categorical data. Repeated two-way ANOVA and paired t-test will be used to study the changes in the primary and secondary endpoints during each intervention. The Wilcoxon 2 rank sum test will be used for the non-parametric values. We will avoid the carryover effect (persistence of the effect of the first intervention on the operative conditions into the second period) through the comparison of the effects of period (time effect) and the order of treatment using independent t-tests. Data will be expressed as mean ± SD, number (%), or median [range]. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases
- Being tested
- The PCV-VCV group, The VCV-PCV group
- Keywords
- Thoracic surgery, one lung ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation, volume-controlled ventilation, right ventricular function
- Medical subject headings
- Lung Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
The PCV-VCV groupOther
During the PCV period, the inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to deliver a TV of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) to the patient's dependent lung. During the VCV period, the patient's dependent lung will be ventilated with a TV of 6 mL/kg (PBW). Whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, Ppk, and a FGF will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the lumen of the nondependent lung will be left open to air. Dependent lung recruitment maneuvers will be repeated at 30-minute intervals by raising the inspiratory pressure up to 35 cmH2O for 10 seconds.
The VCV-PCV groupOther
During the PCV period, the inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to deliver a TV of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) to the patient's dependent lung. During the VCV period, the patient's dependent lung will be ventilated with a TV of 6 mL/kg (PBW). Whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, Ppk, and a FGF will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the lumen of the nondependent lung will be left open to air. Dependent lung recruitment maneuvers will be repeated at 30-minute intervals by raising the inspiratory pressure up to 35 cmH2O for 10 seconds.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| The PCV-VCV group | Active comparator | The dependent lung will be ventilated with pressure controlled (PCV) followed by the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) Receives: Other: The PCV-VCV group |
| The VCV-PCV group | Active comparator | The dependent lung will be ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) followed by the pressure controlled (PCV) Receives: Other: The VCV-PCV group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Right ventricular function
Peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV)
Measured: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Secondary outcomes (4)
Blood pressure
Blood pressure
Measured: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Pa/FiO2 ratio
the ratio between arterial oxygen tension (PaO2)and inspired fraction of oxygen (FiO2)
Measured: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Airway pressures
Peak and plateau airway pressures
Measured: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Right ventricular volumes
right ventricular end diastolic and systolic volumes
Measured: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study startApr 2012
- Primary completionJan 2013
- Study completionMar 2013
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Lung DiseasesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Mohamed R El Tahan, MD, Study director, Assistant ProfessorRoshdi Al Metwally, MD, Principal investigator, Associate ProfessorHatem Qutub, MD, Study chair, Associate ProfessorYasser F El Ghoneimy, MD, Study chair, Associate ProfessorMohamed A Regal, MD, Study chair, Associate ProfessorHaytham Zien, MD, Study chair, Assistant Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01763879
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2012081
- Other IDs
- 2012081
- Status last verified
- Jul 2013
- First submitted
- 30 Dec 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Jul 2013
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Jul 2013. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Right Ventricular Function During One-lung Ventilation: The Effects of Pressure Controlled and Volume Controlled Ventilation
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01763879
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2012081
- Conditions
- Lung Diseases
- Keywords
- Thoracic surgery, one lung ventilation, pressure-controlled ventilation, volume-controlled ventilation, right ventricular function
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 28 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Apr 2012
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The use of pressure controlled ventilation (TV) during one lung ventilation (OLV) for thoracic surgery is associated with comparable oxygenation with volume controlled ventilation (VCV) with added benefits of decreasing airway pressures and shunt fraction. The later may improve the right ventricular (RV) function during OLV. We postulate that the use of PCV during OLV for thoracic surgery would preserve RV function than during VCV. After local ethics committee approval and informed consent, we will randomly allocate 28 patients scheduled for elective thoracic surgery OLV to randomly crossed from PCV to VCV mode (n= 14 for each) during with VT of 6 mL/kg, I: E ratio 1: 2.5, PEEP of 5 cm H2O, recruitment maneuvers and respiratory rate will be adjusted to maintain normocapnia. Intraoperative changes in the right ventricular function (peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and RV fractional area changes (RV-FAC)), hemodynamic and oxygenation parameters, peak and plateau airway pressures, compliance will be recorded.
Detailed description
One-lung ventilation (OLV) provides excellent operative field for thoracic procedures, but is opposed by the harmful impairment of cardiac index and right ventricular (RV) function which may influence postoperative morbidity and mortality. In our previous study, we demonstrated significant reductions in RV ejection fraction (REF) and CI values after the initiation of OLV attributable to the increased right ventricular afterload, stroke work and end-diastolic volume augmented by increased airway pressures. This may be harmful with the patients with advanced obstructive lung diseases and those with pulmonary hypertension. Thus there is no doubt that decreases in airway pressures will be associated with better RV function.
Volume controlled ventilation (VCV) is the commonly used traditional ventilation mode for OLV during thoracic procedures but its use is associated with deleterious increases in airway pressure which may impede RV function.
Pressure controlled ventilation (PCV) is an alternative mode of ventilation which is widely used in the patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and acute lung injury (ALI), whereby high initial flow rates are delivered to quickly achieve and maintain the set inspiratory pressure followed by rapidly decelerating flow.These high initial flow rates lead to a more rapid alveolar inflation.
PCV has been suggested as a useful tool to improve oxygenation as well as decreases in intra-pulmonary shunt (Qs/Qt) and airway pressures compared with VCV during OLV for patients undergoing thoracic surgery. Whereas, others demonstrated comparable arterial oxygenation with the use of PCV and VCV during OLV.
However, the use of PCV offers advantages over VCV during OLV in the term of reducing mean and bronchial peak airway pressures and intrapulmonary shunt, hence limiting the risk for barotrauma and impaired RV function.
Up to the investigators knowledge, there is no available study of the effects of PCV and VCV on RV function during OLV after thoracic surgery.
The investigators hypothesize that the use of PCV during OLV will be associated with preserved RV function than during the use of VCV. They will compare the effects of the use of PCV and VCV with 5 cm H2O level of PEEP and recruitment maneuvers during OLV on the right ventricular function (peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV), end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and RV fractional area changes (RV-FAC)), hemodynamic parameters (heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure, (MAP)), oxygenation parameters (arterial oxygen and carbon dioxide tension (PaO2 and PaCO2, respectively), and arterial tension to inspired fraction of oxygen (PaO2/FiO2) ratio), ventilation parameters (peak and plateau airway pressures (Ppk and Ppl, respectively) and compliance) and the ICU and hospital length-of-stays, morbidity and 30-day mortality.
Sample size calculation:
A priori power analysis of the previous published data11 showed that the investigators will need to study 13 pairs to detect a 20% difference in the mean maximal systolic TAV values (7.0 cm/s) with a SD of 1.4 cm/s, after start of OLV, a type-I error of 0.05 and a power of 90%. We will add 10% more patients for a final sample size of 28 patients to account for patients dropping out during the study.
Interventions:
In all patients, standard monitors will be applied. A thoracic epidural or paravertebral catheter will be inserted with no more use of local anesthetics during the study to avoid their effects on hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction.12 An arterial line (20 G) and a right internal jugular vein catheter will be inserted. Anesthetic technique will be standardized in all studied patients. Anesthesiologists who will give the anaesthetic will be not involved in the patient's assessment. General anesthesia will be induced with propofol (2-3 mg/kg), fentanyl (2-3 µg/kg), and cisatracurium (0.2 mg/kg) will be given to facilitate tracheal intubation with a left-sided double-lumen tube (DLT). The correct position of its tip will be confirmed with a fiberoptic bronchoscope. Anesthesia will be maintained with 1-1.5 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) of sevoflurane and increments of fentanyl (0.5µg/kg) and cisatracurium (0.04 mg/kg).
The patients' lungs will be mechanically ventilated using VCV mode, fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 0.5 in air, tidal volume (VT) of 8 mL/kg (predicted body weight), inspiratory to expiratory [I: E] ratio of 1:2.5, a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) of 5 cm H2O, respiratory rate (R.R) will be adjusted to achieve an PaCO2 of 35-45 mm Hg, peak inspiratory pressures (Ppk) will be limited to 35 cm H2O and a low fresh gas flow (FGF) (<2 L/min) in a semi closed circuit system.
Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) will be inserted and the right ventricular function will be assessed with the measurements of EDV, ESV, RVEF, both maximal systolic and diastolic TAV at the tricuspid annulus at the RV free wall recorded from the apical 4-chamber views using pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging.
All operations will be performed by the same surgeons. Intraoperative hypoxemia will be defined as decrease in arterial oxygen saturation less than 90% will be treated with increasing of FiO2 to 1.0. Addition of low level of 2 cm H2O of CPAP will be considered if the later fails to correct hypoxemia. 1 Intraoperative fluid therapy will include intravenous infusion of 2 ml/kg/hour of Lactated Ringer's solution and blood losses will be compensated with colloids and with red blood cell concentrates if the hemoglobin levels decreases below 8 to 9 g/dL. Mean arterial blood pressure will be maintained greater than 60 mm Hg using bolus doses of ephedrine 5 mg or phenylephrine 100 ug. Urine output will be maintained to be greater than 0.5 ml/kg/hour.
At the end of surgery, the nondependent will be re-expanded and TLV will be resumed as before surgery, sevoflurane will be discontinued, the residual neuromuscular block will be antagonized, and the patient will be extubated. Postoperative analgesia will be accomplished with the use of continuous epidural/paravertebral infusion of bupivacaine 0.125% and fentanyl 2 µg/mL.
Statistical Analysis:
Data will be tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Fisher exact test will be used for categorical data. Repeated two-way ANOVA and paired t-test will be used to study the changes in the primary and secondary endpoints during each intervention. The Wilcoxon 2 rank sum test will be used for the non-parametric values. We will avoid the carryover effect (persistence of the effect of the first intervention on the operative conditions into the second period) through the comparison of the effects of period (time effect) and the order of treatment using independent t-tests. Data will be expressed as mean ± SD, number (%), or median [range]. A value of P < 0.05 will be considered to be statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Double blind (investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| The PCV-VCV group | Active comparator | Other: The PCV-VCV groupThe dependent lung will be ventilated with pressure controlled (PCV) followed by the volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) |
| The VCV-PCV group | Active comparator | Other: The VCV-PCV groupThe dependent lung will be ventilated with volume-controlled ventilation (VCV) followed by the pressure controlled (PCV) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical class from II to III
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- decompensated cardiac (New York Heart Association >II)
- pulmonary (vital capacity or FEV1% < 50% of the predicted values)
- asthma
- hepatic diseases.
- renal diseases
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| The PCV-VCV groupDuring the PCV period, the inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to deliver a TV of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) to the patient's dependent lung. During the VCV period, the patient's dependent lung will be ventilated with a TV of 6 mL/kg (PBW). Whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, Ppk, and a FGF will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the lumen of the nondependent lung will be left open to air. Dependent lung recruitment maneuvers will be repeated at 30-minute intervals by raising the inspiratory pressure up to 35 cmH2O for 10 seconds. | Other | The PCV-VCV group |
| The VCV-PCV groupDuring the PCV period, the inspiratory pressure will be adjusted to deliver a TV of 6 mL/kg (predicted body weight) to the patient's dependent lung. During the VCV period, the patient's dependent lung will be ventilated with a TV of 6 mL/kg (PBW). Whereas FiO2, I: E ratio, PEEP, frequency, Ppk, and a FGF will be maintained as during two-lung ventilation (TLV) and the lumen of the nondependent lung will be left open to air. Dependent lung recruitment maneuvers will be repeated at 30-minute intervals by raising the inspiratory pressure up to 35 cmH2O for 10 seconds. | Other | The VCV-PCV group |
Primary outcome
Right ventricular function
Time frame: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Peak systolic and diastolic tricuspid annular velocity (TAV)
4 secondary outcomes
Blood pressure
Time frame: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Pa/FiO2 ratio
Time frame: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Airway pressures
Time frame: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Right ventricular volumes
Time frame: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Jul 2013.
Related trials for Lung Diseases
Recruiting
MRD-Guided Postoperative Surveillance and Adaptive Treatment for Resectable Lung Cancer
Lung Neoplasms, Neoadjuvant Therapy
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Study to Compare the Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Immunogenicity Between SB27 and Keytruda in Subjects With Metastatic Non-squamous Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV
RecruitingObservational study
Label-free Femtosecond Laser Imaging Combined With the Fast Lung Artificial Intelligence Model for Rapid Intraoperative Diagnosis of Lung Surgical Specimens: A Multicentre, Prospective, Parallel-workflow, Non-inferiority Study.
Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study of Calderasib (MK-1084) Plus Pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in Participants With KRAS G12C Mutant Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) With Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (MK-1084-004/KANDLELIT-004)
Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Efficacy and Safety of Ivonescimab Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum-Based Chemotherapy in Advanced Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma
Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma, Advanced
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Mohamed R El Tahan, MD study director
Assistant Professor
Roshdi Al Metwally, MD principal investigator
Associate Professor
Hatem Qutub, MD study chair
Associate Professor
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing The PCV-VCV group and The VCV-PCV group in people with Lung Diseases, run by Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University at 1 site in Saudi Arabia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Jul 2013. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Saudi Arabia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Right ventricular function (time frame: Change from baseline at 30 min after the initiation of the intervention). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Jul 2013.