AzTrials
AzTrials

Irritable Bowel SyndromePhase 1/2NCT01726751

Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Relief in Irritable Bowel Syndrome

A Phase 1/2 study testing Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS) and Spinal cord nerve stimulation in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 60 years
Conditions the study is for
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea
What is being tested?
Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS) and Spinal cord nerve stimulation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
10 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Aug 2005to Apr 2014
Phase
Phase 1/2
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 60 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • age 18-60, Rome II criteria, abdominal pain >4 (0-10 VAS), stable symptoms for >2 years

Who cannot join

  • other gastrointestinal disease, somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Karolinska University Hospital

    Solna, Stockholm County, 17176

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome - a Randomized Cross-over Trial

To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Patients recorded average pain level, pain attacks, number of diarrheas and global quality of life. At the end of the study patients can choose to retain their SCS stimulation system or have it removed.

The outcome of the present trial will show whether SCS is a useful treatment of IBS. The long-term follow-up will show the continuous amelioration of SCS over at least six months.

Read the detailed description

The primary aim of the study is to investigate if the typical chronic abdominal pain in IBS can be ameliorated by SCS. Secondary aims are possible effects of SCS on diarrhea or constipation, quality of life and side effects, and further to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SCS as validated by the willingness of the patients to retain the SCS stimulation equipment.

Eligible patients are selected by a gastroenterologist for the study inclusion criteria: age 18-60, fulfilment of Rome II criteria, abdominal pain episodically reaching > 4 on a 0-10 VAS, and stable symptoms for the past 2 years. A thorough clinical work-up is done to exclude organic disease, including routine blood and electrolyte status, hepatic enzyme function and lactose tolerance test as well as colonoscopy or colon x-ray. Patients with significant somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity will be excluded.

Study design: A quadripolar SCS-lead (Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, USA) was implanted via a percutaneous puncture at the Th11/12 level of the dorsal epidural space in local anesthesia with the patient in the prone position. The electrode is advanced to the mid-thoracic level, aiming for a final position around T6-T8, until intraoperative stimulation yields paresthesias covering the abdomen . The electrode is then connected to an impulse generator (Itrel-3®, Medtronic Inc.) implanted subcutaneously in the upper left quadrant of the abdomen. Stimulation frequency will be set to 50 Hz for all patients but other parameters (electrode pole combinations, amplitudes and pulse width) are adjusted and set to produce adequate paresthesias of comfortable intensity.

During the subsequent ongoing trial reprogramming was allowed, if necessary for optimal stimulation.

SCS will be started 2 weeks after surgery. Thereafter patients are randomized to either of two study arms: one starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A), and another with six weeks without SCS (delayed start) (B). When on active SCS, patients are prompted to stimulate 8-12 h per day. Patients are instructed to increase the stimulation upon pain attack break-through.

After six weeks, patients without stimulation were crossed-over to stimulation and vice versa. After another six weeks both study arms included continued stimulation for additional 12 weeks up to 26 weeks. After a final 2-week period without stimulation the trial is terminated.

During the whole study period patients will record, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day (0-10) and 4) average quality of life (0-10).

Patients are scheduled for regular controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation. Patient compliance will be ensured, as the impulse generator stores information on the percentage of elapsed time that stimulation has been in use.

At termination of the study participants were offered to keep the implanted SCS system or have it removed.

All patients will be contacted for a structured telephone interview follow-up at a time-point varying between 18 to 78 months after the study termination. A questionnaire was used to assess present pain level, medication, use of the SCS system, side effects and global satisfaction. Patients will also be asked whether they would have participated if they had known the outcome in advance, and if they would recommend a trial of SCS treatment to someone else with similar gastrointestinal problems.

All patients will be evaluated with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and a modified version of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale for IBS (GSRS-IBS).

Being tested
Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS), Spinal cord nerve stimulation
Keywords
Spinal cord stimulation, Irritable bowel syndrome, Abdominal pain, Diarrhea
Medical subject headings
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea, Pain, Abdominal Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS)Device

    Also called Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., MN, USA

    Electric stimulation of the spinal cord

  • Spinal cord nerve stimulationDevice

Study groups in NCT01726751
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Early off-stimulation (group B)OtherLate SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group B starting with no SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of active SCS (on-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.
Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS); Device: Spinal cord nerve stimulation
Early on-stimulation (group A)OtherEarly SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group A starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of no SCS (off-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS.
Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS); Device: Spinal cord nerve stimulation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS?

    During the whole study period each patient will record the number of pain attacks.

    Patients are scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation

    Measured: According to protocol for 26 weeks

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. To record effects of SCS on diarrhea/constipation

    During the whole study period each patient recorded, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day and 4) assessment of average quality of life. For the latter two items patients were instructed to use a numerical rating scale (NRS) with a range of 0-10.

    Patients were scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation

    Measured: According to protocol for 26 weeks

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Nov 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2005
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionApr 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 1/2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Model description
Spinal cord stimulation
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
10 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01726751
Sponsor's protocol ID
SCS-IBS-004
Status last verified
Nov 2018
First submitted
30 Oct 2012
Last updated
7 Nov 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.

    PubMed 34854473

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 1/2 study testing Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS) and Spinal cord nerve stimulation in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS? (time frame: According to protocol for 26 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01726751, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in