Irritable Bowel SyndromePhase 1/2NCT01726751
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Pain Relief in Irritable Bowel Syndrome
A Phase 1/2 study testing Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS) and Spinal cord nerve stimulation in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
Trial summary
To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea
- What is being tested?
- Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS) and Spinal cord nerve stimulation
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 10 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSweden
- Study dates
- Aug 2005to Apr 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 60 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- age 18-60, Rome II criteria, abdominal pain >4 (0-10 VAS), stable symptoms for >2 years
Who cannot join
- other gastrointestinal disease, somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome - a Randomized Cross-over Trial
To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Patients recorded average pain level, pain attacks, number of diarrheas and global quality of life. At the end of the study patients can choose to retain their SCS stimulation system or have it removed.
The outcome of the present trial will show whether SCS is a useful treatment of IBS. The long-term follow-up will show the continuous amelioration of SCS over at least six months.
Read the detailed description
The primary aim of the study is to investigate if the typical chronic abdominal pain in IBS can be ameliorated by SCS. Secondary aims are possible effects of SCS on diarrhea or constipation, quality of life and side effects, and further to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SCS as validated by the willingness of the patients to retain the SCS stimulation equipment.
Eligible patients are selected by a gastroenterologist for the study inclusion criteria: age 18-60, fulfilment of Rome II criteria, abdominal pain episodically reaching > 4 on a 0-10 VAS, and stable symptoms for the past 2 years. A thorough clinical work-up is done to exclude organic disease, including routine blood and electrolyte status, hepatic enzyme function and lactose tolerance test as well as colonoscopy or colon x-ray. Patients with significant somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity will be excluded.
Study design: A quadripolar SCS-lead (Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, USA) was implanted via a percutaneous puncture at the Th11/12 level of the dorsal epidural space in local anesthesia with the patient in the prone position. The electrode is advanced to the mid-thoracic level, aiming for a final position around T6-T8, until intraoperative stimulation yields paresthesias covering the abdomen . The electrode is then connected to an impulse generator (Itrel-3®, Medtronic Inc.) implanted subcutaneously in the upper left quadrant of the abdomen. Stimulation frequency will be set to 50 Hz for all patients but other parameters (electrode pole combinations, amplitudes and pulse width) are adjusted and set to produce adequate paresthesias of comfortable intensity.
During the subsequent ongoing trial reprogramming was allowed, if necessary for optimal stimulation.
SCS will be started 2 weeks after surgery. Thereafter patients are randomized to either of two study arms: one starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A), and another with six weeks without SCS (delayed start) (B). When on active SCS, patients are prompted to stimulate 8-12 h per day. Patients are instructed to increase the stimulation upon pain attack break-through.
After six weeks, patients without stimulation were crossed-over to stimulation and vice versa. After another six weeks both study arms included continued stimulation for additional 12 weeks up to 26 weeks. After a final 2-week period without stimulation the trial is terminated.
During the whole study period patients will record, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day (0-10) and 4) average quality of life (0-10).
Patients are scheduled for regular controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation. Patient compliance will be ensured, as the impulse generator stores information on the percentage of elapsed time that stimulation has been in use.
At termination of the study participants were offered to keep the implanted SCS system or have it removed.
All patients will be contacted for a structured telephone interview follow-up at a time-point varying between 18 to 78 months after the study termination. A questionnaire was used to assess present pain level, medication, use of the SCS system, side effects and global satisfaction. Patients will also be asked whether they would have participated if they had known the outcome in advance, and if they would recommend a trial of SCS treatment to someone else with similar gastrointestinal problems.
All patients will be evaluated with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and a modified version of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale for IBS (GSRS-IBS).
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea, Pain
- Being tested
- Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS), Spinal cord nerve stimulation
- Keywords
- Spinal cord stimulation, Irritable bowel syndrome, Abdominal pain, Diarrhea
- Medical subject headings
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea, Pain, Abdominal Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS)Device
Also called Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., MN, USA
Electric stimulation of the spinal cord
Spinal cord nerve stimulationDevice
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Early off-stimulation (group B) | Other | Late SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group B starting with no SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of active SCS (on-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS. Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS); Device: Spinal cord nerve stimulation |
| Early on-stimulation (group A) | Other | Early SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group A starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of no SCS (off-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS. Receives: Device: Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS); Device: Spinal cord nerve stimulation |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS?
During the whole study period each patient will record the number of pain attacks.
Patients are scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation
Measured: According to protocol for 26 weeks
Secondary outcomes (1)
To record effects of SCS on diarrhea/constipation
During the whole study period each patient recorded, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day and 4) assessment of average quality of life. For the latter two items patients were instructed to use a numerical rating scale (NRS) with a range of 0-10.
Patients were scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation
Measured: According to protocol for 26 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2005
- Primary completionApr 2014
- Study completionApr 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Irritable Bowel SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Uppsala UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Model description
- Spinal cord stimulation
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronics, Inc., Bengt Ihre Foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Per Hellström, Uppsala University
- Investigators
- Per M Hellström, MD, PhD, Principal investigator, Uppsala University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01726751
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- SCS-IBS-004
- Status last verified
- Nov 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Oct 2012
- Last updated
- 7 Nov 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
PubMed 34854473
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Nov 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Spinal Cord Stimulation in the Irritable Bowel Syndrome - a Randomized Cross-over Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01726751
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCS-IBS-004
- Conditions
- Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation, Diarrhea, Pain
- Keywords
- Spinal cord stimulation, Irritable bowel syndrome, Abdominal pain, Diarrhea
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 10 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Uppsala UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Medtronics, Inc., Bengt Ihre Foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine
- Study start
- Aug 2005
- Primary completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Nov 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
To elucidate Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) as treatment for IBS. An SCS system with a 4-polar electrode at the T5-8 level is implanted. In a randomized, cross-over study design, active stimulation is compared to a period without stimulation, with an ensuing tailing stimulation period, twice as long. Patients recorded average pain level, pain attacks, number of diarrheas and global quality of life. At the end of the study patients can choose to retain their SCS stimulation system or have it removed.
The outcome of the present trial will show whether SCS is a useful treatment of IBS. The long-term follow-up will show the continuous amelioration of SCS over at least six months.
Detailed description
The primary aim of the study is to investigate if the typical chronic abdominal pain in IBS can be ameliorated by SCS. Secondary aims are possible effects of SCS on diarrhea or constipation, quality of life and side effects, and further to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of SCS as validated by the willingness of the patients to retain the SCS stimulation equipment.
Eligible patients are selected by a gastroenterologist for the study inclusion criteria: age 18-60, fulfilment of Rome II criteria, abdominal pain episodically reaching > 4 on a 0-10 VAS, and stable symptoms for the past 2 years. A thorough clinical work-up is done to exclude organic disease, including routine blood and electrolyte status, hepatic enzyme function and lactose tolerance test as well as colonoscopy or colon x-ray. Patients with significant somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity will be excluded.
Study design: A quadripolar SCS-lead (Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., Minnesota, USA) was implanted via a percutaneous puncture at the Th11/12 level of the dorsal epidural space in local anesthesia with the patient in the prone position. The electrode is advanced to the mid-thoracic level, aiming for a final position around T6-T8, until intraoperative stimulation yields paresthesias covering the abdomen . The electrode is then connected to an impulse generator (Itrel-3®, Medtronic Inc.) implanted subcutaneously in the upper left quadrant of the abdomen. Stimulation frequency will be set to 50 Hz for all patients but other parameters (electrode pole combinations, amplitudes and pulse width) are adjusted and set to produce adequate paresthesias of comfortable intensity.
During the subsequent ongoing trial reprogramming was allowed, if necessary for optimal stimulation.
SCS will be started 2 weeks after surgery. Thereafter patients are randomized to either of two study arms: one starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A), and another with six weeks without SCS (delayed start) (B). When on active SCS, patients are prompted to stimulate 8-12 h per day. Patients are instructed to increase the stimulation upon pain attack break-through.
After six weeks, patients without stimulation were crossed-over to stimulation and vice versa. After another six weeks both study arms included continued stimulation for additional 12 weeks up to 26 weeks. After a final 2-week period without stimulation the trial is terminated.
During the whole study period patients will record, on a daily basis: 1) number of pain attacks, 2) number of diarrhea episodes, 3) average pain level for the day (0-10) and 4) average quality of life (0-10).
Patients are scheduled for regular controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation. Patient compliance will be ensured, as the impulse generator stores information on the percentage of elapsed time that stimulation has been in use.
At termination of the study participants were offered to keep the implanted SCS system or have it removed.
All patients will be contacted for a structured telephone interview follow-up at a time-point varying between 18 to 78 months after the study termination. A questionnaire was used to assess present pain level, medication, use of the SCS system, side effects and global satisfaction. Patients will also be asked whether they would have participated if they had known the outcome in advance, and if they would recommend a trial of SCS treatment to someone else with similar gastrointestinal problems.
All patients will be evaluated with the hospital anxiety and depression scale (HADS) and a modified version of the gastrointestinal symptom rating scale for IBS (GSRS-IBS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 2
- Model description
- Spinal cord stimulation
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Early off-stimulation (group B) | Other | Device: Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS), Device: Spinal cord nerve stimulationLate SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group B starting with no SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of active SCS (on-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS. |
| Early on-stimulation (group A) | Other | Device: Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS), Device: Spinal cord nerve stimulationEarly SCS treatment. After 2 weeks without SCS, randomization to either of two study arms: Group A starting with SCS for a period of six weeks (A) followed by a period of no SCS (off-period for 6 weeks). Thereafter, free stimulation for 12 weeks, followed by a concluding 2 sweeks of no SCS. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- age 18-60, Rome II criteria, abdominal pain >4 (0-10 VAS), stable symptoms for >2 years
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- other gastrointestinal disease, somatic or psychiatric co-morbidity
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS)Also: Quad-plus®, Medtronic Inc., MN, USAElectric stimulation of the spinal cord | Device | Early off-stimulation (group B), Early on-stimulation (group A) |
| Spinal cord nerve stimulation | Device | Early off-stimulation (group B), Early on-stimulation (group A) |
Primary outcome
To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS?
Time frame: According to protocol for 26 weeks
During the whole study period each patient will record the number of pain attacks. Patients are scheduled for regular outpatient controls, at 2, 8, 14, 26 and 28 weeks after implantation
1 secondary outcome
To record effects of SCS on diarrhea/constipation
Time frame: According to protocol for 26 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Nov 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 34854473O'Connell NE, Ferraro MC, Gibson W, Rice AS, Vase L, Coyle D, Eccleston C. Implanted spinal neuromodulation interventions for chronic pain in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 2;12(12):CD013756. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013756.pub2.
Related trials for Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingObservational study
Abdominal Symptoms and Rosacea: An Observational Study on the Association Between Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) and the Gut-Skin Axis
IBS (Irritable Bowel Syndrome), Rosacea
Recruiting
Stress Reduction and Lifestyle Modification in Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Recruiting
Exercise Interventions and Dietary Advice in Fibromyalgia and IBS
Fibromyalgia, Irritable Bowel Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Constipation (IBS-C)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Constipation
RecruitingPhase 2
A Study of Brenipatide (LY3537031) in Participants With Irritable Bowel Syndrome-Diarrhea (IBS-D)
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Diarrhea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Per M Hellström, MD, PhD principal investigator
Uppsala University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Spinal Cord Stimultion (SCS) and Spinal cord nerve stimulation in people with Irritable Bowel Syndrome and Constipation, run by Uppsala University at 1 site in Sweden.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Nov 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To investigate if typical abdominal pain of IBS can be ameliorated by SCS? (time frame: According to protocol for 26 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01726751, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Nov 2018.