Bladder CancerNCT01698359
Evaluation of Ultrasound Probe for Use in Bladder Radiotherapy
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer affects over 3,000 new patients in the UK each year and radiotherapy comprises a key part of the treatment pathway for many of them. Bladder radiotherapy in the UK involves delivery of radiation to the entire bladder volume and aims to deliver a high dose to the bladder while sparing… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Bladder Cancer
- How many people
- 5 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Nov 2012to Oct 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Any age
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: Healthy volunteers from within the staff of the Radiotherapy, Medical Physics and Oncology departments at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Who may be able to join
- Healthy volunteers
Who cannot join
- Pre-existing bladder conditions
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United Kingdom1 site
University hospital Birmingham
Birmingham, West Midlands, B15 2TH
Anjali Zarkar, FRCR MD MBBS
About this study
Official title: Evaluation of Ultrasound Probe for Use in Adaptive Bladder Radiotherapy
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer affects over 3,000 new patients in the UK each year and radiotherapy comprises a key part of the treatment pathway for many of them. Bladder radiotherapy in the UK involves delivery of radiation to the entire bladder volume and aims to deliver a high dose to the bladder while sparing nearby healthy organs (e.g. the bowel). Unfortunately, large variations in bladder shape and volume are observed throughout treatment that compromise the probability of a positive outcome for the patient, either by increasing the risk of side-effects or by reducing the likelihood of adequately treating the disease.
In recent years, the implementation of 'adaptive' bladder radiotherapy strategies has increased. These techniques allow modification of the treatment based on the observed variations in bladder shape and volume. However, these strategies often rely on daily X-ray imaging of the patient prior to treatment, which is time-consuming and associated with a small risk of inducing a cancer in the patient.
This study will evaluate the potential of a commercially available ultrasound probe for use as an alternative to X-ray scanning during treatment for these patients. The study will also aim to compare the likelihood of reducing side-effects and successfully treating the disease for the different adaptive strategies that are used around the world.
Read the detailed description
All experiments and data analysis will be performed in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiotherapy departments respectively, at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.
Five volunteers will be recruited to this study. They will each be required to follow a documented drinking protocol prior to each of three scan sessions. The drinking protocol is specific to this study and will not be intended for use with patients. To address the primary endpoint of the study (i.e. the precision of the ultrasound probe for measurement of bladder volume), measurement of a wide range of bladder volumes is required. In order to address this aim while making efficient use of the limited available MRI scanner time, the drinking protocol has been designed such that the volunteer will begin each scan session with an empty bladder and finish it with a full bladder. To this end, each volunteer will be required to void their bladder upon arrival and then consume 500ml of water immediately prior to the start of the scan session.
Each volunteer will then be positioned on the scanner couch according to the same protocol used for patients and alternate MRI and ultrasound scans will then be acquired. Given the time required for each scan it is anticipated that five MRI scans and fifteen ultrasound scans (three scans at a time to reduce the noise on the results, i.e. ultimately giving five ultrasound bladder volume measurements) will be acquired in each session. Each volunteer will be asked to attend for three sessions over the course of a number of weeks so that the repeatability of bladder filling patterns can be determined.
Data processing and analysis
The volume measurements from the ultrasound probe will be recorded and each of the MRI images will be exported to the Radiotherapy department where the bladder volume will be determined. The precise timings of all scan acquisitions will be recorded during the imaging session. Bladder volumes measured by the ultrasound probe, which can be read instantly, will be recorded during the session. To evaluate the primary endpoint, the precision and accuracy of the ultrasound probe will be quantified by comparing the measured values to those expected from the MRI volumes. Each volume measurement from the MRI scans will be checked by a second observer to minimise any associated researcher error.
To evaluate the secondary endpoint, the imaging protocol described above will provide up to 15 MRI images for each volunteer that can be used to inform a comparison of the different adaptive strategies. However, since patients are always asked to empty their bladder prior to radiotherapy treatment (in order to minimise the volume that receives radiation), the deliberately wide-ranging bladder volumes that will have been measured in this study will not be representative of those that would be observed in clinical practice. To address this problem, a suitable dataset that quantifies the distribution of bladder volumes encountered in a typical patient cohort will be used (Christie dataset, permission obtained.Software will be written to randomly assign a bladder volume to each day of each volunteer's 'treatment'. The MRI scan from that volunteer that most closely corresponds to the selected volume will then be assigned for that day's treatment. This will be repeated for the full 20 days of treatment and the importance of each MRI scan can then be factored into the results analysis accordingly.
The treatment planning system within the Radiotherapy department will then be used with the MRI scans to simulate a range of different 'treatments' according to each of the different adaptive bladder radiotherapy strategies to be compared. The different strategies are summarised here:
- Conventional strategy: This is the current standard treatment, in which the patient plan is prepared based on an initial CT scan of the patient with an empty bladder and no account is made of subsequent daily variations in bladder shape and volume.
- Plan-of-the-day strategy: Based on an initial CT scan of the patient with an empty bladder, three different treatment plans are created based on an assumption of how the bladder might expand. These are intended to simulate empty, partially full and full bladders. The patient is scanned before treatment each day and the most appropriate plan is selected for treatment.
- Dynamic strategy: Three different treatment plans are created based on a series of initial CT scans of the patient with empty, partially full and full bladder. These would be expected to directly represent the empty, partially full and full bladders for the individual patient. The patient is scanned before treatment each day and the most appropriate plan is selected for treatment.
- Composite strategy: The patient is CT scanned with an empty bladder and treated according to the Conventional strategy for the first 7 days of treatment with daily imaging. The first 5 daily scans of the patient are used to generate plans based on small, partially full and full bladder. From the 8th day of treatment the daily image is used to select which of these plans is appropriate for treatment.
Data processing of the MRI scans will be carried out retrospectively. The MRI scans will be anonymised and exported to the Radiotherapy department. The data will then be used to (i) acquire bladder volume information to compare with that acquired from the ultrasound probe and (ii) prepare and evaluate radiotherapy treatment simulations to investigate the benefits of different adaptive bladder radiotherapy strategies
Comparison of different adaptive techniques will focus on how much radiation is received by the bowel and the extent to which the radiation misses the disease on any day of treatment.
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Medical subject headings
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Accuracy of ultrasound measurement of bladder volume in comparision with gold standard MRI measurement
The principal aim of this study is to quantify the accuracy of ultrasound measurement of bladder volume in comparision with gold standard MRI measurement. To do this, each of the five volunteers will have 5 repeat measurements of each imaging modality (ultrasound and MRI) within each 45 minute scan session as the bladder volume increases in response to the specified drinking protocol. Each volunteer will undergo three scan sessions over three weeks. Study participants will not receive follow-up. An accuracy of +/-10% would be considered sufficient to inform future studies.
Measured: Three weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2012
- Primary completionJul 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionOct 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Bladder CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Anjali Zarkar, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
- Investigators
- Anjali Zarkar, FRCR, Principal investigator, UHB
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01698359
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- RRK4571
- Status last verified
- Sep 2012
- First submitted
- 17 Sep 2012
- Last updated
- 3 Oct 2012
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Oct 2012. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Evaluation of Ultrasound Probe for Use in Adaptive Bladder Radiotherapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01698359
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RRK4571
- Conditions
- Bladder Cancer
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 5 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2012
- Primary completion
- Jul 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Oct 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 3 Oct 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer affects over 3,000 new patients in the UK each year and radiotherapy comprises a key part of the treatment pathway for many of them. Bladder radiotherapy in the UK involves delivery of radiation to the entire bladder volume and aims to deliver a high dose to the bladder while sparing nearby healthy organs (e.g. the bowel). Unfortunately, large variations in bladder shape and volume are observed throughout treatment that compromise the probability of a positive outcome for the patient, either by increasing the risk of side-effects or by reducing the likelihood of adequately treating the disease.
In recent years, the implementation of 'adaptive' bladder radiotherapy strategies has increased. These techniques allow modification of the treatment based on the observed variations in bladder shape and volume. However, these strategies often rely on daily X-ray imaging of the patient prior to treatment, which is time-consuming and associated with a small risk of inducing a cancer in the patient.
This study will evaluate the potential of a commercially available ultrasound probe for use as an alternative to X-ray scanning during treatment for these patients. The study will also aim to compare the likelihood of reducing side-effects and successfully treating the disease for the different adaptive strategies that are used around the world.
Detailed description
All experiments and data analysis will be performed in the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Radiotherapy departments respectively, at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.
Five volunteers will be recruited to this study. They will each be required to follow a documented drinking protocol prior to each of three scan sessions. The drinking protocol is specific to this study and will not be intended for use with patients. To address the primary endpoint of the study (i.e. the precision of the ultrasound probe for measurement of bladder volume), measurement of a wide range of bladder volumes is required. In order to address this aim while making efficient use of the limited available MRI scanner time, the drinking protocol has been designed such that the volunteer will begin each scan session with an empty bladder and finish it with a full bladder. To this end, each volunteer will be required to void their bladder upon arrival and then consume 500ml of water immediately prior to the start of the scan session.
Each volunteer will then be positioned on the scanner couch according to the same protocol used for patients and alternate MRI and ultrasound scans will then be acquired. Given the time required for each scan it is anticipated that five MRI scans and fifteen ultrasound scans (three scans at a time to reduce the noise on the results, i.e. ultimately giving five ultrasound bladder volume measurements) will be acquired in each session. Each volunteer will be asked to attend for three sessions over the course of a number of weeks so that the repeatability of bladder filling patterns can be determined.
Data processing and analysis
The volume measurements from the ultrasound probe will be recorded and each of the MRI images will be exported to the Radiotherapy department where the bladder volume will be determined. The precise timings of all scan acquisitions will be recorded during the imaging session. Bladder volumes measured by the ultrasound probe, which can be read instantly, will be recorded during the session. To evaluate the primary endpoint, the precision and accuracy of the ultrasound probe will be quantified by comparing the measured values to those expected from the MRI volumes. Each volume measurement from the MRI scans will be checked by a second observer to minimise any associated researcher error.
To evaluate the secondary endpoint, the imaging protocol described above will provide up to 15 MRI images for each volunteer that can be used to inform a comparison of the different adaptive strategies. However, since patients are always asked to empty their bladder prior to radiotherapy treatment (in order to minimise the volume that receives radiation), the deliberately wide-ranging bladder volumes that will have been measured in this study will not be representative of those that would be observed in clinical practice. To address this problem, a suitable dataset that quantifies the distribution of bladder volumes encountered in a typical patient cohort will be used (Christie dataset, permission obtained.Software will be written to randomly assign a bladder volume to each day of each volunteer's 'treatment'. The MRI scan from that volunteer that most closely corresponds to the selected volume will then be assigned for that day's treatment. This will be repeated for the full 20 days of treatment and the importance of each MRI scan can then be factored into the results analysis accordingly.
The treatment planning system within the Radiotherapy department will then be used with the MRI scans to simulate a range of different 'treatments' according to each of the different adaptive bladder radiotherapy strategies to be compared. The different strategies are summarised here:
- Conventional strategy: This is the current standard treatment, in which the patient plan is prepared based on an initial CT scan of the patient with an empty bladder and no account is made of subsequent daily variations in bladder shape and volume.
- Plan-of-the-day strategy: Based on an initial CT scan of the patient with an empty bladder, three different treatment plans are created based on an assumption of how the bladder might expand. These are intended to simulate empty, partially full and full bladders. The patient is scanned before treatment each day and the most appropriate plan is selected for treatment.
- Dynamic strategy: Three different treatment plans are created based on a series of initial CT scans of the patient with empty, partially full and full bladder. These would be expected to directly represent the empty, partially full and full bladders for the individual patient. The patient is scanned before treatment each day and the most appropriate plan is selected for treatment.
- Composite strategy: The patient is CT scanned with an empty bladder and treated according to the Conventional strategy for the first 7 days of treatment with daily imaging. The first 5 daily scans of the patient are used to generate plans based on small, partially full and full bladder. From the 8th day of treatment the daily image is used to select which of these plans is appropriate for treatment.
Data processing of the MRI scans will be carried out retrospectively. The MRI scans will be anonymised and exported to the Radiotherapy department. The data will then be used to (i) acquire bladder volume information to compare with that acquired from the ultrasound probe and (ii) prepare and evaluate radiotherapy treatment simulations to investigate the benefits of different adaptive bladder radiotherapy strategies
Comparison of different adaptive techniques will focus on how much radiation is received by the bowel and the extent to which the radiation misses the disease on any day of treatment.
Study design
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Healthy volunteers from within the staff of the Radiotherapy, Medical Physics and Oncology departments at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Healthy volunteers
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Pre-existing bladder conditions
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Accuracy of ultrasound measurement of bladder volume in comparision with gold standard MRI measurement
Time frame: Three weeks
The principal aim of this study is to quantify the accuracy of ultrasound measurement of bladder volume in comparision with gold standard MRI measurement. To do this, each of the five volunteers will have 5 repeat measurements of each imaging modality (ultrasound and MRI) within each 45 minute scan session as the bladder volume increases in response to the specified drinking protocol. Each volunteer will undergo three scan sessions over three weeks. Study participants will not receive follow-up. An accuracy of +/-10% would be considered sufficient to inform future studies.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Oct 2012.
Related trials for Bladder Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Testing the Role of DNA Released From Tumor Cells Into the Blood in Guiding the Use of Immunotherapy After Surgical Removal of the Bladder, Kidney, Ureter, and Urethra for Urothelial Cancer Treatment, MODERN Study
Muscle Invasive Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Muscle Invasive Renal Pelvis Urothelial Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 3
A Clinical Trial of Sacituzumab Tirumotecan (Sac-TMT, MK-2870) and Pembrolizumab (MK-3475A) in Participants With Bladder Cancer (MK-2870-055)
Bladder Cancer
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
A Study of CTX-009 in Combination With Paclitaxel in Adult Patients With Unresectable Advanced, Metastatic or Recurrent Biliary Tract Cancers (COMPANION-002)
Biliary Tract Cancer, Cholangiocarcinoma
Recruiting
Effect of Cyclic Sighing Breathing Exercise on CRBD, Pain, and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing TUR
Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor, Transurethral Resection of the Prostate (TURP)
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anjali Zarkar, FRCR principal investigator
UHB
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Bladder Cancer, run by University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Oct 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Gareth Webster, PhD (+44 (0) 121 37 1 5056, Gareth.Webster@uhb.nhs.uk), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Accuracy of ultrasound measurement of bladder volume in comparision with gold standard MRI measurement (time frame: Three weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Oct 2012.