Residual Neuromuscular BlockadeNCT01678625
Electromyographic Assessment of Onset and Recovery of Neuromuscular Blockade
An observational study of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Residual neuromuscular blockade (weakness) is a common occurrence in the postanesthesia care unit when muscle relaxant drugs have been used in the operating room. The only method of reliably detecting the presence of neuromuscular blockade is through the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
- What is being tested?
- Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG)
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2012to Dec 2013
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Patients presenting for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia with an expected duration greater than 60 minutes will be enrolled in this study.
Who may be able to join
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Status I to III patients requiring neuromuscular blockade in the operating room will be eligible for enrollment
Who cannot join
- 1) presence of an underlying neuromuscular disease; 2) use of drugs known to interfere with neuromuscular transmission (antiseizure medications, anticholinesterases, magnesium sulfate); 3) presence of renal or hepatic disease; or 4) procedures preventing access to at least one of the upper extremities.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
NorthShore University HealthSystem
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
About this study
Residual neuromuscular blockade (weakness) is a common occurrence in the postanesthesia care unit when muscle relaxant drugs have been used in the operating room. The only method of reliably detecting the presence of neuromuscular blockade is through the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors. These devices measure and quantify the degree of muscle weakness and display the results on a screen. When using train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation, the ratio of the fourth muscle contraction (twitch) to the first twitch will be displayed; when this ratio is 90% (or 0.9) or greater, full recovery of muscle strength is present, and the endotracheal tube can be removed. At the present time, there is only one commercially-available quantitative monitor available in the United States -the TOF-Watch. It is not used by many clinicians because it requires experience to obtain accurate results, is expensive, and is subject to interference by factors in the operating room. The aim of this investigation is to examine a new quantitative monitor (the T4-EMG (EMG = electromyography) that may not be subject to the same limitations as the TOF-Watch AMG (AMG = acceleromyography). In order to study the accuracy of this new device, the T4-EMG will be compared to the current "clinical gold standard", the TOF-Watch.
Read the detailed description
The aim of this investigation is to examine a new prototype of a quantitative monitoring instrument that will meet these requirements. Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia will be monitored with a new EMG device (T4-EMG) from induction of anesthesia until recovery of neuromuscular blockade. Continuous data will be recorded onto an interfaced computer from the T4-EMG monitor during this time period. At the same time, continuous neuromuscular data will be recorded onto the computer from an AMG device (TOF-Watch, the "established standard" for clinical use) which is attached to the same arm. The applicability (ease of use, equipment need, etc.), repeatability (precision or internal consistency), and performance (agreement with established standard, bias) of the T4-EMG compared to the AMG will be determined during onset and recovery of neuromuscular blockade.
44 patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with an expected duration greater than 60 minutes will be enrolled in this study. ASA I to III patients requiring neuromuscular blockade in the operating room will be eligible for enrollment. Anesthetic management will be standardized.
Upon arrival to the operating room, neuromuscular monitoring surface electrodes will be applied. All monitoring will be conducted while the patient is under general anesthesia for the surgical procedure. Surface electrodes (non-invasive EKG electrodes) will be placed on the cleansed skin over the ulnar nerve of the available arm near the wrist. The electrodes will be connected by leads to a peripheral nerve stimulator (TOF-Watch). When the nerve stimulator is activated, the response to stimulation will be measured simultaneously by the AMG (TOF-Watch-acceleration of contraction of the adductor pollicis-thumb) and the EMG (T4-EMG-electrical activity of the adductor pollicis-thumb) devices. Therefore, the TOF-Watch will serve as nerve stimulator for both study groups. The transducer of the AMG device will be placed on the thumb of the corresponding hand. A 75-150g preload (via the Hand adapter) will be applied as per standard recommendations. After induction of anesthesia, but before administration of rocuronium, calibration, supramaximal stimulation, and stable baseline will be achieved for the TOF-Watch as suggested by the GCRP guidelines.
The T4-EMG will be placed on the same arm as the AMG device, with sensing electrodes attached to the surface of the thenar eminence (base of the thumb). A second sensing lead, used to detect the delivery of an electrical stimulating pulse, will be placed over the stimulating leads of the AMG device. This sensing lead will only be used to trigger data acquisition in the T4-EMG, and has no direct connection to the patient, nor any electrical feedback connection that alters the function of the AMG. After a satisfactory level of stimulation and response has been obtained for the TOF-Watch, the T4-EMG device will be turned on, and the impedance of the thenar sensing leads will be measured. The trigger sense will be engaged, and further baseline stimuli will be delivered via the AMG (TOF-Watch). Data simultaneously collected from the thenar sensing leads will be inspected on the T4-EMG display, and fine adjustment of electrode positioning and stimulus intensity may be made to optimize the evoked myoelectric response from the patient. At the conclusion of the setup procedure, all settings of the AMG and the T4-EMG will be held constant for the remainder of the surgery.
After these baseline data are collected (average time 5 minutes), the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) will be administered. Data relating to onset (a TOF ratio decreases from 1.0 to 0.3 or less on the AMG device display), maintenance (the TOF ratio is less than 0.3 and constant on the AMG device display), and reversal (an increase in the TOF ratio from 0.1 to 0.9 or above) will be recorded. Monitoring will continue until full recovery of neuromuscular function is noted (a TOF ratio of at least 0.9 or greater on the AMG device display). At this time, the anesthesia agents will be turned off and the patient awakened and extubated. Patients' trachea may extubated before achieving a TOF ratio of 0.9 if they awaken before this time, as per usual clinical routine determined by the clinician.
For the first 34 patients, the TOF-Watch is used as the nerve stimulator for both the AMG (TOF-Watch) and EMG (T4-EMG) groups. The ability of the T4-EMG device to sense/measure TOF ratios is the primary aim of the study (in comparison to the "clinical gold standard" TOF-Watch). However, the prototype T4-EMG (as well as the commercial device to be developed) will also contain a nerve stimulator (as do all qualitative and quantitative monitors). On a subset of patients monitored by the TOF-Watch (10 patients), the stand-alone T4-EMG device (single unit containing both the nerve stimulator and sensing/monitoring components) will be connected to the same arm and operated independently of the TOF-Watch. Its stimulating electrodes will be placed on the surface of the arm adjacent to the TOF-Watch electrodes; sensing leads will be placed on the thenar eminence as in the protocol described above. The T4-EMG will be set up independently of the TOF-Watch, with its own stimulator adjustment being made according to the same protocol as the TOF-Watch adjustment. The T4-EMG will be operated to stimulate and record at times selected by the anesthesiologist that do not conflict with operation of the TOF-Watch or interfere with other patient care activities. Evoked muscle response data will be displayed by the T4-EMG, but amplitude ratios will not be computed and it will not be used for direct patient care. The purpose is to demonstrate that the device elicits and records evoked muscle responses from surgical patients and to assess usability: this is in contrast to the main protocol where the T4-EMG is triggered by the TOF-Watch and where comparison of recorded responses is the goal.
The primary endpoint in the first 33 patients will be an analysis of the agreement between the AMG (clinical "gold standard") and EMG devices during neuromuscular recovery. Data will be compared between the two devices at AMG-derived TOF ratios values of 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1.0 (if achieved) during recovery of neuromuscular function. Bias and limits of agreement will be calculated at each TOF value.
- Conditions
- Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
- Being tested
- Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG)
- Keywords
- Residual neuromuscular blockade, Train-of-four, Acceleromyography, Electromyography
- Medical subject headings
- Delayed Emergence from Anesthesia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG)Device
TOF ratios will be compared between the EMG and AMG groups
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleromyography group | Train-of-four ratio calculation (TOF-Watch-SX-Bluestar enterprise) Receives: Device: Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG) | |
| Electromyography group | Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG) Receives: Device: Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG) |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Train-of-four (TOF)ratio
Train-of-four ratios during recovery of neuromuscular blockade will be compared between the AMG and EMG devices (at a TOF ratio of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9.)
Measured: TOF ratios will be measured for the duration of the operation, approximately 3 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2012
- Primary completionDec 2013
- Study completionDec 2013
Why it stopped: Company making the device no longer in existence. Did not finish supplying data to research team
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Residual Neuromuscular BlockadeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor Health
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- T4 Analytics
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Glenn Murphy, Endeavor Health
- Investigators
- Glenn S. Murphy, MD, Principal investigator, Endeavor Health
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01678625
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EH12-158
- Status last verified
- Sep 2019
- First submitted
- 28 Aug 2012
- Last updated
- 13 Sep 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Sep 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Electromyographic Assessment of Onset and Recovery of Neuromuscular Blockade
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01678625
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EH12-158
- Conditions
- Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
- Keywords
- Residual neuromuscular blockade, Train-of-four, Acceleromyography, Electromyography
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Company making the device no longer in existence. Did not finish supplying data to research team
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Endeavor HealthUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- T4 Analytics
- Study start
- Jun 2012
- Primary completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2013 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Sep 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Residual neuromuscular blockade (weakness) is a common occurrence in the postanesthesia care unit when muscle relaxant drugs have been used in the operating room. The only method of reliably detecting the presence of neuromuscular blockade is through the use of quantitative neuromuscular monitors. These devices measure and quantify the degree of muscle weakness and display the results on a screen. When using train-of-four (TOF) nerve stimulation, the ratio of the fourth muscle contraction (twitch) to the first twitch will be displayed; when this ratio is 90% (or 0.9) or greater, full recovery of muscle strength is present, and the endotracheal tube can be removed. At the present time, there is only one commercially-available quantitative monitor available in the United States -the TOF-Watch. It is not used by many clinicians because it requires experience to obtain accurate results, is expensive, and is subject to interference by factors in the operating room. The aim of this investigation is to examine a new quantitative monitor (the T4-EMG (EMG = electromyography) that may not be subject to the same limitations as the TOF-Watch AMG (AMG = acceleromyography). In order to study the accuracy of this new device, the T4-EMG will be compared to the current "clinical gold standard", the TOF-Watch.
Detailed description
The aim of this investigation is to examine a new prototype of a quantitative monitoring instrument that will meet these requirements. Patients undergoing surgery under general anesthesia will be monitored with a new EMG device (T4-EMG) from induction of anesthesia until recovery of neuromuscular blockade. Continuous data will be recorded onto an interfaced computer from the T4-EMG monitor during this time period. At the same time, continuous neuromuscular data will be recorded onto the computer from an AMG device (TOF-Watch, the "established standard" for clinical use) which is attached to the same arm. The applicability (ease of use, equipment need, etc.), repeatability (precision or internal consistency), and performance (agreement with established standard, bias) of the T4-EMG compared to the AMG will be determined during onset and recovery of neuromuscular blockade.
44 patients presenting for elective surgical procedures with an expected duration greater than 60 minutes will be enrolled in this study. ASA I to III patients requiring neuromuscular blockade in the operating room will be eligible for enrollment. Anesthetic management will be standardized.
Upon arrival to the operating room, neuromuscular monitoring surface electrodes will be applied. All monitoring will be conducted while the patient is under general anesthesia for the surgical procedure. Surface electrodes (non-invasive EKG electrodes) will be placed on the cleansed skin over the ulnar nerve of the available arm near the wrist. The electrodes will be connected by leads to a peripheral nerve stimulator (TOF-Watch). When the nerve stimulator is activated, the response to stimulation will be measured simultaneously by the AMG (TOF-Watch-acceleration of contraction of the adductor pollicis-thumb) and the EMG (T4-EMG-electrical activity of the adductor pollicis-thumb) devices. Therefore, the TOF-Watch will serve as nerve stimulator for both study groups. The transducer of the AMG device will be placed on the thumb of the corresponding hand. A 75-150g preload (via the Hand adapter) will be applied as per standard recommendations. After induction of anesthesia, but before administration of rocuronium, calibration, supramaximal stimulation, and stable baseline will be achieved for the TOF-Watch as suggested by the GCRP guidelines.
The T4-EMG will be placed on the same arm as the AMG device, with sensing electrodes attached to the surface of the thenar eminence (base of the thumb). A second sensing lead, used to detect the delivery of an electrical stimulating pulse, will be placed over the stimulating leads of the AMG device. This sensing lead will only be used to trigger data acquisition in the T4-EMG, and has no direct connection to the patient, nor any electrical feedback connection that alters the function of the AMG. After a satisfactory level of stimulation and response has been obtained for the TOF-Watch, the T4-EMG device will be turned on, and the impedance of the thenar sensing leads will be measured. The trigger sense will be engaged, and further baseline stimuli will be delivered via the AMG (TOF-Watch). Data simultaneously collected from the thenar sensing leads will be inspected on the T4-EMG display, and fine adjustment of electrode positioning and stimulus intensity may be made to optimize the evoked myoelectric response from the patient. At the conclusion of the setup procedure, all settings of the AMG and the T4-EMG will be held constant for the remainder of the surgery.
After these baseline data are collected (average time 5 minutes), the neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) will be administered. Data relating to onset (a TOF ratio decreases from 1.0 to 0.3 or less on the AMG device display), maintenance (the TOF ratio is less than 0.3 and constant on the AMG device display), and reversal (an increase in the TOF ratio from 0.1 to 0.9 or above) will be recorded. Monitoring will continue until full recovery of neuromuscular function is noted (a TOF ratio of at least 0.9 or greater on the AMG device display). At this time, the anesthesia agents will be turned off and the patient awakened and extubated. Patients' trachea may extubated before achieving a TOF ratio of 0.9 if they awaken before this time, as per usual clinical routine determined by the clinician.
For the first 34 patients, the TOF-Watch is used as the nerve stimulator for both the AMG (TOF-Watch) and EMG (T4-EMG) groups. The ability of the T4-EMG device to sense/measure TOF ratios is the primary aim of the study (in comparison to the "clinical gold standard" TOF-Watch). However, the prototype T4-EMG (as well as the commercial device to be developed) will also contain a nerve stimulator (as do all qualitative and quantitative monitors). On a subset of patients monitored by the TOF-Watch (10 patients), the stand-alone T4-EMG device (single unit containing both the nerve stimulator and sensing/monitoring components) will be connected to the same arm and operated independently of the TOF-Watch. Its stimulating electrodes will be placed on the surface of the arm adjacent to the TOF-Watch electrodes; sensing leads will be placed on the thenar eminence as in the protocol described above. The T4-EMG will be set up independently of the TOF-Watch, with its own stimulator adjustment being made according to the same protocol as the TOF-Watch adjustment. The T4-EMG will be operated to stimulate and record at times selected by the anesthesiologist that do not conflict with operation of the TOF-Watch or interfere with other patient care activities. Evoked muscle response data will be displayed by the T4-EMG, but amplitude ratios will not be computed and it will not be used for direct patient care. The purpose is to demonstrate that the device elicits and records evoked muscle responses from surgical patients and to assess usability: this is in contrast to the main protocol where the T4-EMG is triggered by the TOF-Watch and where comparison of recorded responses is the goal.
The primary endpoint in the first 33 patients will be an analysis of the agreement between the AMG (clinical "gold standard") and EMG devices during neuromuscular recovery. Data will be compared between the two devices at AMG-derived TOF ratios values of 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, and 1.0 (if achieved) during recovery of neuromuscular function. Bias and limits of agreement will be calculated at each TOF value.
Study design
- Observational model
- Case-control
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleromyography group | – | Device: Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG)Train-of-four ratio calculation (TOF-Watch-SX-Bluestar enterprise) |
| Electromyography group | – | Device: Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG)Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG) |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Patients presenting for elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia with an expected duration greater than 60 minutes will be enrolled in this study.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- American Society of Anesthesiologists Status I to III patients requiring neuromuscular blockade in the operating room will be eligible for enrollment
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- 1) presence of an underlying neuromuscular disease; 2) use of drugs known to interfere with neuromuscular transmission (antiseizure medications, anticholinesterases, magnesium sulfate); 3) presence of renal or hepatic disease; or 4) procedures preventing access to at least one of the upper extremities.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Train-of-four ratio calculation (T4-EMG)TOF ratios will be compared between the EMG and AMG groups | Device | Acceleromyography group, Electromyography group |
Primary outcome
Train-of-four (TOF)ratio
Time frame: TOF ratios will be measured for the duration of the operation, approximately 3 hours
Train-of-four ratios during recovery of neuromuscular blockade will be compared between the AMG and EMG devices (at a TOF ratio of 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9.)
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Company making the device no longer in existence. Did not finish supplying data to research team). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Sep 2019.
Related trials for Residual Neuromuscular Blockade
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Diaphragm Ultrasound and Neuromuscular Monitoring for Predicting Early Respiratory Events After Extubation
Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, Diaphragm Dysfunction
RecruitingObservational study
The Association Between Residual Neuromuscular Block Risk Prediction Score and the Train-of-Four Ratio
Muscle Relaxants
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Postoperative Residual Neuromuscular Block and Passive Smoke Exposure in Pediatric Dental Patients
Postoperative Residual Curarization, Neuromuscular Block Prolonged
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Acceleromyography Versus Electromyography for Neuromuscular Recovery Assessment at the End of Surgery
Neuromuscular Blockade, Cholecystectomy
Recruiting
Impact of Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine on Early Postoperative Pulmonary Function
Residual Neuromuscular Block
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Glenn S. Murphy, MD principal investigator
Endeavor Health
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Residual Neuromuscular Blockade, run by Endeavor Health at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Company making the device no longer in existence. Did not finish supplying data to research team). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Train-of-four (TOF)ratio (time frame: TOF ratios will be measured for the duration of the operation, approximately 3 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Sep 2019.