Jaw, Edentulous, PartiallyNCT01623739
Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
A study testing Placement of a dental implant in people with Jaw, Edentulous, Partially and Acquired Absence of Single Tooth, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The investigators are asking subjects to take part in a research study of soft tissue (gums) and bone (jawbone) healing around dental implants following tooth extraction. The investigators want to compare how the gums and the bone changes shape with healing in two different scenarios: 1. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Acquired Absence of Single Tooth
- What is being tested?
- Placement of a dental implant
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 38 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Dec 2010to May 2016
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient is 18 years or older.
- Ability to understand and provide informed consent before starting the study.
- Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements.
- The patient, if of child-bearing potential, has a negative urine pregnancy test.
- Adequate oral hygiene to allow for implant therapy consistent with standards of care.
- Adequate bone volume to accommodate the planned endosseous dental implant placement following immediate placement protocols utilizing Straumann Bone Level implants RC 4.1mm or Bone Level Implant NC 3.3 mm at 8, 10, 12 or 14 mm in length.
Show all 9Show fewer
- One or more teeth in either the maxilla or mandible anterior or premolar areas requiring extraction leading to a single-tooth gap requiring implant placement as determined by the patient's dental provider.
- Following extraction, surgical site anatomy presents conditions allowing immediate implant placement.
- Primary stability of implant consistent with standards of care is achieved at the time of placement.
Who cannot join
- Patient reports current smoking habit with moderate or heavy smoking (more than 10 cigarettes per day) or tobacco chewing use.
- History of alcoholism or drug abuse within the past 5 years.
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits.
- Patient has significant untreated periodontal disease (grade III or IV), caries, or clinical or radiographic signs of infection within two adjacent tooth positions of implant area.
- History of HIV infection, Hepatitis B or C.
- Patients with a history of systemic disease that precludes standard dental implant therapy or alters daily activities to a level consistent with ASA III classification (including cardiovascular, hepatic, renal, gastrointestinal, metabolic, neurologic, pulmonary, endocrine, autoimmune, or psychiatric disorders).
Show all 18Show fewer
- Presence of local inflammation or mucosal diseases such as lichen planus
- Patient history consistent with high risk for subacute bacterial endocarditis
- Current hematological disorder or coumadin (or similar) therapy
- Patient has a disease that affects bone metabolism, such as but not limited to osteoporosis, hyperthyroidism, hyperparathyroidism, congenital connective tissue disorders (e.g., osteogenesis imperfecta), or Paget's disease.
- Patient is taking medications or having treatments known to have an effect on bone turnover, including: thiazide diuretics, calcitonin, systemic steroids, bisphosphonates, vitamin D (>800 IU/day), estrogen or progesterone therapy.
- Current steroid treatment: defined as any person who within the last two years has received for two weeks a dose equivalent to 20 mg hydrocortisone
- Patient currently undergoing chemotherapy
- Patient history of radiation treatment to the head or neck
- Physical or mental handicaps that would interfere with patient's ability to exercise good oral hygiene on a regular basis
- Use of any investigational drug or device within the 30 day period immediately prior to implant surgery
- Patient is pregnant
- Extraction sites having anatomic conditions that preclude immediate implant placement.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Graduate Periodontics, Dental School, UTHSCSA
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
About this study
The investigators are asking subjects to take part in a research study of soft tissue (gums) and bone (jawbone) healing around dental implants following tooth extraction. The investigators want to compare how the gums and the bone changes shape with healing in two different scenarios:
- When the implant is placed at the same time the tooth is extracted.
- When the tooth is extracted and then left to heal for a period of 4 to 8 weeks before the implant is placed.
Previous studies have shown that both methods work and can give good results. In fact the two methods are used routinely as part of standard care but it is not known if the two procedures are equally good since they have never been compared in one same research study.
Read the detailed description
This controlled, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to compare soft and hard tissue dimensional changes for two commonly used approaches for replacing a recently extracted tooth by means of a dental implant, i.e. immediate implant placement (Type 1) or early implant placement (Type 2). Additionally, this study will evaluate the association between the osseous anatomy and implant position with soft and hard tissue changes.
Extraction sites will include maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar teeth having intact adjacent teeth. Implants placed for this study will be SLA surface, bone level design, Straumann BL RC (Bone Level Regular Cross-fit ) 4.1mm or BL NC (Bone Level Narrow Cross-fit ) 3.3mm diameter implants at 8, 10, 12 or 14mm in length.
Immediate implant placement (Type 1) resulting in a horizontal defect dimension (HDD) will receive bone grafting, using freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA)(Straumann Allograft GC®) and will be covered by a resorbable membrane (BioGide®).
For the implants randomized to type 2 implant placement, the extraction socket will be filled with a collagen plug and allowed to heal for 4 to 8 weeks before the implant will be placed. Simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) will be performed using FDBA (Straumann Allograft GC®)and a resorbable collagen membrane (BioGide®). The type 2 implant placement procedure will follow the guidelines as described by Buser et al. (2008).
All implant placement will follow standard protocols utilizing tapping and placement according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
- Being tested
- Placement of a dental implant
- Keywords
- Dental implants, Esthetic score, Immediate implants, Early placement
- Medical subject headings
- Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Placement of a dental implantProcedure or surgery
Also called Straumann, SLActive, Dental Implants
Type 1 implant placement Type 2 implant placement
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 implant placement | Active comparator | Placement of a dental implant: Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure Receives: Procedure: Placement of a dental implant |
| Type 2 implant placement | Active comparator | Placement of a dental implant: Once the tooth is extracted. The site is left to heal for 4 to 8 weeks before a dental implant is placed during a second surgical procedure. Receives: Procedure: Placement of a dental implant |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site
Baseline will be at the time of crown delivery. Thereafter, the mid facial mucosal level at implant site will be recorded at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery.
Measured: 3 months after crown delivery
Secondary outcomes (5)
PES/WES (Pink Esthetic Score, White Esthetic Score).
The PES and WES scales are 10 point scales, made up of 5 categories, each with a 2 point value. Each category is scored out of 2, and the scores totaled to give an optimal score out of 10. Any score of 6 or higher out of 10 would be considered a good clinical outcome. the PES categories focus on the gum area, and the WES categories focus on the tooth. The scores for PES and WES are totaled, to give a score out of 20, with 20 being the highest possible score (best outcome). The values are totaled and a mean score of all the readings is reported.
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Probing Depth
The measurement of the pocket around the implanted tooth, measured with a graduated probe. A healthy pocket depth is around 3mm with no bleeding during the measurement process. The values are totaled and a mean score of all the readings is reported.
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Modified Plaque Index
Measurement of amount of plaque build-up on teeth, using a scale of 0 (no plaque detection), to 3 (an abundance of soft matter). The scores are totaled and a mean score reported.
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Modified Bleeding Index
Bleeding from the gums is measured on probing the gum and measured on scale of 0 to 5, with 0 being the best outcome, with no bleeding, and 5 being the worst outcome, with spontaneous bleeding. The scores are totaled and a mean score reported.
Measured: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Radiographic Bone Level
Secondary outcome measures will be recorded at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery.
Measured: Up to 5 years after baseline
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2010
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Jaw, Edentulous, PartiallyStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut Straumann AG
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Guy Huynh-Ba, DDS, MS, Principal investigator, UTHSCSA Department of Periodontics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01623739
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ITI 689_2010
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 26 Apr 2012
- Last updated
- 25 Sep 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 25 Sep 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Esthetic, Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Immediately Placed Implants (Type 1) and Early Placed Implants (Type 2)
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01623739
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ITI 689_2010
- Keywords
- Dental implants, Esthetic score, Immediate implants, Early placement
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 38 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Institut Straumann AG
- Study start
- Dec 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 20 Oct 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The investigators are asking subjects to take part in a research study of soft tissue (gums) and bone (jawbone) healing around dental implants following tooth extraction. The investigators want to compare how the gums and the bone changes shape with healing in two different scenarios:
- When the implant is placed at the same time the tooth is extracted.
- When the tooth is extracted and then left to heal for a period of 4 to 8 weeks before the implant is placed.
Previous studies have shown that both methods work and can give good results. In fact the two methods are used routinely as part of standard care but it is not known if the two procedures are equally good since they have never been compared in one same research study.
Detailed description
This controlled, randomized clinical trial (RCT) is designed to compare soft and hard tissue dimensional changes for two commonly used approaches for replacing a recently extracted tooth by means of a dental implant, i.e. immediate implant placement (Type 1) or early implant placement (Type 2). Additionally, this study will evaluate the association between the osseous anatomy and implant position with soft and hard tissue changes.
Extraction sites will include maxillary and mandibular anterior and premolar teeth having intact adjacent teeth. Implants placed for this study will be SLA surface, bone level design, Straumann BL RC (Bone Level Regular Cross-fit ) 4.1mm or BL NC (Bone Level Narrow Cross-fit ) 3.3mm diameter implants at 8, 10, 12 or 14mm in length.
Immediate implant placement (Type 1) resulting in a horizontal defect dimension (HDD) will receive bone grafting, using freeze dried bone allograft (FDBA)(Straumann Allograft GC®) and will be covered by a resorbable membrane (BioGide®).
For the implants randomized to type 2 implant placement, the extraction socket will be filled with a collagen plug and allowed to heal for 4 to 8 weeks before the implant will be placed. Simultaneous guided bone regeneration (GBR) will be performed using FDBA (Straumann Allograft GC®)and a resorbable collagen membrane (BioGide®). The type 2 implant placement procedure will follow the guidelines as described by Buser et al. (2008).
All implant placement will follow standard protocols utilizing tapping and placement according to the manufacturer's guidelines.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Type 1 implant placement | Active comparator | Procedure: Placement of a dental implantPlacement of a dental implant: Implant is placed immediately following tooth extraction in one surgical procedure |
| Type 2 implant placement | Active comparator | Procedure: Placement of a dental implantPlacement of a dental implant: Once the tooth is extracted. The site is left to heal for 4 to 8 weeks before a dental implant is placed during a second surgical procedure. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- The patient is 18 years or older.
- Ability to understand and provide informed consent before starting the study.
- Ability and willingness to comply with all study requirements.
- The patient, if of child-bearing potential, has a negative urine pregnancy test.
- Adequate oral hygiene to allow for implant therapy consistent with standards of care.
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Patient reports current smoking habit with moderate or heavy smoking (more than 10 cigarettes per day) or tobacco chewing use.
- History of alcoholism or drug abuse within the past 5 years.
- Severe bruxism or clenching habits.
- Patient has significant untreated periodontal disease (grade III or IV), caries, or clinical or radiographic signs of infection within two adjacent tooth positions of implant area.
- History of HIV infection, Hepatitis B or C.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Placement of a dental implantAlso: Straumann, SLActive, Dental ImplantsType 1 implant placement Type 2 implant placement | Procedure or surgery | Type 1 implant placement, Type 2 implant placement |
Primary outcome
Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site
Time frame: 3 months after crown delivery
Baseline will be at the time of crown delivery. Thereafter, the mid facial mucosal level at implant site will be recorded at 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery.
5 secondary outcomes
PES/WES (Pink Esthetic Score, White Esthetic Score).
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Probing Depth
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Modified Plaque Index
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Modified Bleeding Index
Time frame: 3, 6, 12, 24, 36, 48, 60 months after crown delivery
Radiographic Bone Level
Time frame: Up to 5 years after baseline
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 25 Sep 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Active, not recruiting
L-PRF Block vs Composite Graft for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation
Alveolar Ridge Resorption After Extraction, Alveolar Bone Loss
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Digital and Conventional Clasp-retained Partial Dentures (DIGICLASP)
Partial Edentulism
Active, not recruiting
Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Clinical Outcome of PrimeTaper EV Implant in Single Tooth Restorations
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Recruiting
Clinical and Radiographic Evaluation of UV-Treated Dental Implants With or Without Melatonin in the Upper Posterior Jaw
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially, Bone Resorption
Active, not recruiting
A Clinical Study on Acuris™ - Conometric Concept for Single Tooth Restoration
Jaw, Edentulous, Partially
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Guy Huynh-Ba, DDS, MS principal investigator
UTHSCSA Department of Periodontics
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Placement of a dental implant in people with Jaw, Edentulous, Partially and Acquired Absence of Single Tooth, run by The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 25 Sep 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 20 Oct 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Mid Facial Mucosal Level at Implant Site (time frame: 3 months after crown delivery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 25 Sep 2018.