AzTrials
AzTrials

Chronic Instability of JointNCT01618032

Effects of Two Techniques of Mobilization in the Dorsiflexion on Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability

A study testing HVLA and MWM in people with Chronic Instability of Joint, run by CEU San Pablo University.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Restrictions on ankle dorsiflexion are common in subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI). In fact, this is one factor that can contribute to the recurrence of such injuries. Passive mobilization techniques to improve ankle dorsiflexion are commonly used in physiotherapy treatments. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 40 years
Conditions the study is for
Chronic Instability of Joint
What is being tested?
HVLA and MWM
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
52 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Nov 2010to Nov 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 40 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Subjects with chronic ankle instability

Who cannot join

  • Acute or subacute ankle sprain.
  • Recent lesions in lower extremities.

About this study

Official title: The Effects of Two Techniques of Mobilization in the Improvement of Dorsiflexion on Chronic Instability Ankles. A Double Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

Restrictions on ankle dorsiflexion are common in subjects with chronic ankle instability (CAI). In fact, this is one factor that can contribute to the recurrence of such injuries. Passive mobilization techniques to improve ankle dorsiflexion are commonly used in physiotherapy treatments. However, no studies have compared manipulative techniques of mobilization techniques in subjects with chronic ankle instability.

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of two mobilization techniques on ankle dorsiflexion in patients with chronic ankle instability.

Being tested
HVLA, MWM, placebo

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • HVLAOther

    High velocity and low amplitude manipulation in traction of subtalar jonit

  • MWMOther

    Mobilization with movement as Mulligan for increase dorsiflexion of the ankle in weight bearing

  • placeboOther

    Manual contact during a period of time similar of teh other interventions

Study groups in NCT01618032
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
HVLAExperimentalHigh velocity and low amplitude traction manipulation on the ankle joint
Receives: Other: HVLA
MWMExperimentalMobilization with movement on ankle joint as Mulligan
Receives: Other: MWM
placeboSham comparatorContact without therapeutic effect
Receives: Other: placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Pre-intervention ankle dorsiflexion

    Ankle dorsiflexion is measured by the weight-bearing lunge method

    Measured: pre-intervention

  2. Inmediately post-intervention ankle dorsiflexion

    Ankle dorsiflexion is measured by the weight-bearing lunge method

    Measured: inmediately post-intervention

  3. ten minutes post-intervention ankle dorsiflexion

    Ankle dorsiflexion is measured by the weight-bearing lunge method

    Measured: ten minutes post-intervention

  4. 24 hr post-intervention ankle dorsiflexion

    Ankle dorsiflexion is measured by the weight-bearing lunge method

    Measured: 24 hr post-intervention

  5. 48 hr post-intervention ankle dorsiflexion

    Ankle dorsiflexion is measured by the weight-bearing lunge method

    Measured: 48 hr post-intervention

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted13 Jun 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startNov 2010
  3. Primary completionDec 2011
  4. Study completionNov 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
52 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01618032
Sponsor's protocol ID
CEU-002
Status last verified
Nov 2012
First submitted
8 Jun 2012
Last updated
3 Dec 2012
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing HVLA and MWM in people with Chronic Instability of Joint, run by CEU San Pablo University.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2012. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Pre-intervention ankle dorsiflexion (time frame: pre-intervention). The study lists 5 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2012.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in