AzTrials
AzTrials

Ankle SprainNCT06897293

Comparison of MBR + Suture Tape and MBR for CLAI : A Prospective Cohort Study

An observational study of Ankle Sprain and Hypermobility, Joint, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

Recruiting

Looking for participants now. Contact the study team or a site below to ask about taking part.

Sites and contacts
Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. Additional suture tape augmentation has been suggested to provide more strength and stability. However, the outcomes of the MBP with suture tape augmentation were unknown, which requires further exploration. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 55 years
Conditions the study is for
Ankle Sprain, Hypermobility, Joint
What is being tested?
Modified Broström procedure + Suture tape augmentation operation and Modified Broström procedure operation
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
86 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
1 Jun 2021to 1 Jun 2026
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 55 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Study population: The patients who go to visit a doctor for persistent lateral ankle pain and instability over three months and invalid conservative treatment, with the age of 15 - 55 years. If the Beighton score of the patient is ≥4 and the exclusion criteria are met, he or she is going to be advised to participate in this study.

Who may be able to join

  • Clinical diagnosis of lateral ankle instability
  • Beighton score ≥4
  • Age with 18 to 60 years

Who cannot join

  • Patients with an acute or subacute ankle injury
  • Injury of the deltoid ligament
  • Alignment of lower extremity greater than 5 degrees
  • Fractures of the lower extremity
  • Stage III or IV osteoarthritis
  • Patients who refused to participate in the study

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country. Contact the study team or a site near you to ask about taking part.

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Peking University Third Hospital

    Beijing, Beijing Municipality

    Dong Jiang, MD, 13811280948, bysyjiangdong@126.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Modified Broström Repair + Suture Tape and Modified Broström Repair for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability : A Prospective Cohort Study

GJL is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an MBR for CLAI. Additional suture tape augmentation has been suggested to provide more strength and stability. However, the outcomes of the MBP with suture tape augmentation were unknown, which requires further exploration.

Read the detailed description

Generalized joint laxity (GJL) is a risk factor for postoperative recurrent instability following an open modified Broström repair (MBR) for chronic lateral ankle instability (CLAI). MBR with suture tape augmentation may provide more strength and stability. However, BPR with suture tape augmentation may lead to rejection of the suture tape. In addition, the outcomes of the MBP with suture tape augmentation were unknown.

Being tested
Modified Broström procedure + Suture tape augmentation operation, Modified Broström procedure operation
Medical subject headings
Ankle Injuries, Joint Instability

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Modified Broström procedure + Suture tape augmentation operationProcedure or surgery

    Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström + Suture tape augmentation operation

  • Modified Broström procedure operationProcedure or surgery

    Patients with CLAI and GJL will accept the Modified Broström procedure operation

Study groups in NCT06897293
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Open Modified Broström +Suture tape augmentation groupPatients who accept a modified Broström procedure + Suture tape augmentation operation
Receives: Procedure: Modified Broström procedure + Suture tape augmentation operation
Open Modified Broström groupPatients who accept a modified Broström procedure operation
Receives: Procedure: Modified Broström procedure operation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score

    This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, ranges from 0-100, and the higher of the score is associate with a better outcome.

    Measured: postoperative AOFAS score at 1 year

  2. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score

    This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, ranges from 0-100, and the higher of the score is associate with a better outcome.

    Measured: postoperative AOFAS score at 2 years

  3. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score

    This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, ranges from 0-100, and the higher of the score is associate with a better outcome.

    Measured: postoperative AOFAS score at 6 months

  4. The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score

    This score is a primary scale for lateral ankle instability, ranges from 0-100, and the higher of the score is associate with a better outcome.

    Measured: postoperative AOFAS score at 3 months

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Anterior displacement and talar tilt angle in stress radiography

    The outcomes are common indicators for evaluation the lateral stability of ankle, and can be evaluated through same stress radiography

    Measured: postoperative radiographic measures at 2 years

  2. Rate of re-injury

    The rate of patients re-sprain after the surgery

    Measured: the rate of re-injury at 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Mar 2025
  2. Study start1 Jun 2021
  3. Primary completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
86 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT06897293
Sponsor's protocol ID
M2024292
Status last verified
May 2026
First submitted
13 Mar 2025
Last updated
20 May 2026
Results posted
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: The demographics data, Beighton score, primary and secondary outcomes would be available to other researchers

Publications

  • Wittig U, Hohenberger G, Ornig M, Schuh R, Reinbacher P, Leithner A, Holweg P. Improved Outcome and Earlier Return to Activity After Suture Tape Augmentation Versus Brostrom Repair for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability? A Systematic Review. Arthroscopy. 2022 Feb;38(2):597-608. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2021.06.028. Epub 2021 Jul 9.

    PubMed 34252562
  • Xu HX, Lee KB. Modified Brostrom Procedure for Chronic Lateral Ankle Instability in Patients With Generalized Joint Laxity. Am J Sports Med. 2016 Dec;44(12):3152-3157. doi: 10.1177/0363546516657816. Epub 2016 Aug 5.

    PubMed 27496909

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Ankle Sprain and Hypermobility, Joint, run by Peking University Third Hospital at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: looking for participants now, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Dong Jiang, MD (13811280948, bysyjiangdong@126.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

The American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score (time frame: postoperative AOFAS score at 1 year). The study lists 4 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT06897293, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2026; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in