HIVCTN0049NCT01612169
Hospital Visit as Opportunity for Prevention and Engagement for HIV-Infected Drug Users
A study testing Patient Navigation (PN) Group and Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group in people with HIV and AIDS, run by Columbia University at 12 sites in United States.
Trial summary
Primary Objective: This study will evaluate the most effective strategy in achieving HIV virologic suppression among HIV-infected substance users recruited from the hospital setting who are randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: 1) Patient Navigator (PN); 2) Patient Navigator + Contingency Management… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- HIV, AIDS, Substance Abuse
- What is being tested?
- Patient Navigation (PN) Group and Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 801 participants
- Where
- 12 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jul 2012to Jun 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participating individuals must:
- be admitted to a hospital and be HIV-infected at the time of recruitment
- be at least 18 years old
- meet one of the following: A) have an AIDS-defining illness during the current hospital admission; or B) have the most recent CD4 count and viral load performed within the past 6 months be <350 cells/uL and >200 copies/mL; or C) have the most recent CD4 count and viral load performed within the past 12 months be <=500 cells/uL and >200 copies/mL or unknown accompanied by the Site PI's discretion that the patient a) is likely to currently have a viral load >200 copies/mL, b) is not currently successfully/correctly taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) and c) needs to be on ART
- report (or have evidence in the medical record of) any opioid and/or stimulant and/or heavy alcohol use within the past 12 months (Note: Medical record evidence may consist of a) positive toxicology screen(s) for stimulants or heavy alcohol or b) clinician notes indicating heavy use of alcohol, use of stimulants or non-prescribed opioids or abuse of prescribed opioids.)
- have a Karnofsky performance scale index score of >=60
Show all 12Show fewer
- provide informed consent
- provide locator information
- sign a HIPAA form / medical record release form to facilitate medical record abstraction
- report living in the vicinity and being able to return for follow-up visits
- complete the baseline assessment, including blood draw
- be able to communicate in English
Who cannot join
- Individuals will be excluded from the study if they:
- do not meet any one or more of the above-described inclusion criteria
- have significant cognitive or developmental impairment to the extent that they are unable to provide informed consent
- are terminated via Site PI decision with agreement from study Lead Investigator
Trial locations and contacts
12 sites in 1 country.
12 sites in 1 country
United States12 sites
Grady Memorial Hospital
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21287
University Hospital At University of Alabama, Birmingham (Uab)
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Boston Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02118
Stroger Cook County Hospital/Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
Parkland Health and Human Services
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Jackson Memorial Hospital
Miami, Florida, 33136
University of Miami
Miami, Florida, 33136
Saint Luke's Roosevelt Hospital Center
New York, New York, 10019
Hahnemann University Hospital
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19102
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Upmc)
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15213
Los Angeles County Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90502
About this study
Official title: NIDA CTN Protocol 0049. Project HOPE -- Hospital Visit as Opportunity for Prevention and Engagement for HIV-Infected Drug Users
Primary Objective: This study will evaluate the most effective strategy in achieving HIV virologic suppression among HIV-infected substance users recruited from the hospital setting who are randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: 1) Patient Navigator (PN); 2) Patient Navigator + Contingency Management (PN+CM); and 3) Treatment as Usual (TAU).
Primary Hypothesis: The rate of viral suppression (plasma HIV viral load of <= 200 copies/mL) relative to non-suppression or all-cause mortality in the 3 study groups will differ from each other at the 12 month follow-up.
Read more
Sub-hypothesis 1. The rate of virologic suppression (plasma HIV viral load of <= 200 copies/mL) in the PN+CM group will be greater than that in the TAU group.
Sub-hypothesis 2. The rate of virologic suppression in the PN+CM group will be greater than that in the PN group.
Sub-hypothesis 3. The rate of virologic suppression in the PN group will be greater than that in the TAU group.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of the experimental interventions on: HIV virological suppression and CD4 T-cell count changes at 6 months post-randomization; engagement in HIV primary care and visit attendance; and rate of hospitalizations.
- To evaluate the effect of the experimental interventions on: drug use frequency and severity; and drug use treatment engagement and session attendance.
- To assess selected mechanisms of action of the intervention (.i.e. mediators of intervention effect).
- To assess potential characteristics associated with differential treatment effectiveness (i.e. moderators of intervention effect).
- To evaluate the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of the interventions.
Read the detailed description
This study is a 3-arm randomized, prospective trial in which HIV-infected inpatients who report substance use at screening will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to Patient Navigator (PN) vs. Patient Navigator + Contingency Management (PN+CM) vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU). Randomization will occur after screening, informed consent, baseline assessment and collection of biological (blood) specimens. Participants assigned to the PN and PN+CM groups will meet (ideally at bedside if the participant is still hospitalized at the time of randomization) with the Patient Navigator interventionist and will complete up to 11 intervention sessions over the 6-month-long intervention period. Participants assigned to the TAU group will receive care as it is typically offered in the inpatient setting. Follow-up visits will be conducted at approximately 6 and 12 months post-randomization.
To minimize patient and staff burden, sites may implement a pre-screening procedure with permission from their respective IRBs to determine which inpatients would meet the study's AIDS-defining illness/CD4 count/viral load inclusion criteria. Pre-screening, screening, enrollment, assessment, randomization and the initial intervention visit will (ideally) occur during the participant's stay at an inpatient facility. Recognizing that participants may be recruited at various stages of illness during their inpatient visit, however, this may not be possible. To allow maximum flexibility, all activities that occur after the screening informed consent may be completed after the patient has been discharged from the hospital. The intervention duration will be 6 months with sessions ideally occurring weekly during the first month, bi-weekly during months 2 and 3 and monthly during months 4- 6. Follow-up visits will occur at approximately 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Therefore, the total duration of individual participation in the study is approximately 12 months.
Prior to approaching patients to recruit them into the study, members of the medical teams within each hospital (i.e., attending physicians, fellows, residents and nurse practitioners) who are involved in patient care and who know the patients' HIV-infected status will assess the medical stability of the patients. If a patient has expressed interest in potentially participating in research and is deemed medically stable, then a study staff member will meet with the patient at bedside to discuss the study. Strict ethical guidelines regarding professional conduct and confidentiality will be enforced for all study staff.
Prior to screening individuals to determine their eligibility to participate, the research staff will briefly explain the study purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits and voluntary nature of participation. Individuals willing to be screened to determine eligibility will provide written informed consent, including providing HIPAA authorization for medical record abstraction. After signing the consent and HIPAA forms, participants will be offered copies of the forms to keep for their records.
After the enrollment process (providing written informed consent and completing a locator form) is complete and a brief rapport-building discussion between the interviewer and participant has taken place, the research interviewer will administer the baseline assessment through a handheld Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) device. The CAPI system displays each assessment question on a computer monitor, allowing the interviewer to read the questions and then enter the participants' responses directly into the computer. The baseline assessment will include, but not be limited to questions on participant demographics, HIV care, medication adherence, substance use and co morbid conditions such as hepatitis, depression, etc.
Collection of Biologic Specimens:
We will collect blood specimens at the baseline, 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits to evaluate the primary outcome, HIV virologic suppression, as well as to measure CD4 count, and complete blood count (CBC). Blood specimen processing will be done by sites' local laboratories. In the event that a blood specimen cannot be collected for any reason (e.g., vein is "dry", participant is lost to follow-up, etc.) or the result of a collected specimen is not available (e.g., not enough specimen drawn, lab processing error, etc.), the study team may abstract and use non-study lab results for the purpose of evaluating the HIV virologic suppression outcome and measuring CD4 count and CBC. Participants randomized to the intervention groups may also provide urine for drug screening.
Randomization:
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to one of the 3 treatment groups. Randomization will be stratified by site. The randomization procedure will be conducted in a centralized process through the Data and Statistical Center (DSC2). After the baseline assessment is successfully completed, a designated study staff member will perform the randomization. Randomization for each participant is done over the Internet using the Enrollment Module in AdvantageEDC (the study electronic data capture system).
Study Interventions:
The 3 treatment conditions/study groups are: 1) Patient Navigator intervention (PN), 2) Patient Navigator plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) intervention and 3) Treatment as Usual (TAU).
The patient navigator (PN) approach includes five functions: 1) establishing an effective working relationship; 2) encouraging identification and use of strengths, abilities and assets; 3) supporting client control over goal setting and the search for needed resources; 4) viewing the community as a resource and identifying informal sources of support; and 5) conducting case management as an active community based activity. Specifically, patient navigators will provide the following to all study participants randomized to the PN group: 1) four initial meetings, ideally having the first one during hospitalization and three within the first 3 weeks of hospital discharge, and 2) after the initial four meetings, patient navigators will meet with the PN group participants ideally twice monthly during months 2 and 3 and once during months 4 - 6.
Study participants randomized to the patient navigator plus contingency management (PN+CM) group will receive the patient navigation (PN) intervention as outlined above and in Section 11.2 of the sponsor protocol combine with contingency management (CM). For participants randomly assigned to the PN+CM study group, patient navigators will: 1) effectively communicate the incentive plan to the participant, 2) track each of the seven target behaviors that may earn participant incentives, 3) verify occurrence of the target behaviors, 4) deliver incentives according to the protocol, and 5) maintain a record of incentives delivered.
Participants assigned to the treatment as usual (TAU) group will receive the standard treatment provided at participating sites for linking patients to HIV and substance use care.
Follow-up visits will be conducted at approximately 6- and 12-months post-randomization and will involve follow-up CAPIs and blood collection.
- Conditions
- HIV, AIDS, Substance Abuse, Inpatient
- Being tested
- Patient Navigation (PN) Group, Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group
- Keywords
- HIV patients, Hospitalized patients, Substance Users, Drug Users
- Medical subject headings
- Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome, Substance-Related Disorders, Drug Misuse
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Patient Navigation (PN) GroupBehavioural
The patient navigator approach includes five functions: 1) establishing an effective working relationship; 2) encouraging identification and use of strengths, abilities and assets; 3) supporting client control over goal setting and the search for needed resources; 4) viewing the community as a resource and identifying informal sources of support; and 5) conducting case management as an active community based activity.
Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) GroupBehavioural
Study participants randomized to this group will receive the patient navigation (PN) intervention as outlined above combined with contingency management (CM).
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment as Usual (TAU) Group | No intervention | Participants assigned to the TAU group will receive the standard treatment provided at each hospital for linking patients to HIV and substance use care. During the formal site selection process, a thorough assessment will be conducted of each site's standard practice for linkage to HIV care and substance use treatment. Throughout the course of the trial, hospital sites will be monitored for any potential changes that might occur in standard practice around linkage to HIV care and substance use treatment. |
| Patient Navigation (PN) Group | Experimental | The patient navigator approach includes five functions: 1) establishing an effective working relationship; 2) encouraging identification and use of strengths, abilities and assets; 3) supporting client control over goal setting and the search for needed resources; 4) viewing the community as a resource and identifying informal sources of support; and 5) conducting case management as an active community based activity.
After the initial four meetings, patient navigators will meet with PN group participants ideally twice monthly during months 2 and 3 and once monthly during months 4 - 6. Receives: Behavioral: Patient Navigation (PN) Group |
| Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group | Experimental | Study participants randomized to this group will receive the patient navigation (PN) intervention as outlined above combined with contingency management (CM). Using the principles of contingency management, this combined intervention will incorporate viral load suppression as a target of reinforcement as well as several other behaviors (HIV clinical care, medication adherence, cessation or reduction of substance use) that are hypothesized to be moderators or mediators of the primary outcome.
For participants randomly assigned to the PN+CM study group, patient navigators will: 1) effectively communicate the incentive plan to the participant, 2) track each of the seven target behaviors that may earn participant incentives, 3) verify occurrence of the target behaviors, 4) deliver incentives according to the protocol, and 5) maintain a record of incentives delivered. PNs will use a computer-based tracking program to facilitate this work. Receives: Behavioral: Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
HIV Viral Suppression
The primary outcome variable is binary: HIV viral suppression (<= 200 copies/ml), as determined by blood draw at/near the 12 month follow-up versus presence of viral load > 200 or death (all-cause mortality). We are aware that, for patients on therapy, the goal of antiretroviral therapy is achieving a viral load "below the limit of detection of the assay" which currently is usually < 40 copies/ml. However, we have chosen to define "suppression" as <= 200 copies/ml to be consistent with the January 2011 Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents.
Measured: 12 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
HIV Secondary Outcomes
- Viral suppression at 6 months (binary; laboratory assay)
- CD4 Cell count (continuous; laboratory assay)
- Engagement into care (binary; self-report/medical record abstraction)
- HIV care visit attendance (count; self-report/medical record abstraction)
- Medication Adherence (count; self-report/ACTG Adherence Questionnaire)
- Hospitalizations (count; self-report/medical record abstraction)
- All cause mortality
Measured: 12 months
Substance Use Related Secondary Outcomes
- Substance use frequency (count; self-report ASI and binary; urine/breath analysis)
- Substance Use Severity (continuous, DAST and AUDIT)
- Treatment engagement (binary; self-report/medical record abstraction)
- Number of drug treatment sessions (Count; self-report/medical record abstraction)
Measured: 12 months
Mediators and Moderators of Outcomes
- Viral Suppression Moderators: psychological distress (BSI), Housing instability, Food Insecurity Health literacy, HIV-related cognitive problems, and renal and liver function status.
- Viral Suppression Mediators: Medication self-efficacy, Physician-Patient relationship, social support and substance use.
- CD4 Count Moderators: HCV status.
- Drug Use Moderators: Readiness for drug treatment
- Drug Use Mediators: Readiness for drug treatment and social support.
Measured: 12 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2012
- Primary completionJun 2015
- Study completionJun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (9)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for HIVStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Columbia UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 801 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jackson Health System, Grady Health System, Johns Hopkins University, Boston Medical Center, Hahnemann University Hospital, Rush University Medical Center, PARKLAND HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, University of Pittsburgh, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Alabama at Birmingham, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Lisa Metsch, Columbia University
- Investigators
- Lisa Metsch, Ph.D, Principal investigator, Columbia UniversityLauren Gooden, Ph.D, Study director, Columbia UniversityCarlos del Rio, M.D., Principal investigator, Emory University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01612169
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AAAK1709
- Other IDs
- U10DA013720-11
- Acronym
- CTN0049
- Status last verified
- Mar 2016
- First submitted
- 4 Jun 2012
- Last updated
- 14 Mar 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Information about the study and the de-identified study data will be available at https://datashare.nida.nih.gov/ within 18 months of the date the data are locked, as per the procedures of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.
Publications
Wang G, Yang X, Wang K, Li X, Dai Z, Qiao S. Clinical and behavioral predictors of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder among people with HIV who use substances: a secondary analysis of the HOPE trial. J Neurovirol. 2026 May 7;32(3):18. doi: 10.1007/s13365-026-01315-9.
PubMed 42095976Gutkind S, Starbird LE, Murphy SM, Teixeira PA, Gooden LK, Matheson T, Feaster DJ, Jain MK, Masson CL, Perlman DC, Del Rio C, Metsch LR, Schackman BR. Cost of Hepatitis C care facilitation for HIV/Hepatitis C Co-infected people who use drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109265. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109265. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
PubMed 35042101Stitzer ML, Gukasyan N, Matheson T, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Duan R, Gooden L, Del Rio C, Metsch LR. Enhancing patient navigation with contingent financial incentives for substance use abatement in persons with HIV and substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):23-30. doi: 10.1037/adb0000504. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
PubMed 31436447Mitchell SG, Monico LB, Stitzer M, Matheson T, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Schwartz RP, Metsch L. How patient navigators view the use of financial incentives to influence study involvement, substance use, and HIV treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Nov;94:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
PubMed 30243412Philbin MM, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Duan R, Das M, Jacobs P, Lucas GM, Batey DS, Nijhawan A, Jacobson JM, Mandler R, Daar E, McMahon DK, Armstrong WS, Del Rio C, Metsch LR. The North-South Divide: Substance Use Risk, Care Engagement, and Viral Suppression Among Hospitalized Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in 11 US Cities. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):146-149. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy506.
PubMed 29920584Stitzer ML, Hammond AS, Matheson T, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Duan R, Gooden L, Del Rio C, Metsch LR. Enhancing Patient Navigation with Contingent Incentives to Improve Healthcare Behaviors and Viral Load Suppression of Persons with HIV and Substance Use. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Jul;32(7):288-296. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0014. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
PubMed 29883190Winhusen T, Feaster DJ, Duan R, Brown JL, Daar ES, Mandler R, Metsch LR. Baseline Cigarette Smoking Status as a Predictor of Virologic Suppression and CD4 Cell Count During One-Year Follow-Up in Substance Users with Uncontrolled HIV Infection. AIDS Behav. 2018 Jun;22(6):2026-2032. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1928-x.
PubMed 29030717Stitzer M, Matheson T, Cunningham C, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Hammond AS, Fitzsimons H, Metsch LR. Enhancing patient navigation to improve intervention session attendance and viral load suppression of persons with HIV and substance use: a secondary post hoc analysis of the Project HOPE study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Jun 27;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0081-1.
PubMed 28651612Metsch LR, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Matheson T, Stitzer M, Das M, Jain MK, Rodriguez AE, Armstrong WS, Lucas GM, Nijhawan AE, Drainoni ML, Herrera P, Vergara-Rodriguez P, Jacobson JM, Mugavero MJ, Sullivan M, Daar ES, McMahon DK, Ferris DC, Lindblad R, VanVeldhuisen P, Oden N, Castellon PC, Tross S, Haynes LF, Douaihy A, Sorensen JL, Metzger DS, Mandler RN, Colfax GN, del Rio C. Effect of Patient Navigation With or Without Financial Incentives on Viral Suppression Among Hospitalized Patients With HIV Infection and Substance Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Jul 12;316(2):156-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8914.
PubMed 27404184
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Mar 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- NIDA CTN Protocol 0049. Project HOPE -- Hospital Visit as Opportunity for Prevention and Engagement for HIV-Infected Drug Users
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01612169
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CTN0049 / AAAK1709
- Conditions
- HIV, AIDS, Substance Abuse, Inpatient
- Keywords
- HIV patients, Hospitalized patients, Substance Users, Drug Users
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 801 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Columbia UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Jackson Health System, Grady Health System, Johns Hopkins University, Boston Medical Center, Hahnemann University Hospital, Rush University Medical Center, PARKLAND HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, University of Pittsburgh, University of California, Los Angeles, University of Alabama at Birmingham, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center, National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
- Study start
- Jul 2012
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jun 2012 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Primary Objective: This study will evaluate the most effective strategy in achieving HIV virologic suppression among HIV-infected substance users recruited from the hospital setting who are randomly assigned to one of three treatment conditions: 1) Patient Navigator (PN); 2) Patient Navigator + Contingency Management (PN+CM); and 3) Treatment as Usual (TAU).
Primary Hypothesis: The rate of viral suppression (plasma HIV viral load of <= 200 copies/mL) relative to non-suppression or all-cause mortality in the 3 study groups will differ from each other at the 12 month follow-up.
Sub-hypothesis 1. The rate of virologic suppression (plasma HIV viral load of <= 200 copies/mL) in the PN+CM group will be greater than that in the TAU group.
Sub-hypothesis 2. The rate of virologic suppression in the PN+CM group will be greater than that in the PN group.
Sub-hypothesis 3. The rate of virologic suppression in the PN group will be greater than that in the TAU group.
Secondary Objectives:
- To evaluate the effect of the experimental interventions on: HIV virological suppression and CD4 T-cell count changes at 6 months post-randomization; engagement in HIV primary care and visit attendance; and rate of hospitalizations.
- To evaluate the effect of the experimental interventions on: drug use frequency and severity; and drug use treatment engagement and session attendance.
- To assess selected mechanisms of action of the intervention (.i.e. mediators of intervention effect).
- To assess potential characteristics associated with differential treatment effectiveness (i.e. moderators of intervention effect).
- To evaluate the incremental cost and cost-effectiveness of the interventions.
Detailed description
This study is a 3-arm randomized, prospective trial in which HIV-infected inpatients who report substance use at screening will be randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to Patient Navigator (PN) vs. Patient Navigator + Contingency Management (PN+CM) vs. Treatment as Usual (TAU). Randomization will occur after screening, informed consent, baseline assessment and collection of biological (blood) specimens. Participants assigned to the PN and PN+CM groups will meet (ideally at bedside if the participant is still hospitalized at the time of randomization) with the Patient Navigator interventionist and will complete up to 11 intervention sessions over the 6-month-long intervention period. Participants assigned to the TAU group will receive care as it is typically offered in the inpatient setting. Follow-up visits will be conducted at approximately 6 and 12 months post-randomization.
To minimize patient and staff burden, sites may implement a pre-screening procedure with permission from their respective IRBs to determine which inpatients would meet the study's AIDS-defining illness/CD4 count/viral load inclusion criteria. Pre-screening, screening, enrollment, assessment, randomization and the initial intervention visit will (ideally) occur during the participant's stay at an inpatient facility. Recognizing that participants may be recruited at various stages of illness during their inpatient visit, however, this may not be possible. To allow maximum flexibility, all activities that occur after the screening informed consent may be completed after the patient has been discharged from the hospital. The intervention duration will be 6 months with sessions ideally occurring weekly during the first month, bi-weekly during months 2 and 3 and monthly during months 4- 6. Follow-up visits will occur at approximately 6 and 12 months post-randomization. Therefore, the total duration of individual participation in the study is approximately 12 months.
Prior to approaching patients to recruit them into the study, members of the medical teams within each hospital (i.e., attending physicians, fellows, residents and nurse practitioners) who are involved in patient care and who know the patients' HIV-infected status will assess the medical stability of the patients. If a patient has expressed interest in potentially participating in research and is deemed medically stable, then a study staff member will meet with the patient at bedside to discuss the study. Strict ethical guidelines regarding professional conduct and confidentiality will be enforced for all study staff.
Prior to screening individuals to determine their eligibility to participate, the research staff will briefly explain the study purpose, procedures, potential risks and benefits and voluntary nature of participation. Individuals willing to be screened to determine eligibility will provide written informed consent, including providing HIPAA authorization for medical record abstraction. After signing the consent and HIPAA forms, participants will be offered copies of the forms to keep for their records.
After the enrollment process (providing written informed consent and completing a locator form) is complete and a brief rapport-building discussion between the interviewer and participant has taken place, the research interviewer will administer the baseline assessment through a handheld Computer Assisted Personal Interview (CAPI) device. The CAPI system displays each assessment question on a computer monitor, allowing the interviewer to read the questions and then enter the participants' responses directly into the computer. The baseline assessment will include, but not be limited to questions on participant demographics, HIV care, medication adherence, substance use and co morbid conditions such as hepatitis, depression, etc.
Collection of Biologic Specimens:
We will collect blood specimens at the baseline, 6-month and 12-month follow-up visits to evaluate the primary outcome, HIV virologic suppression, as well as to measure CD4 count, and complete blood count (CBC). Blood specimen processing will be done by sites' local laboratories. In the event that a blood specimen cannot be collected for any reason (e.g., vein is "dry", participant is lost to follow-up, etc.) or the result of a collected specimen is not available (e.g., not enough specimen drawn, lab processing error, etc.), the study team may abstract and use non-study lab results for the purpose of evaluating the HIV virologic suppression outcome and measuring CD4 count and CBC. Participants randomized to the intervention groups may also provide urine for drug screening.
Randomization:
Participants will be randomized in a 1:1:1 fashion to one of the 3 treatment groups. Randomization will be stratified by site. The randomization procedure will be conducted in a centralized process through the Data and Statistical Center (DSC2). After the baseline assessment is successfully completed, a designated study staff member will perform the randomization. Randomization for each participant is done over the Internet using the Enrollment Module in AdvantageEDC (the study electronic data capture system).
Study Interventions:
The 3 treatment conditions/study groups are: 1) Patient Navigator intervention (PN), 2) Patient Navigator plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) intervention and 3) Treatment as Usual (TAU).
The patient navigator (PN) approach includes five functions: 1) establishing an effective working relationship; 2) encouraging identification and use of strengths, abilities and assets; 3) supporting client control over goal setting and the search for needed resources; 4) viewing the community as a resource and identifying informal sources of support; and 5) conducting case management as an active community based activity. Specifically, patient navigators will provide the following to all study participants randomized to the PN group: 1) four initial meetings, ideally having the first one during hospitalization and three within the first 3 weeks of hospital discharge, and 2) after the initial four meetings, patient navigators will meet with the PN group participants ideally twice monthly during months 2 and 3 and once during months 4 - 6.
Study participants randomized to the patient navigator plus contingency management (PN+CM) group will receive the patient navigation (PN) intervention as outlined above and in Section 11.2 of the sponsor protocol combine with contingency management (CM). For participants randomly assigned to the PN+CM study group, patient navigators will: 1) effectively communicate the incentive plan to the participant, 2) track each of the seven target behaviors that may earn participant incentives, 3) verify occurrence of the target behaviors, 4) deliver incentives according to the protocol, and 5) maintain a record of incentives delivered.
Participants assigned to the treatment as usual (TAU) group will receive the standard treatment provided at participating sites for linking patients to HIV and substance use care.
Follow-up visits will be conducted at approximately 6- and 12-months post-randomization and will involve follow-up CAPIs and blood collection.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Treatment as Usual (TAU) Group | No intervention | –Participants assigned to the TAU group will receive the standard treatment provided at each hospital for linking patients to HIV and substance use care. During the formal site selection process, a thorough assessment will be conducted of each site's standard practice for linkage to HIV care and substance use treatment. Throughout the course of the trial, hospital sites will be monitored for any potential changes that might occur in standard practice around linkage to HIV care and substance use treatment. |
| Patient Navigation (PN) Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Patient Navigation (PN) GroupThe patient navigator approach includes five functions: 1) establishing an effective working relationship; 2) encouraging identification and use of strengths, abilities and assets; 3) supporting client control over goal setting and the search for needed resources; 4) viewing the community as a resource and identifying informal sources of support; and 5) conducting case management as an active community based activity. After the initial four meetings, patient navigators will meet with PN group participants ideally twice monthly during months 2 and 3 and once monthly during months 4 - 6. |
| Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group | Experimental | Behavioral: Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) GroupStudy participants randomized to this group will receive the patient navigation (PN) intervention as outlined above combined with contingency management (CM). Using the principles of contingency management, this combined intervention will incorporate viral load suppression as a target of reinforcement as well as several other behaviors (HIV clinical care, medication adherence, cessation or reduction of substance use) that are hypothesized to be moderators or mediators of the primary outcome. For participants randomly assigned to the PN+CM study group, patient navigators will: 1) effectively communicate the incentive plan to the participant, 2) track each of the seven target behaviors that may earn participant incentives, 3) verify occurrence of the target behaviors, 4) deliver incentives according to the protocol, and 5) maintain a record of incentives delivered. PNs will use a computer-based tracking program to facilitate this work. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (12 listed)
- be admitted to a hospital and be HIV-infected at the time of recruitment
- be at least 18 years old
- meet one of the following: A) have an AIDS-defining illness during the current hospital admission; or B) have the most recent CD4 count and viral load performed within the past 6 months be <350 cells/uL and >200 copies/mL; or C) have the most recent CD4 count and viral load performed within the past 12 months be <=500 cells/uL and >200 copies/mL or unknown accompanied by the Site PI's discretion that the patient a) is likely to currently have a viral load >200 copies/mL, b) is not currently successfully/correctly taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) and c) needs to be on ART
- report (or have evidence in the medical record of) any opioid and/or stimulant and/or heavy alcohol use within the past 12 months (Note: Medical record evidence may consist of a) positive toxicology screen(s) for stimulants or heavy alcohol or b) clinician notes indicating heavy use of alcohol, use of stimulants or non-prescribed opioids or abuse of prescribed opioids.)
- have a Karnofsky performance scale index score of >=60
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- do not meet any one or more of the above-described inclusion criteria
- have significant cognitive or developmental impairment to the extent that they are unable to provide informed consent
- are terminated via Site PI decision with agreement from study Lead Investigator
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Patient Navigation (PN) GroupThe patient navigator approach includes five functions: 1) establishing an effective working relationship; 2) encouraging identification and use of strengths, abilities and assets; 3) supporting client control over goal setting and the search for needed resources; 4) viewing the community as a resource and identifying informal sources of support; and 5) conducting case management as an active community based activity. | Behavioural | Patient Navigation (PN) Group |
| Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) GroupStudy participants randomized to this group will receive the patient navigation (PN) intervention as outlined above combined with contingency management (CM). | Behavioural | Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group |
Primary outcome
HIV Viral Suppression
Time frame: 12 months
The primary outcome variable is binary: HIV viral suppression (<= 200 copies/ml), as determined by blood draw at/near the 12 month follow-up versus presence of viral load > 200 or death (all-cause mortality). We are aware that, for patients on therapy, the goal of antiretroviral therapy is achieving a viral load "below the limit of detection of the assay" which currently is usually < 40 copies/ml. However, we have chosen to define "suppression" as <= 200 copies/ml to be consistent with the January 2011 Guidelines for the Use of Antiretroviral Agents in HIV-1-Infected Adults and Adolescents.
3 secondary outcomes
HIV Secondary Outcomes
Time frame: 12 months
Substance Use Related Secondary Outcomes
Time frame: 12 months
Mediators and Moderators of Outcomes
Time frame: 12 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Mar 2016.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 42095976Wang G, Yang X, Wang K, Li X, Dai Z, Qiao S. Clinical and behavioral predictors of HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder among people with HIV who use substances: a secondary analysis of the HOPE trial. J Neurovirol. 2026 May 7;32(3):18. doi: 10.1007/s13365-026-01315-9.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35042101Gutkind S, Starbird LE, Murphy SM, Teixeira PA, Gooden LK, Matheson T, Feaster DJ, Jain MK, Masson CL, Perlman DC, Del Rio C, Metsch LR, Schackman BR. Cost of Hepatitis C care facilitation for HIV/Hepatitis C Co-infected people who use drugs. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2022 Mar 1;232:109265. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2022.109265. Epub 2022 Jan 10.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 31436447Stitzer ML, Gukasyan N, Matheson T, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Duan R, Gooden L, Del Rio C, Metsch LR. Enhancing patient navigation with contingent financial incentives for substance use abatement in persons with HIV and substance use. Psychol Addict Behav. 2020 Feb;34(1):23-30. doi: 10.1037/adb0000504. Epub 2019 Aug 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30243412Mitchell SG, Monico LB, Stitzer M, Matheson T, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Schwartz RP, Metsch L. How patient navigators view the use of financial incentives to influence study involvement, substance use, and HIV treatment. J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Nov;94:18-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.07.009. Epub 2018 Jul 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29920584Philbin MM, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Duan R, Das M, Jacobs P, Lucas GM, Batey DS, Nijhawan A, Jacobson JM, Mandler R, Daar E, McMahon DK, Armstrong WS, Del Rio C, Metsch LR. The North-South Divide: Substance Use Risk, Care Engagement, and Viral Suppression Among Hospitalized Human Immunodeficiency Virus-Infected Patients in 11 US Cities. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):146-149. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy506.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29883190Stitzer ML, Hammond AS, Matheson T, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Duan R, Gooden L, Del Rio C, Metsch LR. Enhancing Patient Navigation with Contingent Incentives to Improve Healthcare Behaviors and Viral Load Suppression of Persons with HIV and Substance Use. AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2018 Jul;32(7):288-296. doi: 10.1089/apc.2018.0014. Epub 2018 Jun 8.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29030717Winhusen T, Feaster DJ, Duan R, Brown JL, Daar ES, Mandler R, Metsch LR. Baseline Cigarette Smoking Status as a Predictor of Virologic Suppression and CD4 Cell Count During One-Year Follow-Up in Substance Users with Uncontrolled HIV Infection. AIDS Behav. 2018 Jun;22(6):2026-2032. doi: 10.1007/s10461-017-1928-x.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28651612Stitzer M, Matheson T, Cunningham C, Sorensen JL, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Hammond AS, Fitzsimons H, Metsch LR. Enhancing patient navigation to improve intervention session attendance and viral load suppression of persons with HIV and substance use: a secondary post hoc analysis of the Project HOPE study. Addict Sci Clin Pract. 2017 Jun 27;12(1):16. doi: 10.1186/s13722-017-0081-1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 27404184Metsch LR, Feaster DJ, Gooden L, Matheson T, Stitzer M, Das M, Jain MK, Rodriguez AE, Armstrong WS, Lucas GM, Nijhawan AE, Drainoni ML, Herrera P, Vergara-Rodriguez P, Jacobson JM, Mugavero MJ, Sullivan M, Daar ES, McMahon DK, Ferris DC, Lindblad R, VanVeldhuisen P, Oden N, Castellon PC, Tross S, Haynes LF, Douaihy A, Sorensen JL, Metzger DS, Mandler RN, Colfax GN, del Rio C. Effect of Patient Navigation With or Without Financial Incentives on Viral Suppression Among Hospitalized Patients With HIV Infection and Substance Use: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Jul 12;316(2):156-70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.8914.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Information about the study and the de-identified study data will be available at https://datashare.nida.nih.gov/ within 18 months of the date the data are locked, as per the procedures of the National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network.
Related trials for HIV
Not yet recruiting
HealthMpowerment Korea: Pilot Testing the Cultural Adaptation of a Digital HIV Intervention for Men Who Have Sex With Men in South Korea
HIV Infections, HIV Prevention and Care
Not yet recruiting
Prescribe to Prevent HIV: A Hybrid Trial Helping Addiction Clinics Prevent HIV & Infections Through Safer Drug Use Support
People Who Use Opioids/People With Opioid Use Disorder (OUD)
Recruiting
Evaluating the Impact of Using the B-OK Bottles for HIV and ART Literacy in South Africa
HIV, HIV Treatment
Recruiting
Trial Phase: Syndemic Adapted Medly Uganda
Mental Health
RecruitingObservational study
Olfactory Function and Model-Based Behavior in People Living With HIV and SUD
HIV, Substance Use Disorder
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Lisa Metsch, Ph.D principal investigator
Columbia University
Lauren Gooden, Ph.D study director
Columbia University
Carlos del Rio, M.D. principal investigator
Emory University
12 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Patient Navigation (PN) Group and Patient Navigator Plus Contingency Management (PN+CM) Group in people with HIV and AIDS, run by Columbia University at 12 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 12 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Mar 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 12 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
HIV Viral Suppression (time frame: 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01612169, which also lists 9 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Mar 2016.