AzTrials
AzTrials

Skeletal Muscle HypertrophyMeat-MilkNCT01578590

Post-exercise Recovery After Dietary Protein Ingestion in Healthy Young Men (Meat-Milk Study)

A study testing Lean minced meat (beef) in people with Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Rationale: The consumption of dietary protein immediately after exercise is necessary to maximally stimulate muscle protein synthesis rates (24, 37). Recent work suggests that the type of protein consumed (e.g., animal vs. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 35 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy
What is being tested?
Lean minced meat (beef)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
12 participants
Where
1 siteNetherlands
Study dates
May 2012to Aug 2012
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 35 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Males
  • Aged between 18-35 years
  • Healthy, recreationally active
  • BMI < 25 kg/m2

Who cannot join

  • Smoking
  • Allergies to milk proteins (whey or casein)
  • Vegetarians
  • Female
  • Arthritic conditions
  • A history of neuromuscular problems
  • Previous participation in amino acid tracer studies
  • Individuals on any medications known to affect protein metabolism (i.e. corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatories, or prescription strength acne medications).

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Netherlands1 site
  • University of Maastricht

    Maastricht, Limburg, 6229 ER

Other trials in Netherlands

About this study

Official title: Post-exercise Recovery After Dietary Protein Ingestion in Healthy Young Men

Rationale: The consumption of dietary protein immediately after exercise is necessary to maximally stimulate muscle protein synthesis rates (24, 37). Recent work suggests that the type of protein consumed (e.g., animal vs. plant-derived proteins) during post-exercise recovery can affect the amplitude of acute increases in muscle protein synthesis rates (25, 31). Specifically, consumption of bovine milk proteins immediately after a single bout of resistance exercise stimulates muscle protein synthesis rates greater than consumption of an isonitrogenous soy-protein beverage (31, 37). Importantly, consumption of milk promotes greater hypertrophy than soy after resistance training (10). Thus, it is generally assumed that the acute muscle protein synthetic response predicts long-term training outcomes, such as hypertrophy. Currently, a great amount of work has been carried out to study the effects of consuming milk proteins on muscle protein synthesis rates after resistance exercise (5, 7, 26, 32). However, very little is known about the effects of other types of high-quality animal proteins, such as beef, on stimulating post-exercise muscle protein synthesis rates. Further describing the muscle protein synthetic response after consumption of other types of high-quality animal proteins will provide valuable information for individuals with milk allergies, lactose intolerance, or simply a strong dislike of dairy products.

Objective: To investigate whether the in vivo post-resistance exercise muscle protein synthetic response is augmented when minced beef is ingested as compared to an isonitrogenous-matched milk protein beverage in healthy young men.

Read more

Study design: Crossover, randomized

Study population: 12 healthy young males (18-35 y).

Intervention: Subjects will perform resistance exercise and consume either a piece of meat (135 grams, 35 g of protein) or an isonitrogenous-matched milk protein beverage on two separate test days. In addition, continuous intravenous tracer infusions will be applied, with plasma and muscle samples collected. A two week 'wash-out' period will be included between trials.

Main study parameters/endpoints Primary endpoint: Muscle protein synthetic rate, expressed as fractional synthetic rate (FSR). Secondary endpoints: Rate of protein digestion and absorption and whole body protein balance.

Read the detailed description

INTRODUCTION AND RATIONALE

Resistance exercise and protein ingestion can act separately and synergistically to stimulate muscle protein synthesis rates. This synergy of muscle contraction and protein ingestion provides the basis for training-mediated hypertrophy. Many workers have manipulated post-exercise feeding paradigms in an attempt to define the 'optimal' protein source to consume to support muscle protein accretion. Original work was performed using intravenous infusion of mixed amino acids or bolus ingestion of mixtures of crystalline amino acids; however, consuming free amino acids rarely occurs in normal dietary situations. Currently, there has been a great deal of interest in studying the capacity of dairy proteins to stimulate post exercise muscle protein synthesis rates and promote training-mediated hypertrophy. Dairy proteins represent an attractive protein source for researchers to study because they are rapidly digested/absorbed and contain a high proportional of essential amino acid, especially leucine. Both of these characteristics, speed of digestion/absorption and peak amplitude in leucinemia, are fundamental for the maximal stimulation of muscle protein synthesis rates after protein ingestion. However, very little is known about the effects of other types of high-quality animal proteins, such as beef, on stimulating post-exercise muscle protein synthesis rates. Beef is considered a high-quality and widely consumed protein source. Importantly, a 113-g serving of beef contains 30 g of protein (~10 g essential amino acids; ~2 g leucine) and is similar in amino acid composition to that of milk proteins. Certainly, some evidence suggests that the synergistic effect of exercise and feeding on muscle protein synthesis rates is still apparent after consumption of beef. However, the workers did not compare this response to a group that consumed an alternative high-quality isonitrogenous-matched animal-derived protein source. As a result, it can only be speculated on the capacity of beef to stimulate muscle protein synthesis rates as compared to milk proteins during post exercise recovery.

In the present study, we wish to determine the impact of single meal-like amount of minced beef or dairy milk on digestion and absorption kinetics and post exercise muscle protein synthesis rates. This study will be the first to directly compare two commonly consumed protein-rich food items on muscle protein synthesis rates in healthy young men. This information will be highly relevant for developing nutritional interventions for maintaining and accruing muscle mass.

HYPOTHESES \& OBJECTIVES

The following hypothesis will be investigated:

Ingestion of minced meat after resistance exercise increases muscle protein synthesis rates to a greater extent than ingestion of bovine milk.

Primary Objective: To determine whether the intake of minced beef is more effective than ingestion of a milk protein beverage in stimulating post exercise muscle protein synthesis rates in young men.

Secondary Objectives: 1) To assess protein digestion and absorption and whole body protein balance in healthy young men. 2) To evaluate postprandial aminoacidemia after ingestion of minced beef or a milk protein beverage in healthy young men.

STUDY DESIGN

The present study employs a crossover design. In total, 12 healthy young male subjects will be included in the study. Subjects will be randomly assigned to consume minced beef or milk during trial one. During the test day, subjects will perform leg extension exercise and immediately afterwards consume 35 g of protein either as minced beef or milk. Approximately, two weeks later subjects will return to the laboratory for the identical experimental procedures as trial 1, which includes exercise that is worked-match to trial 1 and consumption of alternative protein source that was not consumed in trial 1.

Screening

Subjects will participate in one screening session in which leg volume, body weight and composition (DEXA) will be assessed. Subjects will be asked to fill in a medical questionnaire inquiring about their general health, medical history, use of medication and sports activities. Additionally, all subjects will participate in an orientation session for familiarization with the exercise equipment.

Subjects will arrive at the laboratory at 8.30 AM by car or public transportation. Body weight and height will be assessed, as well as body fat composition (percentage) via a Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA) scan. In the event of an unexpected medical finding during the screening, subjects will always be notified. If a subject does not want to receive this notification he cannot participate in the study.

During the familiarization session with the exercise equipment, proper lifting technique will be demonstrated for knee extension exercise. A guided-motion exercise machine will be used to promote proper form and for the subject's personal safety. Prior to the determination of the subject's one repetition maximum (1RM), they will perform 2 sets of leg extension exercise for 10 repetitions on the exercise machine at a light load. Thereafter, the load will be increased after each successful lift until failure. 5 min rest periods will be allowed between attempts. A repetition is valid if the subject uses proper form and is able to complete the entire lift in a controlled manner without assistance.

Experimental test day

Each subject will participate in 2 experimental test days, separated by 14 days, with each day lasting 8.5 h. During a test day, subjects perform a single bout of knee extension exercise and will ingest a 135-gram of minced beef patty containing 35 g of protein or an isonitrogenous-matched milk protein beverage. The use of a L-[ring-2H5]-phenylalanine, L-[ring-2H2]-tyrosine, and [1-13C]-leucine infusion will allow us to assess the digestion and absorption kinetics of the ingested protein source and the fractional synthetic rate (FSR) of muscle proteins in the fasting and fed state in an in vivo human setting.

Protocol

At 8.00 am, following an overnight fast, subjects will arrive at the laboratory by car or public transportation. Subject will rest in a supine position and a Teflon catheter will be inserted into an antecubital vein for intravenous stable isotope infusion. A second Teflon catheter will be inserted in a heated dorsal hand vein of the contralateral arm and placed in a hot-box (60C) for arterialized blood sampling. Following basal blood collection (8 mL; t=-210 min), the plasma phenylalanine, leucine, tyrosine pools will be primed with a single intravenous dose of tracers. Subsequently, a blood sample will be obtained (t=-200) and a continuous tracer infusion will commence. Arterialized blood samples (8 mL) will be drawn at t= -185, -170, -120, -60, -30 min and a muscle biopsy will be collected from the vastus lateralis muscle (t=-30 min). This muscle biopsy will allow us to determine basal muscle protein synthetic rates. Following the collection of the muscle biopsy, subjects will perform knee extension exercise on a guided-motion exercise machine for 4 sets at a load they can lift for 10 - 12 repetitions. Subjects will be allowed to rest 2 minutes in between each exercise set and the load will be adjusted to maintain the desired 10-12 repetitions. Immediately after the exercise bout subjects will return to the resting supine position and arterialized blood sample will be drawn. Afterwards, a muscle biopsy will be collected (t= -5 min) from the opposite leg of the muscle biopsy obtained at t= -30. Subjects will then receive a minced beef meal containing 35 g of protein or an equivalent protein dose provided as dairy milk (t= 0). Arterialized blood samples (8 ml) will be collected at t= 15, 30, 45, 60, 90 and 120 min during the postprandial (fed) period. The third muscle biopsy will be taken from the same leg as the last biopsy and from the same incision. Subsequently, arterialized blood samples (8 ml) will be collected at t=150, 180, 210, 240, 270, 300 min. Finally, at 300 min a fourth muscle biopsy will be taken from the same incision as the last biopsies (t= -0.5 and 120 min). In total, four muscle biopsies will be taken through two separate incisions during each trial. The second and third muscle biopsy (immediately after and 2 h after exercise) will allow us to measure temporal muscle protein synthetic responses between the different consumed protein sources (milk vs. meat) after exercise. It is generally assumed that 'peak' stimulation of muscle protein synthesis rates is more meaningful in predicting phenotypic outcomes (muscle hypertrophy). However, peak muscle protein synthesis rates may appear at different time points depending on the protein source consumed. Obtaining a muscle biopsy at 2 h post-exercise will allow us to determine peak muscle protein synthesis rates between the different consumed protein sources. However, resistance exercise-induced muscle protein synthesis rates can extend beyond this 2 h time point and thus obtaining an fourth muscle biopsy at 5 h will also allow us to obtain physiological relevant information with regards to the anabolic response of resistance exercise.

Being tested
Lean minced meat (beef)

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Lean minced meat (beef)Dietary supplement

    Also called Meat, Milk

    A piece of meat (135 grams, 35 g of protein) or an isonitrogenous-matched milk protein beverage

Study groups in NCT01578590
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Subjects will consume lean minced meatExperimentalSubjects will perform resistance exercise and consume a piece of meat (135 grams, 35 g of protein)
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Lean minced meat (beef)
Subjects will consume a milk beverageActive comparatorSubjects will perform resistance exercise and consume a milk protein beverage
Receives: Dietary Supplement: Lean minced meat (beef)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Muscle protein synthetic rate, expressed as fractional synthetic rate (FSR)

    Measured: 1 day

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Rate of protein digestion and absorption and whole body protein balance

    Measured: 1 day

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Apr 2012 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2012
  3. Primary completionAug 2012
  4. Study completionAug 2012

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
12 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01578590
Sponsor's protocol ID
METC 11-3-088
Acronym
Meat-Milk
Status last verified
Nov 2014
First submitted
15 Mar 2012
Last updated
2 Dec 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Gorissen SHM, Trommelen J, Kouw IWK, Holwerda AM, Pennings B, Groen BBL, Wall BT, Churchward-Venne TA, Horstman AMH, Koopman R, Burd NA, Fuchs CJ, Dirks ML, Res PT, Senden JMG, Steijns JMJM, de Groot LCPGM, Verdijk LB, van Loon LJC. Protein Type, Protein Dose, and Age Modulate Dietary Protein Digestion and Phenylalanine Absorption Kinetics and Plasma Phenylalanine Availability in Humans. J Nutr. 2020 Aug 1;150(8):2041-2050. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxaa024.

    PubMed 32069356
  • Burd NA, Gorissen SH, van Vliet S, Snijders T, van Loon LJ. Differences in postprandial protein handling after beef compared with milk ingestion during postexercise recovery: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2015 Oct;102(4):828-36. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.114.103184. Epub 2015 Sep 9.

    PubMed 26354539

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Lean minced meat (beef) in people with Skeletal Muscle Hypertrophy, run by Maastricht University Medical Center at 1 site in Netherlands.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Dec 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Netherlands. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Muscle protein synthetic rate, expressed as fractional synthetic rate (FSR) (time frame: 1 day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01578590, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Dec 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in