Sleep Apnea, ObstructivePhase 1SCIP-PANCT01454830
Tailored Intervention to Promote Positive Airway Pressure Adherence
A Phase 1 study testing Tailored in people with Sleep Apnea, Obstructive and Patient Compliance, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of a tailored (i.e., individualized) intervention to promote adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) in adults with newly-diagnosed, CPAP treated, obstructive sleep apnea. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Patient Compliance
- What is being tested?
- Tailored
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 118 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Mar 2014
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- males and females >/= 18 years of age
- newly diagnosed with apnea/hypopnea index >/= 10 events/hr
- CPAP naive
- able to read and speak English
Who cannot join
- previous diagnosis and/or treatment of OSA
- major new psychiatric diagnosis within 6 months of study enrollment
- require supplemental oxygen or bilevel positive airway pressure on CPAP titration polysomnogram
- diagnosis of co-existent sleep disorder on polysomnogram, including periodic limb movements >/= 10 events/hr with arousal, central sleep apnea with >/= 5 central events/hr, insomnia, sleep hypoventilation syndrome, or narcolepsy
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Penn State Hershey Medical Center
Hershey, Pennsylvania, 17033
About this study
Official title: Phase I Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial: Sociocultural and Cognitive Perception Intervention to Promote Positive Airway Pressure Adherence
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of a tailored (i.e., individualized) intervention to promote adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) in adults with newly-diagnosed, CPAP treated, obstructive sleep apnea.
Read the detailed description
Poor adherence to CPAP is a significant problem among OSA patients resulting in suboptimal health and functional outcomes. Intervention studies to promote CPAP adherence have shown relatively small effects in selected samples and were costly. The overall objective of this research is to examine the effect, feasibility, and acceptability of a tailored intervention on CPAP adherence among adults with newly-diagnosed, CPAP treated OSA. The central hypothesis is that critically timed tailored interventions that focus on sociocultural aspects and cognitive perceptions of the individual experience with OSA diagnosis and treatment will improve overall CPAP adherence rates. The pilot randomized controlled trial will examine CPAP adherence outcomes at 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo among those randomly assigned to the tailored intervention or usual (standard) care and examine specific feasibility and participant acceptability outcomes in order to design and conduct a subsequent larger randomized controlled trial testing the overall efficacy of the tailored intervention.
- Conditions
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Patient Compliance
- Being tested
- Tailored, Usual care
- Keywords
- Social support, Cognition, Adaptation, psychological, Health behavior, Patient education
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Patient Compliance, Health Behavior
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
TailoredBehavioural
Also called Individualized
Individualized on critical indicator (Self-efficacy measure in Sleep Apnea) measured at each intervention delivery period (pre-diagnosis, immediately post-diagnosis, post-CPAP titration, and during week 1 of home CPAP treatment. Intervention components include patient education, preparatory skills training, modification of inaccurate/unrealistic cognitive perceptions of risk, outcome expectations, and treatment self-efficacy
Usual careOther
Also called standard of care
Usual care comparison group will proceed from initial clinical evaluation for OSA, diagnosis by polysomnography, CPAP titration polysomnography, and home CPAP treatment initiation as per current standard of care
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored | Experimental | Tailored, or individualized, intervention addressing patient education, skills training, and cognitive perceptions Receives: Behavioral: Tailored |
| Usual care | Active comparator | The comparison group, usual care, includes the standard of care delivered to all newly-diagnosed OSA persons proceeding to CPAP treatment Receives: Other: Usual care |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Nightly CPAP Use
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
Measured: 1 week
Nightly CPAP Use
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
Measured: 1 month
Nightly CPAP Use
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
Measured: 3 months
Secondary outcomes (4)
Proportion of Sleep Time on CPAP
% of Total Sleep Time (TST) using CPAP
Measured: 1 week
Proportion of Participants Who Complete Protocol After Allocation
Feasibility assessment - retention after enrollment and allocation employed as a feasibility outcome of pilot RCT
Measured: Duration of protocol period
Proportion of Participants Who Withdrawal
Feasibility assessment - withdrawal by participants for feasibility outcome of pilot RCT
Measured: Duration of protocol period
Acceptability of Study Intervention and Comparative Group
Feasibility assessment to determine participant acceptance of the study intervention and comparative condition (i.e., usual care); semi-structured interviews conducted with 50% of participants randomly assigned to "interview" at study termination and debriefing (3 months)
Measured: 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionMar 2014
- Study completionMar 2014
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Sleep Apnea, ObstructiveStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), ANF
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Amy M. Sawyer, Milton S. Hershey Medical Center
- Investigators
- Amy M Sawyer, PhD, Principal investigator, The Pennsylvania State University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01454830
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 37007
- Other IDs
- 4R00NR011173
- Acronym
- SCIP-PA
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2011
- Last updated
- 23 Nov 2016
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Sawyer AM, Deatrick JA, Kuna ST, Weaver TE. Differences in perceptions of the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy among adherers and nonadherers. Qual Health Res. 2010 Jul;20(7):873-92. doi: 10.1177/1049732310365502. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
PubMed 20354236Sawyer AM, Canamucio A, Moriarty H, Weaver TE, Richards KC, Kuna ST. Do cognitive perceptions influence CPAP use? Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Oct;85(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
PubMed 21071166Sawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE. A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2011 Dec;15(6):343-56. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
PubMed 21652236Weaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, Younger J, Cantor C, McCloskey S, Pack AI. Self-efficacy in sleep apnea: instrument development and patient perceptions of obstructive sleep apnea risk, treatment benefit, and volition to use continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep. 2003 Sep;26(6):727-32. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.6.727.
PubMed 14572127Yang H, Watach A, Varrasse M, King TS, Sawyer AM. Clinical Trial Enrollment Enrichment in Resource-Constrained Research Environments: Multivariable Apnea Prediction (MAP) Index in SCIP-PA Trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Feb 15;14(2):173-181. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6926.
PubMed 29246264
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 23 Nov 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase I Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial: Sociocultural and Cognitive Perception Intervention to Promote Positive Airway Pressure Adherence
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01454830
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- SCIP-PA / 37007
- Conditions
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Patient Compliance
- Keywords
- Social support, Cognition, Adaptation, psychological, Health behavior, Patient education
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 118 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Milton S. Hershey Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- National Institute of Nursing Research (NINR), ANF
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 19 Oct 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Nov 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to examine the feasibility of a tailored (i.e., individualized) intervention to promote adherence to continuous positive airway pressure therapy (CPAP) in adults with newly-diagnosed, CPAP treated, obstructive sleep apnea.
Detailed description
Poor adherence to CPAP is a significant problem among OSA patients resulting in suboptimal health and functional outcomes. Intervention studies to promote CPAP adherence have shown relatively small effects in selected samples and were costly. The overall objective of this research is to examine the effect, feasibility, and acceptability of a tailored intervention on CPAP adherence among adults with newly-diagnosed, CPAP treated OSA. The central hypothesis is that critically timed tailored interventions that focus on sociocultural aspects and cognitive perceptions of the individual experience with OSA diagnosis and treatment will improve overall CPAP adherence rates. The pilot randomized controlled trial will examine CPAP adherence outcomes at 1wk, 1mo, and 3mo among those randomly assigned to the tailored intervention or usual (standard) care and examine specific feasibility and participant acceptability outcomes in order to design and conduct a subsequent larger randomized controlled trial testing the overall efficacy of the tailored intervention.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Tailored | Experimental | Behavioral: TailoredTailored, or individualized, intervention addressing patient education, skills training, and cognitive perceptions |
| Usual care | Active comparator | Other: Usual careThe comparison group, usual care, includes the standard of care delivered to all newly-diagnosed OSA persons proceeding to CPAP treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- males and females >/= 18 years of age
- newly diagnosed with apnea/hypopnea index >/= 10 events/hr
- CPAP naive
- able to read and speak English
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- previous diagnosis and/or treatment of OSA
- major new psychiatric diagnosis within 6 months of study enrollment
- require supplemental oxygen or bilevel positive airway pressure on CPAP titration polysomnogram
- diagnosis of co-existent sleep disorder on polysomnogram, including periodic limb movements >/= 10 events/hr with arousal, central sleep apnea with >/= 5 central events/hr, insomnia, sleep hypoventilation syndrome, or narcolepsy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| TailoredAlso: IndividualizedIndividualized on critical indicator (Self-efficacy measure in Sleep Apnea) measured at each intervention delivery period (pre-diagnosis, immediately post-diagnosis, post-CPAP titration, and during week 1 of home CPAP treatment. Intervention components include patient education, preparatory skills training, modification of inaccurate/unrealistic cognitive perceptions of risk, outcome expectations, and treatment self-efficacy | Behavioural | Tailored |
| Usual careAlso: standard of careUsual care comparison group will proceed from initial clinical evaluation for OSA, diagnosis by polysomnography, CPAP titration polysomnography, and home CPAP treatment initiation as per current standard of care | Other | Usual care |
Primary outcome
Nightly CPAP Use
Time frame: 1 week
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
Nightly CPAP Use
Time frame: 1 month
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
Nightly CPAP Use
Time frame: 3 months
Mean CPAP use, hrs/night
4 secondary outcomes
Proportion of Sleep Time on CPAP
Time frame: 1 week
Proportion of Participants Who Complete Protocol After Allocation
Time frame: Duration of protocol period
Proportion of Participants Who Withdrawal
Time frame: Duration of protocol period
Acceptability of Study Intervention and Comparative Group
Time frame: 3 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 23 Nov 2016.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 20354236Sawyer AM, Deatrick JA, Kuna ST, Weaver TE. Differences in perceptions of the diagnosis and treatment of obstructive sleep apnea and continuous positive airway pressure therapy among adherers and nonadherers. Qual Health Res. 2010 Jul;20(7):873-92. doi: 10.1177/1049732310365502. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
- Background: PubMed 21071166Sawyer AM, Canamucio A, Moriarty H, Weaver TE, Richards KC, Kuna ST. Do cognitive perceptions influence CPAP use? Patient Educ Couns. 2011 Oct;85(1):85-91. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.10.014. Epub 2010 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 21652236Sawyer AM, Gooneratne NS, Marcus CL, Ofer D, Richards KC, Weaver TE. A systematic review of CPAP adherence across age groups: clinical and empiric insights for developing CPAP adherence interventions. Sleep Med Rev. 2011 Dec;15(6):343-56. doi: 10.1016/j.smrv.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
- Background: PubMed 14572127Weaver TE, Maislin G, Dinges DF, Younger J, Cantor C, McCloskey S, Pack AI. Self-efficacy in sleep apnea: instrument development and patient perceptions of obstructive sleep apnea risk, treatment benefit, and volition to use continuous positive airway pressure. Sleep. 2003 Sep;26(6):727-32. doi: 10.1093/sleep/26.6.727.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29246264Yang H, Watach A, Varrasse M, King TS, Sawyer AM. Clinical Trial Enrollment Enrichment in Resource-Constrained Research Environments: Multivariable Apnea Prediction (MAP) Index in SCIP-PA Trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2018 Feb 15;14(2):173-181. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.6926.
Related trials for Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of a Multimodal Deep Learning Model Using Peripheral Oxygen Saturation and Ballistocardiography Signals for Predicting Apnea-Hypopnea Index in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 3
A Study to Learn About the Monthly Dosing Study Medicine Called Berobenatide in Adults With Breathing Problems During Sleep and Overweight or Obesity Who Do Not Use a Breathing Machine (PAP) (VESPER-OSA 2)
Apnea, Sleep Disorders
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Supplemental Oxygen for Sleep-Disordered Breathing in Adults With Chronic Opioid Use.
Sleep-disordered Breathing, Chronic Opioid Use
Recruiting
Nightly Wearable Monitoring During Home-Based Submental Electrical Stimulation for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
RecruitingPhase 1/2
DRonabinol Treatment of OSA
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Amy M Sawyer, PhD principal investigator
The Pennsylvania State University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing Tailored in people with Sleep Apnea, Obstructive and Patient Compliance, run by Milton S. Hershey Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Nov 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Nov 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Nightly CPAP Use (time frame: 1 week). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01454830, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Nov 2016.