Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus AureusPhase 4NCT01356472
Linezolid Alone or Combined With Carbapenem Against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
A Phase 4 study testing Imipenem/cilastatin in people with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, run by Ruijin Hospital.
Trial summary
As previous studies showed that the synergy between linezolid and carbapenem in vitro and in vivo (animal studies), our study is aim to investigate the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with carbapenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP)… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
- What is being tested?
- Imipenem/cilastatin
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 60 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Jun 2011to Jun 2013
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated
- the presence of new or persistent radiographic features
- fever higher than 38°C
- leukocytosis (≥11.0 ×109/L) or neutropenia (≤3.5×109/L)
- purulent endotracheal
- increasing oxygen requirements
- Endotracheal aspiration culture show methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive
Who cannot join
- immunocompromised patients (postorgan transplantation or human immunodeficiency virus-infected or neutropenic [≤1×109/L absolute neutrophils], or patients receiving corticosteroids >20 mg/d for 6 months)
- colonized chronically with methicillin-resistant S. aureus
- pregnancy
- endotracheal aspiration culture showed no MRSA
Trial locations and contacts
No sites are listed yet.
About this study
Official title: Linezolid Alone or Combined With Carbapenem Against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in Vitro and in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
As previous studies showed that the synergy between linezolid and carbapenem in vitro and in vivo (animal studies), our study is aim to investigate the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with carbapenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients.
Read the detailed description
Linezolid is the only commercially available oxazolidinone, the first new class of antibiotic to be developed in the last three decades. Although it is predominantly bacteriostatic, linezolid has good in vitro and in vivo activity against MRSA . However, several studies did not show that linezolid was superior to any of glycopeptides in treatment of MRSA pneumonia. Moreover, combination therapy against MRSA is argued when several in vitro and in vivo studies showed synergy between linezolid and carbapenem or fosfomycin or rifampicin, while vancomycin and linezolid in combination should be avoided. our study is aim to investigate the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with carbapenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients.
- Being tested
- Imipenem/cilastatin
- Keywords
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, linezolid, imipenem/cilastatin
- Medical subject headings
- Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Imipenem/cilastatinDrug
the intervention group was designed for combined linezolid plus imipenem for treating MRSA VAP
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Linezolid alone | No intervention | the control group is designed for linezolid alone treated MRSA VAP (standard treatment). Receives: Drug: Imipenem/cilastatin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
MRSA eradication
The investigators study the efficacy of Linezolid combined with Imipenem to treat the MRSA VAP, the investigators proposed the 7th day's MRSA eradication would be better than Linezolid alone.
Measured: 7 th day
Secondary outcomes (2)
MRSA eradication
Measured: 14th day
mortality
Measured: 28th day
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted19 May 2011 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2011
- Primary completionJun 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (5)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus AureusStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Ruijin HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Investigators
- Er-Zhen Chen, M.D. & Ph.D., Study director, Emergency intensive care unit, Ruijin HospitalHong-Ping Qu, M.D., Principal investigator, Respiratory intensive care unit, Ruijin HospitalYu-Xing Ni, M.D. & Ph.D., Principal investigator, Microbiology laboratory, Ruijin HospitalZhi-Tao Yang, M.D., Study chair, Emergency Department, Ruijin Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01356472
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- MRSA-VAP YANG ZT CN
- Status last verified
- Apr 2011
- First submitted
- 17 May 2011
- Last updated
- 19 May 2011
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Jacqueline C, Navas D, Batard E, Miegeville AF, Le Mabecque V, Kergueris MF, Bugnon D, Potel G, Caillon J. In vitro and in vivo synergistic activities of linezolid combined with subinhibitory concentrations of imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jan;49(1):45-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.45-51.2005.
PubMed 15616274Jacqueline C, Caillon J, Grossi O, Le Mabecque V, Miegeville AF, Bugnon D, Batard E, Potel G. In vitro and in vivo assessment of linezolid combined with ertapenem: a highly synergistic combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jul;50(7):2547-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01501-05.
PubMed 16801442Rubinstein E, Cammarata S, Oliphant T, Wunderink R; Linezolid Nosocomial Pneumonia Study Group. Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):402-12. doi: 10.1086/318486. Epub 2001 Jan 26.
PubMed 11170948Shorr AF, Kunkel MJ, Kollef M. Linezolid versus vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of randomized studies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):923-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki355. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
PubMed 16195255Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H, Hunt JL, Batts DH, Hafkin B. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 1;34(11):1481-90. doi: 10.1086/340353. Epub 2002 May 13.
PubMed 12015695
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 19 May 2011. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Linezolid Alone or Combined With Carbapenem Against Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) in Vitro and in Ventilator-associated Pneumonia
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01356472
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- MRSA-VAP YANG ZT CN
- Keywords
- Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, linezolid, imipenem/cilastatin
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 60 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Ruijin HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Pfizer
- Study start
- Jun 2011
- Primary completion
- Jun 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 19 May 2011 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
As previous studies showed that the synergy between linezolid and carbapenem in vitro and in vivo (animal studies), our study is aim to investigate the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with carbapenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients.
Detailed description
Linezolid is the only commercially available oxazolidinone, the first new class of antibiotic to be developed in the last three decades. Although it is predominantly bacteriostatic, linezolid has good in vitro and in vivo activity against MRSA . However, several studies did not show that linezolid was superior to any of glycopeptides in treatment of MRSA pneumonia. Moreover, combination therapy against MRSA is argued when several in vitro and in vivo studies showed synergy between linezolid and carbapenem or fosfomycin or rifampicin, while vancomycin and linezolid in combination should be avoided. our study is aim to investigate the activity of linezolid, alone and in combination with carbapenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) patients.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Linezolid alone | No intervention | Drug: Imipenem/cilastatinthe control group is designed for linezolid alone treated MRSA VAP (standard treatment). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Pneumonia, Ventilator-associated
- Endotracheal aspiration culture show methicillin-resistant S. aureus positive
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- immunocompromised patients (postorgan transplantation or human immunodeficiency virus-infected or neutropenic [≤1×109/L absolute neutrophils], or patients receiving corticosteroids >20 mg/d for 6 months)
- colonized chronically with methicillin-resistant S. aureus
- pregnancy
- endotracheal aspiration culture showed no MRSA
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Imipenem/cilastatinthe intervention group was designed for combined linezolid plus imipenem for treating MRSA VAP | Drug | Linezolid alone |
Primary outcome
MRSA eradication
Time frame: 7 th day
The investigators study the efficacy of Linezolid combined with Imipenem to treat the MRSA VAP, the investigators proposed the 7th day's MRSA eradication would be better than Linezolid alone.
2 secondary outcomes
MRSA eradication
Time frame: 14th day
mortality
Time frame: 28th day
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 19 May 2011.
- Background: PubMed 15616274Jacqueline C, Navas D, Batard E, Miegeville AF, Le Mabecque V, Kergueris MF, Bugnon D, Potel G, Caillon J. In vitro and in vivo synergistic activities of linezolid combined with subinhibitory concentrations of imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2005 Jan;49(1):45-51. doi: 10.1128/AAC.49.1.45-51.2005.
- Background: PubMed 16801442Jacqueline C, Caillon J, Grossi O, Le Mabecque V, Miegeville AF, Bugnon D, Batard E, Potel G. In vitro and in vivo assessment of linezolid combined with ertapenem: a highly synergistic combination against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Jul;50(7):2547-9. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01501-05.
- Background: PubMed 11170948Rubinstein E, Cammarata S, Oliphant T, Wunderink R; Linezolid Nosocomial Pneumonia Study Group. Linezolid (PNU-100766) versus vancomycin in the treatment of hospitalized patients with nosocomial pneumonia: a randomized, double-blind, multicenter study. Clin Infect Dis. 2001 Feb 1;32(3):402-12. doi: 10.1086/318486. Epub 2001 Jan 26.
- Background: PubMed 16195255Shorr AF, Kunkel MJ, Kollef M. Linezolid versus vancomycin for Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: pooled analysis of randomized studies. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Nov;56(5):923-9. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki355. Epub 2005 Sep 29.
- Background: PubMed 12015695Stevens DL, Herr D, Lampiris H, Hunt JL, Batts DH, Hafkin B. Linezolid versus vancomycin for the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections. Clin Infect Dis. 2002 Jun 1;34(11):1481-90. doi: 10.1086/340353. Epub 2002 May 13.
Related trials for Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Not yet recruiting
Farm-originated Antimicrobial Resistance Modeling: Exploring Humans-to-Animal Dissemination
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus Colonization
RecruitingPhase 4
Daptomycin vs. Vancomycin for the Treatment of Methicillin Resistant S. Aureus Bacteremia
Staphylococcus Aureus Septicemia, Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteremia
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Gene Expression Analysis of Biofilm Formation and Antimicrobial Resistance in Clinical Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus
Staphylococcal Aureus Infection, Surgical Site Infection (SSI)
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
A Clinical Trial of Resistant Potato Starch for Gut MDRO Decolonization
Clostridium Infections, Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
RecruitingPhase 4
Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole vs. Clindamycin for the Treatment of Children With Invasive MRSA Infections
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Osteomyelitis Acute
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Er-Zhen Chen, M.D. & Ph.D. study director
Emergency intensive care unit, Ruijin Hospital
Hong-Ping Qu, M.D. principal investigator
Respiratory intensive care unit, Ruijin Hospital
Yu-Xing Ni, M.D. & Ph.D. principal investigator
Microbiology laboratory, Ruijin Hospital
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Imipenem/cilastatin in people with Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus and Pneumonia, Ventilator-Associated, run by Ruijin Hospital.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 May 2011. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Zhi-Tao Yang, M.D. (008613611965436, yangzhitao@hotmail.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
MRSA eradication (time frame: 7 th day). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01356472, which also lists 5 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 May 2011.