Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 3ONTIMENCT01241500
Randomized Study of ON 01910.Na in Refractory Myelodysplastic Syndrome Patients With Excess Blasts
A Phase 3 study testing ON 01910.Na in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and MDS, run by Traws Pharma, Inc. at 87 sites in 6 countries.
Trial summary
The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) to OS of patients receiving BSC in a population of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts (5% to 30% bone marrow blasts) who have failed azacitidine or… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, MDS, RAEB
- What is being tested?
- ON 01910.Na
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 299 participants
- Where
- 87 sitesin 6 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2010to 3 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- MDS diagnosis confirmed within 6 weeks prior to entry according to WHO or FAB classification
- MDS classified as follows, according to WHO and FAB classification:
- RAEB-1 (5% - 9% BM blasts)
- RAEB-2 (10% - 19% BM blasts)
- CMML (10% - 20% BM blasts) and WBC < 13,000/μL
- RAEB-t (20% - 30% BM blasts), with following criteria:
Show all 16Show fewer
- o WBC < 25 x 10E9/L at entry
- o Stable WBC at least 4 weeks prior to entry and not requiring intervention for WBC control with hydroxyurea, chemotherapy, or leukopheresis.
- At least one cytopenia (ANC < 1800/µL or platelet count < 100,000/µL or hemoglobin <10 g/dL)
- Progression according to 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria any time after start of azacitidine or decitabine during past 2 years; or failure to achieve complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG) after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or relapse after initial complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG criteria) observed after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or, intolerance to azacitidine or decitabine defined by drug-related ≥Grade 3 liver or renal toxicity leading to discontinuation during the past 2 years.
- Did not respond to, relapsed after, not eligible for, or opted not to do bone marrow transplantation
- Off other MDS treatments for at least 4 weeks; Filgrastim (G-CSF) and erythropoietin allowed before and during the study as clinically indicated.
- No need for induction chemotherapy
- ECOG status 0, 1 or 2
- Willing to adhere to protocol prohibitions and restrictions
- Patient (or a legally authorized representative) must sign informed consent form to indicate patient's understanding study's purpose and procedures and willingness to participate
Who cannot join
- Anemia due to factors other than MDS (including hemolysis or gastrointestinal bleeding) unless stabilized for 1 week after RBC transfusion.
- Any active malignancy within the past year, except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia
- Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy
- Total bilirubin ≥1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease.
- Alanine transaminase (ALT)/aspartate transaminase (AST) ≥2.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN)
Show all 17Show fewer
- Serum creatinine ≥2.0 mg/dL
- Ascites requiring active medical management including paracentesis, or hyponatremia (defined as serum sodium value of <130 mEq/L)
- Pregnant or lactating females
- Patients unwilling to follow strict contraception requirements (including condom use for males with sexual partners, and for females: prescription oral contraceptives [birth control pills], contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double-barrier method [spermicidal jelly or foam with condoms or diaphragm], contraceptive patch, or surgical sterilization) before entry and throughout the study
- Females with reproductive potential who do not have a negative urine beta-human chorionic gonadotropin pregnancy test at screening
- Major surgery without full recovery or major surgery within 3 weeks of ON 01910.Na treatment start
- Uncontrolled hypertension (defined as systolic pressure ≥160 mmHg and/or diastolic pressure ≥110 mmHg)
- New onset seizures (within 3 months prior to first dose of ON 01910.Na) or poorly controlled seizures
- Any other concurrent investigational agent or chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or immunotherapy
- Prior treatment with low-dose cytarabine during past 2 years Investigational therapy within 4 weeks of starting ON 01910.Na
- Psychiatric illness or social situation that limits the patient's ability to tolerate and/or comply with study requirements
Trial locations and contacts
87 sites in 6 countries.
87 sites in 6 countries
United States41 sites
University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109
Emory University Winship Cancer Institute
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322
University of Maryland Greenebaum Cancer Center
Baltimore, Maryland, 21201
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231
Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center
Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 70809
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612
University of Chicago Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60637
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas
Dallas, Texas, 75390
North Shore Medical Center
Evanston, Illinois, 60201
Bon Secours St. Francois Health System
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Hackensack University Medical Center
Hackensack, New Jersey, 07601
University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, 77030
Integrated Community Oncology Network
Jacksonville, Florida, 32256
University of California San Diego Moores Cancer Center
La Jolla, California, 92093
North Shore - LIJ Health System
Lake Success, New York, 11042
Cardinal Bernardin Cancer Center
Maywood, Illinois, 60153
Innovative Medical Research of South Florida, Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33169
Mount Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Centers
Miami Beach, Florida, 33140
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
Yale Cancer Center
New Haven, Connecticut, 06520
Weill Cornell Medical College
New York, New York, 10021
Mount Sinai Medical Center
New York, New York, 10029
University of Oklahoma Health Science Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
Woodlands Medical Specialists
Pensacola, Florida, 32503
University of Pennsylvania Health System
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Cancer Care Centers of South Texas
San Antonio, Texas, 78229
Virginia G. Piper Cancer Center
Scottsdale, Arizona, 85258
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
Seattle, Washington, 98109
Edward H. Kaplan MD & Associates
Skokie, Illinois, 60076
Providence Cancer Center
Southfield, Michigan, 48075
Stanford Cancer Center
Stanford, California, 94305
Martin Memorial Cancer Center
Stuart, Florida, 34994
Overlook Hospital
Summit, New Jersey, 07901
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
The Bronx, New York, 10461
Georgetown University Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20007
Cleveland Clinic Florida
Weston, Florida, 33331
University of Kansas Medical Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205
France15 sites
CHU Angers Service de Medecine D - Maladies du Sang
Angers, 49033
CHU Avignon Centre Hospitalier Henri Dufaut
Avignon, 84000
Hôpital Avicenne Hématologie Clinique
Bobigny, 93009
CHU Caen Hématologie Clinique
Caen, 14000
CHU Estaing Service d'hématologie
Clermont-Ferrand, 63000
CHU Lille Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, 59037
CHU Limoges Hopital Dupuytren
Limoges, 87042
Institute Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, 13009
Hôpital de L'archet I
Nice, 6202
Hôtel Dieu Sce Hématologie Clinique
Paris, 75004
Hôpital Saint-Antoine
Paris, 75571
CHU Perpignan Centre Hospitalier Hôpital Saint-Jean
Perpignan, 66046
CRLCC Henri Becquerel
Rouen, 76038
Chu-Strasbourg-Hopital Civil
Strasbourg, 67091
Hôpital Purpan
Toulouse, 31059
Germany10 sites
Universitätsklinikum Bonn
Bonn, North Rhine-Westphalia, 53127
Universitätsklinikum zu Köln
Cologne, 50924
Universitätsklinikum Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang-Goethe-Universität
Frankfurt am Main, 60590
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Hamburg, 20246
Universitätsmedizin Mannheim
Mannheim, 68167
Johannes-Wesling-Klinikum Minden
Minden, 32429
Klinikum Rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
München, 81675
Universitätsklinikum Ulm
Ulm, 89081
Italy9 sites
Azienda Ospedaliera Santi Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo
Alessandria, 15100
Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologa Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliera-Universitairia Vittorio Emanuele-Ferrarotto-Santo Bambino
Catania, 95124
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi di Firenze
Florence, 50134
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
Genova, 16132
Azienda Osperdaliera Universitaria Maggiore della Carità
Novara, 28100
Università degli Studi La Sapienza
Roma, 00161
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Senese Policlinico Santa Maria alle Scotte
Siena, SI, 53100
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Giovanni Battista di Torino
Torino, 10126
Spain8 sites
Hospital Universitario La Princesa
Madrid, 28006
Hospital Universitario La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
Málaga, 29010
Hospital Universitario Central de Asturias
Oviedo, Principality of Asturias, 33006
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
Palma de Mallorca, 07012
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe
Valencia, 46009
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, 46010
Belgium4 sites
Ziekenhuis Netwerk Antwerpen
Antwerp, 2060
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
H. Hartziekenhuis Roeselare-Menen vzw
Roeselare, West-vlaanderen, 8800
CHU de Mont-Godinne
Yvoir, 5530
About this study
Official title: Phase III MultiCenter Randomized Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of ON 01910.Na 72-Hr Continuous IV Infusion in MDS Patients With Excess Blasts Relapsing After or Refractory to or Intolerant to Azacitidine or Decitabine
The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) to OS of patients receiving BSC in a population of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts (5% to 30% bone marrow blasts) who have failed azacitidine or decitabine treatment. This patient population has no available therapy and a short life expectancy (approximately 4 months). The high level of bone marrow activity of ON 01910.Na documented in Phase 1 and 2 studies has the potential to delay substantially the transition of MDS to Acute Myeloid Leukemia(AML), a very significant and severe complication, which shortens survival of these MDS patients.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase III open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter study (up to 50 centers). Approximately 270 patients with MDS classified as RAEB-1 and RAEB-2 using the WHO classification and as RAEB-t and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) using the FAB classification who failed, became intolerant to, or progressed after treatment with 5-azacitidine or decitabine administered during the past 2 years, will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio into the following 2 treatment regimens:
- Best Supportive Care (BSC) + ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr administered as a 72-hr continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 2-week cycle (N = approximately 180 patients)
- BSC (N = approximately 90 patients).
Patients will be stratified at entry by bone marrow (BM) blasts (5% to 19% vs. 20% to 30%). After completing the first eight 2-week cycles (i.e., after 16 weeks of treatment), the frequency of further 72-hr CIV infusions will be decreased to an administration on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 4-week cycle.
Patients will remain treated on study until 2006 International Working Group (IWG) progression criteria are met (i.e., 50% increase of BM blasts or worsening of cytopenias) or until death from any cause, whichever comes first.
Patients who progress to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) while on study should be offered either standard treatment for AML or enrollment in an appropriate investigational study if they are eligible. These treatments with their start and end dates should be documented and patient survival time will be documented for all randomized patients.
Cross-over of BSC patients to ON 01910.Na after progression will not be allowed. However, patients in the BSC-only group will be allowed, as medically justified, access to low-dose cytarabine 20 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SC) once daily for the first consecutive 14 days of each 28-day cycle, up to 4 cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. Low-dose cytarabine will be delayed as needed until recovery of blood counts. All study participants will be allowed, as medically justified, access to RBC and platelet transfusions and to growth factors (erythropoietin, Filgrastim [G-CSF]). Hydroxyurea will be allowed to manage blastic crisis with hyperleukocytosis when patients transition to leukemia.
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, MDS, RAEB, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
- Being tested
- ON 01910.Na
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic syndromes, MDS
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Anemia, Refractory, with Excess of Blasts, Leukemia, Myelomonocytic, Chronic
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
ON 01910.NaDrug
Also called rigosertib
The dose of ON 01910.Na will be 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards. Infusion bags must be changed every 24 hours and a new infusion bag must be used for each of the subsequent 24 hours until completion of the total 72-hour infusion time.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) | Experimental | Patients will receive ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards and best supportive care (BSC). Receives: Drug: ON 01910.Na |
| Best supportive care (BSC) | No intervention | Patients will receive best supportive care (BSC). |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Overall survival
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. All patients will be followed until death or progression, even if they have discontinued treatment for whatever cause. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored at the time last known alive. The OS primary analysis will compare the active ON 01910.Na regimen to BSC once a total number of 223 deaths has been reached.
Measured: Up to 18 months
Secondary outcomes (8)
Overall response (complete and partial remission) according to 2006 IWG criteria
Compare the BSC + ON 01910.Na group to the BSC group with respect to changes in bone marrow myeloblasts, hemoglobin, peripheral neutrophils, platelets and blasts.
Measured: Changes measured at Week 4 from Baseline and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Complete bone marrow response according to 2006 IWG criteria
Compare the BSC + ON 01910.Na group to the BSC group with respect to changes in bone marrow myeloblasts.
Measured: Changes measured at Week 4 from Baseline and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Hematological improvements according to 2006 IWG criteria
Compare the BSC + ON 01910.Na group to the BSC group with respect to in absolute neutrophil count (ANC), platelet count, and erythroid responses.
Measured: Weekly
Scores of Quality of Life Questionnaire
Compare the BSC + ON 01910.Na group to the BSC group with respect to scores of Quality-of-life (QOL)(using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer [EORTC] Quality of Life Questionnaire [QLQ]-C30 version 3.
Measured: Measured at Baseline and every 4 Weeks
Adverse events
Record adverse events according to CTCAE v4.
Measured: Weekly
Change in Aneuploidy
Improvements of cytogenetics as evaluated by the change in aneuploidy in bone marrow according to 2006 IWG criteria.
Measured: Baseline and, only if abnormal at Baseline, Week 4 and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Transition time to AML
Transition time to AML: Defined for RAEB-1 and RAEB-2 MDS and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) patients (with BM blasts from 10% to 20% for CMML) by an increase of at least 50% BM blasts and more than 20% BM blasts; Defined for RAEB-t by an increase of at least 50% BM blasts.
Measured: Measured at Week 4 from date of randomization and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Incidence of infections and bleeding episodes.
Incidence of infections (treated with intravenous antimicrobials) and bleeding episodes.
Measured: Every 4 Weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2010
- Primary completion3 Oct 2018
- Study completion3 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (6)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 299 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Traws Pharma, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Steven M. Fruchtman, MD, Study chair, Traws Pharma, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01241500
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 04-21
- Acronym
- ONTIME
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 1 Nov 2010
- Last updated
- 30 Jun 2020
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Seetharam M, Fan AC, Tran M, Xu L, Renschler JP, Felsher DW, Sridhar K, Wilhelm F, Greenberg PL. Treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients unresponsive to hypomethylating agents with ON 01910.Na. Leuk Res. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
PubMed 21924492Athuluri-Divakar SK, Vasquez-Del Carpio R, Dutta K, Baker SJ, Cosenza SC, Basu I, Gupta YK, Reddy MV, Ueno L, Hart JR, Vogt PK, Mulholland D, Guha C, Aggarwal AK, Reddy EP. A Small Molecule RAS-Mimetic Disrupts RAS Association with Effector Proteins to Block Signaling. Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):643-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.045.
PubMed 27104980Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P, Al-Kali A, Baer MR, Sekeres MA, Roboz GJ, Gaidano G, Scott BL, Greenberg P, Platzbecker U, Steensma DP, Kambhampati S, Kreuzer KA, Godley LA, Atallah E, Collins R Jr, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E, Wilhelm FE, Azarnia N, Silverman LR; ONTIME study investigators. Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):496-508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00009-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
PubMed 26968357Navada SC, Silverman LR. The safety and efficacy of rigosertib in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016 Aug;16(8):805-10. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1209413. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
PubMed 27400247Al-Kali A. Relationship of bone marrow blast (BMBL) response to overall survival (OS) in a multicenter study of rigosertib (Rigo) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts progressing on or after treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017 35:15_suppl, 7056-7056 ASCO 2017
Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Jun 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase III MultiCenter Randomized Controlled Study to Assess Efficacy and Safety of ON 01910.Na 72-Hr Continuous IV Infusion in MDS Patients With Excess Blasts Relapsing After or Refractory to or Intolerant to Azacitidine or Decitabine
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01241500
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ONTIME / 04-21
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, MDS, RAEB, Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic syndromes, MDS
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 299 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Traws Pharma, Inc.Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- The Leukemia and Lymphoma Society
- Study start
- Nov 2010 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 3 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Nov 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective of this study is to compare overall survival (OS) in patients receiving ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) to OS of patients receiving BSC in a population of patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts (5% to 30% bone marrow blasts) who have failed azacitidine or decitabine treatment. This patient population has no available therapy and a short life expectancy (approximately 4 months). The high level of bone marrow activity of ON 01910.Na documented in Phase 1 and 2 studies has the potential to delay substantially the transition of MDS to Acute Myeloid Leukemia(AML), a very significant and severe complication, which shortens survival of these MDS patients.
Detailed description
This is a Phase III open-label, randomized, controlled, multicenter study (up to 50 centers). Approximately 270 patients with MDS classified as RAEB-1 and RAEB-2 using the WHO classification and as RAEB-t and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) using the FAB classification who failed, became intolerant to, or progressed after treatment with 5-azacitidine or decitabine administered during the past 2 years, will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio into the following 2 treatment regimens:
- Best Supportive Care (BSC) + ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr administered as a 72-hr continuous intravenous (CIV) infusion on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 2-week cycle (N = approximately 180 patients)
- BSC (N = approximately 90 patients).
Patients will be stratified at entry by bone marrow (BM) blasts (5% to 19% vs. 20% to 30%). After completing the first eight 2-week cycles (i.e., after 16 weeks of treatment), the frequency of further 72-hr CIV infusions will be decreased to an administration on Days 1, 2, and 3 of a 4-week cycle.
Patients will remain treated on study until 2006 International Working Group (IWG) progression criteria are met (i.e., 50% increase of BM blasts or worsening of cytopenias) or until death from any cause, whichever comes first.
Patients who progress to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) while on study should be offered either standard treatment for AML or enrollment in an appropriate investigational study if they are eligible. These treatments with their start and end dates should be documented and patient survival time will be documented for all randomized patients.
Cross-over of BSC patients to ON 01910.Na after progression will not be allowed. However, patients in the BSC-only group will be allowed, as medically justified, access to low-dose cytarabine 20 mg/m2 subcutaneously (SC) once daily for the first consecutive 14 days of each 28-day cycle, up to 4 cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity develops. Low-dose cytarabine will be delayed as needed until recovery of blood counts. All study participants will be allowed, as medically justified, access to RBC and platelet transfusions and to growth factors (erythropoietin, Filgrastim [G-CSF]). Hydroxyurea will be allowed to manage blastic crisis with hyperleukocytosis when patients transition to leukemia.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) | Experimental | Drug: ON 01910.NaPatients will receive ON 01910.Na 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards and best supportive care (BSC). |
| Best supportive care (BSC) | No intervention | –Patients will receive best supportive care (BSC). |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (16 listed)
- MDS diagnosis confirmed within 6 weeks prior to entry according to WHO or FAB classification
- MDS classified as follows, according to WHO and FAB classification:
- At least one cytopenia (ANC < 1800/µL or platelet count < 100,000/µL or hemoglobin <10 g/dL)
- Progression according to 2006 International Working Group (IWG) criteria any time after start of azacitidine or decitabine during past 2 years; or failure to achieve complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG) after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or relapse after initial complete or partial response or hematological improvement (according to 2006 IWG criteria) observed after at least six 4-week cycles of azacitidine or four 6-week cycles of decitabine during past 2 years; or, intolerance to azacitidine or decitabine defined by drug-related ≥Grade 3 liver or renal toxicity leading to discontinuation during the past 2 years.
- Did not respond to, relapsed after, not eligible for, or opted not to do bone marrow transplantation
Key exclusion criteria (17 listed)
- Anemia due to factors other than MDS (including hemolysis or gastrointestinal bleeding) unless stabilized for 1 week after RBC transfusion.
- Any active malignancy within the past year, except basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or carcinoma in situ of the cervix or breast
- Uncontrolled intercurrent illness including, but not limited to, symptomatic congestive heart failure, unstable angina pectoris, or cardiac arrhythmia
- Active infection not adequately responding to appropriate therapy
- Total bilirubin ≥1.5 mg/dL not related to hemolysis or Gilbert's disease.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| ON 01910.NaAlso: rigosertibThe dose of ON 01910.Na will be 1800 mg/24 hr as a continuous intravenous infusion for 72 hours every other week for the first 16 weeks then every 4 weeks afterwards. Infusion bags must be changed every 24 hours and a new infusion bag must be used for each of the subsequent 24 hours until completion of the total 72-hour infusion time. | Drug | ON 01910.Na + best supportive care (BSC) |
Primary outcome
Overall survival
Time frame: Up to 18 months
Overall survival (OS) is defined as the time from randomization to death from any cause. All patients will be followed until death or progression, even if they have discontinued treatment for whatever cause. Patients lost to follow-up will be censored at the time last known alive. The OS primary analysis will compare the active ON 01910.Na regimen to BSC once a total number of 223 deaths has been reached.
8 secondary outcomes
Overall response (complete and partial remission) according to 2006 IWG criteria
Time frame: Changes measured at Week 4 from Baseline and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Complete bone marrow response according to 2006 IWG criteria
Time frame: Changes measured at Week 4 from Baseline and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Hematological improvements according to 2006 IWG criteria
Time frame: Weekly
Scores of Quality of Life Questionnaire
Time frame: Measured at Baseline and every 4 Weeks
Adverse events
Time frame: Weekly
Change in Aneuploidy
Time frame: Baseline and, only if abnormal at Baseline, Week 4 and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Transition time to AML
Time frame: Measured at Week 4 from date of randomization and every 8 Weeks thereafter
Incidence of infections and bleeding episodes.
Time frame: Every 4 Weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Jun 2020.
- Background: PubMed 21924492Seetharam M, Fan AC, Tran M, Xu L, Renschler JP, Felsher DW, Sridhar K, Wilhelm F, Greenberg PL. Treatment of higher risk myelodysplastic syndrome patients unresponsive to hypomethylating agents with ON 01910.Na. Leuk Res. 2012 Jan;36(1):98-103. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2011.08.022. Epub 2011 Sep 14.
- Background: PubMed 27104980Athuluri-Divakar SK, Vasquez-Del Carpio R, Dutta K, Baker SJ, Cosenza SC, Basu I, Gupta YK, Reddy MV, Ueno L, Hart JR, Vogt PK, Mulholland D, Guha C, Aggarwal AK, Reddy EP. A Small Molecule RAS-Mimetic Disrupts RAS Association with Effector Proteins to Block Signaling. Cell. 2016 Apr 21;165(3):643-55. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.045.
- Results publication: PubMed 26968357Garcia-Manero G, Fenaux P, Al-Kali A, Baer MR, Sekeres MA, Roboz GJ, Gaidano G, Scott BL, Greenberg P, Platzbecker U, Steensma DP, Kambhampati S, Kreuzer KA, Godley LA, Atallah E, Collins R Jr, Kantarjian H, Jabbour E, Wilhelm FE, Azarnia N, Silverman LR; ONTIME study investigators. Rigosertib versus best supportive care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes after failure of hypomethylating drugs (ONTIME): a randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Apr;17(4):496-508. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)00009-7. Epub 2016 Mar 9.
- Results publication: PubMed 27400247Navada SC, Silverman LR. The safety and efficacy of rigosertib in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2016 Aug;16(8):805-10. doi: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1209413. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
- Results publicationAl-Kali A. Relationship of bone marrow blast (BMBL) response to overall survival (OS) in a multicenter study of rigosertib (Rigo) in patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with excess blasts progressing on or after treatment with a hypomethylating agent (HMA). Journal of Clinical Oncology 2017 35:15_suppl, 7056-7056 ASCO 2017
- Results publicationGarcia-Manero G, Fenaux P. Comprehensive Analysis of Safety: Rigosertib in 557 Patients with Myelodysplastic Syndromes (MDS) and Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). Blood Dec 2016, 128 (22) 2011; ASH 2016.
- Leukemia and Lymphoma SocietyLink provided by the sponsor.
- The Myelodysplastic Syndromes FoundationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Study of R289 in Patients With Lower-risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes (LR MDS)
Low Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Steven M. Fruchtman, MD study chair
Traws Pharma, Inc.
87 sites in 6 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing ON 01910.Na in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes and MDS, run by Traws Pharma, Inc. at 87 sites in 6 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 16 inclusion and 17 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 87 sites in United States, France, Germany, Italy, Spain and 1 more country. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Overall survival (time frame: Up to 18 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01241500, which also lists 6 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Jun 2020; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.