Deep Venous ThrombosisDiETNCT01221805
STA®-Liatest®D-Di-Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism
An observational study of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Diagnostica Stago at 18 sites in 5 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the ability of STA® Liatest® D-Di combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) or Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in a 3 month follow-up. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages Up to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, D-dimer
- How many people
- 2,040 participants
- Where
- 18 sitesin 5 countries
- Study dates
- Nov 2011to Apr 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages Up to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study population will be recruited from prospective, consecutive, ambulatory outpatients (presenting at the emergency unit or outpatient clinic) suspected of having venous thromboembolism
Who may be able to join
- Patient is < 80 years old.
- Patient presenting at least one of these symptoms indicative of proximal DVT or PE:
- symptoms for proximal DVT: leg pain, tenderness (discomfort through palpation), leg swelling, and /or edema,
- symptoms for PE: hemoptysis, lung related chest pain, dyspnea.
- Patient provides written informed consent to participate in the study (or verbal no-opposition, as allowed by local regulations)
- Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluation at 3 months and can be contacted by telephone
Who cannot join
- Patient presenting with a condition that may be associated with increased D-dimer levels, even in the absence of VTE, such as:
- Fibrinolytic therapy within the previous seven (7) days,
- Bone fracture or surgery (with general anesthesia longer than thirty (30) minutes) within the previous one (1) month,
- Deep hematoma diagnosed by imaging techniques within the previous one (1) month,
- Disseminated malignancies and active cancer (active cancer defined as: cancer for which therapeutic or palliative treatment is either ongoing at the time of enrolment or has stopped less than six (6) months before enrolment),
- Sepsis, severe infections, pneumonia within the previous 1 month,
Show all 18Show fewer
- Known liver cirrhosis,
- Pregnancy or post-partum within the previous 1 month,
- Atherosclerotic vascular disease thrombosis within the previous 1month (e.g. myocardial infarction, stroke, coronary syndrome, peripheral artery disease stage III or IV),
- Sickle cell disease,
- Patients presenting with a suspect thrombotic event related to catheter implantation
- Ongoing therapeutic anticoagulants (curative and preventive treatment) starting twenty four (24) hours or more before the D-dimer is measured
- Previous anticoagulant therapy stopped less than three (3) months before the D-dimer is measured
- Patients with previous DVT/PE occurred less than three (3) months from screening.
- Suspect thrombotic events in other locations at screening, including distal to the knee and upper extremity DVT (based on standard of care examinations)
- Patients with known tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) deficiency
- Patient participating or who has participated within one month of enrollment in another investigational study
- Major co-morbid condition(s) or other reasons that could limit the patient's ability to participate in the study or to comply with follow-up requirements, or impact the scientific integrity of the study
Trial locations and contacts
18 sites in 5 countries.
18 sites in 5 countries
United States11 sites
Lehigh Valley Hospital Health Network
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18103
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02114
Brigham and Woman's Hosp
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Medical Center of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29403
Northwestern Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Univeristy Medical Center
Colombus, Ohio, 43210
Texas Health Fort Worth Hospital
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104
Moses Cone Memorial Hospital
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401
Indiana University Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202
University of Iowa
Iowa City, Iowa, 52242
Oklahoma Health Sciences Center
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104
About this study
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the ability of STA® Liatest® D-Di combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) or Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in a 3 month follow-up.
Read the detailed description
The study population will be selected from prospective, consecutive ambulatory outpatients suspected of having venous thromboembolism.
These patients will first be evaluated using the Wells score:
- patients with low or moderate pretest probability will be considered for D-dimer testing, those with D-dimer positive will be considered for an imaging procedure,
- patients with high pretest probability will be considered for an imaging procedure.
Patients with "low or moderate" pretest probability and a negative D-Dimer result will be followed for 3 months to evaluate potential development of deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism.
These patients will be contacted by phone 3 month after their first visit.
- Conditions
- Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, D-dimer
- Keywords
- deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, D-dimer, Wells score, Wells clinical pretest probability
- Medical subject headings
- Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, Venous Thromboembolism
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To demonstrate the ability of STA Liatest DDi combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis in a 3 month follow-up
Occurence of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis during the 3 month follow-up after negative diagnosis (i.e. patients with PTP low/moderate and negative STA Liatest D-Di test)
Measured: at 3 months
Secondary outcomes (1)
1. To analyse results homogeneity (inter-centers) in the group "positive D-dimer result and negative diagnosis" (descriptive statistics only). 2. To determine prevalence of VTE in PTP high patients based on imaging results
- Prevalence of VTE in PTP high patients based on imaging results.
Measured: at 3 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2011
- Primary completionMar 2016
- Study completionApr 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Deep Venous ThrombosisStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 2,040 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Diagnostica Stago
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- GILLES PERNOD, MD PhD, Principal investigator, University Hospital, Grenoble
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01221805
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- DCIC 10 18
- Acronym
- DiET
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 12 Oct 2010
- Last updated
- 5 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Keeling DM, Mackie IJ, Moody A, Watson HG; Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients and the potential for clinical assessment and D-dimer assays to reduce the need for diagnostic imaging. Br J Haematol. 2004 Jan;124(1):15-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04723.x. No abstract available.
PubMed 14675404Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Castel A, Werker-van Gelder L, Vlasveld LT, van Klink RC, Planken EV, Huisman MV. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;97(1):146-50.
PubMed 17200782Kelly J, Hunt BJ. A clinical probability assessment and D-dimer measurement should be the initial step in the investigation of suspected venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):1116-9. No abstract available.
PubMed 12970044Pasha SM, Klok FA, Snoep JD, Mos IC, Goekoop RJ, Rodger MA, Huisman MV. Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):e123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.009. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
PubMed 19942258Perrier A, Desmarais S, Goehring C, de Moerloose P, Morabia A, Unger PF, Slosman D, Junod A, Bounameaux H. D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in outpatients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):492-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9702032.
PubMed 9279229Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Kovacs MJ. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1227-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023153.
PubMed 14507948Pernod G, Caterino J, Maignan M, Tissier C, Kassis J, Lazarchick J; DIET study group. D-Dimer Use and Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis in Emergency Units: Why Is There Such a Difference in Pulmonary Embolism Prevalence between the United States of America and Countries Outside USA? PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169268. eCollection 2017.
PubMed 28085911
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 5 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- STA®-Liatest®D-Di-Exclusion of Venous Thromboembolism
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01221805
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- DiET / DCIC 10 18
- Conditions
- Deep Venous Thrombosis, Pulmonary Embolism, D-dimer
- Keywords
- deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, D-dimer, Wells score, Wells clinical pretest probability
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 2,040 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Diagnostica StagoIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- University Hospital, Grenoble
- Study start
- Nov 2011
- Primary completion
- Mar 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Apr 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Oct 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the ability of STA® Liatest® D-Di combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism (PE) or Deep Venous Thrombosis (DVT) in a 3 month follow-up.
Detailed description
The study population will be selected from prospective, consecutive ambulatory outpatients suspected of having venous thromboembolism.
These patients will first be evaluated using the Wells score:
- patients with low or moderate pretest probability will be considered for D-dimer testing, those with D-dimer positive will be considered for an imaging procedure,
- patients with high pretest probability will be considered for an imaging procedure.
Patients with "low or moderate" pretest probability and a negative D-Dimer result will be followed for 3 months to evaluate potential development of deep venous thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism.
These patients will be contacted by phone 3 month after their first visit.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- Up to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study population will be recruited from prospective, consecutive, ambulatory outpatients (presenting at the emergency unit or outpatient clinic) suspected of having venous thromboembolism
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Patient is < 80 years old.
- Patient presenting at least one of these symptoms indicative of proximal DVT or PE:
- Patient provides written informed consent to participate in the study (or verbal no-opposition, as allowed by local regulations)
- Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluation at 3 months and can be contacted by telephone
Key exclusion criteria (18 listed)
- Patient presenting with a condition that may be associated with increased D-dimer levels, even in the absence of VTE, such as:
- Patients presenting with a suspect thrombotic event related to catheter implantation
- Ongoing therapeutic anticoagulants (curative and preventive treatment) starting twenty four (24) hours or more before the D-dimer is measured
- Previous anticoagulant therapy stopped less than three (3) months before the D-dimer is measured
- Patients with previous DVT/PE occurred less than three (3) months from screening.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
To demonstrate the ability of STA Liatest DDi combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis in a 3 month follow-up
Time frame: at 3 months
Occurence of pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis during the 3 month follow-up after negative diagnosis (i.e. patients with PTP low/moderate and negative STA Liatest D-Di test)
1 secondary outcome
1. To analyse results homogeneity (inter-centers) in the group "positive D-dimer result and negative diagnosis" (descriptive statistics only). 2. To determine prevalence of VTE in PTP high patients based on imaging results
Time frame: at 3 months
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 5 Aug 2016.
- Background: PubMed 14675404Keeling DM, Mackie IJ, Moody A, Watson HG; Haemostasis and Thrombosis Task Force of the British Committee for Standards in Haematology. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in symptomatic outpatients and the potential for clinical assessment and D-dimer assays to reduce the need for diagnostic imaging. Br J Haematol. 2004 Jan;124(1):15-25. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2141.2003.04723.x. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17200782Goekoop RJ, Steeghs N, Niessen RW, Jonkers GJ, Dik H, Castel A, Werker-van Gelder L, Vlasveld LT, van Klink RC, Planken EV, Huisman MV. Simple and safe exclusion of pulmonary embolism in outpatients using quantitative D-dimer and Wells' simplified decision rule. Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jan;97(1):146-50.
- Background: PubMed 12970044Kelly J, Hunt BJ. A clinical probability assessment and D-dimer measurement should be the initial step in the investigation of suspected venous thromboembolism. Chest. 2003 Sep;124(3):1116-9. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19942258Pasha SM, Klok FA, Snoep JD, Mos IC, Goekoop RJ, Rodger MA, Huisman MV. Safety of excluding acute pulmonary embolism based on an unlikely clinical probability by the Wells rule and normal D-dimer concentration: a meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2010 Apr;125(4):e123-7. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.11.009. Epub 2009 Nov 26.
- Background: PubMed 9279229Perrier A, Desmarais S, Goehring C, de Moerloose P, Morabia A, Unger PF, Slosman D, Junod A, Bounameaux H. D-dimer testing for suspected pulmonary embolism in outpatients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997 Aug;156(2 Pt 1):492-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.156.2.9702032.
- Background: PubMed 14507948Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, Forgie M, Kearon C, Dreyer J, Kovacs G, Mitchell M, Lewandowski B, Kovacs MJ. Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis. N Engl J Med. 2003 Sep 25;349(13):1227-35. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa023153.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 28085911Pernod G, Caterino J, Maignan M, Tissier C, Kassis J, Lazarchick J; DIET study group. D-Dimer Use and Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis in Emergency Units: Why Is There Such a Difference in Pulmonary Embolism Prevalence between the United States of America and Countries Outside USA? PLoS One. 2017 Jan 13;12(1):e0169268. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169268. eCollection 2017.
Related trials for Deep Venous Thrombosis
RecruitingPhase 3
Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism (VTE) in Adult Participants With Solid and Hematologic Cancers
Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 in Adult Participants for Prevention of Cancer-Associated Thrombosis
Cancer-Associated Thrombosis (CAT)
RecruitingPhase 3
REGN7508 Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid (ASA) for Venous Thromboprophylaxis After Total Knee Arthroplasty in Adult Participants
Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism (VTE)
Active, not recruiting
This Research Proposal Focuses on Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Nursing Care Protocol in Preventing Deep Vein Thrombosis (DVT) in Patients Undergoing On-pump Cardiac Surgery. The Study Will Include an Intervention Group That Receives the Nursing Protocol and a Control Group That Receives Routine
On-pump Cardiac Surgery - Prevention - Intervention - Experimental Group - Control Group - Incidence - Complications, DVT - Deep Vein Thrombosis
Recruiting
DEFIANCE: RCT of ClotTriever System Versus Anticoagulation In Deep Vein Thrombosis
Venous Thromboembolism, Deep Venous Thrombosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
GILLES PERNOD, MD PhD principal investigator
University Hospital, Grenoble
18 sites in 5 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Deep Venous Thrombosis and Pulmonary Embolism, run by Diagnostica Stago at 18 sites in 5 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 18 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 5 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 18 sites in United States, France, Italy, Spain, Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To demonstrate the ability of STA Liatest DDi combined with a clinical pretest probability (PTP) to safely exclude pulmonary embolism or deep venous thrombosis in a 3 month follow-up (time frame: at 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01221805, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 5 Aug 2016.