AzTrials
AzTrials

PoisoningNCT01209455

Mechanisms of N-acetylcysteine Mediated Vascular Adverse Effects

A study testing Chlorphenamine and Ranitidine and Paracetamol in people with Poisoning, run by University of Edinburgh at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Paracetamol overdose is the leading cause of acute liver failure in the Western World. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been the antidote of choice for over 30 years but its use is associated with adverse effects in 40% of cases. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 64 years, men onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Poisoning
What is being tested?
Chlorphenamine and Ranitidine and Paracetamol
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
24 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
3 Jan 2011to 15 Jul 2011
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 64 years
  • Men only
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Healthy male, non-smoking, volunteers aged between 18-64 years

Who cannot join

  • Lack of informed consent Age <18 or >64 years Current smoker Current involvement in a clinical trial Clinically significant comorbidity: heart failure, hypertension, known hyper-lipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, asthma, coagulopathy or bleeding disorders Current intake of aspirin, other non-steroid anti-inflammatory medications, or vasodilators Recent infective/inflammatory condition Recent blood donation (during the preceding three months)

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • Clinical Research Facility, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh

    Edinburgh, Midlothian, EH16 4SA

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Paracetamol overdose is the leading cause of acute liver failure in the Western World. N-acetylcysteine (NAC) has been the antidote of choice for over 30 years but its use is associated with adverse effects in 40% of cases. Patients characteristically experience nausea, vomiting and an anaphylactoid ('pseudo-allergic') syndrome. This reaction is clinically similar to true anaphylaxis (allergic reaction) including flushing, rash, constriction of airways, and a fall in blood pressure, but occurs via a different mechanism. Although treatable, these reactions lead to patient distress, commonly cause confusion among treating physicians, and lead to significant delays in antidote administration. The aetiology of these adverse reactions to NAC remains unclear. We hypothesise: i) these reactions result from a dose-dependent release of the chemical histamine, causing dilatation of blood vessels (vasodilatation) and the anaphylactoid syndrome; ii) paracetamol conversely exerts a protective effect on the reaction, with a less severe reaction observed in the presence of higher paracetamol concentrations. We will investigate the mechanisms underlying adverse reactions to NAC in the human forearm model, examining the role of histamine and other markers involved in the inflammatory process. The wider significance is an improved understanding of this poorly delineated phenomenon, with implications for other medications associated with similar reactions, such as non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioids such as morphine.

Read the detailed description

In this study the investigators test the following hypotheses:

  1. NAC causes dose-dependent vasodilatation associated with histamine release in vivo.
  2. Release of other mediators, known to be associated with anaphylaxis, does not occur during anaphylactoid reactions to NAC.
  3. Paracetamol has a protective role against NAC adverse reactions.

Investigation of these hypotheses in man is difficult. While local skin changes to intradermal NAC have been used to examine dose-response in patients, this approach does not lend itself to detailed investigation of the underlying mechanism and cannot be used to explore the effect of high paracetamol concentrations. We propose to use an alternative well-established model previously used by us to investigate the mechanisms involved in the pharmacodynamics of morphine in man by the measurement of forearm blood flow and skin response following intra-arterial infusion. The proposed model allows administration of doses far smaller than those used systemically and thus minimises the risk of unwanted systemic effects from either NAC or paracetamol. Safe administration of intra-arterial NAC (up to 300 mg/min, greater than that intended here) has previously been demonstrated. Local changes can be used as a surrogate for systemic effects, as described previously.

We will take a structured 3-part approach to the research hypotheses. Studies 1 and 2 will aim to establish a dose-response curve and seek evidence of tachyphylaxis, while measuring the level of histamine release. The presence of tachyphylaxis may help to explain why, in the clinical setting, NAC can often be safely re-introduced following a reaction. In study 3, the investigators intend to conduct a 4-way randomised controlled crossover mechanistic study. This will examine the pharmacodynamic effect of NAC in both the presence and absence of histamine antagonists (antihistamines), and low- and high-dose paracetamol. This study will also enable investigation of a possible protective role of paracetamol.

For all studies, the investigators will recruit healthy male volunteers between the ages of 18 and 64 years. Subjects will be non-smokers on no concomitant medications. Individuals with clinically significant co-morbidity such as heart failure, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia, diabetes mellitus, asthma, coagulopathy or bleeding disorders will be excluded. Exclusion criteria will also include those individuals who have had recent infective or inflammatory conditions or recently donated blood (within the last 3 months).

Each study will be performed in a quiet, temperature-controlled room maintained at 22-24ºC with subjects lying supine. Participants will have fasted and abstained from caffeine and tobacco for at least 4 hours and from alcohol for 24 hours before each study.

Subjects will undergo cannulation of the brachial artery in one arm with a sterile 27-standard wire gauge steel needle. Study drugs will be infused via this cannula. Blood will be drawn from both the infused and control arms via 17-gauge venous cannulae inserted into each arm under local anaesthesia.

After a 30-min lead-in period, forearm blood flow will be measured at 6-10 minute intervals in the infused and non-infused arms by venous occlusion plethysmography using mercury-in-silastic strain gauges as described previously.

Subjects may be recruited to more than one study provided a minimum of 1 week has passed between studies.

Study 1: Dose-response study Sufficient volunteers will be recruited to complete 8 studies using an incremental rising dose infusion of intra-arterial NAC (6 doses) to determine a dose response curve for arterial vasodilatation in the forearm. After a washout period of 30 mins to ensure a return to normal state, this will be repeated to determine whether the response is consistent over time. Study 1 will identify a dose to be used in study 2 that causes maximum local forearm vasodilatation without systemic effects (rise in contralateral forearm blood flow, blood pressure, heart rate, facial flushing).

Our hypothesis is that while an increase in histamine may be observed in response to NAC, no change in the other mediators commonly associated with anaphylactic reactions will be demonstrated. Blood samples will be obtained at baseline, at the end of the study, and at 10-min intervals during the incremental dose infusion of NAC to include each of the 6 doses administered (total 14 occasions). To maximise efficiency in addressing our hypothesis we intend to measure histamine and NAC at each time point. Enough blood will also be drawn on each occasion for measurement of other potential inflammatory mediators, including tryptase, vWF, tPA, IL-6, PGD2, and PGI2.

Study 2: Acute tolerance study Acute tolerance will be investigated in study 2. Eight studies will be completed using a constant infusion of NAC over 60 mins at a dose identified in study 1. Forearm vasodilatation and the level of histamine release will be measured every 10 mins. This study may help to explain why in the clinical setting NAC can often be safely reintroduced, without complication, following a reaction.

Blood samples will be obtained at baseline, at the end of the study, and at 10-min intervals during the infusion of NAC (total 8 occasions). Histamine and NAC will be measured at each time point and blood stored for later measurement of other potential mediators if appropriate following the results of study 1.

Study 3: Mechanistic study

Study 3 is a 4-way randomised controlled crossover study to investigate potential mediators. Sufficient subjects will be recruited to complete 8 studies, with each volunteer attending 4 times. At each visit, subjects will receive an increasing dose infusion of NAC as described in study 1. In addition they will also receive one of:

  1. Co-infusion of normal saline (control)
  2. Co-infusion of histamine antagonists (H1 and H2 antagonist)
  3. Co-infusion of low dose paracetamol to give a local concentration of <50 mg/l
  4. Co-infusion of higher dose paracetamol to give a local concentration of ~200 mg/l

Blood samples will be obtained at baseline, at the end of the study, and at 10-min intervals during the incremental dose infusion of NAC to include each of the 6 doses administered (total 8 occasions). Histamine, NAC and paracetamol assays will be measured at all time points. Blood will also be stored for later analysis of the other mediators if appropriate according to the results of study 1.

Drugs We have previously administered intra-arterial NAC without complication. Assuming a forearm blood flow of 50 ml/min, an infusion of 25 mg/min would be expected to achieve a local concentration ~500 mg/l, similar to peak concentrations reached during the standard 20-hour intravenous NAC protocol used on the hospital wards. We intend to use a range of 6 incremental doses at 10 min intervals to include this concentration: 1 mg/min, 5 mg/min, 10 mg/min, 50 mg/min, 100 mg/min, and 200 mg/min. The total infusion rate will be maintained 1 ml/min.

Histamine antagonists in current clinical use have not yet been administered in intr-arterial studies. We intend to use chlorphenamine (H1 antagonist) and ranitidine (H2 antagonist). Intravenous (IV) administration of 10mg chlorphenamine results in a plasma concentration of ~14 mcg/l. IA administration of 1 mcg/min would achieve a similar forearm concentration. Assuming NAC causes vasodilatation with an increase in forearm blood flow, the investigators propose to administer 5 mcg/min to ensure maximal H1 blockade. Similarly, IV administration of 50mg ranitidine results in a plasma concentration of ~150 mcg/l. IA administration of 7.5 mcg/min would be expected to achieve a similar forearm concentration. In the presence of increased forearm blood flow, the investigators propose to administer 37.5 mcg/min.

Therapeutic IV administration of 1g paracetamol results in a plasma concentration of ~12 mg/l. To achieve a desired concentration of ~25 mg/l, in the presence of a forearm blood blow of 50 ml/min, the investigators would intend to administer an IA infusion of 1.25 mg/min. To account for the presence of increased forearm blood flow, the investigators propose to administer 4 mg/min IA paracetamol. To achieve a higher local PA concentration of ~200 mg/l, a concentration comparable to potentially hepatotoxic concentrations following PA overdose, the investigators propose to administer 30 mg/min PA.

Skin changes Skin changes will be assessed through assessment of erythema or oedema in the forearm recorded using the Modified Draize Scale. Subjects will also be asked to subjectively express the intensity of any itching on a scale of 1 (no itch) to 7 (intense itch).

Expertise available The studies will be carried out in the Clinical Research Facility at the Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, which has extensive experience in performing such studies. Most of the assays will be undertaken in the University of Edinburgh laboratories, which have expertise in these assays. The principal investigator is a trainee clinical toxicologist with the necessary skills to undertake the research.

Conditions
Poisoning
Being tested
Chlorphenamine and Ranitidine, Paracetamol
Keywords
Acetylcysteine, Adverse effects, Acetaminophen, Anaphylactoid reactions
Medical subject headings
Poisoning, Anaphylaxis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Chlorphenamine and RanitidineDrug

    We intend to use chlorphenamine (H1 antagonist) and ranitidine (H2 antagonist).Assuming NAC causes vasodilatation with an increase in forearm blood flow, we propose to administer 5 mcg/min to ensure maximal H1 blockade. In the presence of increased forearm blood flow, we propose to administer 37.5 mcg/min.

  • ParacetamolDrug

    Therapeutic IV administration of 1g paracetamol results in a plasma concentration of ~12 mg/l. To achieve a desired concentration of ~25 mg/l, in the presence of a forearm blood blow of 50 ml/min, we would intend to administer an IA infusion of 1.25 mg/min. To account for the presence of increased forearm blood flow, we propose to administer 4 mg/min IA paracetamol.

  • ParacetamolDrug

    To achieve a local paracetamol concentration of ~200 mg/l, a concentration comparable to potentially hepatotoxic concentrations following paracetamol overdose, we propose to administer 30 mg/min paracetamol.

Study groups in NCT01209455
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
SalineNo interventionVolunteers will receive an incremental rising dose infusion of IA NAC (6 doses) together with a co-infusion of normal saline to determine a dose response curve for arterial vasodilatation in the forearm.
Histamine antagonistsActive comparatorSubjects will receive an increasing dose infusion of NAC as described in arm 1 but in this arm will receive a co-infusion of histamine antagonists (H1 and H2 antagonists) to determine vasodilatation in response to NAC in the presence of histamine antagonists.
Receives: Drug: Chlorphenamine and Ranitidine
Low dose paracetamolActive comparatorSubjects will receive an increasing dose infusion of NAC as described in arm 1 but in this arm will receive a co-infusion of low dose paracetamol to determine whether the vasodilatory response to NAC is inhibited.
Receives: Drug: Paracetamol
High dose paracetamolActive comparatorSubjects will receive an increasing dose infusion of NAC as described in arm 1 but in this arm will receive a co-infusion of higher dose paracetamol to determine whether the vasodilatory response to NAC is inhibited.
Receives: Drug: Paracetamol

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Attenuation of NAC induced vasodilatation by histamine antagonists (H1 and H2 antagonists) and/or paracetamol

    Measured: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 minutes

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Inhibition of the inflammatory cascade contributes to a paracetamol mediated protective role against NAC adverse reactions.

    Measured: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 minutes

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted27 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study start3 Jan 2011
  3. Primary completion15 Jul 2011
  4. Study completion15 Jul 2011

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
24 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01209455
Sponsor's protocol ID
NAC Forearm 0910
Status last verified
Jun 2024
First submitted
24 Sep 2010
Last updated
20 Jun 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Chlorphenamine and Ranitidine and Paracetamol in people with Poisoning, run by University of Edinburgh at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Jun 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Attenuation of NAC induced vasodilatation by histamine antagonists (H1 and H2 antagonists) and/or paracetamol (time frame: 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80, 90 minutes). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Jun 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in