AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral AngioplastyNCT01202344

Computer Prediction of Restenosis Following Peripheral Angioplasty

A study testing Additional x-ray images in people with Peripheral Angioplasty, run by Dheeraj Rajan at 1 site in Canada.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to develop a computer program that might be able to accurately assess the risk of artery re-narrowing following angioplasty or stenting based on computer images. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Angioplasty
What is being tested?
Additional x-ray images
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
2 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Sep 2010to 3 Dec 2024
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • scheduled for percutaneous dilation of a peripheral artery;
  • age more than 18 years;
  • informed consent signed by the subject;
  • target lesion in native artery;
  • baseline lumen diameter greater than 4 mm.

Who cannot join

  • previous revascularization of the target lesion;
  • subject undergoing chemotherapy.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University Health Network

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2C4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

The purpose of this study is to develop a computer program that might be able to accurately assess the risk of artery re-narrowing following angioplasty or stenting based on computer images. After angioplasty (a procedure to re-open narrowed or blocked blood vessels) the patients will have extra images taken in order to assess the results of the procedure; which will then be used to see whether or not these images can help predict outcomes such as the patient having to come back to the hospital to have the procedure done again.

Read the detailed description

The study involves medical imaging of patients undergoing an angioplasty intervention in a peripheral artery. It is similar to an observational study, except that additional imaging is performed which is above the standard-of-care. Some risks may be associated with the additional imaging due to a small increase in radiation exposure and intravenous contrast administration. No investigational drug or device will be tested in this study. No control group will be used.

Logistic regression analysis will be performed using NCSS statistical software to identify which explanatory variable(s), selected from the simulation results, can be used to predict binary restenosis, the categorical dependent variable.

For each subject, binary restenosis will be determined by comparing the CT-scan images obtained 1 hour post-intervention to those obtained at the 6 month follow-up study. The CT-scan images will be segmented and a mesh of the target vessel will be reconstructed as described in objective 1. The lumen area will be measured in every cross-section of the mesh perpendicular to the vessel centerline, with 2 mm steps between cross-sections. The minimum lumen diameter will be calculated from the minimum lumen area. If the minimum lumen diameter at follow-up is less than 50% of the minimum lumen diameter post-intervention, then the binary restenosis is positive. Otherwise it is negative.

Objective 1: Evaluate the accuracy of computer predictions of artery dilatation and stent implantation from CT-scan images. This information is hypothesized to be indicative of the accuracy of other quantities predicted by computer simulation of angioplasty, such as those used as independent variables in objective 2.

Objective 2: Establish a regression model with 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity for predicting binary restenosis based on one or several injury parameters in patients undergoing angioplasty. The candidate injury parameters are:

  • endothelium denudation (in % of total endothelium area)
  • descriptors of the magnitude and spatial distribution of stretch ratio in the arterial wall
  • descriptors of the magnitude and spatial distribution of intramural stress in the arterial wall All injury parameters are predicted by computer simulation of angioplasty.
Being tested
Additional x-ray images
Keywords
Angioplasty, Stenosis, Restenosis, Elastic Recoil, cheduled for percutaneous dilation of a peripheral artery, Target lesion in native artery, Baseline lumen diameter greater than 4 mm
Medical subject headings
Constriction, Pathologic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Additional x-ray imagesOther

    Approximately 3 additional x-ray images following angioplasty (within 1 hour)

Study groups in NCT01202344
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RestenosisOtherPatients who have restinosis immediately following angioplasty.
Receives: Other: Additional x-ray images
No RestenosisOtherPatients who do not have restinosis immediately following angioplasty.
Receives: Other: Additional x-ray images

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Simulation Accuracy

    From the pre-intervention CT-scans, the target artery, calcium and lumen will be segmented, meshed and used to simulate the angioplasty steps. Simulation accuracy will be evaluated by comparing geometrical descriptors of the artery and lumen size and shape calculated in the simulation to those measured on the post-intervention CT scan images.

    Measured: less than 6 hours after the procedure

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Logistic Regression Analysis

    Logistic regression analysis will be performed using NCSS statistical software to identify which explanatory variable(s), selected from the simulation results, can be used to predict binary restenosis, the categorical dependent variable.

    Binary restenosis will be determined by comparing the CT-scan images obtained 1 hour post-intervention to those obtained at the 6 month follow-up study.

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2010
  3. Primary completion3 Dec 2024
  4. Study completion3 Dec 2024

Why it stopped: lack of funding

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
2 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01202344
Sponsor's protocol ID
08-0335-BE
Status last verified
Dec 2024
First submitted
10 Sep 2010
Last updated
6 Dec 2024
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Hoffmann R, Mintz GS, Mehran R, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Leon MB. Tissue proliferation within and surrounding Palmaz-Schatz stents is dependent on the aggressiveness of stent implantation technique. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Apr 15;83(8):1170-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00053-3.

    PubMed 10215278
  • Koyama J, Owa M, Sakurai S, Shimada H, Hikita H, Higashikata T, Ikeda S. Relation between vascular morphologic changes during stent implantation and the magnitude of in-stent neointimal hyperplasia. Am J Cardiol. 2000 Oct 1;86(7):753-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01075-4.

    PubMed 11018195
  • Syeda B, Wexberg P, Gyongyosi M, Denk S, Beran G, Kiss K, Sperker W, Glogar D. Effects of radial stretch on target lesion revascularization after percutaneous coronary intervention: an intravascular ultrasound study. Can J Cardiol. 2003 May;19(6):691-7.

    PubMed 12772020
  • Schwartz RS, Huber KC, Murphy JG, Edwards WD, Camrud AR, Vlietstra RE, Holmes DR. Restenosis and the proportional neointimal response to coronary artery injury: results in a porcine model. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992 Feb;19(2):267-74. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(92)90476-4.

    PubMed 1732351
  • Rogers C, Tseng DY, Squire JC, Edelman ER. Balloon-artery interactions during stent placement: a finite element analysis approach to pressure, compliance, and stent design as contributors to vascular injury. Circ Res. 1999 Mar 5;84(4):378-83. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.4.378.

    PubMed 10066671
  • Capron L, Bruneval P. Influence of applied stress on mitotic response of arteries to injury with a balloon catheter: quantitative study in rat thoracic aorta. Cardiovasc Res. 1989 Nov;23(11):941-8. doi: 10.1093/cvr/23.11.941.

    PubMed 2611802
  • Olson NE, Chao S, Lindner V, Reidy MA. Intimal smooth muscle cell proliferation after balloon catheter injury. The role of basic fibroblast growth factor. Am J Pathol. 1992 May;140(5):1017-23.

    PubMed 1580326
  • Jamal A, Bendeck M, Langille BL. Structural changes and recovery of function after arterial injury. Arterioscler Thromb. 1992 Mar;12(3):307-17. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.12.3.307.

    PubMed 1547190
  • Doornekamp FN, Borst C, Post MJ. Endothelial cell recoverage and intimal hyperplasia after endothelium removal with or without smooth muscle cell necrosis in the rabbit carotid artery. J Vasc Res. 1996 Mar-Apr;33(2):146-55. doi: 10.1159/000159143.

    PubMed 8630348
  • Nugent HM, Rogers C, Edelman ER. Endothelial implants inhibit intimal hyperplasia after porcine angioplasty. Circ Res. 1999 Mar 5;84(4):384-91. doi: 10.1161/01.res.84.4.384.

    PubMed 10066672

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Additional x-ray images in people with Peripheral Angioplasty, run by Dheeraj Rajan at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Dec 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was stopped early (reason given: lack of funding). Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Simulation Accuracy (time frame: less than 6 hours after the procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01202344, which also lists 10 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Dec 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in