AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisAIMNCT01192516

Effectiveness of Tailored Activity Pacing for Symptomatic Osteoarthritis

A study testing Tailored Activity Pacing and General Activity Pacing in people with Osteoarthritis and Pain, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The primary objective of this project is to examine effectiveness of a tailored pacing intervention on fatigue, pain, and physical function compared to general pacing intervention and usual care groups. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis, Pain
What is being tested?
Tailored Activity Pacing and General Activity Pacing
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
195 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2010to Sep 2013
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Age of 50 years and older
  • Reported pain for at least 3 months
  • Mild-moderate pain severity according to the WOMAC pain scale
  • Radiographic evidence of knee or hip osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence score of 2 in at least one joint)
  • Community-dwelling (i.e. own home, apartment, senior residence)
  • Ambulatory with or without a cane or walker
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Adequate cognition to complete study activities (score of 5 on the 6-Item Screener)
  • Ability to use the Actiwatch-S (Phillips-Respironics, Mini-Mitter, Bend OR)accelerometer to record symptoms and activity patterns (ascertained by completion of a learning module specific to the use of the device in this study)
  • English-speaking

Who cannot join

  • Self-reported medical history of conditions with pain and/or fatigue as a known and marked symptom (e.g multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis)
  • Medically unstable (e.g. acute conditions or acute presentations of chronic conditions)
  • Anemia (hemoglobin of <10 for men and <11 for women)
  • Unmanaged thyroid dysfunction (Thyroid stimulating hormone <.035>5.5 mg/dl)
  • 2 or more days of complete bed rest within the last month
  • Limb hemiplegia or amputation
Show all 13Show fewer
  • Arthroscopic procedure within the previous 2 months
  • Joint injection within the previous 3 months
  • Total or partial joint replacement within the previous 6 months
  • Self-reported illness or conditions that impair cooperation with the study team or ability to complete study procedures
  • Current enrollee in physical or occupational therapy for symptoms associated with osteoarthritis
  • Current attendance or attendance within the previous year in a cognitive behavioral therapy program or other self-management program that includes activity pacing instruction
  • Any other unforeseen exclusion criteria that, by the opinion of the study personnel, would make the participant unable to safely or effectively complete the study.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA Ann Arbor Healthcare System

    Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48113

Other trials in United States

About this study

The primary objective of this project is to examine effectiveness of a tailored pacing intervention on fatigue, pain, and physical function compared to general pacing intervention and usual care groups. A secondary objective is to evaluate the natural history of symptoms and physical disability over time among people with knee and hip osteoarthritis.

Read the detailed description

In the United States, osteoarthritis is a growing public health issue and a leading cause of disability among older adults. Almost 50% of users of the Veterans Affairs (VA) system present with osteoarthritis. Veterans are a particularly important group to target for symptom management interventions as they are twice as likely as non-veterans to report chronic joint symptoms and activity limitations. There are few evidence-based symptom management interventions offered by health care professionals, such as occupational and physical therapists, at the time when people are seeking treatment for their symptoms. The proposed activity pacing intervention is individually-tailored to a person's symptom and activity patterns. This tailoring provides a personally-relevant and focused intervention that may help people adopt this strategy into their daily lives.

Conditions
Osteoarthritis, Pain
Being tested
Tailored Activity Pacing, General Activity Pacing
Keywords
Osteoarthritis, Activity Pacing
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis, Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Tailored Activity PacingBehavioural

    Therapeutic intervention will be based on a tailored approach using collected data on symptom and activity patterns of each participant.

  • General Activity PacingBehavioural

    Therapeutic intervention using generalized pacing instruction to manage symptoms

Study groups in NCT01192516
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Arm 1ExperimentalTailored activity pacing
Receives: Behavioral: Tailored Activity Pacing
Arm 2ExperimentalGeneral activity pacing and symptom management (Occupational therapy)
Receives: Behavioral: General Activity Pacing
Arm 3No interventionUsual care group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Fatigue- Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI)

    This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and fatigue interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score is worse fatigue.

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Fatigue-BFI

    This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score is worse fatigue.

    Measured: 10 weeks post-baseline

  3. Fatigue-BFI

    This is a summary measure of fatigue severity and interference items in which the average of 9 items is taken. Each item is rated on a scale of 0 - 10. A higher score indicates worse fatigue.

    Measured: 6 months post-baseline

  4. Pain- Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC)

    This is a summary of reported pain in specific activities. It is 5 questions with answers ranging from 0 - 4. Total possible score is 20 in which a higher score is worse pain.

    Measured: Baseline

  5. Pain- WOMAC

    This is a 5-item pain scale in which scores from 0 - 4 are summed. A higher score indicates more pain.

    Measured: 10 weeks post-baseline

  6. Pain- WOMAC

    This is a 5 item pain scale in which items on a scale of 0 - 4 are summed. A higher score means more pain.

    Measured: 6 months post baseline

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Physical Function- Six Minute Walk

    Six minute walk is the distance (in feet) that people walk at a usual pace over 6 minutes

    Measured: Baseline

  2. Physical Function- Six Minute Walk

    This is the distance in feet that people walk over 6 minutes.

    Measured: 10 weeks post-baseline

  3. Physical Function- Six Minute Walk

    This is the distance people walk in feet over 6 minutes

    Measured: 6 months post baseline

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Sep 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionSep 2013
  4. Study completionSep 2013

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
195 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01192516
Sponsor's protocol ID
E7557-R
Acronym
AIM
Status last verified
Mar 2015
First submitted
25 Aug 2010
Last updated
7 Apr 2015
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Murphy SL, Schepens Niemiec S, Lyden AK, Kratz AL. Pain, Fatigue, and Physical Activity in Osteoarthritis: The Moderating Effects of Pain- and Fatigue-Related Activity Interference. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Sep;97(9 Suppl):S201-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.05.025. Epub 2016 May 17.

    PubMed 27207435
  • Murphy SL, Lyden AK, Clary M, Geisser ME, Yung RL, Clauw DJ, Williams DA. Activity pacing for osteoarthritis symptom management: study design and methodology of a randomized trial testing a tailored clinical approach using accelerometers for veterans and non-veterans. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011 Aug 2;12:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-12-177.

    PubMed 21810253

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Tailored Activity Pacing and General Activity Pacing in people with Osteoarthritis and Pain, run by US Department of Veterans Affairs at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Mar 2015). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Fatigue- Brief Fatigue Inventory (BFI) (time frame: Baseline). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01192516, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2015.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in