Acute RejectionPhase 3RIACTNCT01117662
Efficacy of Rituximab in Acute Cellular Rejection in Renal Transplant Patients
A Phase 3 study testing Rituximab in people with Acute Rejection, run by Hannover Medical School at 14 sites in Germany.
Trial summary
Acute kidney allograft rejection is the major cause for a loss of graft function and has a negative impact on long-term graft survival. Anti-rejection therapy traditionally focuses on T cell-mediated mechanisms of renal allograft rejection. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Rejection
- What is being tested?
- Rituximab
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 13 participants
- Where
- 14 sitesGermany
- Study dates
- May 2012to 23 Aug 2016
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- male or female patients age ≥ 18 at the time of the inclusion in the study
- male or female patients after kidney transplantation if medically justifiable (cave: previous immunosuppression, particularly prior induction therapies or biologicals).
- Proof of an acute rejection in kidney transplant according to Banff-criteria: T-cell-mediated rejection as borderline, grade IA/B, IIA/B (no v-only), if one or more results are available as significant B-cell infiltrates CD20≥20 / high power field, glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis or C4d positivity (with the exception of ABO-incompatible transplantations) as well as patients who have no T-cell-mediated acute rejection, but signs of acute humoral rejection (as listed above according to the criteria glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, C4d positivity) who have to be treated according to medical opinion of the physician with steroid therapy. The evidence of rejection can be performed by a protocol or indication biopsy.
- SV40-negativity in the biopsy
- GFR calculated using the MDRD-Formula > 25 ml/min/1,73 m² in the time period before the noticed rejection.
- Presence of a negative pregnancy test and consent to a highly effective contraceptive method (i.e. failure rate less than 1% per year, which are implants, injectable contraceptives, combined oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices (only hormone spirals), sexual abstinence or vasectomy of the partner) in patients of child-bearing age. This is not required when bilateral sterilization or ovariectomy of the patient and in patients that have exclusively female sex partners. Presence of consent to a highly effective contraceptive method for male patient.
- Informed consent
Who cannot join
- Known contraindications, resp. incompatibility for Rituximab and/or for the concomitant medication
- Administration of Rituximab within the last 12 months before inclusion
- Simultaneous participation in an other clinical study or participation in an other clinical study within the last 30 days
- Breastfeeding women or pregnant women
- Persons who fail to assess essence, meaning and significance of the clinical study and act along these lines (according to § 40 Abs. 4 and § 41 Abs. 2 and Abs. 3 AMG)
- Existence of an active CMV-infection, existence of a HIV-infection, existence of a replicative hepatitis B or C, existence of other grave infections
Show all 13Show fewer
- Cardiac insufficiency in phase NYHA III-IV
- High grade cardiac arrhythmias
- Unstable coronary heart disease
- Poorly adjusted diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 10 %) at the time of the inclusion in the study.
- State after splenectomy
- Contra-indication referring to a renewed transplant biopsy (e.g. coagulopathy, anticoagulation)
- Other exclusion criteria according to the estimate of the attending doctor (e.g. aggravation of the general health condition, occurrence of a malignant disease)
Trial locations and contacts
14 sites in 1 country.
14 sites in 1 country
Germany14 sites
Universitätsklinikum der RWTH Aachen Medizinische Klinik II
Aachen, 52074
Charité Campus Mitte Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Berlin, 10117
Universitätsklinikum Köln Medizinische Klinik IV Nephrologie
Cologne, 50937
Kliniken der Stadt Köln gGmbH Medizinische Klinik I
Cologne, 51109
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf Klinik für Nephrologie
Düsseldorf, 40225
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen Nephrologie und Hypertensiologie
Erlangen, 91054
Universitätsklinikum Essen Klinik für Nephrologie
Essen, 45147
Universitätsklinikum Freiburg Medzinische Klinik IV Nephrologie Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, 79106
Nephrologisches Zentrum Niedersachsen 34346 Hannoversch Münden
Hannoversch Münden, 34346
Hannover Medical School
Hanover, Lower Saxony, 30625
Universitätsklinikum Jena Klinik für Innere Medizin III
Jena, 07747
Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel Klinik für Nieren- und Hochdruckkrankheiten Kiel
Kiel, 24105
Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I der Ludwig-Maximilians-Uniklinik München Klinikum Großhadern
München, 81377
Universitätsklinikum Münster Innere Medizin / Nephrologie
Münster, 48149
About this study
Official title: Efficacy of Rituximab in Acute Cellular Rejection With B-cell Infiltrates in Renal Transplant Patients - Randomized Placebo Controlled Double Blind Trial
Acute kidney allograft rejection is the major cause for a loss of graft function and has a negative impact on long-term graft survival. Anti-rejection therapy traditionally focuses on T cell-mediated mechanisms of renal allograft rejection. However, available agents that affect T-cell pathways have only little impact on long-term graft survival. There is increasing evidence that B-cells play an important role in acute transplant rejections. CD20+ B cell infiltrates in acute T-cell mediated rejections are frequent and correlate with a worse response to conventional anti-rejection treatment and an increased risk of graft loss. In one pilot study, supported by several case reports, a beneficial effect of Rituximab for the treatment of acute rejection episodes with intrarenal B-cell infiltrates was shown. However, despite the promise of these observations solid evidence is required before incorporating this treatment option into a general treatment recommendation.
In a multicenter randomized placebo controlled double blind phase III trial the investigators want to demonstrate that Rituximab in addition to standard treatment with steroid-boli is superior to the standard treatment alone regarding long-term kidney function. If the proposed study proves that Rituximab treatment of acute rejections is beneficial for the long-term allograft function, the conventional rejection therapy needs to be revised to this novel concept of B- cell targeting
- Conditions
- Acute Rejection
- Being tested
- Rituximab, Placebo
- Keywords
- transplantation, acute rejection, kidney
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
RituximabDrug
Also called MabThera
Intravenous application of Rituximab 375mg/m² body surface in 250 ml NaCl 0,9 % over 4 hours
PlaceboDrug
Intravenous application of placebo (NaCl 0,9 %) matching active treatment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Experimental | Intravenous application of Rituximab 375mg/m² body surface in 250 ml NaCl 0,9 % over 4 hours Receives: Drug: Rituximab |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Intravenous application of placebo (NaCl 0,9 %) matching active treatment Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change of the GFR (glomerular filtration rate) one year after intervention compared to the baseline GFR before the rejection, which is calculated by a defined algorithm
Measured: Baseline, 1 year
Secondary outcomes (1)
Progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy between the biopsy that led to enrolment in the study and a scheduled protocol biopsy one year after intervention ("∆IFTA-Score")
Measured: 1 year
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 May 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2012
- Primary completionMay 2016
- Study completion23 Aug 2016
Why it stopped: The planned recruitment number of 180 Patient could not been achieved.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Acute RejectionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hannover Medical School
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01117662
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 200710602
- Acronym
- RIACT
- Status last verified
- Aug 2018
- First submitted
- 28 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 22 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Schiffer L, Schiffer M, Merkel S, Schwarz A, Mengel M, Jurgens C, Schroeder C, Zoerner AA, Pullmann K, Brocker V, Becker JU, Dammrich ME, Trader J, Grosshennig A, Biertz F, Haller H, Koch A, Gwinner W. Rationale and design of the RIACT-study: a multi-center placebo controlled double blind study to test the efficacy of RItuximab in Acute Cellular tubulointerstitial rejection with B-cell infiltrates in renal Transplant patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Oct 26;13:199. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-199.
PubMed 23101480
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 22 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Efficacy of Rituximab in Acute Cellular Rejection With B-cell Infiltrates in Renal Transplant Patients - Randomized Placebo Controlled Double Blind Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01117662
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- RIACT / 200710602
- Conditions
- Acute Rejection
- Keywords
- transplantation, acute rejection, kidney
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: The planned recruitment number of 180 Patient could not been achieved.
- Enrolment
- 13 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hannover Medical SchoolUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- German Federal Ministry of Education and Research
- Study start
- May 2012
- Primary completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- 23 Aug 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 May 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Acute kidney allograft rejection is the major cause for a loss of graft function and has a negative impact on long-term graft survival. Anti-rejection therapy traditionally focuses on T cell-mediated mechanisms of renal allograft rejection. However, available agents that affect T-cell pathways have only little impact on long-term graft survival. There is increasing evidence that B-cells play an important role in acute transplant rejections. CD20+ B cell infiltrates in acute T-cell mediated rejections are frequent and correlate with a worse response to conventional anti-rejection treatment and an increased risk of graft loss. In one pilot study, supported by several case reports, a beneficial effect of Rituximab for the treatment of acute rejection episodes with intrarenal B-cell infiltrates was shown. However, despite the promise of these observations solid evidence is required before incorporating this treatment option into a general treatment recommendation.
In a multicenter randomized placebo controlled double blind phase III trial the investigators want to demonstrate that Rituximab in addition to standard treatment with steroid-boli is superior to the standard treatment alone regarding long-term kidney function. If the proposed study proves that Rituximab treatment of acute rejections is beneficial for the long-term allograft function, the conventional rejection therapy needs to be revised to this novel concept of B- cell targeting
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Rituximab | Experimental | Drug: RituximabIntravenous application of Rituximab 375mg/m² body surface in 250 ml NaCl 0,9 % over 4 hours |
| Control | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboIntravenous application of placebo (NaCl 0,9 %) matching active treatment |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- male or female patients age ≥ 18 at the time of the inclusion in the study
- male or female patients after kidney transplantation if medically justifiable (cave: previous immunosuppression, particularly prior induction therapies or biologicals).
- Proof of an acute rejection in kidney transplant according to Banff-criteria: T-cell-mediated rejection as borderline, grade IA/B, IIA/B (no v-only), if one or more results are available as significant B-cell infiltrates CD20≥20 / high power field, glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis or C4d positivity (with the exception of ABO-incompatible transplantations) as well as patients who have no T-cell-mediated acute rejection, but signs of acute humoral rejection (as listed above according to the criteria glomerulitis, peritubular capillaritis, C4d positivity) who have to be treated according to medical opinion of the physician with steroid therapy. The evidence of rejection can be performed by a protocol or indication biopsy.
- SV40-negativity in the biopsy
- GFR calculated using the MDRD-Formula > 25 ml/min/1,73 m² in the time period before the noticed rejection.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Known contraindications, resp. incompatibility for Rituximab and/or for the concomitant medication
- Administration of Rituximab within the last 12 months before inclusion
- Simultaneous participation in an other clinical study or participation in an other clinical study within the last 30 days
- Breastfeeding women or pregnant women
- Persons who fail to assess essence, meaning and significance of the clinical study and act along these lines (according to § 40 Abs. 4 and § 41 Abs. 2 and Abs. 3 AMG)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| RituximabAlso: MabTheraIntravenous application of Rituximab 375mg/m² body surface in 250 ml NaCl 0,9 % over 4 hours | Drug | Rituximab |
| PlaceboIntravenous application of placebo (NaCl 0,9 %) matching active treatment | Drug | Control |
Primary outcome
Change of the GFR (glomerular filtration rate) one year after intervention compared to the baseline GFR before the rejection, which is calculated by a defined algorithm
Time frame: Baseline, 1 year
1 secondary outcome
Progression of interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy between the biopsy that led to enrolment in the study and a scheduled protocol biopsy one year after intervention ("∆IFTA-Score")
Time frame: 1 year
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: The planned recruitment number of 180 Patient could not been achieved.). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 22 Aug 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 23101480Schiffer L, Schiffer M, Merkel S, Schwarz A, Mengel M, Jurgens C, Schroeder C, Zoerner AA, Pullmann K, Brocker V, Becker JU, Dammrich ME, Trader J, Grosshennig A, Biertz F, Haller H, Koch A, Gwinner W. Rationale and design of the RIACT-study: a multi-center placebo controlled double blind study to test the efficacy of RItuximab in Acute Cellular tubulointerstitial rejection with B-cell infiltrates in renal Transplant patients: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2012 Oct 26;13:199. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-199.
Related trials for Acute Rejection
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Blood Biomarkers in Pediatric Kidney Transplant Recipients
Rejection of Kidney Allograft
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of LBP-MARCO and Ruxolitinib in People With Graft-Versus-Host Disease (GVHD)
Transplant Failure or Rejection of Bone Marrow (Graft vs Host Disease, GVHD)
RecruitingObservational study
Immune Biomarkers for Predicting Complications After Liver Transplantation
Liver Transplantation (LT), Immuno-suppression
RecruitingObservational study
Genome Transplant Dynamics
Thoracic Organ Transplantation
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
Darzalex Faspro (Daratumumab and Hyaluronidase-fihj) Before Standard Desensitization and Allogeneic Bone Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation in Adult Patients at High-risk for Primary Graft Failure Secondary to Donor Specific Antibodies
Hematologic Malignancy, Bone Marrow Transplant Rejection
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
14 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Rituximab in people with Acute Rejection, run by Hannover Medical School at 14 sites in Germany.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 14 sites in Germany. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: The planned recruitment number of 180 Patient could not been achieved.). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change of the GFR (glomerular filtration rate) one year after intervention compared to the baseline GFR before the rejection, which is calculated by a defined algorithm (time frame: Baseline, 1 year). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01117662, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Aug 2018.