SarcomaPhase 2NCT01104298
Doxorubicin vs. Trabectedin Plus Doxorubicin in Non Operable and/or Metastatic STS
A Phase 2 study testing Doxorubicin and Trabectedin in people with Sarcoma, run by Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en Sarcomas at 20 sites in Spain.
Trial summary
The proposed investigation intends to explore if the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in the first line of treatment of advanced sarcomas obtains better results than doxorubicin monotherapy Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Sarcoma
- What is being tested?
- Doxorubicin and Trabectedin
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 115 participants
- Where
- 20 sitesSpain
- Study dates
- Nov 2009to May 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- The patient must sign voluntarily the informed consent from before any study test is conducted that is not part of routine patient care, with the knowledge that he/she can abandon the study at any time without this affecting his/her previous care.
- Aged between 18 and 70.
- Pathological diagnosis of non operable and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.
- The following histological subtypes can be included:
- Undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (previously,malignant fibrous istiocytoma)
- Leiomyosarcoma
Show all 19Show fewer
- Angiosarcoma
- Liposarcoma
- Synovial sarcoma
- Fibrosarcoma
- Hemangiopericytoma
- Neurofibrosarcoma
- Mixofibrosarcoma
- Unclassified sarcoma
- Measurable disease, according to RECIST criteria
- Performance status 0-2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG).
- Adequate bone marrow function (hemoglobin > 10 g/dL, leukocytes ≥ 3.000/mm3, neutrophils ≥1.500/mm3, platelets ≥ 100.000/mm3). Patients with plasma creatinine ≤ 1,6 mg/dL, transaminases ≤2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), total bilirubin ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN), CPK ≤ 2.5 times upper limit of normal (ULN), alkaline phosphatase ≤ 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) are acceptable. If the increase of alkaline phosphatase is > 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN), then the alkaline phosphatase liver fraction and/or 5' nucleotidase and/or GGT must be ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN).
- Men or women of child bearing potential should be using an effective method of contraception before entry into the study and throughout the same and for 6 months after ending the study. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test before study entry.
- Normal cardiac function with a Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥ 50% by echocardiogram or Multiple Uptake Gated Acquisition Scan (MUGA).
Who cannot join
- Previous chemotherapy treatment.
- Previous radiotherapy involving the only localization(s) of measurable tumoral disease.
- Performance status> 2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG).
- Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases.
- Plasma bilirubin > upper limit of normal(ULN).
- Creatinine > 1.6 mg/dL.
Show all 20Show fewer
- History of other neoplastic disease with the exception of basalioma or in situ cervical cancer adequately treated.
- Significant cardiovascular disease (for example, dyspnea > 2 NYHA)
- Significant systemic diseases grade 3 or higher on the NCI-CTC version 3.0 scale, that limit patient availability, or according to investigator judgment may contribute significantly to treatment toxicity.
- Uncontrolled bacterial, mycotic or viral infections.
- Women who are pregnant or breast-feeding
- Psychological, familial, social or geographic circumstances that limit the patient's ability to comply with the protocol or informed consent.
- Patients participating in another clinical trial or receiving any other investigational product.
- Patients who had participated in another clinical trial and/or had received any other investigational product in the last 30 days prior to inclusion.
- The following histologic subtypes are excluded:
- Rhabdomyosarcoma
- Ewing's family of tumors
- Desmoplastic small round cell tumor
- Clear cell sarcoma
- Alveolar sarcoma
Trial locations and contacts
20 sites in 1 country.
20 sites in 1 country
Spain20 sites
ICO Badalona
Badalona
H. Clinic Barcelona
Barcelona
H. Sant Pau
Barcelona
H. Provincial Castellón
Castellon
ICO Girona
Girona
Ico Hospitalet
L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona
H. Xeral Cies
Lugo
Clinica Puerta Hierro
Madrid
H. Clínico. San Carlos
Madrid
H. U. La Paz
Madrid
H.U. Gregorio Marañon
Madrid
H.U. Ramon Y Cajal
Madrid
H.U. Clinico de Malaga
Málaga
H. de Navarra
Navarra
H. C. Asturias
Oviedo
H. Son Dureta
Palma de Mallorca
H. Univ. Canarias
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
H.U. Virgen Del Rocio
Seville
Instituto Valenciano de Oncología
Valencia
H. Miguel Servet
Zaragoza
About this study
Official title: Randomized, Open, Multicenter, Prospective, Phase II Clinical Trial of Doxorubicin vs. Trabectedin Plus Doxorubicin in the First Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non Operable and/or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas
The proposed investigation intends to explore if the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in the first line of treatment of advanced sarcomas obtains better results than doxorubicin monotherapy
Read the detailed description
The proposed investigation intends to explore if the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in the first line of treatment of advanced sarcomas obtains better results than doxorubicin monotherapy.
This proposal arises from the need to bring to the first line of treatment of advanced STS agents that have shown activity in second line. The goal is to improve available standard treatments. Tumors in patients not previously exposed to chemotherapy have not been selected in their biological behavior and they are the best scenario to test antitumor activity of a new anticancer drug.
The combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action may be a clear advantage to obtain better results and potential synergy. On the other hand, the toxicity profiles of both study drugs are different and worsening or summative of adverse effects is not expected.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS).
- Conditions
- Sarcoma
- Being tested
- Doxorubicin, Trabectedin
- Keywords
- metastatic STS, Trabectedin, doxorrubicin, soft tissue sarcoma, non operable sarcoma
- Medical subject headings
- Sarcoma, Ichthyosis, X-Linked
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
DoxorubicinDrug
Also called Adriamycin
A maximum of 6 cycles every 3 weeks of doxorubicin monotherapy 75 mg/square meter will be given in the absence of progression or not acceptable toxicity.
TrabectedinDrug
Also called Yondelis
A maximum of 6 cycles every 3 weeks of the combination (Trabectedin 1,1 mg/square meter + doxorubicin 60 mg/square meter) will be given in the absence of progression or not acceptable toxicity.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active comparator | Classic Doxorubicin (Adriamycin - Doxorubicin hydrochloride) Presentation: Solution with 10, 20, or 50 mg Doxorubicin Hydrochloride. Excipients: hydrochloric acid and sodium chloride 0.9%, q.s. 25 ml.
Pharmaceutical form: concentrate for solution for infusion. Route of administration: Intravenous Receives: Drug: Doxorubicin |
| Arm B | Experimental | Trabectedin Presentation: vials with trabectedin 1 mg and sucrose 400 mg. Pharmaceutical form: A white or whitish lyophilized powder as concentrate for solution for injection.
Route of administration: for intravenous use after reconstitution and further dilution.
Classic Doxorubicin (Adriamycin - Doxorubicin hydrochloride) Presentation: Solution with 10, 20, or 50 mg Doxorubicin Hydrochloride. Excipients: hydrochloric acid and sodium chloride 0.9%, q.s. 25 ml.
Pharmaceutical form: concentrate for solution for infusion. Route of administration: Intravenous Receives: Drug: Trabectedin |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
To determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS)
To determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS). To this end, progression free survival will be compared between both groups of treatment.
Measured: 2012
Secondary outcomes (7)
To determine activity by means of RECIST objective responses in both study arms, trabectedin/doxorubicin combination and the control arm.
To determine activity by means of RECIST objective responses in both study arms, trabectedin/doxorubicin combination and the control arm.
Measured: 2012
To determine the tumor control (response rates plus stabilizations) in both arms of treatment.
To determine the tumor control (response rates plus stabilizations) in both arms of treatment.
Measured: 2012
Overall survival.
Overall survival.
Measured: 2012
To determine activity by tissue changes applying the Choi criteria to Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS)(see radiological review sub study).
To determine activity by tissue changes applying the Choi criteria to Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS)(see radiological review sub study).
Measured: 2012
To determine toxicity of trabectedin/doxorubicin combination and the control arm.
To determine toxicity of trabectedin/doxorubicin combination and the control arm.
Measured: 2012
To determine protein and mRNA expression of genes possibly involved in a potential profile of more favorable response or resistance to study drugs and to analyze the prognostic impact of them on predefined efficacy parameters.
To determine protein and mRNA expression of genes possibly involved in a potential profile of more favorable response or resistance to study drugs and to analyze the prognostic impact of them on predefined efficacy parameters.
Measured: 2012
To evaluate genomic instability, as well as protein expression that could influence response/resistance to the study drugs and make a correlation with efficacy endpoints.
To evaluate genomic instability, as well as protein expression that could influence response/resistance to the study drugs and make a correlation with efficacy endpoints.
Measured: 2012
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted15 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2009
- Primary completionDec 2012
- Study completionMay 2014
Why it stopped: Interim analysis did not show good results for main objective
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for SarcomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en Sarcomas
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Javier Martin Broto, PhM, Principal investigator, GEISAndres Poveda, Ph.M., Principal investigator, GEIS
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01104298
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- GEIS-20
- Other IDs
- 2008-008922-55, 2008
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 13 Apr 2010
- Last updated
- 27 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized, Open, Multicenter, Prospective, Phase II Clinical Trial of Doxorubicin vs. Trabectedin Plus Doxorubicin in the First Line Treatment of Patients With Advanced Non Operable and/or Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01104298
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- GEIS-20
- Conditions
- Sarcoma
- Keywords
- metastatic STS, Trabectedin, doxorrubicin, soft tissue sarcoma, non operable sarcoma
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Interim analysis did not show good results for main objective
- Enrolment
- 115 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en SarcomasUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2009
- Primary completion
- Dec 2012 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 15 Apr 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The proposed investigation intends to explore if the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in the first line of treatment of advanced sarcomas obtains better results than doxorubicin monotherapy
Detailed description
The proposed investigation intends to explore if the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in the first line of treatment of advanced sarcomas obtains better results than doxorubicin monotherapy.
This proposal arises from the need to bring to the first line of treatment of advanced STS agents that have shown activity in second line. The goal is to improve available standard treatments. Tumors in patients not previously exposed to chemotherapy have not been selected in their biological behavior and they are the best scenario to test antitumor activity of a new anticancer drug.
The combination of drugs with different mechanisms of action may be a clear advantage to obtain better results and potential synergy. On the other hand, the toxicity profiles of both study drugs are different and worsening or summative of adverse effects is not expected.
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A | Active comparator | Drug: DoxorubicinClassic Doxorubicin (Adriamycin - Doxorubicin hydrochloride) Presentation: Solution with 10, 20, or 50 mg Doxorubicin Hydrochloride. Excipients: hydrochloric acid and sodium chloride 0.9%, q.s. 25 ml. Pharmaceutical form: concentrate for solution for infusion. Route of administration: Intravenous |
| Arm B | Experimental | Drug: TrabectedinTrabectedin Presentation: vials with trabectedin 1 mg and sucrose 400 mg. Pharmaceutical form: A white or whitish lyophilized powder as concentrate for solution for injection. Route of administration: for intravenous use after reconstitution and further dilution. Classic Doxorubicin (Adriamycin - Doxorubicin hydrochloride) Presentation: Solution with 10, 20, or 50 mg Doxorubicin Hydrochloride. Excipients: hydrochloric acid and sodium chloride 0.9%, q.s. 25 ml. Pharmaceutical form: concentrate for solution for infusion. Route of administration: Intravenous |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (19 listed)
- The patient must sign voluntarily the informed consent from before any study test is conducted that is not part of routine patient care, with the knowledge that he/she can abandon the study at any time without this affecting his/her previous care.
- Aged between 18 and 70.
- Pathological diagnosis of non operable and/or metastatic soft tissue sarcoma.
- The following histological subtypes can be included:
- Measurable disease, according to RECIST criteria
Key exclusion criteria (20 listed)
- Previous chemotherapy treatment.
- Previous radiotherapy involving the only localization(s) of measurable tumoral disease.
- Performance status> 2 Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group(ECOG).
- Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases.
- Plasma bilirubin > upper limit of normal(ULN).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| DoxorubicinAlso: AdriamycinA maximum of 6 cycles every 3 weeks of doxorubicin monotherapy 75 mg/square meter will be given in the absence of progression or not acceptable toxicity. | Drug | Arm A |
| TrabectedinAlso: YondelisA maximum of 6 cycles every 3 weeks of the combination (Trabectedin 1,1 mg/square meter + doxorubicin 60 mg/square meter) will be given in the absence of progression or not acceptable toxicity. | Drug | Arm B |
Primary outcome
To determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS)
Time frame: 2012
To determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS). To this end, progression free survival will be compared between both groups of treatment.
7 secondary outcomes
To determine activity by means of RECIST objective responses in both study arms, trabectedin/doxorubicin combination and the control arm.
Time frame: 2012
To determine the tumor control (response rates plus stabilizations) in both arms of treatment.
Time frame: 2012
Overall survival.
Time frame: 2012
To determine activity by tissue changes applying the Choi criteria to Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS)(see radiological review sub study).
Time frame: 2012
To determine toxicity of trabectedin/doxorubicin combination and the control arm.
Time frame: 2012
To determine protein and mRNA expression of genes possibly involved in a potential profile of more favorable response or resistance to study drugs and to analyze the prognostic impact of them on predefined efficacy parameters.
Time frame: 2012
To evaluate genomic instability, as well as protein expression that could influence response/resistance to the study drugs and make a correlation with efficacy endpoints.
Time frame: 2012
Results and safety
The study was stopped early (reason given: Interim analysis did not show good results for main objective). Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Oct 2015.
Related trials for Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
A Multicenter Phase II Clinical Trial Evaluating 68Ga-HX01 Injection for PET/CT Imaging
Soft Tissue Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 3
Measuring if Immunotherapy Plus Chemotherapy is Better Than Chemotherapy Alone for Patients With Aggressive Poorly Differentiated Sarcomas
Metastatic Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma, Metastatic Undifferentiated Pleomorphic Sarcoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Dose Escalation and Dose Expansion Study of MDX2003 in Patients With Different Types of Lymphoma
Lymphoma, Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM)
Enrolling by invitationPhase 1
Evaluation of the I-phase Clinical Trial of 177Lu-HX02 Injection in Patients With Advanced Malignant Solid Tumors
Soft Tissue Sarcoma, Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Javier Martin Broto, PhM principal investigator
GEIS
Andres Poveda, Ph.M. principal investigator
GEIS
20 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Doxorubicin and Trabectedin in people with Sarcoma, run by Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en Sarcomas at 20 sites in Spain.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 19 inclusion and 20 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 20 sites in Spain. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study was stopped early (reason given: Interim analysis did not show good results for main objective). Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
To determine the efficacy of the combination of trabectedin and doxorubicin in comparison with doxorubicin alone in patients with advanced non operable and/or metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcomas (STS) (time frame: 2012). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Oct 2015.