Cerebrovascular AccidentPhase 1NCT01072461
Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual Environments
A Phase 1 study testing HAS Training, HAT training and Bimanual Training in people with Cerebrovascular Accident and Hemiparesis, run by New Jersey Institute of Technology at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Cerebrovascular Accident, Hemiparesis, Hemiplegia
- What is being tested?
- HAS Training, HAT training and Bimanual Training
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 55 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Mar 2009to Mar 2015
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Six months post cerebrovascular accident
- Residual upper extremity impairment that affects participation
- At least ten degrees of active finger extension
- Tolerate passive shoulder flexion to chest level
Who cannot join
- Severe neglect
- Severe aphasia
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
New Jersey Institute of Technology
Newark, New Jersey, 07102
About this study
The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. The investigators past work has shown that training in a virtual environment (VE) using repetitive, adaptive algorithms has the potential to be an effective rehabilitation medium to facilitate motor recovery of hand function. These findings are in accordance with current neuroscience literature in animals and motor control literature in humans. The investigators are now in a position to refine and optimize elements of the training paradigms to enhance neuroplasticity. The investigators first aim tests if and how competition among body parts for neural representations stifles functional gains from different types of training regimens. The second aim tests the functional benefits of unilateral versus bilateral training regimens.The third aim tests whether functional improvements gained from training in a virtual environment transfer to other (untrained) skills in the real world.
Read the detailed description
The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. The investigators past work has shown that training in a virtual environment (VE) using repetitive, adaptive algorithms has the potential to be an effective rehabilitation medium to facilitate motor recovery of hand function. These findings are in accordance with current neuroscience literature in animals and motor control literature in humans. The investigators are now in a position to refine and optimize elements of the training paradigms to enhance neuroplasticity. The investigators first aim tests if and how competition among body parts for neural representations stifles functional gains from different types of training regimens. The second aim tests the functional benefits of unilateral versus bilateral training regimens.The third aim tests whether functional improvements gained from training in a virtual environment transfer to other (untrained) skills in the real world.
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident, Hemiparesis, Hemiplegia
- Being tested
- HAS Training, HAT training, Bimanual Training
- Keywords
- Cerebrovascular Accident, Robotics, Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation, Neuroplasticity
- Medical subject headings
- Stroke, Paresis, Hemiplegia
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
HAS TrainingBehavioural
Also called Isolated UE training
Robotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and arm in isolation, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment.
HAT trainingBehavioural
Also called Integrated UE training
Robotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and arm as an integrated functional unit, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment
Bimanual TrainingBehavioural
Also called Bilateral UE training
Robotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and non-hemiparetic hand together, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Train Paretic Hand and Arm Separate | Active comparator | Eight three hour training sessions of robotically facilitated hand and arm training in complex virtual environments, using activities that train the fingers in isolation and other activities that train the arm in isolation. Receives: Behavioral: HAS Training |
| Train Paretic Hand and Arm Together | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: HAT training |
| Train Both Hands Together in VE | Experimental | Not described Receives: Behavioral: Bimanual Training |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Jebsen Test of Hand Function
Measured: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Secondary outcomes (5)
Change in Wolf Motor Function Test
Measured: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Change in 9 Hole Peg Test
Measured: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Change in Box and Blocks Test
Measured: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Change in Robotically Collected Kinematics
Measured: 1 day before training and 1 day after training
Change in Reach to Grasp Test
Measured: 1 day before training and 1 day after training
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2009
- Primary completionMar 2013
- Study completionMar 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (21)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Cerebrovascular AccidentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Sergei V. Adamovich PhD, New Jersey Institute of Technology
- Investigators
- Sergei V. Adamovich, PhD, Principal investigator, New Jersey Institute of Technology
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01072461
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 5R01HD058301-02
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 16 Feb 2010
- Last updated
- 7 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(1):29-44. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0497.
PubMed 19713617Tunik E, Adamovich SV. Remapping in the ipsilesional motor cortex after VR-based training: a pilot fMRI study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1139-42. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5335392.
PubMed 19965144Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qiu Q, Lafond I, Saleh S, Ruano V, Delmonico AR, Adamovich SV. Robots integrated with virtual reality simulations for customized motor training in a person with upper extremity hemiparesis: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;36(2):79-86. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3182566f3f.
PubMed 22592063Tunik E, Saleh S, Adamovich SV. Visuomotor discordance during visually-guided hand movement in virtual reality modulates sensorimotor cortical activity in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Mar;21(2):198-207. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2238250. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
PubMed 23314780Bagce HF, Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Krakauer JW, Tunik E. Corticospinal excitability is enhanced after visuomotor adaptation and depends on learning rather than performance or error. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(4):1097-106. doi: 10.1152/jn.00304.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
PubMed 23197454Bagce HF, Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Visuomotor gain distortion alters online motor performance and enhances primary motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke. Neuromodulation. 2012 Jul;15(4):361-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00467.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
PubMed 22672345Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Resting state functional connectivity and task-related effective connectivity changes after upper extremity rehabilitation: a pilot study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4559-62. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346981.
PubMed 23366942Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Mirrored feedback in chronic stroke: recruitment and effective connectivity of ipsilesional sensorimotor networks. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 May;28(4):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1545968313513074. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
PubMed 24370569Yarossi M, Adamovich S, Tunik E. Sensorimotor cortex reorganization in subacute and chronic stroke: A neuronavigated TMS study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5788-91. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944943.
PubMed 25571311Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Bagce H, Yarossi M, Tunik E. Disruption of activity in the ventral premotor but not the anterior intraparietal area interferes with on-line correction to a haptic perturbation during grasping. J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;35(5):2112-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3000-14.2015.
PubMed 25653367Qiu Q, Fluet GG, Lafond I, Merians AS, Adamovich SV. Coordination changes demonstrated by subjects with hemiparesis performing hand-arm training using the NJIT-RAVR robotically assisted virtual rehabilitation system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1143-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5335384.
PubMed 19965145Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Merians AS, Mathai A, Qiu Q. Incorporating haptic effects into three-dimensional virtual environments to train the hemiparetic upper extremity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009 Oct;17(5):512-20. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2028830. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
PubMed 19666345Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Mathai A, Qiu Q, Lewis J, Merians AS. Design of a complex virtual reality simulation to train finger motion for persons with hemiparesis: a proof of concept study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2009 Jul 17;6:28. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-6-28.
PubMed 19615045Merians AS, Fluet GG, Qiu Q, Saleh S, Lafond I, Davidow A, Adamovich SV. Robotically facilitated virtual rehabilitation of arm transport integrated with finger movement in persons with hemiparesis. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011 May 16;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-8-27.
PubMed 21575185Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qiu Q, Davidow A, Adamovich SV. Comparing integrated training of the hand and arm with isolated training of the same effectors in persons with stroke using haptically rendered virtual environments, a randomized clinical trial. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014 Aug 23;11:126. doi: 10.1186/1743-0003-11-126.
PubMed 25148846
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Optimizing Hand Rehabilitation Post-Stroke Using Interactive Virtual Environments
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01072461
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 5R01HD058301-02
- Conditions
- Cerebrovascular Accident, Hemiparesis, Hemiplegia
- Keywords
- Cerebrovascular Accident, Robotics, Virtual Reality, Rehabilitation, Neuroplasticity
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 55 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- New Jersey Institute of TechnologyUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
- Study start
- Mar 2009
- Primary completion
- Mar 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Feb 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. The investigators past work has shown that training in a virtual environment (VE) using repetitive, adaptive algorithms has the potential to be an effective rehabilitation medium to facilitate motor recovery of hand function. These findings are in accordance with current neuroscience literature in animals and motor control literature in humans. The investigators are now in a position to refine and optimize elements of the training paradigms to enhance neuroplasticity. The investigators first aim tests if and how competition among body parts for neural representations stifles functional gains from different types of training regimens. The second aim tests the functional benefits of unilateral versus bilateral training regimens.The third aim tests whether functional improvements gained from training in a virtual environment transfer to other (untrained) skills in the real world.
Detailed description
The complexity of sensorimotor control required for hand function as well as the wide range of recovery of manipulative abilities makes rehabilitation of the hand most challenging. The investigators past work has shown that training in a virtual environment (VE) using repetitive, adaptive algorithms has the potential to be an effective rehabilitation medium to facilitate motor recovery of hand function. These findings are in accordance with current neuroscience literature in animals and motor control literature in humans. The investigators are now in a position to refine and optimize elements of the training paradigms to enhance neuroplasticity. The investigators first aim tests if and how competition among body parts for neural representations stifles functional gains from different types of training regimens. The second aim tests the functional benefits of unilateral versus bilateral training regimens.The third aim tests whether functional improvements gained from training in a virtual environment transfer to other (untrained) skills in the real world.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Train Paretic Hand and Arm Separate | Active comparator | Behavioral: HAS TrainingEight three hour training sessions of robotically facilitated hand and arm training in complex virtual environments, using activities that train the fingers in isolation and other activities that train the arm in isolation. |
| Train Paretic Hand and Arm Together | Experimental | Behavioral: HAT training |
| Train Both Hands Together in VE | Experimental | Behavioral: Bimanual Training |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Six months post cerebrovascular accident
- Residual upper extremity impairment that affects participation
- At least ten degrees of active finger extension
- Tolerate passive shoulder flexion to chest level
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Severe neglect
- Severe aphasia
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| HAS TrainingAlso: Isolated UE trainingRobotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and arm in isolation, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment. | Behavioural | Train Paretic Hand and Arm Separate |
| HAT trainingAlso: Integrated UE trainingRobotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and arm as an integrated functional unit, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment | Behavioural | Train Paretic Hand and Arm Together |
| Bimanual TrainingAlso: Bilateral UE trainingRobotically measured and facilitated training of the hemiparetic hand and non-hemiparetic hand together, in a three dimensional haptically rendered virtual environment | Behavioural | Train Both Hands Together in VE |
Primary outcome
Change in Jebsen Test of Hand Function
Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
5 secondary outcomes
Change in Wolf Motor Function Test
Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Change in 9 Hole Peg Test
Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Change in Box and Blocks Test
Time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training
Change in Robotically Collected Kinematics
Time frame: 1 day before training and 1 day after training
Change in Reach to Grasp Test
Time frame: 1 day before training and 1 day after training
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 19713617Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Tunik E, Merians AS. Sensorimotor training in virtual reality: a review. NeuroRehabilitation. 2009;25(1):29-44. doi: 10.3233/NRE-2009-0497.
- Background: PubMed 19965144Tunik E, Adamovich SV. Remapping in the ipsilesional motor cortex after VR-based training: a pilot fMRI study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1139-42. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5335392.
- Background: PubMed 22592063Fluet GG, Merians AS, Qiu Q, Lafond I, Saleh S, Ruano V, Delmonico AR, Adamovich SV. Robots integrated with virtual reality simulations for customized motor training in a person with upper extremity hemiparesis: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2012 Jun;36(2):79-86. doi: 10.1097/NPT.0b013e3182566f3f.
- Background: PubMed 23314780Tunik E, Saleh S, Adamovich SV. Visuomotor discordance during visually-guided hand movement in virtual reality modulates sensorimotor cortical activity in healthy and hemiparetic subjects. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2013 Mar;21(2):198-207. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2013.2238250. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
- Background: PubMed 23197454Bagce HF, Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Krakauer JW, Tunik E. Corticospinal excitability is enhanced after visuomotor adaptation and depends on learning rather than performance or error. J Neurophysiol. 2013 Feb;109(4):1097-106. doi: 10.1152/jn.00304.2012. Epub 2012 Nov 28.
- Background: PubMed 22672345Bagce HF, Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Visuomotor gain distortion alters online motor performance and enhances primary motor cortex excitability in patients with stroke. Neuromodulation. 2012 Jul;15(4):361-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00467.x. Epub 2012 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 23366942Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Resting state functional connectivity and task-related effective connectivity changes after upper extremity rehabilitation: a pilot study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2012;2012:4559-62. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2012.6346981.
- Background: PubMed 24370569Saleh S, Adamovich SV, Tunik E. Mirrored feedback in chronic stroke: recruitment and effective connectivity of ipsilesional sensorimotor networks. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2014 May;28(4):344-54. doi: 10.1177/1545968313513074. Epub 2013 Dec 26.
- Background: PubMed 25571311Yarossi M, Adamovich S, Tunik E. Sensorimotor cortex reorganization in subacute and chronic stroke: A neuronavigated TMS study. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2014;2014:5788-91. doi: 10.1109/EMBC.2014.6944943.
- Background: PubMed 25653367Schettino LF, Adamovich SV, Bagce H, Yarossi M, Tunik E. Disruption of activity in the ventral premotor but not the anterior intraparietal area interferes with on-line correction to a haptic perturbation during grasping. J Neurosci. 2015 Feb 4;35(5):2112-7. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3000-14.2015.
- Results publication: PubMed 19965145Qiu Q, Fluet GG, Lafond I, Merians AS, Adamovich SV. Coordination changes demonstrated by subjects with hemiparesis performing hand-arm training using the NJIT-RAVR robotically assisted virtual rehabilitation system. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2009;2009:1143-6. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2009.5335384.
- Results publication: PubMed 19666345Adamovich SV, Fluet GG, Merians AS, Mathai A, Qiu Q. Incorporating haptic effects into three-dimensional virtual environments to train the hemiparetic upper extremity. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2009 Oct;17(5):512-20. doi: 10.1109/TNSRE.2009.2028830. Epub 2009 Aug 7.
Related trials for Cerebrovascular Accident
Recruiting
Delay AvoIding Primary Evaluation for ThRombectomy of Acute StrokE Patients With Large Vessel OCclusion in the Angiography SuiTe
Stroke, Acute
RecruitingPhase 4
Xeomin® and Gait Related Mobility After Stroke
Stroke
RecruitingObservational study
Implementing Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in a Rehabilitation Setting
Aphasia, Stroke
Not yet recruiting
EEG Feedback-Based Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Post-Stroke Dysphagia
Ischemic Stroke, Post-stroke Dysphagia
RecruitingObservational study
Development and Validation of Risk Prediction Models for Stroke and Cognitive Impairment in Moyamoya Disease and Moyamoya Syndrome
Moyamoya Disease, Moyamoya Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Sergei V. Adamovich, PhD principal investigator
New Jersey Institute of Technology
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1 study testing HAS Training, HAT training and Bimanual Training in people with Cerebrovascular Accident and Hemiparesis, run by New Jersey Institute of Technology at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Jebsen Test of Hand Function (time frame: Two Weeks Prior to Training, Immediately Prior to Training, Immediately After Training, 3 Months After Training). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT01072461, which also lists 21 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Oct 2015.