Esophageal CancerPhase 3NCT01053182
Esophagectomy Associated Respiratory Complications: Ivor-Lewis Versus Sweet Approaches
A Phase 3 study testing Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy and Sweet Esophagectomy in people with Esophageal Cancer and Postoperative Complications, run by Sichuan University at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
Worldwide, esophageal cancer is the 6th most common cause of cancer-related death. Currently curative resection remains the cornerstone of the therapy. Despite advances in anesthesia, operative techniques and postoperative management, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently accounting for about… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Esophageal Cancer, Postoperative Complications, Diaphragm
- What is being tested?
- Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy and Sweet Esophagectomy
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 320 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jan 2010to Jan 2013
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 70 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Biopsy or cytology confirmed esophageal carcinoma.
- No-contraindication to surgery.
- Tumor locates at middle or lower thoracic esophagus (e.g. below the level of azygos vein according to AJCC cancer staging manual, esophageal and esophagogastric junctional cancer, 7th edition, 2009), so that the anastomosis could be completed within the thorax
- Informed consent.
Who cannot join
- Patients with low performance status (ECOG score > 1)
- Refuse to participate
- History of adjuvant chemo and/or radiotherapy
- History of malignancy
- Previous abdominal and/or thoracic surgery
- History of pleural disease with obvious pleural adhesion on X-ray examination
Show all 9Show fewer
- Contraindication to any of the planned intervention procedure
- Pregnancy
- Age of ≥ 70 years
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Thoracic Surgery Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University
Chengdu, Sichuan, 610042
Longqi Chen, MD, PhD, +86 138 8203 0466, wchrct001@gmail.com
Yidan Lin, MD, PhD, +86 189 80602136, yidan.lin@gmail.com
About this study
Official title: A Phase Ⅲ Study of Respiratory Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Through Either Ivor-Lewis or Sweet Approach for the Treatment of Middle or Lower Third Intrathoracic Esophageal Carcinoma
Worldwide, esophageal cancer is the 6th most common cause of cancer-related death. Currently curative resection remains the cornerstone of the therapy. Despite advances in anesthesia, operative techniques and postoperative management, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently accounting for about 30% of all postoperative complications. Most importantly, PPCs have much been associated with postoperative mortality. The diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle and its respiratory function would be inevitably damaged when esophagectomy is performed through the left posterolateral thoracotomy (Sweet procedure) because the diaphragm must be dissected for the purpose of stomach moralization. Meanwhile, Ivor-Lewis approach may effectively avoid diaphragm injury because the stomach can be managed through a laparotomy whereas an additional abdomen incision is needed. Both procedures are routinely used in practice when surgically managing esophageal cancer. The investigators hypothesize that Ivor-Lewis procedure might be superior to the left-thoracotomy route during esophagectomy in preventing PPCs.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China and worldwide with poor prognosis. Although the surgical resection combined with adjuvant therapy constitutes the mainstay of the treatment the esophagectomy-associated complications are still life-threatening. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including pulmonary infection, atelectasis, edema and ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) are the leading causes of the eventful postoperative episodes.
The diaphragm is the well known essential respiratory muscle whose normal function guarantees more than 30% of pulmonary function. Esophagectomy through left thoracotomy would inevitably cut off the left diaphragm for the abdominal procedure and thus greatly damage the diaphragmatic function. It has been assumed that Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy would save the pulmonary function to a great extent by retaining the intact diaphragm but the addition of a laparotomy would be unavoidable. However, this hypothesis has not been confirmed by any randomized controlled trial with adequate operation volume. At present, a large part of thoracic surgeons, for example in China, still prefer esophagectomy through Sweet approach believing that it is less traumatic. So far, there is presently no convincing evidence to guide the esophagectomy approach selection on the aspect of prevention of PPCs.
Objectives:
- To compare the PPCs rates after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy
- To compare the degrees of diaphragm function deficiencies between two groups.
- To compare the pulmonary function results between two groups
- To compare the degrees of gastric emptying between two groups
Diagnostic Criteria for PPCs: any one of the followings and not because of anastomotic leak, massive pleural effusion and non-pulmonary origin infection:
- postoperative hypoxemia (PaO2≤ 60mmHg and/or PaCO2≥ 50mmHg) or dyspnea
- transfer to intensive care unit due to hypoxemia or dyspnea
- purulent pulmonary secretions requiring bronchoscopic suction
- dependence on oxygen mask or nasal tube for more than 5 days
- infiltrating or atelectasis in one pulmonary lobe or multiple segments identified by chest X-ray film or CT scan)
- postoperative hiatal hernia associated pulmonary dysfunction
- dependence on ventilator support for more than 48h
Degree of diaphragm function: The distance of diaphragmatic movement in centimeters
Pulmonary function measurement: FEV1, FVC and MMV
Gastric emptying function: Radioactivity remained at 15 minutes after ingestion of 100ml Tm99-labelled radioactive milk
Design:
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Thoracic Surgery Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Patients and methods:
All patients with histologically confirmed esophageal carcinoma located at the middle or lower thoracic esophagus presenting to our hospital will be considered for the study
Termination criteria:
- Intolerance of any of the treatment modality,
- Development of PPCs
- Development of any other severe complication, such as progressive bleeding, large pleural effusion, empyema
- Death
Staging investigations will be standard and will include
- Computed Tomography (CT) of Chest in all patients
- Fibroesophagoscopy in all patients
- Esophagogram by barium swallow in all patients
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) wherever possible Further investigation likes bronchoscopy, PET scan, or MRI will be applied if indicated.
Randomization:
Complete randomization will be done using a computer generated sheet. Randomization will be performed after confirming resectability of the primary tumor and enlarged lymph nodes.
All surgeries will be performed under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia. The surgery will be performed either by Dr. Longqi Chen or Dr. Yidan Lin who is the faculty and professor of the thoracic surgery department of West China Hospital. Thoracic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymphadenectomy will be done by open thoracotomy. Stomach dissection and gastric tube making will be done either through the left diaphragm incision when left thoracotomy is applied or through the laparotomy when Ivor-Lewis approach is applied. Operative time, blood loss, blood product replacement and all intraoperative details will be recorded in the proforma. Patients will be shifted postoperatively to the intensive care unit (ICU) for observation and subsequently to the recovery or high dependency ward once stabilized. Postoperative details including period of postoperative ventilation, hemorrhage, pulmonary and cardiac complications, arrhythmias, thoracic duct leak, anastomotic leak, wound infection and recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis or palsy will be recorded. Postoperative mortality will be defined as 30-day mortality plus death before discharge after surgery. Patients will be started on oral feeds between the 8th and 10th day in the absence of an anastomotic leak. The total duration of ICU stay and hospital stay will also be recorded.
Sample size:
The sample size considering an improvement of morbidity of sever pulmonary complications from 15% to 5% will be 280 patients (140 in each arm). The trial will aim at enrolling 320 patients in order to adjust for protocol violations. Interim analyses will be done when ½ (160 events) of the estimated events occur. We expect to complete accrual of patients in three years.
Follow up:
No follow up after discharge. The long-term pulmonary function is not the concern of this clinical trail.
Data management:
All collected data will be entered into a statistical software package for subsequent analysis
- Being tested
- Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy, Sweet Esophagectomy
- Keywords
- esophageal cancer, postoperative complications, diaphragm, pulmonary function
- Medical subject headings
- Esophageal Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Ivor-Lewis EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called Right sided esophagectomy
Esophagectomy via Right Side Thoracotomy Plus Midline Laparotomy Approach
Sweet EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery
Also called Left sided esophagectomy
Esophagectomy through Left Side Thoracotomy
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Ivor-Lewis | Active comparator | Esophagectomy via Right Side Thoracotomy Plus Midline Laparotomy Approach Receives: Procedure: Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy |
| Sweet | Active comparator | Esophagectomy via Left Side Thoracotomy Receives: Procedure: Sweet Esophagectomy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
morbidity of postoperative pulmonary complications
Measured: within 10 postoperative days
Secondary outcomes (1)
diaphragm movement, pulmonary function, stomach emptying
Measured: within 10 postoperative days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted21 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2010
- Primary completionJan 2013 (estimated)
- Study completionJan 2013 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Esophageal CancerStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Sichuan UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Sichuan University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Investigators
- Longqi Chen, MD, PhD, Study director, West China Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01053182
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- WCH-RCT-001
- Status last verified
- Dec 2009
- First submitted
- 20 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 21 Jan 2010
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jan 2010. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Phase Ⅲ Study of Respiratory Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Through Either Ivor-Lewis or Sweet Approach for the Treatment of Middle or Lower Third Intrathoracic Esophageal Carcinoma
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01053182
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- WCH-RCT-001
- Keywords
- esophageal cancer, postoperative complications, diaphragm, pulmonary function
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 320 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Sichuan UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jan 2010
- Primary completion
- Jan 2013 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Jan 2013 (estimated)
- First posted
- 21 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Worldwide, esophageal cancer is the 6th most common cause of cancer-related death. Currently curative resection remains the cornerstone of the therapy. Despite advances in anesthesia, operative techniques and postoperative management, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently accounting for about 30% of all postoperative complications. Most importantly, PPCs have much been associated with postoperative mortality. The diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle and its respiratory function would be inevitably damaged when esophagectomy is performed through the left posterolateral thoracotomy (Sweet procedure) because the diaphragm must be dissected for the purpose of stomach moralization. Meanwhile, Ivor-Lewis approach may effectively avoid diaphragm injury because the stomach can be managed through a laparotomy whereas an additional abdomen incision is needed. Both procedures are routinely used in practice when surgically managing esophageal cancer. The investigators hypothesize that Ivor-Lewis procedure might be superior to the left-thoracotomy route during esophagectomy in preventing PPCs.
Detailed description
Background:
Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China and worldwide with poor prognosis. Although the surgical resection combined with adjuvant therapy constitutes the mainstay of the treatment the esophagectomy-associated complications are still life-threatening. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including pulmonary infection, atelectasis, edema and ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) are the leading causes of the eventful postoperative episodes.
The diaphragm is the well known essential respiratory muscle whose normal function guarantees more than 30% of pulmonary function. Esophagectomy through left thoracotomy would inevitably cut off the left diaphragm for the abdominal procedure and thus greatly damage the diaphragmatic function. It has been assumed that Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy would save the pulmonary function to a great extent by retaining the intact diaphragm but the addition of a laparotomy would be unavoidable. However, this hypothesis has not been confirmed by any randomized controlled trial with adequate operation volume. At present, a large part of thoracic surgeons, for example in China, still prefer esophagectomy through Sweet approach believing that it is less traumatic. So far, there is presently no convincing evidence to guide the esophagectomy approach selection on the aspect of prevention of PPCs.
Objectives:
- To compare the PPCs rates after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy
- To compare the degrees of diaphragm function deficiencies between two groups.
- To compare the pulmonary function results between two groups
- To compare the degrees of gastric emptying between two groups
Diagnostic Criteria for PPCs: any one of the followings and not because of anastomotic leak, massive pleural effusion and non-pulmonary origin infection:
- postoperative hypoxemia (PaO2≤ 60mmHg and/or PaCO2≥ 50mmHg) or dyspnea
- transfer to intensive care unit due to hypoxemia or dyspnea
- purulent pulmonary secretions requiring bronchoscopic suction
- dependence on oxygen mask or nasal tube for more than 5 days
- infiltrating or atelectasis in one pulmonary lobe or multiple segments identified by chest X-ray film or CT scan)
- postoperative hiatal hernia associated pulmonary dysfunction
- dependence on ventilator support for more than 48h
Degree of diaphragm function: The distance of diaphragmatic movement in centimeters
Pulmonary function measurement: FEV1, FVC and MMV
Gastric emptying function: Radioactivity remained at 15 minutes after ingestion of 100ml Tm99-labelled radioactive milk
Design:
Prospective randomized controlled trial.
Setting:
Thoracic Surgery Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
Patients and methods:
All patients with histologically confirmed esophageal carcinoma located at the middle or lower thoracic esophagus presenting to our hospital will be considered for the study
Termination criteria:
- Intolerance of any of the treatment modality,
- Development of PPCs
- Development of any other severe complication, such as progressive bleeding, large pleural effusion, empyema
- Death
Staging investigations will be standard and will include
- Computed Tomography (CT) of Chest in all patients
- Fibroesophagoscopy in all patients
- Esophagogram by barium swallow in all patients
- Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) wherever possible Further investigation likes bronchoscopy, PET scan, or MRI will be applied if indicated.
Randomization:
Complete randomization will be done using a computer generated sheet. Randomization will be performed after confirming resectability of the primary tumor and enlarged lymph nodes.
All surgeries will be performed under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia. The surgery will be performed either by Dr. Longqi Chen or Dr. Yidan Lin who is the faculty and professor of the thoracic surgery department of West China Hospital. Thoracic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymphadenectomy will be done by open thoracotomy. Stomach dissection and gastric tube making will be done either through the left diaphragm incision when left thoracotomy is applied or through the laparotomy when Ivor-Lewis approach is applied. Operative time, blood loss, blood product replacement and all intraoperative details will be recorded in the proforma. Patients will be shifted postoperatively to the intensive care unit (ICU) for observation and subsequently to the recovery or high dependency ward once stabilized. Postoperative details including period of postoperative ventilation, hemorrhage, pulmonary and cardiac complications, arrhythmias, thoracic duct leak, anastomotic leak, wound infection and recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis or palsy will be recorded. Postoperative mortality will be defined as 30-day mortality plus death before discharge after surgery. Patients will be started on oral feeds between the 8th and 10th day in the absence of an anastomotic leak. The total duration of ICU stay and hospital stay will also be recorded.
Sample size:
The sample size considering an improvement of morbidity of sever pulmonary complications from 15% to 5% will be 280 patients (140 in each arm). The trial will aim at enrolling 320 patients in order to adjust for protocol violations. Interim analyses will be done when ½ (160 events) of the estimated events occur. We expect to complete accrual of patients in three years.
Follow up:
No follow up after discharge. The long-term pulmonary function is not the concern of this clinical trail.
Data management:
All collected data will be entered into a statistical software package for subsequent analysis
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Prevention
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Ivor-Lewis | Active comparator | Procedure: Ivor-Lewis EsophagectomyEsophagectomy via Right Side Thoracotomy Plus Midline Laparotomy Approach |
| Sweet | Active comparator | Procedure: Sweet EsophagectomyEsophagectomy via Left Side Thoracotomy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 70 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Biopsy or cytology confirmed esophageal carcinoma.
- No-contraindication to surgery.
- Tumor locates at middle or lower thoracic esophagus (e.g. below the level of azygos vein according to AJCC cancer staging manual, esophageal and esophagogastric junctional cancer, 7th edition, 2009), so that the anastomosis could be completed within the thorax
- Informed consent.
Key exclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Patients with low performance status (ECOG score > 1)
- Refuse to participate
- History of adjuvant chemo and/or radiotherapy
- History of malignancy
- Previous abdominal and/or thoracic surgery
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Ivor-Lewis EsophagectomyAlso: Right sided esophagectomyEsophagectomy via Right Side Thoracotomy Plus Midline Laparotomy Approach | Procedure or surgery | Ivor-Lewis |
| Sweet EsophagectomyAlso: Left sided esophagectomyEsophagectomy through Left Side Thoracotomy | Procedure or surgery | Sweet |
Primary outcome
morbidity of postoperative pulmonary complications
Time frame: within 10 postoperative days
1 secondary outcome
diaphragm movement, pulmonary function, stomach emptying
Time frame: within 10 postoperative days
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jan 2010.
Related trials for Esophageal Cancer
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Multicenter Validation Trial of [18F]AlF-FAPI-74 for PET Imaging of Cancer-associated Fibroblasts Through Fibroblast Activation Protein Inhibitors (FAPI) in Different Tumor Types
Oesophageal Cancer, Gastric Cancer
RecruitingObservational study
Multicenter Prospective Cohort on Esophageal Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection
Superficial Esophageal Cancer, Oesophageal Adenocarcinoma
Recruiting
The Vanguard Study: Testing a New Way to Screen for Cancer
Bladder Carcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 2
At-Home Cancer Directed Therapy Versus in Clinic for the Treatment of Patients With Advanced Cancer
Advanced Anal Carcinoma, Advanced Biliary Tract Carcinoma
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study to Learn About the Study Medicine Called PF-08046876 in People With Advanced Solid Tumors
Advanced/Metastatic Solid Tumors, Bladder Cancer
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Longqi Chen, MD, PhD study director
West China Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy and Sweet Esophagectomy in people with Esophageal Cancer and Postoperative Complications, run by Sichuan University at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Longqi Chen, MD, PhD (+86 138 8203 0466, wchrct001@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
morbidity of postoperative pulmonary complications (time frame: within 10 postoperative days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2010.