AzTrials
AzTrials

Esophageal CancerPhase 3NCT01053182

Esophagectomy Associated Respiratory Complications: Ivor-Lewis Versus Sweet Approaches

A Phase 3 study testing Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy and Sweet Esophagectomy in people with Esophageal Cancer and Postoperative Complications, run by Sichuan University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Worldwide, esophageal cancer is the 6th most common cause of cancer-related death. Currently curative resection remains the cornerstone of the therapy. Despite advances in anesthesia, operative techniques and postoperative management, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently accounting for about… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 70 years
What is being tested?
Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy and Sweet Esophagectomy
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
320 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jan 2010to Jan 2013
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 70 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Biopsy or cytology confirmed esophageal carcinoma.
  • No-contraindication to surgery.
  • Tumor locates at middle or lower thoracic esophagus (e.g. below the level of azygos vein according to AJCC cancer staging manual, esophageal and esophagogastric junctional cancer, 7th edition, 2009), so that the anastomosis could be completed within the thorax
  • Informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients with low performance status (ECOG score > 1)
  • Refuse to participate
  • History of adjuvant chemo and/or radiotherapy
  • History of malignancy
  • Previous abdominal and/or thoracic surgery
  • History of pleural disease with obvious pleural adhesion on X-ray examination
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Contraindication to any of the planned intervention procedure
  • Pregnancy
  • Age of ≥ 70 years

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Longqi Chen, MD, PhD contact

+86 138 8203 0466

wchrct001@gmail.com

Yidan Lin, MD, PhD contact

+86 189 80602136

yidan.lin@gmail.com

China1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Thoracic Surgery Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University

    Chengdu, Sichuan, 610042

    Longqi Chen, MD, PhD, +86 138 8203 0466, wchrct001@gmail.com

    Yidan Lin, MD, PhD, +86 189 80602136, yidan.lin@gmail.com

    Recruiting

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: A Phase Ⅲ Study of Respiratory Complications Associated With Esophagectomy Through Either Ivor-Lewis or Sweet Approach for the Treatment of Middle or Lower Third Intrathoracic Esophageal Carcinoma

Worldwide, esophageal cancer is the 6th most common cause of cancer-related death. Currently curative resection remains the cornerstone of the therapy. Despite advances in anesthesia, operative techniques and postoperative management, postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) occur frequently accounting for about 30% of all postoperative complications. Most importantly, PPCs have much been associated with postoperative mortality. The diaphragm is the most important respiratory muscle and its respiratory function would be inevitably damaged when esophagectomy is performed through the left posterolateral thoracotomy (Sweet procedure) because the diaphragm must be dissected for the purpose of stomach moralization. Meanwhile, Ivor-Lewis approach may effectively avoid diaphragm injury because the stomach can be managed through a laparotomy whereas an additional abdomen incision is needed. Both procedures are routinely used in practice when surgically managing esophageal cancer. The investigators hypothesize that Ivor-Lewis procedure might be superior to the left-thoracotomy route during esophagectomy in preventing PPCs.

Read the detailed description

Background:

Esophageal cancer is a common malignant tumor in China and worldwide with poor prognosis. Although the surgical resection combined with adjuvant therapy constitutes the mainstay of the treatment the esophagectomy-associated complications are still life-threatening. Postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs), including pulmonary infection, atelectasis, edema and ARDS (acute respiratory distress syndrome) are the leading causes of the eventful postoperative episodes.

The diaphragm is the well known essential respiratory muscle whose normal function guarantees more than 30% of pulmonary function. Esophagectomy through left thoracotomy would inevitably cut off the left diaphragm for the abdominal procedure and thus greatly damage the diaphragmatic function. It has been assumed that Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy would save the pulmonary function to a great extent by retaining the intact diaphragm but the addition of a laparotomy would be unavoidable. However, this hypothesis has not been confirmed by any randomized controlled trial with adequate operation volume. At present, a large part of thoracic surgeons, for example in China, still prefer esophagectomy through Sweet approach believing that it is less traumatic. So far, there is presently no convincing evidence to guide the esophagectomy approach selection on the aspect of prevention of PPCs.

Objectives:

  1. To compare the PPCs rates after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy and Sweet esophagectomy
  2. To compare the degrees of diaphragm function deficiencies between two groups.
  3. To compare the pulmonary function results between two groups
  4. To compare the degrees of gastric emptying between two groups

Diagnostic Criteria for PPCs: any one of the followings and not because of anastomotic leak, massive pleural effusion and non-pulmonary origin infection:

  1. postoperative hypoxemia (PaO2≤ 60mmHg and/or PaCO2≥ 50mmHg) or dyspnea
  2. transfer to intensive care unit due to hypoxemia or dyspnea
  3. purulent pulmonary secretions requiring bronchoscopic suction
  4. dependence on oxygen mask or nasal tube for more than 5 days
  5. infiltrating or atelectasis in one pulmonary lobe or multiple segments identified by chest X-ray film or CT scan)
  6. postoperative hiatal hernia associated pulmonary dysfunction
  7. dependence on ventilator support for more than 48h

Degree of diaphragm function: The distance of diaphragmatic movement in centimeters

Pulmonary function measurement: FEV1, FVC and MMV

Gastric emptying function: Radioactivity remained at 15 minutes after ingestion of 100ml Tm99-labelled radioactive milk

Design:

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

Setting:

Thoracic Surgery Department, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Patients and methods:

All patients with histologically confirmed esophageal carcinoma located at the middle or lower thoracic esophagus presenting to our hospital will be considered for the study

Termination criteria:

  1. Intolerance of any of the treatment modality,
  2. Development of PPCs
  3. Development of any other severe complication, such as progressive bleeding, large pleural effusion, empyema
  4. Death

Staging investigations will be standard and will include

  1. Computed Tomography (CT) of Chest in all patients
  2. Fibroesophagoscopy in all patients
  3. Esophagogram by barium swallow in all patients
  4. Endoscopic Ultrasonography (EUS) wherever possible Further investigation likes bronchoscopy, PET scan, or MRI will be applied if indicated.

Randomization:

Complete randomization will be done using a computer generated sheet. Randomization will be performed after confirming resectability of the primary tumor and enlarged lymph nodes.

All surgeries will be performed under general anesthesia with epidural analgesia. The surgery will be performed either by Dr. Longqi Chen or Dr. Yidan Lin who is the faculty and professor of the thoracic surgery department of West China Hospital. Thoracic esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymphadenectomy will be done by open thoracotomy. Stomach dissection and gastric tube making will be done either through the left diaphragm incision when left thoracotomy is applied or through the laparotomy when Ivor-Lewis approach is applied. Operative time, blood loss, blood product replacement and all intraoperative details will be recorded in the proforma. Patients will be shifted postoperatively to the intensive care unit (ICU) for observation and subsequently to the recovery or high dependency ward once stabilized. Postoperative details including period of postoperative ventilation, hemorrhage, pulmonary and cardiac complications, arrhythmias, thoracic duct leak, anastomotic leak, wound infection and recurrent laryngeal nerve paresis or palsy will be recorded. Postoperative mortality will be defined as 30-day mortality plus death before discharge after surgery. Patients will be started on oral feeds between the 8th and 10th day in the absence of an anastomotic leak. The total duration of ICU stay and hospital stay will also be recorded.

Sample size:

The sample size considering an improvement of morbidity of sever pulmonary complications from 15% to 5% will be 280 patients (140 in each arm). The trial will aim at enrolling 320 patients in order to adjust for protocol violations. Interim analyses will be done when ½ (160 events) of the estimated events occur. We expect to complete accrual of patients in three years.

Follow up:

No follow up after discharge. The long-term pulmonary function is not the concern of this clinical trail.

Data management:

All collected data will be entered into a statistical software package for subsequent analysis

Being tested
Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy, Sweet Esophagectomy
Keywords
esophageal cancer, postoperative complications, diaphragm, pulmonary function
Medical subject headings
Esophageal Neoplasms, Postoperative Complications

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Ivor-Lewis EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Right sided esophagectomy

    Esophagectomy via Right Side Thoracotomy Plus Midline Laparotomy Approach

  • Sweet EsophagectomyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Left sided esophagectomy

    Esophagectomy through Left Side Thoracotomy

Study groups in NCT01053182
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Ivor-LewisActive comparatorEsophagectomy via Right Side Thoracotomy Plus Midline Laparotomy Approach
Receives: Procedure: Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy
SweetActive comparatorEsophagectomy via Left Side Thoracotomy
Receives: Procedure: Sweet Esophagectomy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. morbidity of postoperative pulmonary complications

    Measured: within 10 postoperative days

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. diaphragm movement, pulmonary function, stomach emptying

    Measured: within 10 postoperative days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Jan 2010 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2010
  3. Primary completionJan 2013 (estimated)
  4. Study completionJan 2013 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
320 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT01053182
Sponsor's protocol ID
WCH-RCT-001
Status last verified
Dec 2009
First submitted
20 Jan 2010
Last updated
21 Jan 2010
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Ivor-Lewis Esophagectomy and Sweet Esophagectomy in people with Esophageal Cancer and Postoperative Complications, run by Sichuan University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jan 2010. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Longqi Chen, MD, PhD (+86 138 8203 0466, wchrct001@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

morbidity of postoperative pulmonary complications (time frame: within 10 postoperative days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jan 2010.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in