In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) TreatmentPhase 2EFFORTNCT01043120
Effect of Oxytocin Antagonist on Reduction of Uterine Contractions
A Phase 2 study testing Barusiban in people with In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 5 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The main purpose of this clinical research trial was to evaluate the effects of barusiban compared to placebo on uterine contractions on luteal phase uterine contractions in oocyte donors supplemented with progesterone. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 37 years, women onlyHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment
- What is being tested?
- Barusiban
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 99 participants
- Where
- 5 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- Feb 2010to Dec 2010
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 37 years
- Women only
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Participants eligible for this trial were oocyte donors 18-37 years of age, who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long GnRH agonist protocol or the multiple-dose or single-dose GnRH antagonist protocols, had received hCG (10,000 IU urinary hCG or 250 μg recombinant hCG) for triggering of final follicular maturation and had undergone oocyte retrieval. Participants had given signed informed consent, were generally healthy and with a body mass index (BMI) of 18.5-29 kg/m2.
Participants were excluded in case of endometriosis stage I-IV or uterine pathology. Participants were willing to not have intake of alcoholic beverages during the trial, to not have sexual intercourse during the trial, and to either maintain sexual abstinence or use a highly effective method of contraception from end-of-trial till onset of next menses.
Trial locations and contacts
5 sites in 3 countries.
5 sites in 3 countries
About this study
Official title: A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Groups, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre Trial in Oocyte Donors Assessing the Effects of Barusiban, a Selective Oxytocin Antagonist, on Uterine Contractions on the Day of Embryo Transfer
The main purpose of this clinical research trial was to evaluate the effects of barusiban compared to placebo on uterine contractions on luteal phase uterine contractions in oocyte donors supplemented with progesterone.
Read the detailed description
This was a randomised, double-blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial. It was designed to evaluate the efficacy of barusiban, a selective oxytocin antagonist, on reducing the frequency of uterine contractions on the day of embryo transfer.
Participants in this trial were oocyte donors who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol or the multiple-dose GnRH antagonist protocol, had received human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) for triggering of final follicular maturation and had undergone oocyte retrieval (OR) with a yield of ≥ 6 cumulus-oocyte-complexes. The duration of the trial was two days: Day OR +2 (screening, randomisation and dosing of investigational medicinal product) and Day OR +3 (end-of-trial).
On Day OR +2, participants were screened and subsequently randomised to barusiban or placebo. All participants received an intravenous (IV) bolus for 1 minute followed by an IV infusion for up to 59 minutes, administered via an indwelling catheter, of barusiban or placebo. Bolus volume and infusion rate were identical for barusiban and placebo. A mock embryo transfer (MET) procedure was performed 40 minutes after start of dosing and included intrauterine administration of a non-radioactive ultrasound contrast agent (SONOVUE) via the embryo transfer catheter. Transvaginal ultrasound of around 5 minutes duration was performed at seven time points on Day OR +2 and covered a span of approximately 2.5 hours including pre-dosing, during dosing, before and after mock embryo transfer, and post-dosing. The transvaginal ultrasound recordings were analysed for frequency of uterine contractions and other uterine contractility parameters by a central independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation. Movement of the ultrasound contrast agent after the mock embryo transfer procedure was evaluated by the central independent assessor.
As an attempt to document the impact of uterine contractions on potential embryo expulsion, an exploratory evaluation of the movement of an ultrasound contrast agent (SONOVUE)administered intrauterinely via an embryo transfer catheter during the mock embryo transfer was performed. The anatomical point of release of the ultrasound contrast agent (correct or incorrect deposition site, and estimated distance from fundus) as well as any immediate movement (yes/no) of the bolus was recorded by the central independent assessor.
Definitions:
The frequency of uterine contractions was defined as the number of uterine contractions per minute. A contraction was defined as one sequential upward and downward vertical displacement of the endometrial / myometrial interface over time. The frequency was the inverse of period converted to contractions per minute.
The period was the average time it took to complete one contraction during the studied time interval. It was calculated from both the peaks and the troughs at the anterior and posterior endometrial /myometrial interfaces. The period was measured in seconds per contraction.
The external contractile measure was the mean wave amplitude in mm at the lumenal surface. This metric was measured at the lumenal peaks and troughs only and was a measurement designed to study the relationship between endometrial wave activity, manifest as bulk motion of the uterus, versus internal contractile strength. The external contractile measure was reported in mm/contraction. The external contractile measure quantified the movement of the uterus as a whole as measured at the lumen, i.e. the motion of the uterus relative to the body.
The internal contractile measure was the strength of the contractions based upon the sum of the contraction amplitudes measured at the anterior and posterior endometrial / myometrial interfaces. The amplitude at each interface was defined as the average difference between the endometrial / myometrial-lumenal distance measured at the peaks and troughs of the endometrial / myometrial interfaces. The internal contractile measure was reported in mm/contraction. The internal contractile measure quantified the movement of the endometrium relative to the lumen, i.e. the motion internal to the uterus.
The total contractile measure was the sum of the external contractile measure and the internal contractile measure and quantified total muscle movement in the uterus. If the waves at the anterior and posterior endometrial / myometrial interfaces were in phase then there was no endometrial motion relative to the lumen and the motion was a pure wave motion with the internal contractile measure equal to zero. The total contractile measure was reported in mm/contraction.
Inter-subendometrial space was measured clinically as the distance between the anterior stratum basalis and posterior stratum basalis layers in mid-sagittal plane at an anatomic location between 5 and 10 mm from the fundus. All clinical inter-subendometrial space measurements were made by selecting a clear image of the uterus, waiting for any contractions to pass and freezing the image.
A linear distance measurement was then taken between the anatomic landmarks described above. Inter-subendometrial space was calculated from existing measurements using the mean of all measurements identifying the endometrial-myometrial interfaces on the superior and inferior surfaces in each endometrial strip when the arrows identifying endometrial contractions were placed for motion analysis. Inter-subendometrial space was reported in mm.
The direction of wave propagation was classified as one of the following:
- Fundal (from cervix to fundus)
- Cervical (from fundus to cervix)
- Convergent (opposing) starting simultaneously from cervix and fundus
- Focal local contractions (which are not involving the whole uterine walls)
- No activity
- NE: not evaluable At each assessment time point, the most predominant type of direction of wave propagation was recorded.
Dispersion of the ultrasound contrast agent bolus after release from the catheter was recorded as yes/no and number of dispersed fragments, if applicable.
Location of the ultrasound contrast agent bolus was categorised as follows:
- Upper 1/3 (fundal) part of uterine cavity
- Central 1/3 of uterine cavity
- Lower 1/3 (cervical) part of the uterine cavity
- Intralumenal part of Fallopian tube
- Intra-cervical
- Vaginal
- NE: not evaluable Distance from the apex of the fundus at the myometrial-endometrial interface to the position of the microdroplet of ultrasound contrast agent was recorded in mm.
Velocity of the bolus of ultrasound contrast agent was assessed from distance and time, and was recorded in mm/hour.
- Conditions
- In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment
- Being tested
- Barusiban, Placebo
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BarusibanDrug
IV bolus of 20 mg for 1 minute followed by an IV infusion of 19 mg for up to 59 minutes. The maximum total duration of administration was 60 minutes.
PlaceboDrug
IV bolus of saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) for 1 minute followed by an IV infusion of saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) for up to 59 minutes. Details on injection volume, infusion rates and doses are tabulated below.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Barusiban | Experimental | Not described Receives: Drug: Barusiban |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Not described Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Frequency of uterine contractions, Intention-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set
Frequency of uterine contractions was assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. The transvaginal ultrasound recordings were analysed for uterine contractions by a central independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation.
Measured: 30 minutes after start of dosing
Frequency of uterine contractions, Per-Protocol (PP) Analysis Set
Frequency of uterine contractions was assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. The transvaginal ultrasound recordings were analysed for uterine contractions by a central independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation.
Measured: 30 minutes after start of dosing
Secondary outcomes (5)
Uterine contractile measures
Measured: During and after dosing (one day)
Inter-endometrial space
Measured: 30 minutes after start of dosing
Direction of Wave Propagation
Direction of Wave Propagation, Post-hoc analysis
Post-hoc analyses of the secondary endpoint parameter wave propagation were conducted. The ability of the contractile waves to propagate uterine contractions after mock embryo transfer was categorised (No, Yes, Indeterminate, NA or NE) by the central assessor for the following time points: Pre-dose, 30 min after start of dosing and at end of mock embryo transfer (MET0 min). Fisher's exact p-value test comparing the distribution of No and Yes between treatment groups was performed
Measured: 30 min after start of dosing and MET
Dispersion, Location, Distance from Point of Release and Velocity of Ultrasound Contrast Agent
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2010
- Primary completionMay 2010
- Study completionDec 2010
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) TreatmentStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring Pharmaceuticals
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Clinical Development Support, Study director, Ferring Pharmaceuticals
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01043120
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FE200440 CS11
- Other IDs
- 2009-012323-29, 2009
- Acronym
- EFFORT
- Status last verified
- Jun 2017
- First submitted
- 5 Jan 2010
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Randomised, Double-blind, Parallel Groups, Placebo-controlled, Multi-centre Trial in Oocyte Donors Assessing the Effects of Barusiban, a Selective Oxytocin Antagonist, on Uterine Contractions on the Day of Embryo Transfer
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT01043120
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EFFORT / FE200440 CS11
- Conditions
- In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 99 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ferring PharmaceuticalsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Feb 2010
- Primary completion
- May 2010 (actual)
- Study completion
- Dec 2010 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Jan 2010 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The main purpose of this clinical research trial was to evaluate the effects of barusiban compared to placebo on uterine contractions on luteal phase uterine contractions in oocyte donors supplemented with progesterone.
Detailed description
This was a randomised, double-blind, parallel groups, placebo-controlled, multi-centre trial. It was designed to evaluate the efficacy of barusiban, a selective oxytocin antagonist, on reducing the frequency of uterine contractions on the day of embryo transfer.
Participants in this trial were oocyte donors who had undergone controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in the long gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol or the multiple-dose GnRH antagonist protocol, had received human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) for triggering of final follicular maturation and had undergone oocyte retrieval (OR) with a yield of ≥ 6 cumulus-oocyte-complexes. The duration of the trial was two days: Day OR +2 (screening, randomisation and dosing of investigational medicinal product) and Day OR +3 (end-of-trial).
On Day OR +2, participants were screened and subsequently randomised to barusiban or placebo. All participants received an intravenous (IV) bolus for 1 minute followed by an IV infusion for up to 59 minutes, administered via an indwelling catheter, of barusiban or placebo. Bolus volume and infusion rate were identical for barusiban and placebo. A mock embryo transfer (MET) procedure was performed 40 minutes after start of dosing and included intrauterine administration of a non-radioactive ultrasound contrast agent (SONOVUE) via the embryo transfer catheter. Transvaginal ultrasound of around 5 minutes duration was performed at seven time points on Day OR +2 and covered a span of approximately 2.5 hours including pre-dosing, during dosing, before and after mock embryo transfer, and post-dosing. The transvaginal ultrasound recordings were analysed for frequency of uterine contractions and other uterine contractility parameters by a central independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation. Movement of the ultrasound contrast agent after the mock embryo transfer procedure was evaluated by the central independent assessor.
As an attempt to document the impact of uterine contractions on potential embryo expulsion, an exploratory evaluation of the movement of an ultrasound contrast agent (SONOVUE)administered intrauterinely via an embryo transfer catheter during the mock embryo transfer was performed. The anatomical point of release of the ultrasound contrast agent (correct or incorrect deposition site, and estimated distance from fundus) as well as any immediate movement (yes/no) of the bolus was recorded by the central independent assessor.
Definitions:
The frequency of uterine contractions was defined as the number of uterine contractions per minute. A contraction was defined as one sequential upward and downward vertical displacement of the endometrial / myometrial interface over time. The frequency was the inverse of period converted to contractions per minute.
The period was the average time it took to complete one contraction during the studied time interval. It was calculated from both the peaks and the troughs at the anterior and posterior endometrial /myometrial interfaces. The period was measured in seconds per contraction.
The external contractile measure was the mean wave amplitude in mm at the lumenal surface. This metric was measured at the lumenal peaks and troughs only and was a measurement designed to study the relationship between endometrial wave activity, manifest as bulk motion of the uterus, versus internal contractile strength. The external contractile measure was reported in mm/contraction. The external contractile measure quantified the movement of the uterus as a whole as measured at the lumen, i.e. the motion of the uterus relative to the body.
The internal contractile measure was the strength of the contractions based upon the sum of the contraction amplitudes measured at the anterior and posterior endometrial / myometrial interfaces. The amplitude at each interface was defined as the average difference between the endometrial / myometrial-lumenal distance measured at the peaks and troughs of the endometrial / myometrial interfaces. The internal contractile measure was reported in mm/contraction. The internal contractile measure quantified the movement of the endometrium relative to the lumen, i.e. the motion internal to the uterus.
The total contractile measure was the sum of the external contractile measure and the internal contractile measure and quantified total muscle movement in the uterus. If the waves at the anterior and posterior endometrial / myometrial interfaces were in phase then there was no endometrial motion relative to the lumen and the motion was a pure wave motion with the internal contractile measure equal to zero. The total contractile measure was reported in mm/contraction.
Inter-subendometrial space was measured clinically as the distance between the anterior stratum basalis and posterior stratum basalis layers in mid-sagittal plane at an anatomic location between 5 and 10 mm from the fundus. All clinical inter-subendometrial space measurements were made by selecting a clear image of the uterus, waiting for any contractions to pass and freezing the image.
A linear distance measurement was then taken between the anatomic landmarks described above. Inter-subendometrial space was calculated from existing measurements using the mean of all measurements identifying the endometrial-myometrial interfaces on the superior and inferior surfaces in each endometrial strip when the arrows identifying endometrial contractions were placed for motion analysis. Inter-subendometrial space was reported in mm.
The direction of wave propagation was classified as one of the following:
- Fundal (from cervix to fundus)
- Cervical (from fundus to cervix)
- Convergent (opposing) starting simultaneously from cervix and fundus
- Focal local contractions (which are not involving the whole uterine walls)
- No activity
- NE: not evaluable At each assessment time point, the most predominant type of direction of wave propagation was recorded.
Dispersion of the ultrasound contrast agent bolus after release from the catheter was recorded as yes/no and number of dispersed fragments, if applicable.
Location of the ultrasound contrast agent bolus was categorised as follows:
- Upper 1/3 (fundal) part of uterine cavity
- Central 1/3 of uterine cavity
- Lower 1/3 (cervical) part of the uterine cavity
- Intralumenal part of Fallopian tube
- Intra-cervical
- Vaginal
- NE: not evaluable Distance from the apex of the fundus at the myometrial-endometrial interface to the position of the microdroplet of ultrasound contrast agent was recorded in mm.
Velocity of the bolus of ultrasound contrast agent was assessed from distance and time, and was recorded in mm/hour.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Barusiban | Experimental | Drug: Barusiban |
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 37 years
- Sex
- Female only
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BarusibanIV bolus of 20 mg for 1 minute followed by an IV infusion of 19 mg for up to 59 minutes. The maximum total duration of administration was 60 minutes. | Drug | Barusiban |
| PlaceboIV bolus of saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) for 1 minute followed by an IV infusion of saline (sodium chloride 0.9%) for up to 59 minutes. Details on injection volume, infusion rates and doses are tabulated below. | Drug | Placebo |
Primary outcome
Frequency of uterine contractions, Intention-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set
Time frame: 30 minutes after start of dosing
Frequency of uterine contractions was assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. The transvaginal ultrasound recordings were analysed for uterine contractions by a central independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation.
Frequency of uterine contractions, Per-Protocol (PP) Analysis Set
Time frame: 30 minutes after start of dosing
Frequency of uterine contractions was assessed by transvaginal ultrasound. The transvaginal ultrasound recordings were analysed for uterine contractions by a central independent assessor, blinded to treatment allocation.
5 secondary outcomes
Uterine contractile measures
Time frame: During and after dosing (one day)
Inter-endometrial space
Time frame: 30 minutes after start of dosing
Direction of Wave Propagation
Direction of Wave Propagation, Post-hoc analysis
Time frame: 30 min after start of dosing and MET
Dispersion, Location, Distance from Point of Release and Velocity of Ultrasound Contrast Agent
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2017.
Related trials for In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment
RecruitingPhase 4
Study of G-CSF for DOR in Patients Undergoing IVF
Diminished Ovarian Reserve, IVF
Not yet recruiting
Plastic Detox During IVF Treatment
Infertility (IVF Patients)
Not yet recruitingObservational study
ProspectiveFemaleAYA - Late Effects of Cancer Therapies on Gonadal Function, Fertility, Efficiency of Fertility Preservation Procedures and Pregnancy Outcomes
Cancer, Cancer in Pregnancy
Recruiting
Aromatherapy for Mental Health Promotion in IVF Patients
Anxiety, Stress
Recruiting
Biomarkers of Endometrial Receptivity
IVF, Infertility Treatment
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Clinical Development Support study director
Ferring Pharmaceuticals
5 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Barusiban in people with In Vitro Fertilisation (IVF) Treatment, run by Ferring Pharmaceuticals at 5 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 5 sites in Czechia, Spain, Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Frequency of uterine contractions, Intention-To-Treat (ITT) Analysis Set (time frame: 30 minutes after start of dosing). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2017.