AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 4EuroTransNCT00996177

A Study to Compare Patient-controlled Pain Medications Delivered Either Through the Skin or Intravenously

A Phase 4 study testing IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem in people with Pain and Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, run by Janssen-Cilag International NV at 44 sites in 10 countries.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a patient-controlled system to deliver fentanyl compared with a patient-controlled intravenous system to deliver morphine in the management of postoperative pain. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
What is being tested?
IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
657 participants
Where
44 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
Jun 2004to Apr 2005
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients who meet the criteria of American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) pre-operative physical status I, II, or III
  • Patients expected to have moderate or severe pain after a major abdominal or orthopedic procedure
  • Patients expected to remain hospitalized for at least 24 hours postoperatively

Who cannot join

  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to fentanyl, morphine, or to skin adhesives
  • Known or suspected to be dependent on strong opioids or to have abused any drug substance or alcohol
  • Severe respiratory symptoms
  • Chronic pain disorder
  • Pregnant or nursing women, or those lacking adequate contraception

Trial locations and contacts

44 sites in 10 countries.

44 sites in 10 countries

Germany12 sites
  • Study site

    Aachen

  • Study site

    Bochum

  • Study site

    Bonn

  • Study site

    Frankfurt am Main

  • Study site

    Halle

  • Study site

    Hamburg

  • Study site

    Jena

  • Study site

    Kiel

  • Study site

    Kÿln

  • Study site

    Mainz

  • Study site

    Marburg

  • Study site

    Ulm

Other trials in Germany

France8 sites
  • Study site

    Boulogne-Billancourt

  • Study site

    Le Kremlin-Bicêtre

  • Study site

    Lille

  • Study site

    Montpellier

  • Study site

    Nice

  • Study site

    Paris

  • Study site

    Rennes

  • Study site

    Suresnes

Other trials in France

Denmark5 sites
  • Study site

    Aalborg

  • Study site

    Kÿbenhavn Nv N/A

  • Study site

    Kÿbenhavn Ÿ

  • Study site

    Odense C

  • Study site

    Ÿrhus C

Other trials in Denmark

Sweden5 sites
  • Study site

    Gothenburg

  • Study site

    Huddinge

  • Study site

    Linköpng N/A

  • Study site

    Örebro

  • Study site

    Stockholm

Other trials in Sweden

Switzerland4 sites
  • Study site

    Geneva

  • Study site

    Lucerne

  • Study site

    Sankt Gallen

  • Study site

    Zurich

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Study site

    Edinburgh

  • Study site

    London

  • Study site

    N/a N/a

  • Study site

    Salford

Other trials in United Kingdom

Belgium3 sites
  • Study site

    Brussels

  • Study site

    Ghent

  • Study site

    Leuven

Other trials in Belgium

Austria1 site
  • Study site

    Vienna

Other trials in Austria

Ireland1 site
  • Study site

    Cork

Other trials in Ireland

Spain1 site
  • Study site

    Madrid

Other trials in Spain

About this study

Official title: Comparison of Transdermal Fentanyl PCA and IV Morphine PCA in the Management of Postoperative Pain Control

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a patient-controlled system to deliver fentanyl compared with a patient-controlled intravenous system to deliver morphine in the management of postoperative pain.

Read the detailed description

This is a randomized (study drug assigned by chance), open-label (all people involved know the identity of the intervention) study to evaluate the clinical use, safety and ease of care of two patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) systems to deliver pain medication either through the skin or intravenously. The fentanyl hydrochloride PCA system, which delivers the medication through the skin, and morphine intravenous (IV)- PCA, which requires injection into a vein, are used for management of moderate to severe acute pain in postoperative patients who have undergone elective major abdominal or orthopedic surgery. These patients, who are expected to require postoperative pain relief with strong opioids for at least 24 hours, will control the delivery of medication for up to 3 days. Assessment of effectiveness include: patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent); Pain Intensity, measured on a visual numerical rating scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain and 10 means the worst possible pain; Ease-of-Care questionnaires including Patient Ease-of-Care questionnaire, Nurse Ease-of-Care questionnaire, and Physical Therapist Ease-of-Care questionnaire; and, total number of doses delivered by patients in the fentanyl transdermal PCA or morphine IV PCA treatment groups. Safety evaluations include vital signs (pulse, blood pressure) and oxygen saturation, respiratory function, and the incidence of adverse events. The study hypothesis is that fentanyl transdermal PCA is not inferior to morphine IV PCA treatment in patient's global assessment of method of pain control during the first 24 hours after surgery. Transdermal PCA: 40 micrograms fentanyl per on-demand dose, each delivered over 10 minutes for a maximum of 6 doses/hr for 24 hours (maximum of 80 doses, 3.2milligrams). Morphine IV PCA: morphine doses with a maximum of 20 milligrams per 2 hours for 24 hours (maximum 12 doses, 240 milligrams).

Being tested
IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem, IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)
Keywords
Pain, Patient-controlled analgesia, Postoperative pain, Transdermal fentanyl, Surgical pain, Opioid analgesics
Medical subject headings
Pain, Agnosia, Pain, Postoperative

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystemDrug

    40 µg fentanyl on-demand (240µg/hr) or a maximum of 80 doses (3.2 mg) per day

  • IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)Drug

    20mg/2hr (240 mg during 24 hours)

Study groups in NCT00996177
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
IONSYSExperimentalIONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem
Receives: Drug: IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem
Patient-Controlled AnalgesiaActive comparatorIV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)
Receives: Drug: IV Morphine Patient-Controlled Analgesia (IV PCA)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent) 24 hours after start of study treatment

    Measured: 24 hours after randomization (24 hours after either the first transdermal iontorphoretic system was applied or 24 hours after the intravenous access for the morphine solution was applied).

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Assessment of pain control by patient and doctor

    Measured: At 24, 48, and 72 hours after randomization

  2. Pain Intensity, vital signs, and oxygen level in the blood

    Measured: Hourly through 8 hours and then every 4 hours after randomization

  3. Incidence of adverse events

    Measured: Throughout study

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Oct 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2004
  3. Primary completionApr 2005
  4. Study completionApr 2005

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
657 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00996177
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR003943
Other IDs
FEN-PPA-401, 2004-001201-10, 2004
Acronym
EuroTrans
Status last verified
Jan 2014
First submitted
28 Sep 2009
Last updated
29 Jan 2014
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Grond S, Hall J, Spacek A, Hoppenbrouwers M, Richarz U, Bonnet F. Iontophoretic transdermal system using fentanyl compared with patient-controlled intravenous analgesia using morphine for postoperative pain management. Br J Anaesth. 2007 Jun;98(6):806-15. doi: 10.1093/bja/aem102.

    PubMed 17519263

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing IONSYS (fentanyl HCl) Iontophoretic TransdermalSystem in people with Pain and Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, run by Janssen-Cilag International NV at 44 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Jan 2014. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 44 sites in Germany, France, Denmark, Sweden, Switzerland and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient's global assessment of pain control (poor, fair, good, excellent) 24 hours after start of study treatment (time frame: 24 hours after randomization (24 hours after either the first transdermal iontorphoretic system was applied or 24 hours after the intravenous access for the morphine solution was applied).). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00996177, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Jan 2014.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in