AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoarthritisPhase 3NCT00864097

Analgesic Efficacy And Safety of Tanezumab Added On To Diclofenac SR In Patients With Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip

A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab and diclofenac in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 77 sites in 10 countries.

Terminated

Stopped early. The study ended before it was planned to and will not resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Osteoarthritis
What is being tested?
tanezumab and diclofenac
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
607 participants
Where
77 sitesin 10 countries
Study dates
11 Aug 2009to 24 Nov 2010
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip according to ACR criteria with Kellgren-Lawrence X-ray grade equal to, or greater than, 2.
  • Patients must be experiencing some benefit from their current stable dose regimen of oral diclofenac 150 mg/day and be tolerating their diclofenac regimen.
  • Pain and function levels as required by the protocol at Screening and Baseline.
  • Willing to discontinue all non-study pain medications throughout the study except as permitted per protocol.
  • Willing and able to comply with lifestyle guidelines, scheduled visits, treatment plan, laboratory tests and other study procedures.

Who cannot join

  • Pregnant women.
  • BMI greater than 39.
  • History of other disease that may involve index knee or hip including inflammatory joint diseases, chrystalline disease (gout or pseudogout), endocrinopathies, metabolic joint diseases, lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), joint infections, neuropathic disorders, avascular necrosis, Paget's disease or tumors.
  • Fibromyalgia, regional pain caused by lumbar or cervical compression with radiculopathy or other moderate to severe pain that may confound assessments or self-evaluation of the pain associated with OA.
  • Signs and symptoms of clinically significant cardiac disease within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Diagnosis or TIA within 6 months prior to screening or diagnosis of stroke with residual deficits that would preclude completion of required study activities.
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History, diagnosis , signs or symptoms of clinically significant neurological and/or psychiatric disease/disorder.
  • At Screening: uncontrolled hypertension, hemoglobin A1c greater than or equal to 10%, ALT or AST greater than or equal to 3X upper limit of normal, creatinine exceeding 150 micro-mol/L in men or 133 micro-mol/L in women.
  • Patients on warfarin or other coumadin anticoagulant therapy and/or lithium therapy within 30 days prior to Screening.
  • Known hypersensitivity to NSAIDs (eg, diclofenac), cyclooxygenase inhibitors or paracetamol (acetaminophen).

Trial locations and contacts

77 sites in 10 countries.

77 sites in 10 countries

Germany21 sites
  • Charité-Universitaetsmedizin Berlin

    Berlin, 10117

  • Klinische Forschung Berlin-Buch GmbH

    Berlin, 13125

  • Apotheke

    Berlin, 13353

  • Herz Apotheke

    Bochum, 44787

  • Synexus ClinPharm GmbH

    Bochum, 44787

  • Viereck-Apotheke

    Buch, 13125

  • Synexus ClinParm GmbH

    Dresden, 01067

  • Apotheke im Arztehaus Mickten

    Dresden, 01127

  • Schiller Apotheke & Stadt Apotheke

    Göppingen, 73033

  • Schmerz- und Palliativzentrum Goeppingen

    Göppingen, 73033

  • Falken Apotheke Hoheluft

    Hamburg, 20253

  • Klinische Forschung Hamburg GmbH

    Hamburg, 20253

  • Klinische Forschung Hannover - Mitte GmbH

    Hanover, 30159

  • Loewen-Apotheke

    Hanover, 30159

  • Synexus ClinPharm GmbH

    Leipzig, 04103

  • Arkana Apotheke OHG

    Leipzig, 04315

  • Synexus ClinPharm GmbH

    Magdeburg, 39104

  • Apotheke im MSZ

    Magdeburg, 39112

  • Apotheke des Ernst von Bergmann Klinikums

    Potsdam, 14467

  • Synexus ClinParm GmbH

    Potsdam, 14467

  • Kirchsteig Apotheke

    Potsdam, 14480

Other trials in Germany

Ukraine14 sites
  • Chernivtsi Regional Clinical Hospital,Department of Rheumatology

    Chernivtsi, 58000

  • Road Clinical Hospital at Dnipropetrovsk station, Department of Rheumatology

    Dnipropetrovsk, 49008

  • Institute of Urgent and Recovery Surgery named after V.K. Gusaka AMS Ukraine

    Donetsk, 83045

  • Central City Clinical Hospital#1, Department of Therapy,

    Donetsk, 83114

  • Ivano-Frankivsk Regional Clinical Hospital

    Ivano-Frankivsk, 76018

  • City Clinical Hospital #8, Department of reumatology,

    Kharkiv, 61176

  • State Institution "Institute of Gerontology AMS of Ukraine"

    Kiev, 04114

  • Oleksandrivska Clinical Hospital in Kyiv-Department of Rheumatology # 1

    Kyiv, 01023

  • Kyiv Central Basin Clinical Hospital, Department of cardiology,

    Kyiv, 04053

  • 4th City Communal Clinical Hospital, Department of Rheumatology,

    Lviv, 79011

  • City communal clinical hospital #5, Dept. of Therapy, Danylo Galytskiy Lviv National Med. University

    Lviv, 79013

  • Communal Institution Ternopil regional council, "Ternopil Regional Clinical Hospital"

    Ternopil, 46001

  • Vinnytsya regional clinical hospital named after M.I. Pyrogova

    Vinnytsia, 21018

  • Communal institution "City Hospital #7", Department of Therapy,

    Zaporizhzhya, 69118

Other trials in Ukraine

Romania8 sites
  • Clinical Emergency Military Hospital "Dr. Carol Davila"

    Bucharest, 010225

  • Duo Medical srl

    Bucharest, 010584

  • Medical Center "SANA"

    Bucharest, 011025

  • Clinical Hospital "Sf. Maria"

    Bucharest, 011172

  • Center of Rheumatology "Dr Ion Stoia"

    Bucharest, 020985

  • Clinical Emergency County Hospital Constanta

    Constanța, 900591

  • County Emergency Clinic Hospital "Sf. Apostol Andrei"

    Galati, 800578

  • Municipal Hospital No. 1 "Schuller"

    Ploieşti, Prahova, 100337

Other trials in Romania

Russia8 sites
  • Center polyclinic of Federal State Institution

    Arkhangelsk, 163000

  • State Healthcare Institution of Moscow city "City Clinical Hospital #15 n.a. O. M. Filatov"

    Moscow, 111539

  • Chair of Hospital Therapy of Ryazan State Medical University

    Ryazan, 390026

  • St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution "City Hospital #25 City Rheumatology Center"

    Saint Petersburg, 190068

  • State Educational Institution of Additional Professional Education

    Saint Petersburg, 191015

  • Institution of Russian Academy of Sciences "St. Petersburg Clinical Hospital of RAS"

    Saint Petersburg, 194017

  • St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution "City Outpatient Clinical #51"

    Saint Petersburg, 196211

  • St. Petersburg State Healthcare Institution "City Pokrovskaya Hospital"

    Saint Petersburg, 199106

Other trials in Russia

Spain7 sites
  • Hospital de Basurto

    Bilbao, Vizcaya, 48013

  • Hospital Comarcal de Elda

    Elda Alicante, 03600

  • Hospital Universitario Getafe

    Getafe-Madrid, 28905

  • Hospital G. U. Gregorio Maranon

    Madrid, 28007

  • Centro Salud Petrer 1

    Petrel, Alicante, 03610

  • Hospital Nuestra Señora de la Esperanza

    Santiago de Compostela, A Coruna, 15705

  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Santiago

    Santiago de Compostela, 15706

Other trials in Spain

Austria5 sites
  • LKH-Medizinische Universitatsklinik Graz

    Graz, A-8036

  • Nuhr Zentrum

    Senftenberg, 3541

  • ClinPharm International GmbH

    Vienna, A-1090

  • Medizinische Universitaet Wien/AKH

    Vienna, A-1090

  • Rheuma Zentrum Favoriten

    Vienna, A-1100

Other trials in Austria

Poland5 sites
  • "Centrum Medyczne MEDENS S.C. Niepubliczny Zaklad

    Chełm Śląski, 41-403

  • Malopolskie Centrum Medyczne s.c.

    Krakow, 31-510

  • Centrum Medyczne OSTEOMED Sp. z o. o.

    Warsaw, 02-256

  • Synexus SCM Sp. z o.o.

    Wroclaw, 50-088

  • Niepubliczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej "POLIMEDICA"

    Zgierz, 95-100

Other trials in Poland

Sweden4 sites
  • Me3plus AB

    Gothenburg, 400 14

  • Me3plus AB

    Gothenburg, 412 63

  • Center for Lakemedelsstudier

    Malmö, 211 52

  • Medicinskt Centrum

    Norrköping, 602 32

Other trials in Sweden

United Kingdom3 sites
  • Barnsley Hospital NHS Trust

    Barnsley, South Yorkshire, S75 2EP

  • Department of Rheumatology

    Dudley, West Midlands, DY1 2HQ

  • Wrightington Hospital

    Wigan, WN6 9EP

Other trials in United Kingdom

France2 sites
  • CHU de Nantes

    Nantes, 44093

  • Hopital Lariboisiere

    Paris, 75010

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: A PHASE 3, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE BLIND, CONTROLLED, MULTI CENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF TANEZUMAB ADDED ON TO DICLOFENAC SR IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE OR HIP

The purpose of this study is to investigate the analgesic efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac SR in patients with osteoarthritis of the knee or hip currently experiencing partial benefit from, and are tolerating, diclofenac 150 mg/day therapy.

Read the detailed description

This study was terminated on 16 Nov 2010 following a US FDA clinical hold for tanezumab osteoarthritis clinical studies which halted dosing and enrollment of patients on 23 June 2010 for potential safety issues.

Conditions
Osteoarthritis
Being tested
tanezumab, diclofenac, IV placebo
Keywords
Arthritis monoclonal antibody nerve growth factor (NGF) anti-NGF tanezumab PF-04383119 RN-624 OA
Medical subject headings
Osteoarthritis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • tanezumabBiological

    IV tanezumab 10 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16)

  • diclofenacDrug

    Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks

  • tanezumabBiological

    IV tanezumab 5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16)

  • diclofenacDrug

    Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks

  • tanezumabBiological

    IV tanezumab 2.5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16)

  • diclofenacDrug

    Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks

  • diclofenacDrug

    Oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID for 32 weeks

  • IV placeboOther

    IV placebo to match tanezumab every 8 weeks (through Week 16)

Study groups in NCT00864097
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Tanezumab 10 mg + diclofenacExperimentalIV tanezumab 10 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32)
Receives: Biological: tanezumab; Drug: diclofenac
Tanezumab 5 mg + diclofenacExperimentalIV tanezumab 5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32)
Receives: Biological: tanezumab; Drug: diclofenac
Tanezumab 2.5 mg + diclofenacExperimentalIV tanezumab 2.5 mg every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32)
Receives: Biological: tanezumab; Drug: diclofenac
IV placebo + diclofenacPlacebo comparatorIV placebo to match tanezumab every 8 weeks (through Week 16) and oral diclofenac SR 75 mg BID (through Week 32)
Receives: Drug: diclofenac; Other: IV placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  2. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Week 16

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Week 16

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16

Secondary outcomes (20)
  1. Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

  2. Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC physical function is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions, each scored on a NRS of 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Total score range for WOMAC physical function subscale score is 0 (no difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicate worse function. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

  3. Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, and 24

  4. Percentage of Participants With Outcome Measures in Rheumatology - Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Response; LOCF

    OMERACT-OARSI responder: participant has >=50 percent (%) change and >=2 absolute change from Baseline in either WOMAC pain or physical function subscale scores or at least 2 of the following being true: >=20% change and >=1 absolute change from Baseline in WOMAC pain subscale; >=20% change and >=1 absolute change from Baseline in the WOMAC physical function subscale; >=20% change and >=1 absolute change from Baseline in PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain and physical function score: 0 to 10 with higher score = worse response. PGA score: 1 = very good and 5 = very poor.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  5. Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16 and 24

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Greater percentage reduction indicates greater improvement. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0%; >= 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline to Weeks 16 and 24 were reported.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 16 and 24

  6. Percentage of Participants With At Least 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% Reduction From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score; LOCF

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis (OA). WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions, each scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score is 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicate higher pain. Greater percentage reduction indicates greater improvement. Percentage of participants with reduction in WOMAC pain intensity of at least (>=) 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 32 compared to baseline were classified as responders to WOMAC pain subscale and are reported here.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  7. Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; LOCF

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition. A decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value indicated improvement.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  8. Percentage of Participants With Improvement of at Least 2 Points in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis; Baseline Observation Carried Forward (BOCF)

    Participants answered: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your index joint (knee/hip) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded by using a 5-point Likert scale, where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms which are intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated worst condition. A decrease of at least 2 points on the 5-point scale relative to baseline value indicates improvement.

    Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  9. Change From Baseline in Average Pain Score in the Index Knee or Hip at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24

    Participants were asked to assess index joint (knee/hip) pain during the past 24 hours on an 0-10 point integer scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Baseline score was calculated as the mean of the scores in the index joint over the 3 days days in the initial pain assessment period and a weekly mean was calculated using the daily pain scores in the index joint within each study week. The change from Baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score, where negative change indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24

  10. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

    WOMAC: Self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. WOMAC stiffness subscale is a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in index knee or hip during past 48 hours. It is calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), with higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Total score range for WOMAC stiffness subscale score is (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicate higher stiffness. Stiffness is defined as a sensation of decreased ease in movement of knee/hip. Negative change indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  11. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

    WOMAC Index: self-administered, disease-specific 24 item questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain (5 items), stiffness (2 items), and physical function (17 items) in participants with osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee. WOMAC average score is the mean of the WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, with higher score indicating worse response. Greater reduction in WOMAC average score indicated greater improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  12. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

    Participants answered the question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?" Participants responded by using an 11-point scale where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Where 0 is the best response and negative change indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24

  13. Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item: Pain When Going Up or Downstairs at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

    Participants answered the question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded by using an 11-point scale, where 0 = no pain and 10 = extreme pain. Where 0 is the best response and negative change indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24

  14. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Domain Scores at Week 12 and 24

    SF-36v2 was a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well-being: physical and social functioning, physical and role limitations due to emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, and mental health. The total score and the score for a section was an average of the individual question scores, which were scaled 0-100. Higher scores reflected better participant status and positive change indicated an improvement.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12, and 24

  15. Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey Version 2 (SF-36v2) Physical and Mental Component Scores at Week 12 and 24

    SF-36v2: standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and wellbeing (physical and social functioning, role limitations due to physical and emotional problems, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health). Total score for each aspect were scaled 0-100. Higher scores reflect better participant status and positive change indicated an improvement. For obtaining physical and mental component scores, z-score for each scale=(observed score - mean score for general 1990 United States [US] population)/corresponding standard deviation. The 2 component scores were obtained by multiplying each aspect z-score by physical or mental factor score coefficient (1990 general US population) and summing the eight products. Component scores indicated how many standard deviations higher (in case of positive z-score [better functioning])/lower (in case of negative z-score [worse functioning]) participant's value was relative to the mean of the reference population.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 12 and 24

  16. Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Index Score at Week 24

    EQ-5D was a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme dysfunction) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a visual analog scale with score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). EQ-5D summary index was obtained with a formula that weights each level of the dimensions. The index-based score was interpreted along a continuum of 0 (death) to 1 (perfect health). Negative change from baseline represented worsening.

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  17. Number of Participants With Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life - 5 Dimension (EQ-5D) Individual Health State Profile at Week 24

    EQ-5D was a standardized, participant-administered measure of health outcome. It provides a descriptive profile for 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression), using 3 levels (no, moderate, or extreme dysfunction) and a single index value characterizing current health status using a visual analog scale with score ranging from 0 (worst) to 100 (best). Baseline EQ-5D individual health state profile was determined as number of participants "no dysfunction, moderate or some dysfunction and extreme dysfunction" and change from baseline in EQ-5D individual health state profile was determined as number of participants "improved, no change or worsened".

    Measured: Baseline, Week 24

  18. Number of Participants Who Discontinued Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Number of participants who discontinued due to lack of efficacy were reported.

    Measured: Baseline up to end of study (Week 32)

  19. Time to Discontinuation (TTD) Due to Lack of Efficacy

    Median time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.

    Measured: Baseline up to Week 16 and 24

  20. Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

    An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 112 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included SAEs as well as non-serious AEs which occurred during the trial.

    Measured: Baseline up to 112 days after last intravenous dose (up to Week 32)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted18 Mar 2009 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Aug 2009
  3. Primary completion16 Nov 2010
  4. Study completion24 Nov 2010

Why it stopped: See termination reason in detailed description.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
607 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT00864097
Sponsor's protocol ID
A4091017
Other IDs
2009-009318-41, P3 6 MO OA HIP/KNEE DICLOFENAC, 2009
Status last verified
Feb 2021
First submitted
17 Mar 2009
Last updated
26 Feb 2021
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.

Publications

  • Tive L, Bello AE, Radin D, Schnitzer TJ, Nguyen H, Brown MT, West CR. Pooled analysis of tanezumab efficacy and safety with subgroup analyses of phase III clinical trials in patients with osteoarthritis pain of the knee or hip. J Pain Res. 2019 Mar 19;12:975-995. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S191297. eCollection 2019.

    PubMed 30936738
  • Hochberg MC, Tive LA, Abramson SB, Vignon E, Verburg KM, West CR, Smith MD, Hungerford DS. When Is Osteonecrosis Not Osteonecrosis?: Adjudication of Reported Serious Adverse Joint Events in the Tanezumab Clinical Development Program. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016 Feb;68(2):382-91. doi: 10.1002/art.39492.

    PubMed 26554876
  • Balanescu AR, Feist E, Wolfram G, Davignon I, Smith MD, Brown MT, West CR. Efficacy and safety of tanezumab added on to diclofenac sustained release in patients with knee or hip osteoarthritis: a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group, multicentre phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014 Sep;73(9):1665-72. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2012-203164. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

    PubMed 23852695

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing tanezumab and diclofenac in people with Osteoarthritis, run by Pfizer at 77 sites in 10 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 77 sites in Germany, Ukraine, Romania, Russia, Spain and 5 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Feb 2021). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Score at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT00864097, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in